HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
MASSIVE SALFORD QUAYS APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT AVOIDS ALMOST £2MILLION PLANNING FEES
 

Star date: 17th January 2017

593 APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOUSES – ONLY FIVE AFFORDABLE HOUSES: ALMOST £2MILLION PLANNING FEES AVOIDED!

The planning scandal in Salford continues, with councillors due to rubber stamp Fortis Developments' application for 593 apartments and townhouses in two tower blocks of 13 and 27 storeys high at Furness Quay at the back of Dock Office, off Trafford Road.

According to Salford Star calculations, based on Salford City Council's own figures, Fortis will be avoiding almost £2million in Section 106 planning fees, and paying for just five affordable houses to be located `off site'.

Full details here...


Fortis Developments Salford Quays Fortis Developments Salford Quays Fortis Developments Salford Quays
Fortis Developments Salford Quays
click image to enlarge

This Thursday, Fortis Developments will be putting a huge planning application to Salford City Council, for a total of 593 apartments and `duplex townhouses' within Furness House, Custom House and two tower blocks 27 and 13 storeys high.

18 apartments are to be built within a four storey extension to Custom House and 35 will be housed within a six storey extension to Furness House, on top of 114 apartments and townhouses in these buildings that were agreed by the Council last year: with no need for planning permission or any Section 106 fees paid, as it was a conversion from office to residential use.

A further 268 apartments will be housed in the 27 storey tower block, while 247 apartments and 25 `duplex townhouses' will be housed within a thirteen storey high block.

The application going to the planning panel this Thursday totals 568 apartments and 25 `duplex townhouses'. To plonk these in what Salford Council calls the `premium sales area' of Salford Quays, Fortis should be paying premium planning Section 106 fees.

For the apartments, thanks to Salford Council's planning obligations `SPD' brought in a few years ago, Fortis doesn't have to provide any contributions towards affordable housing, only for the 25 townhouses. 20% should be affordable – a massive total of five affordable properties.

However, Fortis tried to avoid even providing these. Council planning officers explain in the report going to councillors that "The applicant states that the development would not be financially viable if affordable housing was provided on site or off site, or if an equivalent commuted sum was provided".

Let's get this right – Fortis is saying that the whole development of 707 properties (593 in this application and 114 in the previous application) would be `unviable' if it had to provide five affordable houses! Surely even Salford Council wouldn't let them get away with this...

Meanwhile, Fortis has to pay planning fees for all the 593 properties, to mitigate the impact of around one thousand new residents traipsing around the place; for `public realm' etc.

According to Salford Council's own figures (taken from the Planning Obligation SPD document), Fortis should be paying £247,142 for the 25 `duplex townhouses' (on top of the massive five affordable properties), and £2,743,610 for the 568 apartments. That's a total of £2,990,752.

However, Council planning officers note that "The applicant...has advised that for reasons of scheme viability the development cannot support the level of contribution considered by the City Council as appropriate to mitigate its impacts, in accordance with the Planning Obligations SPD. The applicant has submitted a viability appraisal in support of their position..."

And, as usual, the Council caves in: "A review of the applicant's viability appraisal undertaken by the City Council's consultant surveyors concluded that the applicant's assertions that the scheme cannot support the level of contribution sought is sound..."

Instead of paying almost £3million to the city, Fortis will be paying just £1.1million, almost £2million less that it should be paying, although there is a `clawback' arrangement should the `viability' increase in the future.

The £1.1million will go towards "The resurfacing of, and works to improve transport and pedestrian connectivity on and to the Quays Loop Road from Sovereign Point to Trafford Rd, and/or Affordable housing (financial contribution for provision off-site)..."

So it looks like Salford might be getting its five affordable houses after all – but not on the Quays, of course!

According to Salford Council's SPD document, developers in a premium sales area like the Quays, building 600 high density apartments (this scheme will see 568) are allowed to make just over £24million profit from the scheme which is included in the total costs for `viability' calculations. No wonder nothing is viable!


*Fortis Developments also avoided £676,682 in fees for its Adelphi Wharf scheme, with no `clawback' arrangement in place – see previous Salford Star article – click here

See also The £42million Salford Planning Scandal – click here

Update: 20th January: Planning councillors vetoed the plans at the panel meeting, not because of lack of Section 106 payments but because of lack of green space, an over large car park and the overshadowing of apartments.




No Brainier H wrote
at 06:46:09 on 19 January 2017
Carlos, you are right my friend. Silly me. £24million in profit isn't enough to be able to lose another couple of million to ensure that the housing crisis is eased. That's not even factoring ongoing maintenance service charges and ground rent from the long lease holds on the individual flats. What's the point of regenerating the local area if locals cannot afford to live there? Jeez Carlos, leave some houses for the rest of us that don't have hipster beards and media jobs. Let's all agree that the council should do their job instead of repeatedly pretending they are a bank funding property developers by proxy. If I didn't have to pay my business rates, I'd also make more profit but fortunately I like being able to sleep at night. No one has a right to a certain percentage of profit at the cost of the public purse. The council are custodians of our money, we've got to a right to demand that they work hard to mitigate our losses and not the developers'.
 
Carl Roland wrote
at 10:59:34 on 18 January 2017
Why should the council take all the developers profits, when they are creating jobs, housing and regenerating the local area. The council are getting paid millions in s106, shouldn't the developer make some profits.
 
No Brainer H wrote
at 05:07:13 on 18 January 2017
It beggars belief. It's a ludicrous density of housing in itself. A labour council shunning the ethos of affordable housing preached by its petulant geography teacher of a leader Jezza Korbyn? He can go back on TV and blame the Tories for not meeting the minimum target for affordable housing, whilst his own councillors shovel affordable housing cash out of the window faster than you can say "unelectable". The councillors on the planning committee must be on commission from property developers. In the Salford City Council gift shop in Swinton they do great door mats for councillors made out of the actual pages of the national planning policy framework. Shame, shame and shame again.
 
One more nail in LABOURS coffin wrote
at 19:39:21 on 17 January 2017
Come on people when are you going to act and vote this lot out. Another example of the rich boys patting each other on the back. This council are just laughing at everyone of you that allow this to go on. Long waiting lists for housing, people getting more and more into debt, horrendous bedroom tax throwing more and more into serious debt and mental health. A Mayor that thinks of no one bar himself.. I could go on and on but as they say YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW...
 
salford resident wrote
at 18:11:34 on 17 January 2017
that's 44 MILLION , Try missing the council tax , then they send in the henchmen , hope people remember this at the elections , no party is safe nowaday's LABOUR , you have been warned
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PETITION AND PROTEST PLANNED OVER SALFORD SCHOOL HEAD TEACHER SUSPENSION
People should beware of merely accepting the outward picture of a head’s performance. I worked for a head who was thought by most... [more]
article: PETITION AND PROTEST PLANNED OVER SALFORD SCHOOL HEAD TEACHER SUSPENSION
I seriously doubt he's earned 1.5 million. If he has, it would probably explain the suspension! Probably the TV exposure has gone... [more]
article: PETITION AND PROTEST PLANNED OVER SALFORD SCHOOL HEAD TEACHER SUSPENSION
My daughter recently left and my son still attends the work drew povey and team harrop do with and for these kids you cant put int... [more]
article: SALFORD PEOPLE TO JUDGE WHETHER PLANNING COUNCILLOR BROKE RULES
Bob, those that want to buy the proposed flats would be aware of what they are buying, including the parking arrangements. If they... [more]
article: SALFORD PEOPLE TO JUDGE WHETHER PLANNING COUNCILLOR BROKE RULES
To wrote at 06.39, you clearly haven't understood my comment. Yes Salix can borrow the money, which would have to be paid back, as... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

PEPPA PIG COMMUNISM GRAFFITI GOES SUBVERSIVE IN SALFORD

Star date: 18th July 2018

'COMMUNISM IS FOR THE CHILDREN' SAYS SUBVERSIVE PEPPA PIG

Bizarre graffiti art has appeared near Salford Central Station depicting two delighted looking Peppa Pigs by the slogan 'Communism is for the children'. The art has led to much amusement and bemusement but is probably related to China banning the popular kids' cartoon.

Full details here...

SALFORD TOWERBLOCK CLADDING RESIDENTS UNITE TO TACKLE PENDLETON TOGETHER

Star date: 18th July 2018

SPRUCE COURT AND THORN COURT TENANTS GET ORGANISED TO FIGHT BACK

"We're sick to death of being treated like dirt..."

Last night, tenants from Spruce Court and Thorn Court met to share concerns over dangerous cladding, fire safety, security and other issues, as they united to take on towerblock manager Pendleton Together and Salford City Council, which owns the blocks.

"They try to ignore what we're saying" insisted one tenant "They're complacent... we're sick to death of being treated like dirt...".

Full details here...

SALFORD QUAYS DEVELOPER TO AVOID £1MILLION PAYMENT WHILE NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVIDED

Star date: 17th July 2018

FURNESS QUAY DEVELOPER PROVIDES NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON HUGE APARTMENT SCHEME

Salford's planning scandal is to go up another gear this week when an application by developer De Trafford for 421 apartments in blocks up to 27 storeys high on the site of Furness Quay is considered by councillors. Thanks to Salford City Council policies, the developer will be providing no affordable properties, while, through 'viability' assessments it is set to avoid over £1million in planning fees.

Meanwhile, the English Cities Fund (ECf) is continuing its secrecy in relation to new apartments and an office development around Chapel Street and New Bailey.

Full details here...

A YEAR AFTER SALFORD CLADDING SCANDAL INDEPENDENT TENANTS MEETING TO BE HELD

Star date: 16th July 2018

CLADDING, SECURITY, FIRE SAFETY AND MORE TO BE DISCUSSED AT PENDLEON TENANTS MEETING

As the Grenfell Tower victims said, before the tragic fire their warnings were not listened to by the authorities. Now tenants in Spruce Court, Pendleton, who are still living with the dangerous cladding, have called an independent meeting for tomorrow, Tuesday, 17th July, to discuss cladding, security and more, while Thorn Court residents are also complaining about the same issues.

Full details here...

PETITION AND PROTEST PLANNED OVER SALFORD SCHOOL HEAD TEACHER SUSPENSION

Star date: 15th July 2018

SCHOOL PROTEST PLANNED OVER HARROP FOLD HEAD AND STAFF SUSPENSION

After Salford City Council suspended Harrop Fold School Head, Drew Povey, and three other staff members last week, supporters have launched a petition to reinstate them, while pupils and parents are planning a protest at the school this Thursday.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx