HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD DEVELOPERS AVOID OVER £5MILLION IN SECTION 106 PAYMENTS IN 2017-18
 

Star date: 2nd August 2018

AGREEMENTS SIGNED BY DEVELOPERS FOR £3.3MILLION – BUT THEY AVOID OVER £5MILLION!

Yesterday, Salford City Council put out a press release boasting that, during the year 2017-18 "we signed 21 [Section 106] agreements to bring in a further £3.3 million when developments are complete and viable". What the Council didn't state is that during the same period, these developers also avoided over £5million in payments.

Full details here...


Gore Street development Salford Former Salford Skills Centre development
click image to enlarge

Yesterday, apparently in response to the previous day's Salford Star article, detailing that just 16 affordable houses had been secured from Section 106 payments during 2017-18*, Salford Council issued a press release boasting about the £millions received from developers via Section 106 during the period...

The release stated that developers had paid £3.2million in Section 106 contributions during the last financial year, while Councillor Derek Antrobus, Lead Member for Planning and Sustainable Development boasted that "In addition to this, we signed 21 agreements to bring in a further £3.3million when developments are complete and viable."

The release is based on the Section 106 End of Year Report, a twenty page document that lists all of the developments covered and amounts paid.

Of the 21 agreements signed by developers, while £3.3million might well be brought in, an analysis of just five of the schemes shows that over £5.1million has also been avoided.

We compared the amounts quoted on the list to figures cited in Salford Star articles at the time of planning meetings for the biggest developments...

Furness Quay, Ordsall, 593 apartments/townhouses: Agreed: £1million. Star figures: Agreed at the time to pay £1.1million but should be paying £2,990,752. Avoided: £1.99million (Council states that a 'further viability report required')

Gore Street, Ordsall, 364 apartments: Agreed: £700,000. Star figures: Should be paying £1,811,362. Avoided: £1,111,362.

Embankment West, Ordsall, 694 PRS apartments: Agreed: £1,125,000. Star figures: Should be paying £2,938,506. Avoided: £1,813,506 (Council states that a 'further viability appraisal required').

Irwell House, Frederick Road, 76 student flats: Agreed: £40,000. Star figures: Should be paying £367,102. Avoided: £327,102.

Former Skills Centre, Liverpool Street, 178 flats, 13 townhouses. Agreed: 0. Star figures: Should be paying £988,364 . Avoided: £988,364 (Council states that a "further viability appraisal required")

On these five schemes alone, there's £5,130,334million avoided or awaiting further viability assessments.

Also on the list are all the English Cities Fund (ECf) developments of unaffordable housing on Chapel Street, which the Council report states has brought nothing in via Section 106 payments, as all these properties were taken out from the umbrella of Section 106 and, instead, subject to a separate and secret Development Account.

The Salford Council press release also boasts that, of the £3.2million actually received from developers during 2017-18, "just over £1 million of that money came from clawback agreements". And, again Councillor Antrobus was gloating that "Salford has one of the best track records in Greater Manchester for attracting S106 money and this demonstrates the success of our clawback policy."

What Councillor Antrobus doesn't say, is that the 'clawback' came from just two developments (£563,269 from City Suites and £505,516.84 from Wilburn Street Basin), out of dozens that received planning permission with reduced Section 106 contributions.


* See previous Salford Star article: Salford Council Section 106 Delivers Only 16 Affordable Houses in 2017-18 – click here

Cody wrote
at 20:32:27 on 02 August 2018
Yet again the Star has demonstrated it's not what the Council tells you, it's what they don't tell you. I'd say the Council needs to challenge some of these developers for their rightful money and affordable properties, though I know the Council won't and will sight "appeal" costs as a reason. If they challenged these companies more often, just to set a precedent, maybe they wouldn't take the piss. 1000s of high-end rent and expensive to buy properties being built/renovated in the last two years alone, and yet only 100s of social housing. It's beyond sad, what's even sadder is I can't even vote to get rid of these people because of a lack of a fairer electoral system and political apathy.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Friends of Kersal Moor
Salford Star Benefit
Salford Star CD
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
I am a sparky by trade and years ago used to work on licensed premises, and as part of the licensing procedure, a fire brigade saf... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
It is a bit like pass the parcel, or musical chairs this blame game. Except the consequences are serious. Could it be Bob's brainw... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
I think I might have been barking up the wrong tree before, but I still think I am in the right Forrest. In a test case in 2012, k... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
Bob the reģular,I fear you have watched too many conspiracy thrìlĺers;Mayor Dennett has come up with the money because... [more]
article: OVER £100,000 SALFORD PARENT SCHOOL FINES NOT GOING BACK INTO SCHOOLS
Schools are now run mainly by people who can only remember the days since New Labour when the state education system was treated e... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

OVER £100,000 SALFORD PARENT SCHOOL FINES NOT GOING BACK INTO SCHOOLS

Star date: 15th November 2018

CASH-STRAPPED SALFORD SCHOOLS NOT BENEFITING FROM PARENTAL FINES

A Freedom of Information response from Salford City Council has revealed that during the year 2017-18, £118,920 income was received from parental fines but didn't go directly to help cash-strapped schools in the city. Instead the money went to 'support council services generally'.

"I think the money should go back into education as the lack of funding is clearly apparent" says parent Mandi Lee, who put in the FOI request.

Full details here...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL TO FINALLY TIGHTEN UP ON PUPPY SELLERS

Star date: 14th November 2018

NEW REGULATIONS MEAN TIGHTER CONTROL OF ANIMAL BUSINESSES

New laws on the sales and keeping of animals mean that Salford City Council will be forced to tighten up on regulating puppy sellers and animal keepers through new national regulations.

One of the biggest changes is that a puppy at a breeder's "may only be shown to a prospective purchaser if it is together with its biological mother", and that inspections of premises are to be carried out by a qualified inspector, rather than the Council's Environment Health Team.

Full details here...

SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022

Star date: 13th November 2018

PENDLETON TENANTS ARE FOUR YEARS FROM SAFETY

The nine blocks of dangerous flats in Pendleton, owned by Salford City Council and managed by Pendleton Together, won't be safe as buildings until 2022, according to the latest accounts posted by Pendleton Together Operating Ltd.

External cladding work, the accounts state, will be completed by 2021 but other internal fire safety measures won't be complete until 2022. Meanwhile, the company recorded a loss of £23.5million last year, and adds that the "cost of further works are estimated to be £35.5million".

Full details here...

PEEL HOLDINGS REFUSED PERMISSION TO BUILD HOUSING ON SALFORD GREENWAY BY SECRETARY OF STATE

Star date: 12th November 2018

SECRETARY OF STATE DISMISSES PEEL HOLDINGS APPEAL TO BUILD 600 HOUSES ON WORSLEY GREENWAY

This morning, the Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has dismissed Peel Holdings' appeal against Salford City Council's refusal to allow the company to build up to 600 houses in the Broad Oak area of the Worsley Greenway.

The Secretary of State agreed with the Inspector that "the proposals would impact negatively on the character and appearance of the Greenway". Noel Gaskell, from RAID, the community group that opposed the development, told the Salford Star "It shows want can be achieved when the general public put their minds to stopping developments that would cause huge problems to the residents."

Full details here...

SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANT TOLD TO LIVE ON £47 A WEEK

Star date: 12th November 2018

'HOW AM I GOING TO MANAGE? I HAVEN'T GOT A CLUE...'

A Salford Universal credit claimant has been told that she must live on just £47 per week, or £190 per month, after 'migrating' from Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)... "How am I going to manage? I haven't got a clue" she tells the Salford Star.

This latest disgusting poverty setback comes on top of the shock of her father dying from a heart attack while waiting for a DWP appeal, after being told he was fit for work. His case, in retrospect, is being heard by an upper tribunal this week.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx