HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL SET TO ENSHRINE HUGE DEVELOPER PROFITS INTO PLANNING PROCESS
 

Star date: 4th June 2015

DEVELOPER VIABILITY AND MASSIVE PROFITS TO BE OFFICIAL SALFORD COUNCIL POLICY

"We note the Council has supported residential developments based upon viability to support a reduced contribution, and this can be met with local political and community unease" Barratt Homes

Salford Council is set to enshrine huge profits for developers and to waive planning fees officially in line with `viability' reports, despite the controversy these issues have aroused. After a consultation, only with those on its planning data base, the new `approach to planning obligations' is set to be endorsed next week by Derek Antrobus, Assistant Mayor for Planning, and Gena Merrett, Assistant Housing Mayor.

Full details here...


Both online and in the new print issue, the Salford Star has been documenting the loss of 830 affordable houses and £19,275,553 in planning fees and obligations over the last twelve months alone. The Star showed how a developer can make over £20million profit while its scheme can be deemed `not economically viable' in a hopelessly skewed planning process that even both Tory and Labour councillors have fiercely criticised...

"What's been going on behind the door I don't know" said Councillor Karen Garrido at a recent planning panel meeting, while Assistant Mayor for Planning, Derek Antrobus was equally scathing...

"It's totally unacceptable that developer after developer comes here claiming that they can't comply with our policy when our local communities are being robbed left, right and centre" he frothed "If you're in business and invest there's always a risk that you might not make profits but we're told when we're assessing viability that we're supposed to guarantee a certain margin of profit...and it's the public sector that's underpinning their profits. We're told that the economy's booming and then the next day we get developers pleading poverty and saying they can't comply. I don't know who to believe any more..."

While his words sound like fighting talk, next week Councillor Antrobus, along with Assistant Housing Mayor, Gena Merrett, is set to endorse a new `approach to planning' which will enshrine massive developer profits and `developers pleading poverty' into the planning system.

The Salford Star print issue deconstructed the huge document on which this new policy is based, showing how developers' profits of up to 20% were to be taken into account along with other costs when `viability' is assessed, via an equation A-(B+C+D+E)...

`A' is the `Gross Development Value', or income from sales, ground rents etc. From this total is then deducted land costs (B), building costs, including sales and marketing (C), interest costs (D) and developer's profit (E). To this equation was added extra building costs, and, by the time standard Section 106 planning fees (public realm, infrastructure, education, heritage, climate change) and provision of affordable housing were added schemes were becoming economically `unviable' all over the place – which allowed developers to `plead poverty' and avoid paying the city millions of pounds.

The snappily titled Supplementary Planning Document Planning Obligations (or SPD) document went out for consultation earlier this year – but for the eyes only of developers, organisations and individuals already on the Council's planning data base. And, of course, the vast majority of those who responded were developers intent on screwing the city for even more money...

Peel Holdings, as usual, complained about everything but, along with two other developers, even objected to Salford Council's weedy attempt to re-claim some money after it has waived fees for certain schemes. Having waived fees, the Council insists on inserting a `clawback' arrangement, whereby, if developers do make a profit (relying on their honesty) they will pay some Section 106 fees.

Peel, and the others, objected to this, while wanting a clause inserted that worked the other way too – that if, once schemes were completed, the profit was less than anticipated, any fees they had paid would be refunded by the Council. In response, Council planning officers told them to do one... "the developer would in essence be shifting its loss on to the city council. It is not appropriate for the city council to underwrite developer risk in this way..."

While developers tried pushing their luck, the Council report on the consultation unsurprisingly notes that "a number of developers expressed support for the proposed approach regarding the negotiation of reduced contributions where a developer considers that the cumulative effect of policy and planning obligation requirements would compromise development viability in relation to a particular scheme..."

Barratt Homes acknowledged the controversy that surrounds the avoidance of fees by developers... "We note the Council has supported residential developments based upon viability to support a reduced (ie below policy) contribution, and this can be met with local political and community unease" it stated "...the SPD should set out positively why this occurs, in order to reduce or manage such opposition by informing them of the realities of development."

Hmmm. Meanwhile, following the Royal Borough of Greenwich proposing to make developers' `viability assessments' (or `poverty pleading') public (see previous Salford Star article – click here), Salford Council does not include such a clause in the report to be endorsed next week.

Indeed, the English Cities fund, in its consultation response, insists the policy should "recognise developers' sensitivities regarding disclosure of confidential and commercially sensitive information, and should state that the City Council will accommodate developers' desire to maintain the confidentiality of information provided..." 

Since the consultation, the Council has amended the huge profits that developers are allowed to make in viability assessments, reducing this from 20% to 17.5%. But there is the added loophole... "a higher percentage developer profit may be necessary for higher risk schemes"...

A Community Impact Asessment on the policy doesn't refer at all to the loss to the city as a result of developers avoiding millions of pounds worth of fees and the provision of affordable housing. It only stresses the positive aspects from the money it might receive in planning fees. But the introduction to that Assessment explains what the policy is all about...

"A key principle guiding the review is the need to ensure that the city council's approach to planning obligations has clear regard to development viability" it states "The cumulative impact of all financial requirements when taken together with other policy requirements should not compromise development viability across the city. The purpose of the review is not therefore to place additional financial requirements on new development, but to rationalise the existing approach to securing planning obligations to ensure that it is clear."

...Clear to all that `developers pleading poverty' and avoiding fees is set to be enshrined into official Salford Council practice.


To read the Salford Star report into the £19million Planning Scandal and The Secrecy behind the English Cities fund see the print issue – click here




Labor Voter wrote
at 3:34:50 AM on Sunday, June 7, 2015
Joe. It is because gays do not understand UKIP. Many think UKIP is racist and hate gays. People need ways to here what they stand for at the top for example.
 
joe oneilll wrote
at 2:51:07 PM on Friday, June 5, 2015
Looks Like London's gay community want to ban us...
 
Michael F in SalFord wrote
at 1:13:54 PM on Thursday, June 4, 2015
With UKiP taking part in London's Gay Pride parade as quoted in Pink News this week it seems some political parties are realising they need to connect with all voters to win. I urge the Salford Conservative Party to be highly determined to follow UKiP's example by making policy challenges that will see diversity at the top of the Salford Council agenda, including on getting builders to invest more in social housing. If builders cannot afford the levy let them invest in 25% of their development being socially affordable.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: ‘ETHICAL’ AVIVA TRIES TO EVICT NEW MANCHESTER HOMELESS SQUAT
Chris is Robin Hood, taking the property of the rich to save those with nothing... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL RUNNING FIRST AID FOR DOGS AFTER £1.6MILLION CUT TO HEALTH IMPROVEMENT
Our rulers must be barking!... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL RUNNING FIRST AID FOR DOGS AFTER £1.6MILLION CUT TO HEALTH IMPROVEMENT
Simple! They've never been good at engaging communities so now they have gone for the poor dogs! P ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL RUNNING FIRST AID FOR DOGS AFTER £1.6MILLION CUT TO HEALTH IMPROVEMENT
sorry what a load of rubbish..never heard anything so daft ... so were is the money to help people in need ..... [more]
article: 91% OF SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANTS IN ARREARS WITH CITY WEST
Mystic Meg, what real evidence do you have to support your accusations against the council? U.C. is a nationaĺ policy impos... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD COUNCIL RUNNING FIRST AID FOR DOGS AFTER £1.6MILLION CUT TO HEALTH IMPROVEMENT

Star date: 19th January 2018 

DOGS FIRST AID COURSE AFTER HUMAN GROUPS CUT

"An insult to the people of Salford..."

Salford City Council is using its Health Improvement Team to run First Aid For Dogs courses, after slashing £1.6million from its budget which helped improve the lives of humans.

The courses, run in conjunction with the PDSA, cover doggy bloat, doggy bandaging and resuscitating doggies... "It's an insult to the people of Salford that managers are putting the health of dogs before the health of people" says one resident affected by the Health Improvement cuts.

Full details here...

‘ETHICAL’ AVIVA TRIES TO EVICT NEW MANCHESTER HOMELESS SQUAT

Star date: 18th January 2018

MANCHESTER COUNCIL SAYS 17 HOMELESS PEOPLE 'WOULD NOT BE INTERESTED IN RELOCATION BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTIVISTS'

After the brutal eviction of 17 homeless people from occupied offices above BetFred in Manchester centre on Monday morning, they have taken refuge in a new building on King Street owned by Aviva Investors Pensions Ltd. Tomorrow, the company is taking the homeless people to court to face further eviction, despite its 'social purpose' statement that "one of our values is to 'care more'"...

Meanwhile, the homeless people are furious about a statement purportedly made by Manchester City Council on the court papers that "they would not be interested in arranging any relocation because they are activists"...

Full details here...

91% OF SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANTS IN ARREARS WITH CITY WEST

Star date: 18th January 2018

HUGE INCREASE IN SALFORD RENT ARREARS DUE TO UNIVERSAL CREDIT

91.3% of City West tenants claiming Universal Credit are currently in arrears with their rent payments, compared to 42.3% of tenants in arrears who are not claiming Universal Credit.

Relating the figures to yesterday's full meeting of Salford Council, City Mayor Paul Dennett added that there was "a clear correlation between the introduction of Universal Credit and increased use of collection orders.

Full details here...

NEW CLADDING FOR SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS IN MARCH SAYS DEPUTY MAYOR

Star date: 17th January 2018

PENDLETON BLOCKS WILL HAVE NEW CLADDING IN MARCH

At today's full meeting of Salford City Council, Deputy Mayor, John Merry, said he was "fairly confident" that new cladding will be put on the nine Pendleton tower blocks, beginning in March. He added that residents' safety had been put "top of the list...I don't think anyone can complain".

John Merry disclosed that documentation relating to cladding on blocks owned by Salix and City West had been sent to councillors, although nothing has been published for the public. He added that a report into how the dangerous cladding was put onto the blocks in the first place will soon be available.

Full details here...

SALFORD HOMELESSNESS CONFERENCE EXCLUDES HOMELESS AT OVER £325 PER TICKET

Star date: 16th January 2018

SALFORD UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE PROMISES 'UNIQUE INSIGHT INTO CAUSES OF HOMELESSNESS' – WITH NO HOMELESS PEOPLE PRESENT

A University of Salford conference which promises to "provide unique insights into the underlying causes and potential solutions to the homelessness crisis" is charging £325+VAT per ticket, thus excluding not only the homeless but also grass roots housing organisations.

One of the speakers is Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, while a panel will ask 'How can we most effectively improve services to vulnerable homeless households and individuals?'...without any 'vulnerable homeless' people there to share their views.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx