HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US   LINKS      
 

 
SALFORD QUAYS CRANES HOPE AS ENGLISH HERITAGE GETS INVOLVED
 

Star date: 11th December 2012

A Salford Star Exclusive

ENGLISH HERITAGE ASSESSES QUAYS CARGO CRANES

Despite Salford Mayor, Ian Stewart, passing a decision to demolish the blue Salford Quays Cargo Cranes recently, English Heritage is currently assessing the historic dock remnants as new evidence emerges on their unique value.

Full details here…


On 26th November, Salford Mayor, Ian Stewart, passed a decision to demolish the unique blue Cargo Cranes on Salford Quays, reasoning that they were in a "dangerous condition", posed a "hazard to the public" and that "Given the state of the economic climate, a double dip recession and the threat to cuts in frontline services, the option of repair is not considered practicable".

All this, despite money being ring fenced from previous pre-cuts budgets to restore the Cranes and Salford Council itself admitting its neglect in letting them get into their current condition (see here).

Now, following an application from a member of the public, English Heritage has stepped in to assess the heritage value of the Cranes, as new evidence emerges that they are DD2 type cranes with, uniquely, one leg. The other, four legged DD2s are in Canary Wharf and Bristol.

An English Heritage spokesperson confirmed that "the application is currently being considered and, following assessment, a report will be made to the Department of Culture, Media and Sport".

If English Heritage decide that these one legged specimens are of heritage value, they will be listed and saved for the City.

Meanwhile, Salford Council's own expensive estimates of restoration costs for the Cranes have been questioned by a crane company which is willing to step in and provide new lower costings if there is a chance of saving them.

"It is heartening to see people making a stand in opposition to the Council's plans, the strength of feeling that there is within the community for retaining and restoring our heritage and the positive sounds being made from the organisations that are able to safeguard the Cranes" says James Walsh who has started a Save Our Cranes facebook group, and whose father, featured on a Quays sculpture tribute to the dockers, was a Welfare Officer for the National Dock Labour Board.

James, who has written an open letter to Ian Stewart, adds: "I don't believe that demolishing the cranes is `people before cranes'. It should be people and cranes. Surely repairing and maintaining the cranes equals sustainable jobs for future local generations…"

As residents await the English Heritage report, they are taking heart that the Tree of Knowledge in Charlestown was saved by English Heritage, literally as the bulldozers were about to begin work (see here).

A protest against the Cranes demolition is planned before Christmas. Further details to follow…

* main photo shows James Walsh of Save Our Cranes

Winston Smith wrote
at 5:52:40 AM on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
@Pimpernel, I think you've hit the nail on the head. The Labour Party wants to distance itself from anything working class. To them, ballet and orchestras are 'worthy' culture and industrial heritage is 'unworthy' culture. It's depressing, but it's nothing new. Non-democratic parties have a track record of dictating to everyone else what is 'acceptable' or 'unacceptable' in art and culture.
 
salford pimpernel wrote
at 3:10:15 AM on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
this LABOUR council hates history, it just reminds them how shit they have been with our money in the past
 
blueliam wrote
at 1:40:37 AM on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Being a sailor I have seen many docks and cranes and these are the only one legged free standing ones I ever come across. Plus the are a nice blue colour. Neglect our past at our peril.
 
wrote
at 12:36:40 PM on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Im not sure if its still going on, but SCC once had a policy of entering into five year ringfenced agreements with certain companies, builders, demolition contractors etc, Im not sure if UV was also one. This tied SCC into using these prefered companies for that time period. Whether they were subsequently value for money or not is debatable as once contracts were awarded "unforseen costs" invariably crept in. These companies had a gun to the head of the council, who having being given one price for a job, particularly in the regeneration developments, saw costs increase drastically from the original quotes. However, failing to use these companies could have resulted in them suing SCC for breach of contract.
 
T. Watt wrote
at 4:35:35 AM on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
The great big rip off is quite correct . All local councils are run by the inept , unemployable in proper , real work . Devoid of any business acumen and any ability , they are just profligate wasters of council taxpayers extorted funds . I would rate Salford Clowncil amongst the worst .
 
The great big rip off wrote
at 3:54:28 AM on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
David i don't think it's the council who come up with these inflated prices, i think it the contractors who will have thought they were bidding for genuine work and do it knowing that all the contractors will be doing the same, if a contractor was to be awarded the contract one would be picked from all the over inflated tenders because nobody at the clown hall has the brains to realise when the job is being over priced. The clowncil will then say "this was the cheapest bid" without even batting an eyelid at the extortionate costs that could be cheaper if they shopped around instead of using a few "select" contractors.
 
david lowther wrote
at 3:04:23 PM on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
why does the council always come up with these ridiculous inflated prices for contractors when money comes into it...we're not stupid mr stewart..we see what you do...try to blag us into backing down...you do it ALL the time...these cranes HAVE to stay for the people no thanks to you and your cronies..don't ever take credit for them...you obviously dont give a s**t...
 
Anngrundy wrote
at 3:03:56 PM on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Time for change we life in a fast modern world not god enough tjay our passed has too bee put on hold and forgot so sad
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star T-shirt ad
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
Salford Star photo stories
Cornerstone advert
Mary Burns Publishing
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES
See White's comment below.. We reckon it's around £20million - see the link at the end of the article for the breakdown ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES
If Villafont do not pay the £1.2m it will cost them just over £3000 per apartment. Surely this does not make the whole scheme unvi... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES
Countryside are developing near us. Take a look at how the operate https://www.facebook.com/groups/1598478033731629/... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES
As "wrote" has said, the developers will not piss off while the fees keep being waived. The council should just say "Not viable? O... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES
I think its about time that the financial affairs of the people taking these decisions are investigated. Something smells to high ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD GIRL LOOKS TO TAKE MISS MANCHESTER CROWN

Star date: 28th March 2015

CAN SALFORD TAKE MANCHESTER?

"It would be fab if a Salford girl won!" Sara

As Manchester continues its takeover of Salford, a Salford girl is aiming to turn the tide and take the title of Miss Manchester. 

17 year old Sara Humphreys, a Disney Princess impersonator from Walkden, says that the competition is more than a pageant and involves raising money for good causes. But to win that Manchester title she needs Salford people's help.

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL TO WAIVE ANOTHER £1.6MILLION IN PLANNING FEES

Star date: 27th March 2015

DEVELOPERS IN ORDSALL AND WALKDEN TO BE LET OFF WITH £1.68MILLION AND PROVISION OF OVER 100 AFFORDABLE HOUSES

In the latest round of planning giveaways, Salford Council is set to waive obligations for the provision of 111 affordable houses and £1.68million in planning fees for developers building over five hundred flats and houses in Ordsall and Walkden.

If councillors accept Council officer recommendations, Countryside Properties will avoid over £450,000 in fees for its Walkden development, while Villafont Ltd and Simandhar Swami LLP will avoid a cool £1.2million in fees for building eight blocks of flats and shops, up to fifteen storeys high, by the riverside in Ordsall.

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL PAYING OVER £200,000 FOR GREENGATE SQUARE FOUNTAINS MANAGEMENT

Star date: 26th March 2015

CASH-STRAPPED COUNCIL PAYS OVER £4,000 A WEEK FOR FOUNTAINS MANAGEMENT

As more cuts to the city's vulnerable people begin to bite, over the last twelve months Salford City Council has paid out £219,065 to a company called Capital Properties to manage Greengate Square and its fountains. This works out at over £4,000 a week.

The fountains and the Greengate Square public space originally cost £13million of public money.

Full details here...

PRIVATISATION OF SALFORD COUNCIL ADULT SOCIAL CARE

Star date: 26th March 2015

ELDERLY AND DISABLED PUT OUT TO MARKET IN MUTUAL MAYHEM

This week, Salford Council confirmed the hiving off of £10.5million worth of adult social care services to a new `mutual', to be called Aspire. Salford City Mayor, Ian Stewart, has called the move `radical' – but a 24 page Council report on the privatisation shows the success of the mutual relies on making profits, or a `surplus', by flogging services to other councils and grabbing 10% of the `market'. There are no immediate savings to the Council.

The report also boasts that Salford has the `second lowest proportion of Council budget allocated to Adult Social Care in the North West region'. What's going on?

Full details here...

OVER 10 PER CENT OF SALFORD CLAIMANTS SANCTIONED

Star date: 25th March 2015

SALFORD 11TH WORST AREA IN UK FOR BENEFIT SANCTIONS

10.7% of Job Seekers Allowance claimants in Salford have received sanctions according to a new report by Sheffield Hallam University and Crisis. Salford is now the 11th worst area in the country for sanctions.

The report states that, since the ConDem Government came to power, "the sanctions rate has increased dramatically", leading to food poverty, survival crime, family/relationship tensions, mental and physical health problems, fuel poverty, debt and possible homelessness.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx