HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL GIVES THE CITY TO DEVELOPERS
 

Star date: 2nd April 2012

SALFORD COUNCIL TEARS UP AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBLIGATION FOR DEVELOPERS IN POOR AREAS

Incredibly, Salford Council is proposing to tear up its obligation for developers to provide affordable housing as part of building schemes in the poorest areas of the city.

Until now, developers had to provide 20% affordable housing everywhere in the city where they were building over 25 properties. In the future this won't be the case, as developers cash in to the tune of millions of pounds…

Full story here…


Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway
Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway Salford Great Affordable Home Giveaway
click image to enlarge

THE GREAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING GIVEAWAY

Developers building in the poorest areas of Salford will no longer have to provide affordable housing as part of their schemes under new proposals from Salford City Council.

In future plans for housing in the City until 2028, developers won't have to provide any affordable housing in areas of so-called `low sales value', which include Higher and Lower Broughton, Charlestown and Lower Kersal, Pendleton, Weaste, Seedley and Langworthy and Little Hulton.

Developers in areas of `mid-to-low sales value'including Trinity, Ordsall, Claremont, Eccles and Peel Green, Irlam and Cadishead, Swinton, Pendlebury, Agecroft and North Walkden - will have to provide just 10% affordable housing.

Up to now, every housing development in the city over 25 homes had to include 20% of affordable housing. Even though many housing schemes got round this obligation (see Salford Star print issue 4 – The Great Affordable Homes Scandal), now Salford Council is to officially rip up the obligation.

So-called `mid sales value' areas – including Broughton Park, Chapel Street, The Crescent, Exchange Quay, Ellesmere Park and Monton, Boothstown, Ellenbrook and South Walkden – will still have to include 20% affordable housing, as will `high sales value' areas like Salford Quays and the `Regional Centre'.

`Mid-to-high sales value' areas – Worsley, South Swinton and Chat Moss – will have to provide 25% affordable housing. Except that few housing schemes come up in Worsley and Chat Moss, while the obligation for affordable housing at MediaCityUK was ripped up years ago.

The proposals are staggering considering that the Salford Council housing waiting list has grown by around 2,000 to almost 16,500 by the end of 2011 (see here).

The Salford Council proposals come as part of its Core Strategy, which informs its housing policy until 2028. Helpfully, Salford Council officer, Chris Findley, has been giving presentations on it all to Community Committees around the city. But at the East Salford Community Committee presentation on 22nd March he failed to include the ripping up of the affordability obligations in East Salford…

…Also, the Council's consultation on the proposals ends today, 2nd April – see here for more details.

Details of the great affordable housing giveaway are contained in Salford Council's horribly complicated Affordable Housing Economic Viability Assessment (see here), based on all sorts of black art assumptions about land values, house prices and, most controversially, developers' profits.

At the moment, any housing scheme in Salford above one hectare in size or 25 housing units must have 20% affordable housing. But the current policy also recognises that "a lower proportion of affordable housing may be appropriate where the financial impact of the provision of affordable housing, combined with other planning obligations as set out in the Planning Obligations SPD, would affect scheme viability…".

Since this policy was introduced in 2006, the `economic viability' argument has allowed developers to ride a coach and horses through it, cashing in all the way. Now Salford Council has re-visited the policy and decided that all schemes in `low sales value' areas are not `economically viable' and have ripped up the clause for provision of affordable housing…

…However, a housing scheme becomes `not economically viable' after developers have taken a 20% profit. Which, according to Salford Council's tables for typical developments  in `low value' areas means that even if developers hit profits of over £2million, £3million and £4million the scheme is still deemed to be `economically unviable' - because the profits, plus the affordable housing cost and other payments, would push the project into deficit.

Whether a housing scheme is in surplus or deficit is worked out with an equation of A – (B+C+D+E).

`A' is the final sales or rent value, and the costs subtracted from this are the Land Costs (B), Development Costs (C), Financing Costs (D) and Developer Profit (E).

On the proposed 20% developer profits virtually all schemes in low and mid-low areas would be in deficit, according to Salford Council figures. The Council `Viability' report states… "It can be seen that in the low value sales areas the provision of affordable housing as part of schemes would not appear to be viable, even with only a relatively small requirement for social rented dwellings as part of the overall mix…On this basis…it is not considered appropriate to set any affordable requirement in the low value area."

The repercussions of this could be staggering, given that most new housing developments are in `low value' areas. Does this mean there is to be no affordable housing in Countryside Properties proposed development for Whit Lane and Lower Kersal? Does this mean there will be no affordable housing in the new Pendleton PFI scheme?

Before the new policy has even been approved, Countryside Properties' proposals for eighty new huge houses in the Top Streets of Higher Broughton were passed without any need for affordable housing – using the `not economically viable' argument (see here).

Now developers might get a gold card to build unaffordable houses in areas that need them most – while loads of available affordable housing has been tinned up and demolished, and the waiting lists for affordable housing grow and grow…

 

* Any objections to the proposals must be lodged today – see the full consultation report and all the documents – click here

** Main photo shows new houses for Whit Lane in Charlestown - but will any be affordable for people who actually live there under these proposals?

John Hollingsworth wrote
at 10:33:42 on 15 January 2017
Conservative government definition of affordable housing outside of London = £250k and under.
 
Inanutshell wrote
at 10:15:47 on 04 April 2012
A developer says "We cannot make a profit if we have to build any affordable houses." Salford council then say "Okay then, build what you want." I bet the viability or the actual truth wont get in the way.
 
Marie Piekarski wrote
at 20:06:04 on 02 April 2012
Well why doesnt this surprise me... Salford has lost so many much needed facilities and buildings.. it is quite obvious to me that those who make the executive decisions to demolish more and more of the city leaving us with empty wasteland where once were schools, churches,shops do not care one jot and probably don't even live here. We don't even have a market now and they don't even want to acknowledge any responsibility to provide one!
 
THX wrote
at 20:05:44 on 02 April 2012
A Labour council or big business Pocket Politician brown-nosing lackeys , with only self-interest in mind ?
 
Nachtschlepper wrote
at 18:48:50 on 02 April 2012
I really don't know whether it's just stupidity, corruption or just sheer lack of spine that this shower of of inept asses allow these things to happen. I can guarantee that not one of them will even bother to try to defend or justify this on the Salford Star website. Please, people of Salford kick this bunch of cowering, snivelling arseholes as far from this place as possible come election day.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING
The UK is on is knees. I got out at the earliest opportunity. Mental Health Services ON ITS KNEES Adult Social Care ON ITS KNEES F... [more]
article: DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING
The future is frightening... [more]
article: DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING
Big headlines over comments from a small number of the overall staff. Rather misleading headline... [more]
article: DIRTY OLD TOWN PERFORMED NEAR SALFORD GASWORKS IN DEMOLITION PROTEST
It's funny that the Oval cricket ground gas holders can get the council to locally list and English Heritage to nationally list th... [more]
article: SALFORD PHOTO ARCHIVE GIVEAWAY
Hi Janet Murphy...I saw Freddie Fielder last year at a funeral....He has moved from Simister near Prestwich..not sure where he sai... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE

Star date: 19th June 2018

COUNCIL BLOCKS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST ON £4,000 MIPIM TRIP

Salford City Council has refused to answer a Salford Star Freedom of Information request on which private company paid the £4,022 costs for City Mayor Paul Dennett and two staff to go to the South of France for the MIPIM property event.

The Council states that "the commercial interests of the Council outweigh that of the public interest in disclosure". The Salford Star is to appeal the decision.

Full details here...

DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING

Star date: 18th June 2018

OVER 80% OF COUNCIL WORKERS HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN SERVICES AND ALMOST 50% THINKING OF LEAVING THEIR JOBS

A survey of almost 1,500 local council workers in the North West reveals that 81% have no confidence in the future of local services, 49% are thinking of leaving their jobs, 54% believe their council no longer delivers quality services, and 45% think that their employer doesn't make the right decisions for the public.

The other results of the survey by UNISON to coincide with its local government conference make equally depressing reading, as the union states that "Vital local services in the North West are collapsing".

Full details here...

SALFORD TIME OUT FOR CARERS

Star date: 18th June 2018

TRIPS, CAKES, MASSAGE, ADVICE AND CHAT AS CARERS TAKE TIME OUT

"I was absolutely weary...I needed to get out of the house" Ernie

Caring for a loved one is indeed a labour of love but it can also be life consuming and draining. So a group called Time Out For Carers is making a difference, running weekly sessions where escapism is the order of the day.

There's free massages, trips out, advice on allowances, tea and coffee and cakes, but, most importantly, relaxed informal chats with carers who are all in the same position.

Full details here...

DIRTY OLD TOWN PERFORMED NEAR SALFORD GASWORKS IN DEMOLITION PROTEST

Star date: 17th June 2018

SALFORD MUSICAL PROTEST TO STOP DEMOLITION OF DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS

This afternoon saw Ewan MacColl's Dirty Old Town performed like never before near the famous gasworks, as a musical protest posse played instruments and sang along to the anthem to try to get the National Grid to stop the demolition of the iconic gas holders and re-think their use.

Full details here...

BUGZY MALONE PLAYS HOME TOWN MANCHESTER FOR £5

Star date: 17th June 2018

BUGZY HOSTS DO WHAT MOVES YOU SHOW

Bugzy Malone plus guests
Saturday 23rd June, 7pm-midnight
Gorilla, Manchester

Top, top, top grime artist, Bugzy Malone, hosts the Bacardi Do What Moves You show at Gorilla on Whitworth Street next Saturday, with local rappers and MCs. Tickets are priced at just £5 with all proceeds going to Lonely Whale.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx