HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES
 

Star date: 27th March 2015

DEVELOPERS IN ORDSALL AND WALKDEN TO BE LET OFF WITH £1.68MILLION AND PROVISION OF OVER 100 AFFORDABLE HOUSES

In the latest round of planning giveaways, Salford Council is set to waive obligations for the provision of 111 affordable houses and £1.68million in planning fees for developers building over five hundred flats and houses in Ordsall and Walkden.

If councillors accept Council officer recommendations, Countryside Properties will avoid over £450,000 in fees for its Walkden development, while Villafont Ltd and Simandhar Swami LLP will avoid a cool £1.2million in fees for building eight blocks of flats and shops, up to fifteen storeys high, by the riverside in Ordsall.

Full details here...


Yet again, Salford Council is set to waive £millions worth of fees and obligations for affordable housing at its planning panel meeting next week, if councillors approve proposals for hundreds of flats and houses in Walkden and Ordsall.

On Woden Street, by the riverside in Ordsall, Villafont Ltd and Simandhar Swami LLP are aiming to build 372 apartments, plus a resident's gym, cafe, shops and offices in eight blocks up to fifteen storeys high.

The flats are all for the Private Rental Sector (PRS) and, if Salford Council policy was followed, 20% of them, or 75 properties, would have to be set aside for affordable housing. Instead, following a report which stated the scheme wouldn't be `viable' if the developers had to provide these, the condition is set to be dropped – with the now-usual claw back arrangement for the money if the `viability' of the development improves in the future.

If a scheme isn't `viable' it means that the developer's profit isn't high enough.

The Ordsall developers should also be paying a total of £1,221,278 in planning obligations (Open Space: £648,718, Public Realm, Infrastructure and Heritage
£572,560
) but again these payments are set to be waived due to `viability' issues and the fact that the scheme will include some work on the riverside footpath, although not to the size `envisaged in the guidance'.

Meanwhile, in Walkden, Countryside Properties - which has already avoided £1.5million in planning fees in Broughton - is set to avoid a further £467,670 worth of payments.

Countryside wants to build 181 two, three and four bedroom houses on Linnyshaw Industrial Estate around Manchester Road and Moss Lane, despite residents' complaints about the impact of traffic.

Countryside should be paying £1,167,670 (Open Space: £463,450; Public Realm, infrastructure and heritage: £271,500 and Education: £432,720.75) – but has offered to cough up just £700,000 (£428,041.46 towards the expansion of St Paul's CofE Primary and £271,958.54 towards a cycle path between Walkden and Windmill Road) due, yet again, to `viability' issues.

Countryside should also be setting aside 20% of its development, or 36 properties, for affordable housing but this condition is also being waived, with a claw back arrangement in place should the developer hit maximum profits on the scheme.

Both applications are set to be discussed at Salford Council's planning panel next with recommendations to approve...


• See also previous Salford Star articles...

Salford Council refuses to reveal planning viability figures - click here

Public Scandal as community robbed to line developers' pockets - click here


Graphic by Steven Speed


Salford Star wrote
at 19:44:32 on 28 March 2015
See White's comment below.. We reckon it's around £20million - see the link at the end of the article for the breakdown
 
white wrote
at 16:58:29 on 28 March 2015
If Villafont do not pay the £1.2m it will cost them just over £3000 per apartment. Surely this does not make the whole scheme unviable, especially when one considers that they are not providing cheaper affordable units and the not inconsiderable rents they will get from the planned residents’ gym, the café, shops and offices. Similarly making the due payment would cost Countryside properties around £2500 per property. Surely they could afford this especially as the necessity to include, obviously cheaper, affordable housing has again been dropped These companies are trying it on, and what is worse, are getting away with it, through the ineptitude, or worse, of our council. Has anyone calculated the grand total of planning fees that our council has waived for various companies?
 
Bob Clarke wrote
at 13:59:42 on 28 March 2015
Countryside are developing near us. Take a look at how the operate https://www.facebook.com/groups/1598478033731629/
 
Another wrote wrote
at 13:59:18 on 28 March 2015
As "wrote" has said, the developers will not piss off while the fees keep being waived. The council should just say "Not viable? Ok we will deal with another developer unless you can come up with a scheme that is viable." If you added up all the developers fees that have been waived since the start of the cuts, Would they actually pay for all the services that have been cut?
 
Terry Brooks wrote
at 16:02:00 on 27 March 2015
I think its about time that the financial affairs of the people taking these decisions are investigated. Something smells to high heaven.
 
Paul Gerrard wrote
at 15:15:11 on 27 March 2015
Spot on, Mike Kelly. The developers are laughing all the way to the bank and thinking what a little treasure trove they have in Salford Council. This is wrong in so many ways - acres of renewable housing condemned and flattened, no new affordable houses built for a new generation of Salfordians, and no income to offset against the cuts they're always complaining about. Fight the Tories? This lot? Can't even tell when they're being fleeced.
 
wrote
at 15:15:02 on 27 March 2015
They will not piss off anywhere mike no other council are stupid enough to fall for the constant bleeding heart its not viable story these wide boys are constantly playing .only this council as the required amount of amateurs to be taken in by it again and again the communist dictatorship is alive and well and living in Salford . ho sorry forgot they don't live in Salford
 
Mike Kelly wrote
at 11:25:56 on 27 March 2015
Lots of Developers claiming viability issues when planning to build in Salford and the Council letting them off with payments. Question.........why build in the first place if its not viable ? Developers are riding on the crest of the expansion of Manchester especially in the Chapel St / Ordsall areas.....using the proximity of the development s to Manchester City Centre, if they cannot make the schemes work for the benefit of all including Salford and its residents why not just piss off and build elsewhere.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
The children of today will have nothing to remind them of what was once a great city, and it's all down to greed, greed, and more ... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
As long as its not more Apartments... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
A park doesnt make money. Overpriced goldfish bowl apartments do. ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
Retired Socialist, I'm getting bored now, reading your sniping comments about Mayor Paul. Can't you change the record? It is just ... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
Sadly shows a complete failure of any ambition to create an iconic legacy for Salford people based on its heritage... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT

Star date: 21st June 2018

COUNCIL SPENT £5,750 ON MIPIM PR IN SOUTH OF FRANCE

Salford Council spent almost £10,000 on the jaunt to the MIPIM property orgy in Cannes. A newly published contract register shows that, as well as the £4,022 costs for the City Mayor and two officers to go to the South of France paid by unknown private sector companies, the Council also spent £5,750 on marketing and PR for MIPIM.

The contract register also shows the Council is spending £9,500 on a 'Salford Story' press consultant, £118,000 on its failed 'digital community hub', over £14,000 on a 'leadership programme' and, er, £25,000 on milk and bread?

Full details here...

NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS

Star date: 20th June 2018

'WE RECOGNISE THE HISTORIC INTEREST'...BUT THEY'RE BEING DEMOLISHED!

Despite musical protests and petitions, the National Grid is adamant that the Salford gas holders, made famous in the Dirty Old Town anthem, will be demolished.

Campaigners are asking for the Grid to re-think a new use for the structures, like in many other towns and cities, but the company states that while "We recognise the historic interest in the Salford gasholder...the structure is being dismantled..."

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE

Star date: 19th June 2018

COUNCIL BLOCKS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST ON £4,000 MIPIM TRIP

Salford City Council has refused to answer a Salford Star Freedom of Information request on which private company paid the £4,022 costs for City Mayor Paul Dennett and two staff to go to the South of France for the MIPIM property event.

The Council states that "the commercial interests of the Council outweigh that of the public interest in disclosure". The Salford Star is to appeal the decision.

Full details here...

DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING

Star date: 18th June 2018

OVER 80% OF COUNCIL WORKERS HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN SERVICES AND ALMOST 50% THINKING OF LEAVING THEIR JOBS

A survey of almost 1,500 local council workers in the North West reveals that 81% have no confidence in the future of local services, 49% are thinking of leaving their jobs, 54% believe their council no longer delivers quality services, and 45% think that their employer doesn't make the right decisions for the public.

The other results of the survey by UNISON to coincide with its local government conference make equally depressing reading, as the union states that "Vital local services in the North West are collapsing".

Full details here...

SALFORD TIME OUT FOR CARERS

Star date: 18th June 2018

TRIPS, CAKES, MASSAGE, ADVICE AND CHAT AS CARERS TAKE TIME OUT

"I was absolutely weary...I needed to get out of the house" Ernie

Caring for a loved one is indeed a labour of love but it can also be life consuming and draining. So a group called Time Out For Carers is making a difference, running weekly sessions where escapism is the order of the day.

There's free massages, trips out, advice on allowances, tea and coffee and cakes, but, most importantly, relaxed informal chats with carers who are all in the same position.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx