HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL DODGES ITS OWN PLANNING RULES
 

Star date: 30th March 2012

SAFORD COUNCIL PARTNERSHIP WITH COUNTRYSIDE PROPERTIES IS `UNVIABLE' FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Salford Council's own Planning Panel was the judge and jury that decided there was no need for affordable housing when presiding over an application for a partnership that included Salford Council.

Salford Council's own policy states that in a scheme of the size proposed, 20% of housing should be affordable. But this was waived, as were other payments, because the project would be `unviable'.

Full story here…


Top Streets of Salford Being Demolished March 2012 Top Streets of Salford Being Demolished March 2012 Top Streets of Salford Being Demolished March 2012
click image to enlarge

Salford City Council has very clear rules when it comes to new housing schemes. Any development of more than 25 dwellings must have at least 20% affordable housing, in accordance with policy HOU3 of its own Housing Planning Guidance document.

So when a planning application for eighty new houses in the Top Streets of Higher Broughton was submitted by Countryside Properties and the Higher Broughton Partnership - of which Salford Council is a partner, along with the Royal Bank of Scotland and Sigma Inpartnership – people might have expected an element of affordable housing.

However, when the plans came up before Salford Council's Planning Panel on March 15th, the 20% affordable housing obligation was waived.

The planning papers even stated that "Due to the size of the site and amount of units proposed there is a requirement for the scheme to provide an element of affordable housing…equating to a total of 16 units. The applicant is not providing any affordable housing across this scheme".

First, the `applicant' tried to dodge the requirement by arguing that this scheme was nothing but an extension of "existing schemes in the nearby vicinity whereby the 20% provision has therefore been met". But even Council planning officers wouldn't swallow that one – it's not even the same developer.

Then `the applicant' submitted a "viability appraisal of the development to demonstrate that should affordable housing be provided then the scheme would be unviable". This was reviewed by Salford Council's surveyors who agreed that any affordable housing would make the scheme "unviable".

Planning papers state that "whilst the provision of affordable housing is important, to meet the housing needs in this area of the City…the benefits of bringing this scheme forward outweigh the need for 16 affordable units and as such the development is considered acceptable in this regard."

Elsewhere in the application, under the heading `Provision of Public Open Space and Landscaping' there was a requirement for the scheme to meet something called Code Level 3 which would have cost £272,000

…But `the applicant' stated that this "further burden could result in the scheme not coming forward", so it was waived again, with a mere note on the planning permission stating that "The Panel requested that liaison take place with the Lead Member for Housing, other appropriate Lead Members and the developer to review the overall provision of public open space in the wider area".

The `applicant' did, however, generously agree to pay a £16,000 climate change charge. Meanwhile, the `applicant' would normally also have to pay for a Section 106 Agreement, to cover off site improvements, however this wasn't required either, because it was providing such things under a `developer agreement' with Salford Council.

In the end, the `applicant' was required to pay a mere £1,500 per house for public realm and stuff, plus £150 per house for construction training, and £200 per house for climate change. Given that these are all three, four and six bedroom houses this is absolute peanuts. The total cost to the `applicant' for eighty houses is £148,000, probably less than the cost of one house.

Salford Council's Planning Panel passed the application as it stood, with no affordable housing requirement, no Section 106 payment and hardly any of the normal infrastructure payments.

This is all nothing new for Salford Council which has been generous in the extreme to developers in the city (see The Great Affordable Homes Scandal in print issue 4 of the Salford Star)...But what is different about this particular application is that the `applicant' is officially Countryside Properties and Higher Broughton Partnership – of which Salford Council is, er, a partner…

 

• In a further twist, the planning decision might yet be ruled unlawful as one of the objectors to the scheme was not informed of the Planning Panel meeting – a clear breach of the rules.

* In an even further twist, after the planning permission was given, it was announced that Jewish housing association, Agudas Israel, would be taking 25 of the houses, presumably making them affordable. So why wasn't this a condition of the planning approval?

See also previous Salford Star articles on the troubled Top Streets of Higher Broughton – click here for There Goes The Neighbourhood
 

 

salford pimpernelle wrote
at 8:09:42 AM on Sunday, April 1, 2012
to salford star. do a interview of all the candidates of the mayoral election, ask them what's their manifesto for a more democratic salford, where salford people have more of a say of the running of this city, where billion £ companies and property developer run this city. ask them if they are elected mayor of this city, that they will order a full public and police inquiry and a financial audit in to the councils books, and that they would put this in to their manifesto and act on it, things like the salford reds stadium,bbc philharmonic orchestra,wasted millions, the ethnic cleansing of salford people from area's like langworthy, kearsal, brougthon and many more, these need to be investigated.
 
salford pimpernelle wrote
at 8:08:41 AM on Sunday, April 1, 2012
Caroline, George Washington once said a, a people that fears it's government lives in dictatorship, and when a government fear's it's people, then those people live in a free democracy.weather you voted for them or didn't vote, the people of salford deserve these idiots that rule us, we are our own worst enemy.
 
caroline wrote
at 1:53:02 AM on Sunday, April 1, 2012
salford pimpernelle..100% agree.They vote them in..be it on there own head..ooops but some do not vote because all seem bad and they are lost...
 
Ian OBrien wrote
at 4:00:44 AM on Saturday, March 31, 2012
Once again, I have to say, I cannot even conclude that those who are facilitating these and morally corrupt bankrupt schemes, even believe themselves to be in anyway a Labour council. I might be able to cope with the thought that the likes of Mr Merry and his merry band are true men of the left who are making bad decisions, but with the ultimate aim of doing good for the people of Salford - after all, they do say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. But it is beyond belief that this kind of corruption can be the product of naivete or even stupidity. That am sure we could, eventually forgive. But not this. Not this blatant abuse of power. This is beyond Thatcherism. The (rusty) Iron Lady sold off council houses and sold the working classes some silly dream that being mortgaged up to the hilt made us middle class (though why any of us would want to be is beyond me). She pulled a master stroke which depleted social housing stock nationwide. But Thatcher is a ghost; a relic of a right wing party which left men to starve to death rather than let them wear their own pants ffs!!! John Merry and his gang make her look almost decent. I am betting he can quote Marx chapter and verse, the way evangelical Christians in America's deep south could quote the new testament while slinging a rope over a tree branch in the dead of night. If I could only believe he really thought, in his struggling little heart, that all this was for the good of the city. I might not be so.......despairing. But, I cannot because he does not. He can not. And SIX bedroom houses? Who the f**k is going to buy a six bedroom house in Higher Broughton, sandwiched right between major transport routes and central manchest....oh. I see. I wonder if John has one of these pegged for his retirement cottage? Shame on the lot of them.
 
salford pimpernelle wrote
at 3:59:12 AM on Saturday, March 31, 2012
and people still vote them in, so who's to blame?
 
Ferdinand Gabaltorix wrote
at 3:58:24 AM on Saturday, March 31, 2012
Whatever undeserving politico-turd we gift the Mayoral Money Pot to had better stop this inept , useless clowncil from running this Dead city like a third-world banana republic.
 
Dead City Resident wrote
at 1:05:38 PM on Friday, March 30, 2012
Ethnic cleansing . Compulsory purchase peoples homes and cheat them of full value compensation . Manipulate the planning rules to accomodate the whims of big business . Just typical of this lot , and utterly disgraceful . What a Shower of bullying , manipulative , scheming , self-serving Shites .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: IS IRLAMS O’ TH’ HEIGHT THE HARDEST PLACE TO SPELL IN BRITAIN?
I have to agree with you that IRLAMS O’ TH’ HEIGHT probably is the hardest name place to spell correctly in Britain. I am here, vi... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL BANNER DECLARES ‘TRANSPARENCY’ DESPITE EVERYTHING BEING SECRET
It has to be stopped. Agree with Mary Ferrer.... [more]
article: OVER 1500 SALFORD PEOPLE SIGN PETITION AGAINST BUILDING IN BUILE HILL PARK
When the foundation put their plan forward they should have made it clear they didn't have the money to renovate the Mansion.Or di... [more]
article: SALFORD NURSERY CAMPAIGNERS TAKE FIGHT TO PARLIAMENT
Inspirational action group. I wish you every success in London. It is time to bang the drum. Make them hear you loud and clear. We... [more]
article: SALFORD UNIVERSITY PLANS 500 PROPERTIES AT CASTLE IRWELL BUT QUESTIONS OVER AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Very worried about the woods at Littleton Road and Gerald Road. Is it worth it when they sweep away these habitats? ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

DISABLED PEOPLE AGAINST THE CUTS STAGE SCRAP UNIVERSAL CREDIT PROTEST IN MANCHESTER

Star date: 18th April 2018

STOP AND SCRAP UNIVERSAL CREDIT WITH NO EVICTIONS STATE GROUPS

Today, in St Peter's Square Manchester, around half a dozen campaign groups took part in a Disabled People Against the Cuts national day of action calling for Universal Credit to be stopped and scrapped.

Chalk slogans covered the square, speeches were made condemning the affect of the discredited benefit and a giant letter was handed into Manchester City Council calling for 'No evictions' as a result of Universal Credit payment delays.

Full details here...

SALFORD NURSERY CAMPAIGNERS TAKE FIGHT TO PARLIAMENT

Star date: 18th April 2018

FIGHT FOR THE FIVE CAMPAIGNERS HEAD TO WESTMINSTER

A coach load of Save Our Nursery campaigners will be heading to Parliament next Wednesday 25th April for a meeting with MPs in the Palace of Westminster and to urge the Government to be flexible over its new funding formula.

It is also hoped that Labour Party Leader, Jeremy Corbyn, will pressure Theresa May to respond at Prime Minister's Question Time on the same day.

Full details here...

HUGE PAY RISES FOR SALFORD CITY COUNCIL OFFICERS

Star date: 17th April 2018

ASSISTANT DIRECTORS TO GET HUGE PAY RISES

Cash-strapped Salford City Council is to give huge pay rises to senior officers after a 'job evaluation exercise' moved them well up the pay scale. It follows the resignation of the Director of Finance and Corporate Business, and spreading the majority of his salary amongst other re-titled roles.

The Salford Star believes the officers are in line to share around £54,000 between them.

Full details here...

HOMELESS KITCHEN AND PROTEST IN MANCHESTER WHILE SALFORD AIMS TO GIVE HOMELESS A VOTE

Star date: 16th April 2018

HOMELESS IN SALFORD CAN STILL REGISTER TO VOTE AS PROTEST HITS MANCHESTER

Today the Salford Unemployed and Community Resource Centre is urging homeless people to get in touch in order to register to vote as it's the last day to do so tomorrow.

Meanwhile, yesterday a food kitchen and sound system happened in Piccadilly Gardens as a party protest against homelessness... "I have spoken to Andy Burnham and I don't think he is going to accomplish his mission to stop homelessness by 2020" said organiser Emma Mohareb.

Full details here...

NEW PLAY AIMING FOR SALFORD URGES WORKING CLASS PEOPLE TO ‘SPEAK UP AND BE HEARD’

Star date: 15th April 2018

WHO WILL FUND WORKING CLASS THEATRE?

A new play aiming to be staged in Salford, at the Kings Arms in June, is set to open up issues affecting the working class, "to encourage those that may have once felt lost, silenced or isolated, to speak up and be heard knowing that someone is listening".

The play, Oct.O.Pus, has a diverse cast that includes Coronation Street's Melissa Johns, but is crowdfunding for £1,000 to pay for props, costumes, set etc, as no-one funds proper working class theatre these days.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx