HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
£19MILLION SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SCANDAL AS PRESSURE GROWS TO MAKE PROCESS TRANSPARENT
 

Star date: 27th May 2015 

£19MILLION AND 830 AFFORDABLE HOMES LOST TO SALFORD IN JUST 12 MONTHS

After years of the Salford Star documenting how developers in the city are avoiding paying planning fees and building affordable homes, the pressure is growing on Salford Council to make the process more transparent.

Salford has lost £19million in planning fees and 830 affordable homes in the last twelve months alone, as developers have submitted confidential reports showing that their schemes would not be `viable' if they had to pay the fees – even though in some cases they are forecast to make up to £24million profit. Now the Royal Borough of Greenwich is proposing to make the confidential viability reports public.

Full details here...


In the new print issue of the Salford Star, there is a three page investigative report detailing every single planning application submitted to Salford Council over the last twelve months in which developers have avoided paying planning fees totalling £19,275,553 and building 833 affordable homes.

Developers avoid paying the `Section 106' fees - which are for things like public realm, infrastructure, heritage, education, climate change and construction training – by claiming that their schemes wouldn't be `economically viable' if they had to comply.

Yet the Salford Star article shows that the way these `viability' figures are worked out - [an equation of A-(B+C+D+E)] - means that developers can make profits of up to £24million as part of the costs.*

In all the planning applications that cite `viability' issues, Salford Council's planning officers, the District Valuer and even, recently, planning councillors, have agreed with the developers' figures crying poverty. Yet no member of the public or press is allowed to view them.

The Salford Star constantly asked to see the `viability' assessments under the Freedom of Information Act but each time it has been turned down on the grounds of `commercial confidentiality' and, very strangely, `public interest'... "Having carefully considered that balance of public interest in this case, the Council has concluded that the public interest in maintaining the exceptions outweighs the public interest in disclosure".

Now pressure is growing on Salford Council to make the viability assessments public after the Royal Borough of Greenwich this month proposed to do exactly that.

"This is about transparency for local people" says Councillor Danny Thorpe, Royal Borough of Greenwich Cabinet Member for Regeneration and Transport "At the moment our hands are tied on affordable housing levels if the viability study shows a development won't work financially with the levels of affordable housing we want.

"This will now allow the whole process to be far more transparent – making the viability studies publicly available as part of the planning documents means the Royal Borough and residents alike can see precisely why a developer might claim they cannot meet our affordable housing targets" he adds "We believe we're the first local authority in the country to be doing this – looking at policy which insists on these studies being in the public domain."

Now the challenge is for Salford Council to follow suit. Assistant Mayor for Planning, Councillor Derek Antrobus, has called the loss of millions of pounds and hundreds of affordable homes in the city "a public scandal of immense proportions", while Conservative Party planning Councillor, Karen Garrido, recently asked at a planning meeting... "What's been going on behind the door, I don't know...I find it a quite sad state of affairs..."

As the article in Salford Star reported, the numbers of Salford households on the housing waiting list rose from 10,251 in 2013 to 11,498 in 2014, while latest figures show an average of 27 bids for every affordable flat that becomes available in the city and 38 bids for every affordable house. Yet, just 16 social rent properties were built and completed in the last financial year (2013-14).

The 830 affordable homes lost through `viability assessments' would almost cover the whole of Salford's housing needs for the next twelve months – while the £19million lost through developer avoidance would have more than wiped out all the cuts to the city's environment, community safety and leisure departments over the last four years.

Now Salford City Council must make these viability assessments public so that everyone knows exactly what is `going on behind the door'...


*The equation is A-(B+C+D+E)...

`A' is the `Gross Development Value', or income from sales, ground rents etc. From this total is then deducted land costs (B), building costs, including sales and marketing (C), interest costs (D) and developer's profit (E).

In the Council report cited in the article, a `developer's profit' of 20% was "assumed across all residential appraisals". The Council figures show that a developer building 600 high density apartments on a `premium' site, such as Salford Quays should make £24,019,200 profit.


• Read the full £19million Planning Scandal article in Salford Star print issue or in the electronic version (page 27) – click here

Anon wrote
at 1:03:45 AM on Wednesday, June 17, 2015
How can we have faith in the judgement of urban vision that the viability assessments submitted to them are sound? Which individual or individuals validate these reports and the many assumptions contained within? It will be very interesting to see what happens when Greenwich throws a light onto all this.
 
Andy Baz wrote
at 11:21:06 AM on Friday, May 29, 2015
Thievess and vagabondshttp://www.andybaz.mobi
 
UoS wrote
at 4:33:46 PM on Thursday, May 28, 2015
This is great coverage of a growing scandal. Though bad in Salford it is far, far worse in London where the consequences are more serious (as there is simply no affordable rent anywhere in London). The Star are just realising the consequences of leaving something as essential as housing up to 'the market' to determine. The poor are shafted!
 
Prisoner Irlam wrote
at 1:41:16 AM on Thursday, May 28, 2015
Might as well employ FIFA Seb Blatter , a great Team Leader that isn't accountable to anyone £19,000,000 how many Affordable Houses could be built with that nice bundle of Flash . Any one ready to blow the Whistle on this scam , that's short changing the Salford Tax payer time to ring 999!!!!!!
 
Salford lad wrote
at 1:41:11 AM on Thursday, May 28, 2015
Salford planning and regen is run by a rather yuppie style assistant director called Karen Hurst who like a loyal courttier oakin to the Elizabeathan era courts the grace and favour of the City mayor. Invariably this leads to ludicrous schemes ranging from fountains t Greengate irwell and her allegedly bending over to accommodate Peel Holdings regardless of whether any of this is of real benefit to the public of Salford. This officer and her colleagues influence on policy and planing decisions is compounded by the two mainstays of planning, Chris Findlay the Councile (un) planning officer and Mr "Salford" the ex journalist Cllr Antrobus. This effectively means that regardless of how many planning committees there may be in salford, regardless of their political make up, the decisions are based on the power and recommendation of these three. Having had first hand experience of the way they work my conclusion is God help Slford!
 
Alice wrote
at 10:52:10 AM on Wednesday, May 27, 2015
I hope as many people as possible get the 'Star in print' ..there is an article in it which details the collusion between Developers and the Council and the gives a breakdown of the loss in income and potential social housing. Worth a read and you will be shocked. It is almost unbelievable and makes me wonder about the motives of the Council. Does it prefer to be chums with the profit seekers rather than the people of Salford. I hope newly elected Councillors......Harry Davis for my area .....enquire about these dealings. I voted for your honesty and your sense of justice. Can you get some transparency for us.
 
Mike Kelly wrote
at 7:11:32 AM on Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Salford Council adopt a policy that makes it all transparent hahaha , they have made a whole new meaning to opaque and muddied.
 
Michael F in SalFord wrote
at 7:11:15 AM on Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Greater Council decision transparency would be good for politics. Even better would be putting into the Council 20 co-opted Councillors to replace deputy Mayors. The 20 drawn from proportional reflection of the Salford General Election results, ensuring UKiP, Greens, TUSC, Liberal, Labour and local Independent can get their points across. Chaired by an Elected Mayor that is not paid, siting as impartial chair. I think we will then see Salford get its due income to help save vulnerable services.
 
Paul Gerrard wrote
at 7:10:40 AM on Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Lost income and lost housing - a long running scandal of Labour Councils in cahoots with developers. Check out Radio 4 documentary from last night: 'The Affordable Housing Crisis' http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05vzysp
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
SLADS
Salford Live Events
Salford Star contact
Salford Star
Salford Star print
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: CLADDING TO BE REMOVED FROM NINE SALFORD PENDLETON TOWER BLOCKS
This reeks of a cover up...I bet they already know the cladding is the flammable sort. Why remove it otherwise? Meanwhile, tenants... [more]
article: SALFORD AND ECCLES MP DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ASSURANCE ON TOWER BLOCK CLADDING
I have it on very good authority that a certain lady from the high command of certain "housing provider", is tickled pink that he... [more]
article: SALFORD LISTED DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS TO BE DEMOLISHED AS PEGGY SEEGER SLATES ‘LAND GRABBERS’
Regarding gas holders on Liverpool street. Love them or loathe them,. Still love to see them . Was brought up and lived in Ayr str... [more]
article: SALFORD COMMUNITY STADIUM MAKES £1.5MILLION LOSS AS COUNCIL LOANS GROW
General opinion from those in the know at the time was it was a vanity project for the ex Leader and Deputy Leader of the Council... [more]
article: SALFORD AND ECCLES MP DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ASSURANCE ON TOWER BLOCK CLADDING
Everybody, including this MP is missing the point. There is no need to test these buildings, all you have to do is contact the com... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

CLADDING TO BE REMOVED FROM NINE SALFORD PENDLETON TOWER BLOCKS

Star date: 23rd June 2017

SALFORD COUNCIL TO REMOVE ALL ACM CLADDING

This afternoon, Pendleton Together has sent a letter to residents informing them that Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding on nine Pendleton Together tower blocks, including Spruce Court, Whitebeam Court and Thorn Court is to be removed, at the behest of Salford City Council.

Salford Council states that the move is "precautionary".

Full details here...

ANOTHER SALFORD GREEN BELT CONSULTATION IN THE PIPELINE

Star date: 23rd June 2017

THOUSANDS OF OBJECTIONS TO SALFORD GREEN BELT PROPOSALS

Salford City Council officers have stated that "it may be necessary to undertake some further public consultation" on plans to build on the city's Green Belt, in a new report to the city's councillors.

During his campaign to be elected GM Mayor, Andy Burnham called for a "radical re-write" of the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, which included proposals to build 2,250 houses on Green Belt near Irlam and Cadishead. Officers cited "the scale and nature of public objections" as reasons for the re-think.

Full details here...

ORDSALL LEISURE CENTRE TO LOSE RECEPTION STAFF AS DEVELOPERS CASH IN

Star date: 22nd June 2017

COMMUNITY PETITIONS AGAINST LOSS OF STAFF AT SALFORD COMMUNITY LEISURE

Salford Community Leisure is proposing to axe reception staff from Ordsall Leisure Centre. A community petition from users of the centre has been launched, arguing "This will have a detrimental impact on the service we rely upon"

Meanwhile, Salford Council has plans to flatten Ordsall Leisure Centre with the land estimated to be worth up to £1.5million, and developers in the area are paying no planning fees.

Full details here...

SALFORD AND ECCLES MP DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ASSURANCE ON TOWER BLOCK CLADDING

Star date: 21st June 2017

AS CLADDING TESTS CONTINUE, REBECCA LONG BAILEY DEMANDS ASSURANCE AND FINANCE FROM GOVERNMENT

Despite being "assured of tenant safety" by housing providers for the city's 43 tower blocks, Salford and Eccles MP, Rebecca Long-Bailey, has written to the Government demanding immediate "total assurance of safety on the materials used" for cladding.

In a letter to residents, the MP also demands from the Government "funding to carry out any necessary works to remediate once the assessments are complete plus funding to support or re-house residents whilst that is carried out." She also calls for the Government to pay for the retrofitting of sprinklers in the blocks.

Full details here...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL LOOKING TO DITCH URBAN VISION?

Star date: 21st June 2017

SALFORD COUNCIL TESTING OTHER MODELS FOR PLANNING AND HIGHWAYS COMPANY

After a controversial decision last year to extend the contract of Urban Vision, Salford City Council is now tendering for companies to "engage in a Soft Market Testing exercise" to look at other options for the delivery of its planning, highways and building control services for which the Council spends £42million annually.

Urban Vision is a joint venture profit making company in which the Council holds a 19.9% stake but until this year has never even got a dividend.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx