HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
GOVERNMENT ADMITS ‘ABUSE’ OF PLANNING POLICIES THAT HAVE BLIGHTED SALFORD
 

Star date: 6th March 2018

GREATER TRANSPARENCY AND END TO 'ABUSE OF VIABILITY ASSESSMENTS' ON AGENDA – NOW SOMEONE TELL SALFORD COUNCIL!!!

Yesterday, Prime Minister, Theresa May promised to end "abuse of the 'viability assessment' process" in planning, while Housing Secretary, Sajid Javid, added an option of having 'non-negotiable' developer contributions set nationally.

Javid also spoke of an expectation for "all viability assessments to be publicly available". Salford City Council is still blocking Freedom of Information requests to see 'viability assessments', while the 'abuse' of these things has seen the city lose around £50million and thousands of affordable houses.

Full details here...


For over ten years the Salford Star has documented how developers have avoided paying full contributions and providing affordable housing in the city, through exploiting huge loopholes in the planning system.

At the last count, around £50million had been lost to Salford, as well as thousands of affordable houses.* Salford Star research was backed up last week by Sheffield University's Jonathon Silver, who investigated just 26 sites in Salford and concluded that over £18million and two thousand affordable houses had been lost (see here).

The Salford Star has shown that causes of this have been both the Government's National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and Salford City Council's own developer-friendly policies.

The NPPF allows developers to include huge profits in costs (up to 20%) as part of any 'viability assessment' which assesses whether developments are economically 'viable' if planning fees are paid – and, unsurprisingly, almost all are found not to be 'viable' if full planning contributions, or Section 106 monies, are having to be coughed up. The same get-out is used to avoid providing affordable housing.

Meanwhile, a few years ago, Salford Council itself changed its Supplementary Planning Document, or SPD, so that developers in certain areas of Salford didn't have to provide any affordable housing or pay full fees, particularly those building high density apartments near the 'regional centre'.

Despite warnings from housing charities, activists, even from within the Tory Party itself (see here), the planning process has been one of the main factors firing the current affordable housing crisis. Both Salford Council and the Conservative/ ConDem Government can be blamed.

So it was very strange yesterday when Tory grandees suddenly rounded on developers, although it would be mad not to welcome the sentiments. First up was Prime Minister Theresa May who said that "by ending abuse of the 'viability assessment' process, we're going to make it much harder for unscrupulous developers to dodge their obligation to build homes local people can afford."

And next came Housing Secretary, Sajid Javid, who promised - to the strains of violins and how there were fifteen of his family living in a shoe box - that "changes will stop developers using the legal loophole of 'viability assessments' to 'wriggle out' of building the affordable homes..."

He added that he was reforming the controversial NPPF, including "a new approach to developer contributions"; one option of which "could be for developer contributions to be set nationally and made non-negotiable".

Depending on what percentages are set, the Salford Star would certainly applaud this initiative as it would take the decision away from Salford Council officers, who have refused to shed light on their dealings with developers, and hand-wringing impotent local councillors.

Javid also promised "greater transparency" and "increased accountability" in the process, both over how these planning contributions are negotiated and where they are eventually spent. As part of this, Javid said that he was "expecting all viability assessments to be publicly available subject to some very limited circumstances"...

Salford City Council has consistently refused to reveal viability assessments, even under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). Last December, the Council responded to a Salford Star request for the viability assessment for the Brown Cow pub site in Worsley, with almost all of the information blanked out, or redacted (see main photo).

The Star asked for an internal inquiry into the response and, two weeks ago, the Council replied that it stood by its original decision... "The developer and other parties have also been fully consulted and they also object strenuously to the release of any of their commercial and confidential information" it added.

The Government has now launched a consultation into its 'transparency' in planning plans which anyone can respond to. For more details click here.

Meanwhile, the response to other housing initiatives put forward by the Government yesterday veered from Jeremy Corbyn's "feeble" to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) condemning a 'failure' to deal with the housing crisis...

"High housing costs are trapping people in poverty, but every year we're falling short of building the low-cost rented homes we need to meet demand" said Campbell Robb, chief executive of JRF "It is not right that so many families are struggling to make ends meet.

"Yet the speech overlooked entirely the role central government must play in redesigning the housing market and building the affordable homes we need – private developers and local authorities cannot do this alone" he added "A failure to do so will mean that many families on low incomes will miss out on the opportunity to build a decent and secure life. The forthcoming social housing Green Paper is an opportunity: we urge the Government to commit to building 78,000 affordable homes a year."


*For more background into the Salford planning scandal see related Salford Star articles...

Salford Housing Crisis – The Causes – click here

£42million Planning Scandal Mushrooms as Salford Mayor Asks What's Going On – click here

Only Two Affordable Properties For Over 4,000 Flats and Houses Built in Greengate and Chapel Street - click here

Salford In UK Top 10 Greedy Property Speculator Hotspots - click here

9 Year Waiting List For One Bed Affordable Flat in Salford - click here

Salford Star print issue 10 has a huge article detailing the background and ruses behind the planning scandal – click here for electronic version

Also, put the words 'viability assessment' into the site search engine at the top of the front page of our website for individual developments 

Tony roe wrote
at 21:06:45 on 06 March 2018
I have three councillors in my ward. Last week a problem cropped up and I had to speak to My local councillor. She said " Sorry but I cannot make a decision before i speak to my other two colleagues" what is the use if one councillor cannot make a decision without the other two.If that is the case then we only need one councillor for each ward.
 
Felsey wrote
at 21:05:26 on 06 March 2018
I hear Mickey Mouse is wearing a Salford Council wrist watch. I am seriously at the end of my tether. How do we get rid of the lot of them. Their wool has slipped over our eyes thanks to Salford Star. We can see clearly now and we activists know the wind of change is blowing hard and strong towards us Saving Salford.
 
Mike Kelly wrote
at 16:08:56 on 06 March 2018
The government might have admitted to the abuse of current planning legislation, I however doubt that they will change anything. The current situation works to the advantage of the developer as far as I can see and seeing as how they love big business I guess they will not want to upset their buddies many of whom I would guess provide financial support to The Tory Party. Viability Issues pleading by developers need to be investigated rigorously and challenged at every possible stage. If developers cannot provide affordable housing as part of a package let them go build elsewhere. If they indicate they will go to the Planning Inspectorate let them do so the delay in starting to build will cost them more than the provision of affordable housing I would guess, plus if the government are to be believed they would also want to see why the figuresdo not add up.
 
Shirley Jones wrote
at 16:08:51 on 06 March 2018
Now this is what I call Journalism! Salford Council behaves less like a Council every day. Forgets it's purpose a majority of the time. We need Councillors less likely to wring hands and more likely to stand up and be counted and truly represent those who voted for them in the way Salford Citizens would want.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Friends of Kersal Moor
Salford Star Benefit
Salford Star CD
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
I am a sparky by trade and years ago used to work on licensed premises, and as part of the licensing procedure, a fire brigade saf... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
It is a bit like pass the parcel, or musical chairs this blame game. Except the consequences are serious. Could it be Bob's brainw... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
I think I might have been barking up the wrong tree before, but I still think I am in the right Forrest. In a test case in 2012, k... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
Bob the reģular,I fear you have watched too many conspiracy thrìlĺers;Mayor Dennett has come up with the money because... [more]
article: OVER £100,000 SALFORD PARENT SCHOOL FINES NOT GOING BACK INTO SCHOOLS
Schools are now run mainly by people who can only remember the days since New Labour when the state education system was treated e... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

OVER £100,000 SALFORD PARENT SCHOOL FINES NOT GOING BACK INTO SCHOOLS

Star date: 15th November 2018

CASH-STRAPPED SALFORD SCHOOLS NOT BENEFITING FROM PARENTAL FINES

A Freedom of Information response from Salford City Council has revealed that during the year 2017-18, £118,920 income was received from parental fines but didn't go directly to help cash-strapped schools in the city. Instead the money went to 'support council services generally'.

"I think the money should go back into education as the lack of funding is clearly apparent" says parent Mandi Lee, who put in the FOI request.

Full details here...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL TO FINALLY TIGHTEN UP ON PUPPY SELLERS

Star date: 14th November 2018

NEW REGULATIONS MEAN TIGHTER CONTROL OF ANIMAL BUSINESSES

New laws on the sales and keeping of animals mean that Salford City Council will be forced to tighten up on regulating puppy sellers and animal keepers through new national regulations.

One of the biggest changes is that a puppy at a breeder's "may only be shown to a prospective purchaser if it is together with its biological mother", and that inspections of premises are to be carried out by a qualified inspector, rather than the Council's Environment Health Team.

Full details here...

SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022

Star date: 13th November 2018

PENDLETON TENANTS ARE FOUR YEARS FROM SAFETY

The nine blocks of dangerous flats in Pendleton, owned by Salford City Council and managed by Pendleton Together, won't be safe as buildings until 2022, according to the latest accounts posted by Pendleton Together Operating Ltd.

External cladding work, the accounts state, will be completed by 2021 but other internal fire safety measures won't be complete until 2022. Meanwhile, the company recorded a loss of £23.5million last year, and adds that the "cost of further works are estimated to be £35.5million".

Full details here...

PEEL HOLDINGS REFUSED PERMISSION TO BUILD HOUSING ON SALFORD GREENWAY BY SECRETARY OF STATE

Star date: 12th November 2018

SECRETARY OF STATE DISMISSES PEEL HOLDINGS APPEAL TO BUILD 600 HOUSES ON WORSLEY GREENWAY

This morning, the Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has dismissed Peel Holdings' appeal against Salford City Council's refusal to allow the company to build up to 600 houses in the Broad Oak area of the Worsley Greenway.

The Secretary of State agreed with the Inspector that "the proposals would impact negatively on the character and appearance of the Greenway". Noel Gaskell, from RAID, the community group that opposed the development, told the Salford Star "It shows want can be achieved when the general public put their minds to stopping developments that would cause huge problems to the residents."

Full details here...

SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANT TOLD TO LIVE ON £47 A WEEK

Star date: 12th November 2018

'HOW AM I GOING TO MANAGE? I HAVEN'T GOT A CLUE...'

A Salford Universal credit claimant has been told that she must live on just £47 per week, or £190 per month, after 'migrating' from Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)... "How am I going to manage? I haven't got a clue" she tells the Salford Star.

This latest disgusting poverty setback comes on top of the shock of her father dying from a heart attack while waiting for a DWP appeal, after being told he was fit for work. His case, in retrospect, is being heard by an upper tribunal this week.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx