HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
MASSIVE SALFORD QUAYS APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT AVOIDS ALMOST 2MILLION PLANNING FEES
 

Star date: 17th January 2017

593 APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOUSES ONLY FIVE AFFORDABLE HOUSES: ALMOST 2MILLION PLANNING FEES AVOIDED!

The planning scandal in Salford continues, with councillors due to rubber stamp Fortis Developments' application for 593 apartments and townhouses in two tower blocks of 13 and 27 storeys high at Furness Quay at the back of Dock Office, off Trafford Road.

According to Salford Star calculations, based on Salford City Council's own figures, Fortis will be avoiding almost 2million in Section 106 planning fees, and paying for just five affordable houses to be located `off site'.

Full details here...


Fortis Developments Salford Quays Fortis Developments Salford Quays Fortis Developments Salford Quays
Fortis Developments Salford Quays
click image to enlarge

This Thursday, Fortis Developments will be putting a huge planning application to Salford City Council, for a total of 593 apartments and `duplex townhouses' within Furness House, Custom House and two tower blocks 27 and 13 storeys high.

18 apartments are to be built within a four storey extension to Custom House and 35 will be housed within a six storey extension to Furness House, on top of 114 apartments and townhouses in these buildings that were agreed by the Council last year: with no need for planning permission or any Section 106 fees paid, as it was a conversion from office to residential use.

A further 268 apartments will be housed in the 27 storey tower block, while 247 apartments and 25 `duplex townhouses' will be housed within a thirteen storey high block.

The application going to the planning panel this Thursday totals 568 apartments and 25 `duplex townhouses'. To plonk these in what Salford Council calls the `premium sales area' of Salford Quays, Fortis should be paying premium planning Section 106 fees.

For the apartments, thanks to Salford Council's planning obligations `SPD' brought in a few years ago, Fortis doesn't have to provide any contributions towards affordable housing, only for the 25 townhouses. 20% should be affordable a massive total of five affordable properties.

However, Fortis tried to avoid even providing these. Council planning officers explain in the report going to councillors that "The applicant states that the development would not be financially viable if affordable housing was provided on site or off site, or if an equivalent commuted sum was provided".

Let's get this right Fortis is saying that the whole development of 707 properties (593 in this application and 114 in the previous application) would be `unviable' if it had to provide five affordable houses! Surely even Salford Council wouldn't let them get away with this...

Meanwhile, Fortis has to pay planning fees for all the 593 properties, to mitigate the impact of around one thousand new residents traipsing around the place; for `public realm' etc.

According to Salford Council's own figures (taken from the Planning Obligation SPD document), Fortis should be paying 247,142 for the 25 `duplex townhouses' (on top of the massive five affordable properties), and 2,743,610 for the 568 apartments. That's a total of 2,990,752.

However, Council planning officers note that "The applicant...has advised that for reasons of scheme viability the development cannot support the level of contribution considered by the City Council as appropriate to mitigate its impacts, in accordance with the Planning Obligations SPD. The applicant has submitted a viability appraisal in support of their position..."

And, as usual, the Council caves in: "A review of the applicant's viability appraisal undertaken by the City Council's consultant surveyors concluded that the applicant's assertions that the scheme cannot support the level of contribution sought is sound..."

Instead of paying almost 3million to the city, Fortis will be paying just 1.1million, almost 2million less that it should be paying, although there is a `clawback' arrangement should the `viability' increase in the future.

The 1.1million will go towards "The resurfacing of, and works to improve transport and pedestrian connectivity on and to the Quays Loop Road from Sovereign Point to Trafford Rd, and/or Affordable housing (financial contribution for provision off-site)..."

So it looks like Salford might be getting its five affordable houses after all but not on the Quays, of course!

According to Salford Council's SPD document, developers in a premium sales area like the Quays, building 600 high density apartments (this scheme will see 568) are allowed to make just over 24million profit from the scheme which is included in the total costs for `viability' calculations. No wonder nothing is viable!


*Fortis Developments also avoided 676,682 in fees for its Adelphi Wharf scheme, with no `clawback' arrangement in place see previous Salford Star article click here

See also The 42million Salford Planning Scandal click here

Update: 20th January: Planning councillors vetoed the plans at the panel meeting, not because of lack of Section 106 payments but because of lack of green space, an over large car park and the overshadowing of apartments.




No Brainier H wrote
at 06:46:09 on 19 January 2017
Carlos, you are right my friend. Silly me. 24million in profit isn't enough to be able to lose another couple of million to ensure that the housing crisis is eased. That's not even factoring ongoing maintenance service charges and ground rent from the long lease holds on the individual flats. What's the point of regenerating the local area if locals cannot afford to live there? Jeez Carlos, leave some houses for the rest of us that don't have hipster beards and media jobs. Let's all agree that the council should do their job instead of repeatedly pretending they are a bank funding property developers by proxy. If I didn't have to pay my business rates, I'd also make more profit but fortunately I like being able to sleep at night. No one has a right to a certain percentage of profit at the cost of the public purse. The council are custodians of our money, we've got to a right to demand that they work hard to mitigate our losses and not the developers'.

Carl Roland wrote
at 10:59:34 on 18 January 2017
Why should the council take all the developers profits, when they are creating jobs, housing and regenerating the local area. The council are getting paid millions in s106, shouldn't the developer make some profits.

No Brainer H wrote
at 05:07:13 on 18 January 2017
It beggars belief. It's a ludicrous density of housing in itself. A labour council shunning the ethos of affordable housing preached by its petulant geography teacher of a leader Jezza Korbyn? He can go back on TV and blame the Tories for not meeting the minimum target for affordable housing, whilst his own councillors shovel affordable housing cash out of the window faster than you can say "unelectable". The councillors on the planning committee must be on commission from property developers. In the Salford City Council gift shop in Swinton they do great door mats for councillors made out of the actual pages of the national planning policy framework. Shame, shame and shame again.

One more nail in LABOURS coffin wrote
at 19:39:21 on 17 January 2017
Come on people when are you going to act and vote this lot out. Another example of the rich boys patting each other on the back. This council are just laughing at everyone of you that allow this to go on. Long waiting lists for housing, people getting more and more into debt, horrendous bedroom tax throwing more and more into serious debt and mental health. A Mayor that thinks of no one bar himself.. I could go on and on but as they say YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW...

salford resident wrote
at 18:11:34 on 17 January 2017
that's 44 MILLION , Try missing the council tax , then they send in the henchmen , hope people remember this at the elections , no party is safe nowaday's LABOUR , you have been warned

Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
So,Bob the regular,if we adobted your approach, how long would t tk to mk th tower bloks safe?... [more]
article: WHY HAS SALFORD COUNCIL NOT RELEASED SAFETY REPORT ON TOWER BLOCKS?
What about Bernard Ryan's great point ? What about Salix?... [more]
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
Ray ,why should taxpayers and rate payers pay for new cladding, when the people who put the wrong cladding on and made a balls of ... [more]
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
Bob the Regular, I'm starting to come around to your way of thinling. You're bolshy. You rock the boat. That's good. You're doling... [more]
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
So basically,Bob the regular,you are more interested in knocking the council than fixing cladding!... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

FUEL POVERTY IN SALFORD PENDLETON BLOCKS A MATTER OF NATIONAL CONCERN

Star date: 25th September 2018

'WE FREEZE IN WINTER' RESIDENT TELLS DEPUTY MAYOR

At last night's meeting of Salford City Council's Growth and Prosperity Scrutiny Panel on Tower Block Safety, a representative of Fuel Poverty Action (FPA) told the Deputy Mayor and panel of the possible 'lethal' affects of residents in the Pendleton blocks switching off their NIBE systems because they cannot afford to have them on.

"People are afraid to put the heating on at all" said the rep from FPA "It is a matter of national concern."

Full details here...

WHY HAS SALFORD COUNCIL NOT RELEASED SAFETY REPORT ON TOWER BLOCKS?

Star date: 25th September 2018

WHERE IS THE TRIDENT SAFETY REPORT?

In the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire, Salford City Council commissioned a safety report from a company called Trident on all the high rise blocks in Pendleton. Over a year later the report, promised at the time to residents and press, has still not been released.

At last night's scrutiny panel of Salford Council, tenants again asked the question about the Trident report and did not get an adequate response. The Strategic Director for the Environment and Community Safety admitted that he hadn't even read it all!

Full details here...

SALFORD PROTEST AGAINST CHINESE WORKER REPRESSION AT JASIC TECHNOLOGY

Star date: 24th September 2018

PROTEST AT JOHN WILKINSON CENTRE IN SALFORD OVER LINKS WITH JASIC

"There's people in China who have been tortured for trying to join a trade union...and you're in bed with them..."

This morning, trade unionists staged a protest at John Wilkinson's Wilkinson Star HQ at the Wardley Industrial Estate over the company's links with Jasic Technology Ltd in Shenzhen, China.

The company which makes welding equipment, distributed in the UK by Wilkinson Star, is accused of violent repression of its workers who have tried to form an independent trade union.

Full details here...

GIG FOR THE PETERLOO HIDDEN PROJECT AT MOSTON MINERS CENTRE

Star date: 22nd September 2018

BENEFIT FOR PETERLOO HIDDEN PROJECT

Gig at The Miners
Saturday 6th October 7:30pm
Miners Community Arts and Music Centre, Moston

On 6th October there's to be a special gig at the Moston Miners Centre to raise funds for Red Saunders' Hidden Project, which is re-creating the Peterloo Massacre in photo tableaus. Starring on the night will be Claire Mooney, Matt Hill, Free Radicals and Tony Harper,.

Full details here...

RHYL TO SALFORD WALK FOR CAMPAIGN AGAINST LIVING MISERABLY

Star date: 22nd September 2018

50 PEOPLE, SIXTY MILES, 50,000 TARGET

When three close friends of Daniel Hobbs took their own lives, he and others decided to do something about it, and have now organised a sixty mile walk from Rhyl to Salford to raise money for the Campaign Against Living Miserably, which is leading a movement against suicide in young men. They've got an ambitious 50,000 target. Can you help?

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx