HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
OLDER SALFORD RESIDENTS SPEAK OUT ON CORONAVIRUS
 

Star date: 11th March 2020

TO PANIC OR NOT TO PANIC – OVER SIXTIES SPEAK OUT!

Given that the coronavirus seems to affect those over sixty more than others, how worried is this age group in Salford about catching it, what measures are they putting in place to curb it, and, on a scale of 1 to 10, how concerned are they about a virus spread in the city? The Salford Star asked a small sample of residents and councillors all about it, as the World Health Organisation declares a pandemic.

Full response here...


This afternoon, the World Health Organisation has declared a coronavirus pandemic, and in England confirmed cases continue to rise. The virus appears to affect the over sixties population more than other age groups, so we asked a small sample of elderly Salford residents what they thought.

How worried are they about catching the virus? What measures have they put in place to try to avoid the virus? Have they stopped going out or visiting people or shopping? Are they stockpiling food or goods in case of isolation? On a scale of 1-10 how concerned are they about the virus spread in Salford or beyond?

Here's the response from those who responded...

1) Given that the virus seems to affect those over 60 more than others, how worried are you about the likelihood of you catching it?

Dot, age 73: "I'm not! If I do I do."
Tom Nolan, age 72: "I'm concerned because I have asbestos related lung disease".
Roy, age 67: "Very worried due to immune system suppression medication."
Val, age 79 (Secretary of Boddan Lodge Over 60s Club): "Not too worried."
John Defo: "l think hysteria aside, that we the over 60s should always take extra care in the flu season to ensure we minimise our chances of suffering from contagious virus diseases."
David, age 72: "Not very worried, I say my prayers."
Councillor John Warmisham: "There's every possibility that I may catch it, but I'm taking every precaution as recommended by public health."
Ali Cassim, age 64: "Not bothered at all."

2) What measures have you put in place to try to avoid the virus? Have you stopped going out/visiting people/shopping?

Roy: "No not stopped. But cut it down a lot..."
Tom: "Trying to keep away as far as possible from others when shopping. Plus disinfecting my home more, plus the door and lift on my floor, buttons etc. Salix said just follow Government guidelines..."

John: "l have always used hand sanitiser when out and about, sometimes l may have omitted its use but since the coronavirus scare l am using it a lot more than before, plus l have started to make my own sanitiser..."
Val: "I have not stopped going out socialising or shopping."
David: "No"
Dot: "No, because I don't think you can. They are pointless measures aren't they?"
Councillor Warmisham: "Again I'm following public health guidelines and living life as normal until I'm told differently. Indeed I'm going to a benefit gig in Manchester tonight and will continue to watch live football, shop and go for a pint!"
Ali: "Carrying on as normal, only precaution is I carry a small bacterial spray in my backpack that I use when needed such as getting off the bus, after shopping and after using the toilet in my local pub 'cos they don't have hot water. Common sense, I think."

3) Are you stockpiling any food/goods in case of isolation?

Tom: "Yep, even bought small chest freezer. And am contacting my doctor for meds I need in advance..."
Roy: "No, not stockpiling, even if I need to go into isolation."
John: "l have always had a good stock when l see bargain prices of kitchen wipes and toilet rolls. Other than that l don't stockpile. l have however noticed that the price of such paper goods has increased even in the Pound type shops."
Val: "I have not been stockpiling, I always have a lot of most things. I live alone and have two fridges and two freezers. My sons would tell you I am a hoarder."
Dot: "No, it's not necessary."
Councillor Warmisham: "No I am not stockpiling and think those that do have been scared into it by certain media. If you do run out of loo paper there's always the Sun and the Daily Mail!"
David: "No"
Ali: "No"

4) On a scale of 1-10 how concerned are you about the virus spread in Salford or beyond?

Ali: "Not too concerned, it is what it is. I'd say 3/10."
Tom: "High possibility...Not seen them but high footfall places like precincts and supermarkets should have hand sanitiser stations same as hospitals. Also on public transport. Not worrying just for me, it's all the other older, less fit than me who could catch it."
Roy: "10"
Dot: "5 - It will come into Salford as it is already in the surrounding area."
David:  "4 - We had worse cases than this with all the slums in Salford with TB, Polio and smokers cough (smog in the 50s). I was more worried about getting Polio. Why should I worry about it? Boris Johnson isn't, it seems to me. Other countries have stopped football matches and gatherings, we don't seem to be doing anything."
Val: "Perhaps 5."
Councillor Warmisham: "Nobody knows for sure if it will spread across certain parts of the UK, there is every likelihood though, so I'd probably say 7/10."
John: "On a scale of 1-10 l am concerned about the coronavirus in Salford and around the UK and then the world by a ratio of about 6..."


5)  Anything else you would like to add?

Roy: "You just need to do whatever you can to avoid it."

Val: "I would like to have people washing their hands as they enter Boddan Lodge, but know I would be told I am too fussy..."

John: "l think that there are a number of issues that can and are being buried as a result of the so-called epidemic...We have seen it before when the economy has started to slide that we have some kind of crisis; war, terrorist act etc. We have also to consider the effects of Brexit which can and has caused all kinds of panic..."

Dot: "What can I do about it? Just be sensible."

David: "I hope it gets eradicated, I don't worry about getting it."

Ali: "I think the lifestyle that people lead makes them more susceptible to contracting the virus. I have a pretty routine lifestyle that I adhere to on a daily basis and would think that the chances of me catching COVID-19 are very limited indeed. It doesn't mean to say that I am blasè and irresponsible as to the dangers of contacting it, I just consider myself to be realistic and level-headed, and will leave all the hysterical, over-the-top reactions to others."

Councillor Warmisham: "People should continue to go about their daily lives as normal. Follow the advice of public health and listen/read/watch reputable media to get the latest information."

Tom: "What's alarming is how many older folks are dying...it's like, no-one gives a toss if gramps kicks the bucket..."


Please feel free to put your own thoughts in the comments box...


This is Part 2 of a two part article – read Part 1 – No Salford Leadership On Coronavirus – click here

wrote
at 13:10:38 on 16 March 2020
wrote 6 20 sorry for calling you a crackpot i meant to say you are an ignorant dogmatic and you are the type of person who would squeal like a pig along the lines of they cant do that to me i pay my taxes the debate was simple MONEY WOULD BE BETTER SPENT ON SAVING LIVES AND EVEN POSSIBLY SAVING YOUR LITTLE SELF THAN SPENDING MONEY ON WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION NOTHING WAS WROTE TO SUGGEST WE CANT STOP VIRUSES BUT THE POINT WAS WE WOULD HAVE MORE MONEY TO SPEND ON SAVING LIVES AND MAKING AND BUILDING FACILITIES LIKE HOSPITALS AND NOT RATIONING CARE OR WHO MAY LIVE AND WHO MAY DIE TIMES THEY ARE A CHANGING ITS TIME TO DEBATE AND PETULENTS LIKE YOU 6 20 WONT BE ABLE TO HANDLE MATURE DEBATE .ARE YOU ALAN PARTRIDGE OFF RADIO NORWICH BY THE WAY .
?
wrote
at 06:20:41 on 16 March 2020
I disagree, I don't think you got the point... no amount of money will stop these types of things from coming into being. You won't stop the next one either, you can only prepare. Though for what is pure guess work, as you can't prepare for every eventuality. However preparing still won't stop people from getting ill and dieing, it may help but it won't stop it. Furthermore, the way you debate is ridiculous. I'm a "crackpot" for having a different view from you? You don't even know if I support having Nuclear weapons or not, you just assumed. Even if I did support Nuclear weapons/power, calling someone a "Crackpot" is not an argument. I see this type of 'argument' on here and elsewhere in the world quite a lot, "You don't believe what I believe so you're a moron!" Things are not that straightforward and black and white in life. Sadly though, I don't think anything I'v said will make a difference to you, so I won't waste my time anymore.
?
wrote
at 17:32:30 on 14 March 2020
wrote 16 . 39 dont think you got the point did you it will only impact on people like you when you or your loved ones are left to rot without care for lack of money and that little slice could be the difrence between life and death we cant stop this virus but we can stop the next if we put money into research and science the virus isnt the problem its crackpots like you cheer yourselves up nuclear war supporters watch dr strangelove or how i stopped worrying and learned to love the bomb .
?
paul kelly wrote
at 13:03:29 on 14 March 2020
whats been the benefits of spending since the 1950s spendingtrillions of pounds on nuclear weapons just to pretend you are an empire nuclear weapons have not been used or can be used even the maniacs who have them know that last centuries mindset as got to change it must be increasingly obvious that the threats we face are climate change and this current on the way covid 19 epedemic and when a vaccine is found we would be better spending money on research to stop the spread of future viruses the next one could have the potential to lead to death on the proportion of the black death i believe we are on notice stop spending money on useless nuclear weapons and spend the money on saving the planet and humanity . in the last few years the tories have destroyed the capability to look after sick people by the closing of many hospitals all over the country in salford ladywell /a hospital that specialised in caring for the elderly /salford royal the bridgewater pendlebury childrens hospital /the northern / and the jewish hospitals and if this virus gets a serious infection rate in the community many will suffer the consequences in italy there are now field hospitals treating the elderly and one of indolent boris johnsons aids announced that people deemed not likely to survive this virus should be left to die because through tory cuts the nhs cant cope . CND are quite right the money wasted on nuclear weapons must be spent on education schools nurses and HOSPITALS because we most definately need them and we certainly dont need nuclear fission or fusion and for the proponents of nuclear weapons if you become ill or your loved ones do and you are told we have no resources /money to look after you but we do have a non independent nuclear capability maintained by the americans and under the control of president trump the penny might drop maybe them mad hippies were right about getting rid of nuclear weapons sorry no intention to slur the mad or hippies time for change priorities need to be looked at and sharpish best wishes to all salfordians take care look after each other .
?
wrote
at 05:49:00 on 14 March 2020
@ Wrote 16:39 - As stated, the money wouldn’t stop the emergence or spread, it’d just help the NHS prepare, people will still get infected and die at the same rate. So scrapping the Nukes wouldn’t have made much difference. In addition, the amount of times CNDs have said where the money should be spent (Social Care, Social Housing, Schooling, Free Uni etc) would leave even less money to go around. So in reality you would not have the full £200bn +, but rather a slice of it that still wouldn’t stop the spread and deaths caused by it.
?
wrote
at 16:39:13 on 13 March 2020
yes so there you go it could have been spent on the NHS AND IT WOULD BE BETTER SPENT ON BUTTER NOT GUNS .so think on when treatment is rationed that your nuclear weapons which are not independent america control the launch codes the money wasted on weapons of destruction should be spent on progressive science rather than distructive science i do hope wrote 07. 06 that you or anybody you know is not left to die for lack of resources to look after you .perhaps you should look up the word irony .
?
wrote
at 07:06:55 on 13 March 2020
@ Paul Kelly - £200bn wouldn’t have stopped the virus from coming into being and wouldn’t stop it’s spread or spare the people who are too old or sick from dieing. It would probably prop the NHS up nicely which would enable it to be better prepared, but people would still die and the virus would spread. Also, even if we’d gotten rid of the IND the money would’ve already been allocated elsewhere.
?
paul kelly wrote
at 14:53:30 on 12 March 2020
dont worry we have our independent nuclear trident submarines to protect us only costs upwards of 200 billion pounds wonder where that money could have been better spent .
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx