HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD STAR PUBLIC INQUIRY PATHFINDER CALL
 

Star date: 30th March 2011 

SALFORD PATHFINDER FAILURE
Part 6 Conclusion – Our Friends In The North

The Salford Pathfinder folds this week, having stuck up a final two fingers at the city's community by backing the demolition of more terrace houses in the Top Streets of Higher Broughton.

Over the past 5 articles on Pathfinder, we've attempted to show just why the programme needs a Public Inquiry. Now read our conclusion – is the mess of the 1970s repeating itself?

Click here for full story...


Broughton Green 2011 Broughton Green 2011 Broughton Green 2011
Broughton Green 2011 Broughton Green 2011 Broughton Green 2011
Broughton Green 2011 Broughton Green 2011 Broughton Green 2011
Broughton Green 2011 Broughton Green 2011 Top Streets Higher Broughton
Top Streets Higher Broughton Top Streets Higher Broughton
click image to enlarge

PART 6 - OUR FRIENDS IN THE NORTH 

Read Part 1 here

Read Part 2 here

Read Part 3 here

Read Part 4 here

Read Part 5 here

This week, the Salford Pathfinder programme winds up.  Its symbolic last act in Salford has been to finance the demolition of a further 108 terrace houses in the Top Streets of Higher Broughton, which will wipe out the remaining streets  – apart from those covered by a High Court injunction (see here) or those few houses that still have people living in them.

The Salford Council report approving the demolitions states that "it is possible that this proposal may attract a degree of adverse publicity". Why? Is it because, yet again, perfectly good houses that could have been refurbished and handed to those on the city's ever growing housing waiting list are being bulldozed to make way for yet more knee-railed grass crofts? 

The Top Streets wipe out is Pathfinder's final two fingers to the community. Because this ill thought out Government programme - that has cost hundreds of millions of pounds of public money - was never about Salford's community or affordable housing. It was about providing housing for Manchester city centre commuters. Or, as the latest Audit Commission report puts it, `to maximise the productivity and competitiveness of the regional centre and to support the economic growth of the Manchester City Region'.

"I think that's what the intention was, to try and re-populate places by making them more attractive" says Roy Irwin, the Audit Commissions Head of Housing "If you've got an economy that's working reasonably well…do you want everyone to arrive by car, rail and bus from further afield and have no-one live nearby? I think what the Pathfinder was trying to do was to make the housing offer of the place better - as well as tackle indirectly some of the other stuff around skills and job opportunities but that's not been the main driver."

Since Pathfinder first started in 2003 there have been bitter battles by Salford's community to hang onto their homes. In Seedley, huge banners were hung from houses saying `No demolition' – they've now largely been replaced by grass crofts. In Langworthy, people were given a pittance for houses that they were told were being demolished – only for Urban Splash to move in with huge Government subsidies to `re-model' houses that, in the first phase, were totally unaffordable to local people…

On Spike Island in Lower Broughton, the community was horrified to discover that there was a plan to replace their houses with duck ponds and bistros. The community fought back and won that particular battle. But rumours persist that the war isn't yet over. Elsewhere in Lower Broughton the demolitions continue every day – despite the scheme needing another £400million to ever be complete.

In Higher Broughton, a whole community has almost been wiped out. In 2005 the Bottom Streets of Higher Broughton were the scene of the first ever physical eviction by Pathfinder in the country, as the sheriff and his posse arrived to force out the Griffiths brothers. One of the brothers, Guy Griffiths, summed up his situation in Issue 4 of Salford Star…

"Basically they're getting rid of people who are poor or working class, so somebody more affluent can move in" he wrote "Look at this area – I can get to Manchester in ten minutes on the bus…I'm in the right location, my house wasn't unfit, yet I got turfed out – something's wrong, isn't it?"

Back in 2003, Salford Council set out its plan for Pathfinder in a report to its Cabinet. Within ten years, it stated, the aim was to reduce (demolish) 8,360 Band A (ie terraces) homes in Central Salford. And to increase band D-H homes (more expensive ones) in Central Salford by 3,231. The plan was very clear. Although, in the event, Pathfinder has failed even on its own terms.

In line with the total unaccountability and lack of transparency of Pathfinder, we don't know the full figure for demolitions and new builds in Central Salford alone. What we do know is that in Manchester and Salford together, there have been 6014 demolitions and 3807 new builds, proving, we believe, clearance of much of the existing community. This is why an Audit Commission report this month has largely given the Manchester Salford Pathfinder (MSP) a positive outcome.

"MSP has nearly completed its demolition programme and has made good progress on laying the foundations for the long term transformation of the housing market in its major intervention areas."

But having now done the demolitions and cleared the land and community, the Audit Commission admits that the whole programme is in danger of going back to square one if it doesn't get yet more public money on top of the £354.11million for Manchester and Salford that it's already had.

If not, it states, any gains that have happened (on its terms) will be reversed – leading to `blight', `dereliction', `a reduced ability to attract and keep economically active residents' and `a loss of extra council tax revenue'. In Lower Broughton "there is a danger of significant areas of cleared land being left with little immediate prospect of development".

We believe that behind Pathfinder there were two different agendas going on. For Salford Council the agenda was about bringing in more council tax revenue and diluting the city's poverty figures by having more expensive houses filled with `economically active people'. For that, it was willing to upset and destroy existing communities.

For the developers the agenda was about profit. With public money underpinning the programme they couldn't really lose. The land was cleared and prepared for them with public money and there was `gap funding' subsidies. If it worked they took a tasty profit – and when it didn't work, they were paid millions in Kickstart funding to carry on building, or through social landlords buying up their unsold private sale stock with huge Government grants. Or through a multitude of subsidised mortgage schemes to enable people to buy the private sale stock at sky high prices.

It's no coincidence that Pathfinder was driven by developers, investors' agents, buy-to-let mortgage floggers and business interests. In Issue 6 of Salford Star we revealed that sat on the board of the Manchester Salford Pathfinder in 2007 was Alan Cherry, chairman of Countryside Properties, developers of Lower Broughton; Bryce Glover of the Alliance and Leicester bank wholesale section which was launching buy-to-let mortgages; and Derek Nesbitt of DTZ, the sole selling agent for Broughton Green houses. Also on the board was George Mills of MBLA Architects which did the masterplan for Lower Broughton, and John Early, who was working for AMEC, a private investment partner in the Chapel Street regeneration.

The main role of the Pathfinder board was "to provide strategic direction for MSP" and to "scrutinise, challenge and make decisions on funding".  The Audit Commission report stresses that "residents are engaged at various levels throughout the HMR programme, although they are not directly involved in the Partnership Board".

The Audit Commission estimates it will now take £38million a year for Pathfinder to complete its programme over the next three years, and suggests the new Local Enterprise Partnership, or LEP, could be involved in this. Chairman of the shadow Greater Manchester LEP is former Pathfinder board member, John Early, now a founder of Genr8 Developments, `established to deliver large scale mixed use regeneration schemes'.

Apart from the community being cleared and some expensive new housing gone up, everything else has failed. The Audit Commission report states…

• the Pathfinder area continues to suffer above average levels of unemployment…almost 20% of the working age population remains workless.
• House values have not risen in line with other parts of the country.
• The Pathfinder housing market still relies heavily on public funding
• There's more long term empty houses than in 2006.

All this after £354.11million of public spending.

Make no mistake about it, Pathfinder poured more money into the regeneration of Salford than any other scheme. To build expensive houses and clear the community out of homes that weren't slums - where was the logic in that? Where were the jobs? Where were the opportunities for people to become more `economically active' and make their own housing choices?

After the 1970s mess the city was on its knees for a whole generation. Is history repeating itself in Central Salford?

A Public Inquiry into Pathfinder now please!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Resident of this Deadhole slum . wrote
at 09:37:40 on 01 January 2012
Will 2012 be the Year of the Pathfinder Farce Public Enquiry ? Or will the ineptitude and bungling be covered up in yet another cloak of bullshit , deception , lies and corruption ?
 
Icing on the cake wrote
at 14:22:46 on 04 May 2011
Order of the "gold knee rail" for Councillor Merry for his services to Salford Regeneration?
 
H.J.S. wrote
at 12:45:09 on 11 April 2011
1 "cover for me" 2 "good idea boss" 3 "it was like that when I got here"
 
dave wrote
at 14:44:39 on 04 April 2011
The very fact that the council are silent regarding this obscene farce is proof that this gang of bungling wasters have plenty to hide . Roll on 5th may ...
 
Carl Cfx wrote
at 13:56:02 on 04 April 2011
They wont comment on this. They will keep their heads down and then when people (the government and the people who came up with the scheme) realise it is a mess, Salford will say it was all going great until you cut funding. The people of Salford have not benefited from this and as we cant see the figures, I would guess Salford council have not seen much (well maybe 25 pieces of silver). So, that leaves the developers to count THEIR profits
 
D Clemo wrote
at 10:22:32 on 04 April 2011
Perhaps we could have some comment from the council regarding this farce , before we kick them out of office.
 
JM---the real slim shady wrote
at 10:07:29 on 01 April 2011
My name is John and I would like to stand up and confess.I would like to take this opportunity to apologise to all the people of Salford who have been afflicted with this scheme. I,and my fellow councillors,executioners and regeneration officers want to apologise to the people of Langworthy and Broughton who had their homes taken away from them and were paid a pittance. We are sorry that we lied to the people in Chimney pot park about the value of their homes and that we exploited them so a developer could make a nice profit. I understand how hard it must be to see your old house, that we told you was going to be demolished,renovated and selling for over 10 times what we paid you. It must really hurt seeing that, especially as we charged you to move into houses that we had done a shabby renovation job on. To the people of Lower Broughton, we are sorry that we destroyed your community and put you in cardboard boxes. To the people in Higher Broughton, we are sorry that we sacrificed you so our business partners could make money. It was necessary to underpay you for your homes so the partners could make a fat profit. I am sorry to have forced you to live in conditions we created but we needed to encourage you to move. I am sorry that you have had to take on additional debt to keep a roof over your heads. I am truly sorry. John (the real slim shady). Ps---check the date suckers!
 
The Truth wrote
at 15:43:27 on 30 March 2011
And if those 108 houses are demolished prior to the ones subject to the injunction being renovated, what is to stop Salford changing their mind over that? I,m sure that Merry just wants a nice knee railed area for the photo shoot when the community hub opens (5 years late). He should hold his hands up and apologise to all the people who have had this forced on them over the years.
 
D.Clemo wrote
at 15:41:17 on 30 March 2011
Of course the council's sole motive in this disgraceful affair was increasing council tax revenue , to fund even more excesses , waste and squander .In many parts of Britain , council tax has been reduced - but not in Salford .But then we have to pay for an army of grossly overpaid 'executive' garbage- spouters .Salford Star is quite right to demand a public enquiry into the Pathfinder farce , and thanks to the Star for exposing this disgraceful situation .PUBLIC ENQUIRY NOW .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD MP SHOULD BE DESELECTED AFTER KEEPING TORIES IN POWER SAYS CONSTITUENT
Words and music by Alice Searle. I like Alice and agree generally with her sentiment. Stringer is well past his sell by date. We'v... [more]
article: SALFORD PEOPLE TO JUDGE WHETHER PLANNING COUNCILLOR BROKE RULES
Bob the regular, I am sorry, you are just plain wrong, no one would have put peoples lives at risk if they knew that the cladding ... [more]
article: SALFORD MP SHOULD BE DESELECTED AFTER KEEPING TORIES IN POWER SAYS CONSTITUENT
Alice Searle is obviously against democracy and is desperate for this country to stay in the EU when the majority in a democratic ... [more]
article: SALFORD PEOPLE TO JUDGE WHETHER PLANNING COUNCILLOR BROKE RULES
@ charity begins at home, comparing directors salary with that of the Prime Ministers salary is not a good thing. If they had a bi... [more]
article: A YEAR AFTER SALFORD CLADDING SCANDAL INDEPENDENT TENANTS MEETING TO BE HELD
I’m sorry to say I won’t hold my breath to get the answers we all need. We will get fobbed off time after time....what are they hi... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD MP SHOULD BE DESELECTED AFTER KEEPING TORIES IN POWER SAYS CONSTITUENT

Star date: 19th July 2018

CALLS FOR GRAHAM STRINGER TO BE DESELECTED FOR 'TREACHERY'

On Tuesday night, Blackley and Broughton MP, Graham Stringer, was one of four Labour Party MPs who voted with the Tories on the latest Brexit proposals, allowing Theresa May to scrape to victory by three votes and avert a possible General Election.

Here, a constituent of the Salford MP and Labour Party member, gives her personal opinion, joining the call for Graham Stringer to be deselected...

Full details here...

PEPPA PIG COMMUNISM GRAFFITI GOES SUBVERSIVE IN SALFORD

Star date: 18th July 2018

'COMMUNISM IS FOR THE CHILDREN' SAYS SUBVERSIVE PEPPA PIG

Bizarre graffiti art has appeared near Salford Central Station depicting two delighted looking Peppa Pigs by the slogan 'Communism is for the children'. The art has led to much amusement and bemusement but is probably related to China banning the popular kids' cartoon.

Full details here...

SALFORD TOWERBLOCK CLADDING RESIDENTS UNITE TO TACKLE PENDLETON TOGETHER

Star date: 18th July 2018

SPRUCE COURT AND THORN COURT TENANTS GET ORGANISED TO FIGHT BACK

"We're sick to death of being treated like dirt..."

Last night, tenants from Spruce Court and Thorn Court met to share concerns over dangerous cladding, fire safety, security and other issues, as they united to take on towerblock manager Pendleton Together and Salford City Council, which owns the blocks.

"They try to ignore what we're saying" insisted one tenant "They're complacent... we're sick to death of being treated like dirt...".

Full details here...

SALFORD QUAYS DEVELOPER TO AVOID £1MILLION PAYMENT WHILE NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVIDED

Star date: 17th July 2018

FURNESS QUAY DEVELOPER PROVIDES NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON HUGE APARTMENT SCHEME

Salford's planning scandal is to go up another gear this week when an application by developer De Trafford for 421 apartments in blocks up to 27 storeys high on the site of Furness Quay is considered by councillors. Thanks to Salford City Council policies, the developer will be providing no affordable properties, while, through 'viability' assessments it is set to avoid over £1million in planning fees.

Meanwhile, the English Cities Fund (ECf) is continuing its secrecy in relation to new apartments and an office development around Chapel Street and New Bailey.

Full details here...

A YEAR AFTER SALFORD CLADDING SCANDAL INDEPENDENT TENANTS MEETING TO BE HELD

Star date: 16th July 2018

CLADDING, SECURITY, FIRE SAFETY AND MORE TO BE DISCUSSED AT PENDLEON TENANTS MEETING

As the Grenfell Tower victims said, before the tragic fire their warnings were not listened to by the authorities. Now tenants in Spruce Court, Pendleton, who are still living with the dangerous cladding, have called an independent meeting for tomorrow, Tuesday, 17th July, to discuss cladding, security and more, while Thorn Court residents are also complaining about the same issues.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx