HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL GIVES THE CITY TO DEVELOPERS
 

Star date: 2nd April 2012

SALFORD COUNCIL TEARS UP AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBLIGATION FOR DEVELOPERS IN POOR AREAS

Incredibly, Salford Council is proposing to tear up its obligation for developers to provide affordable housing as part of building schemes in the poorest areas of the city.

Until now, developers had to provide 20% affordable housing everywhere in the city where they were building over 25 properties. In the future this won't be the case, as developers cash in to the tune of millions of pounds…

Full story here…


Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway
Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway
click image to enlarge

THE GREAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING GIVEAWAY

Developers building in the poorest areas of Salford will no longer have to provide affordable housing as part of their schemes under new proposals from Salford City Council.

In future plans for housing in the City until 2028, developers won't have to provide any affordable housing in areas of so-called `low sales value', which include Higher and Lower Broughton, Charlestown and Lower Kersal, Pendleton, Weaste, Seedley and Langworthy and Little Hulton.

Developers in areas of `mid-to-low sales value'including Trinity, Ordsall, Claremont, Eccles and Peel Green, Irlam and Cadishead, Swinton, Pendlebury, Agecroft and North Walkden - will have to provide just 10% affordable housing.

Up to now, every housing development in the city over 25 homes had to include 20% of affordable housing. Even though many housing schemes got round this obligation (see Salford Star print issue 4 – The Great Affordable Homes Scandal), now Salford Council is to officially rip up the obligation.

So-called `mid sales value' areas – including Broughton Park, Chapel Street, The Crescent, Exchange Quay, Ellesmere Park and Monton, Boothstown, Ellenbrook and South Walkden – will still have to include 20% affordable housing, as will `high sales value' areas like Salford Quays and the `Regional Centre'.

`Mid-to-high sales value' areas – Worsley, South Swinton and Chat Moss – will have to provide 25% affordable housing. Except that few housing schemes come up in Worsley and Chat Moss, while the obligation for affordable housing at MediaCityUK was ripped up years ago.

The proposals are staggering considering that the Salford Council housing waiting list has grown by around 2,000 to almost 16,500 by the end of 2011 (see here).

The Salford Council proposals come as part of its Core Strategy, which informs its housing policy until 2028. Helpfully, Salford Council officer, Chris Findley, has been giving presentations on it all to Community Committees around the city. But at the East Salford Community Committee presentation on 22nd March he failed to include the ripping up of the affordability obligations in East Salford…

…Also, the Council's consultation on the proposals ends today, 2nd April – see here for more details.

Details of the great affordable housing giveaway are contained in Salford Council's horribly complicated Affordable Housing Economic Viability Assessment (see here), based on all sorts of black art assumptions about land values, house prices and, most controversially, developers' profits.

At the moment, any housing scheme in Salford above one hectare in size or 25 housing units must have 20% affordable housing. But the current policy also recognises that "a lower proportion of affordable housing may be appropriate where the financial impact of the provision of affordable housing, combined with other planning obligations as set out in the Planning Obligations SPD, would affect scheme viability…".

Since this policy was introduced in 2006, the `economic viability' argument has allowed developers to ride a coach and horses through it, cashing in all the way. Now Salford Council has re-visited the policy and decided that all schemes in `low sales value' areas are not `economically viable' and have ripped up the clause for provision of affordable housing…

…However, a housing scheme becomes `not economically viable' after developers have taken a 20% profit. Which, according to Salford Council's tables for typical developments  in `low value' areas means that even if developers hit profits of over £2million, £3million and £4million the scheme is still deemed to be `economically unviable' - because the profits, plus the affordable housing cost and other payments, would push the project into deficit.

Whether a housing scheme is in surplus or deficit is worked out with an equation of A – (B+C+D+E).

`A' is the final sales or rent value, and the costs subtracted from this are the Land Costs (B), Development Costs (C), Financing Costs (D) and Developer Profit (E).

On the proposed 20% developer profits virtually all schemes in low and mid-low areas would be in deficit, according to Salford Council figures. The Council `Viability' report states… "It can be seen that in the low value sales areas the provision of affordable housing as part of schemes would not appear to be viable, even with only a relatively small requirement for social rented dwellings as part of the overall mix…On this basis…it is not considered appropriate to set any affordable requirement in the low value area."

The repercussions of this could be staggering, given that most new housing developments are in `low value' areas. Does this mean there is to be no affordable housing in Countryside Properties proposed development for Whit Lane and Lower Kersal? Does this mean there will be no affordable housing in the new Pendleton PFI scheme?

Before the new policy has even been approved, Countryside Properties' proposals for eighty new huge houses in the Top Streets of Higher Broughton were passed without any need for affordable housing – using the `not economically viable' argument (see here).

Now developers might get a gold card to build unaffordable houses in areas that need them most – while loads of available affordable housing has been tinned up and demolished, and the waiting lists for affordable housing grow and grow…

 

* Any objections to the proposals must be lodged today – see the full consultation report and all the documents – click here

** Main photo shows new houses for Whit Lane in Charlestown - but will any be affordable for people who actually live there under these proposals?

John Hollingsworth wrote
at 4:33:42 AM on Sunday, January 15, 2017
Conservative government definition of affordable housing outside of London = £250k and under.
 
Inanutshell wrote
at 4:15:47 AM on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
A developer says "We cannot make a profit if we have to build any affordable houses." Salford council then say "Okay then, build what you want." I bet the viability or the actual truth wont get in the way.
 
Marie Piekarski wrote
at 2:06:04 PM on Monday, April 2, 2012
Well why doesnt this surprise me... Salford has lost so many much needed facilities and buildings.. it is quite obvious to me that those who make the executive decisions to demolish more and more of the city leaving us with empty wasteland where once were schools, churches,shops do not care one jot and probably don't even live here. We don't even have a market now and they don't even want to acknowledge any responsibility to provide one!
 
THX wrote
at 2:05:44 PM on Monday, April 2, 2012
A Labour council or big business Pocket Politician brown-nosing lackeys , with only self-interest in mind ?
 
Nachtschlepper wrote
at 12:48:50 PM on Monday, April 2, 2012
I really don't know whether it's just stupidity, corruption or just sheer lack of spine that this shower of of inept asses allow these things to happen. I can guarantee that not one of them will even bother to try to defend or justify this on the Salford Star website. Please, people of Salford kick this bunch of cowering, snivelling arseholes as far from this place as possible come election day.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: 91% OF SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANTS IN ARREARS WITH CITY WEST
I believe that Salford Council secretly want and agree with Universal Credit and with benefit sanctions. The reason that I say thi... [more]
article: NEW CLADDING FOR SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS IN MARCH SAYS DEPUTY MAYOR
Oh for goodness sake Felse, you don’t even live in one of these blocks and you’re sticking your nose into something again. You’ve ... [more]
article: NEW CLADDING FOR SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS IN MARCH SAYS DEPUTY MAYOR
With regard MJ Felse, what he needs to succeed in local politics, are just three things. 1: Money. 2: Publicity. To become known a... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL HELD TO RANSOM BY PEEL HOLDINGS OVER NEW SHIP CANAL LIFTING BRIDGE
Perhaps the simple answer to the toll of 12p might be to offer the toll collector a £50 note each day. If he or she could not give... [more]
article: 91% OF SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANTS IN ARREARS WITH CITY WEST
In the section yesterday I mentioned about the plight of a friend as regards universal credit. After all the rows we have had with... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

91% OF SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANTS IN ARREARS WITH CITY WEST

Star date: 18th January 2018

HUGE INCREASE IN SALFORD RENT ARREARS DUE TO UNIVERSAL CREDIT

91.3% of City West tenants claiming Universal Credit are currently in arrears with their rent payments, compared to 42.3% of tenants in arrears who are not claiming Universal Credit.

Relating the figures to yesterday's full meeting of Salford Council, City Mayor Paul Dennett added that there was "a clear correlation between the introduction of Universal Credit and increased use of collection orders.

Full details here...

NEW CLADDING FOR SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS IN MARCH SAYS DEPUTY MAYOR

Star date: 17th January 2018

PENDLETON BLOCKS WILL HAVE NEW CLADDING IN MARCH

At today's full meeting of Salford City Council, Deputy Mayor, John Merry, said he was "fairly confident" that new cladding will be put on the nine Pendleton tower blocks, beginning in March. He added that residents' safety had been put "top of the list...I don't think anyone can complain".

John Merry disclosed that documentation relating to cladding on blocks owned by Salix and City West had been sent to councillors, although nothing has been published for the public. He added that a report into how the dangerous cladding was put onto the blocks in the first place will soon be available.

Full details here...

SALFORD HOMELESSNESS CONFERENCE EXCLUDES HOMELESS AT OVER £325 PER TICKET

Star date: 16th January 2018

SALFORD UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE PROMISES 'UNIQUE INSIGHT INTO CAUSES OF HOMELESSNESS' – WITH NO HOMELESS PEOPLE PRESENT

A University of Salford conference which promises to "provide unique insights into the underlying causes and potential solutions to the homelessness crisis" is charging £325+VAT per ticket, thus excluding not only the homeless but also grass roots housing organisations.

One of the speakers is Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, while a panel will ask 'How can we most effectively improve services to vulnerable homeless households and individuals?'...without any 'vulnerable homeless' people there to share their views.

Full details here...

‘NO COMPASSION’ AS MANCHESTER HOMELESS SQUAT EVICTED

Star date: 16th January 2018

BETFRED SQUAT EVICTED AS 17 HOMELESS PEOPLE BACK ON STREETS

Yesterday's early morning eviction of a squat above the BefFred shop opposite Manchester Town Hall has been roundly condemned by housing campaigners, as 17 homeless people were put back on the streets.

Greater Manchester Housing Action stated "shame on whoever it was that made the decision to evict"; while Angela Barratt, of Salford Manchester Street Support, who was volunteering at the squat's night shelter as the eviction happened, told the Salford Star that "There was just no compassion..."

Full details here...

PEEL HOLDINGS SALFORD BUILDING SQUATTED BY HOMELESS

Star date: 15th January 2018

PEEL OFFICES IN ECCLES SQUATTED

As the Manchester squat above BetFred in the city centre was evicted this morning, homeless people in Salford have occupied an office building owned by Peel Holdings near Eccles.

Peel recently received a cheap public money loan of over £8million for its Lightbox apartments in MediaCityUK, where flats cost up to £400,000... "This was our only option" says John who has been homeless for almost five years.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx