HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD RESIDENT ISSUES PLEA ON THE CITY’S DISAPPEARING TREES
 

Star date: 10th May 2019

TREES BEING CHOPPED DOWN FOR NEW BUILDS

A Concerned Salford Resident has issued a plea to Salford City Council to protect more trees in the city, highlighting areas around St Philips Church, off Chapel Street, and around Canon Green Court, M3, in particular.

"I can say, as someone who has suffered with mental health issues most of my life, how much of a lifeline the local trees are to my personal wellbeing and the good they do for us all in this area in so many ways" he writes.

Full details here...


Salford trees
click image to enlarge

Below we reprint a letter to Salford City Council from a Concerned Resident on the fate of the city's fast disappearing trees. He would like everyone to read it and respond...

"I live in Trinity, Salford M3, and have done for 13 years. I am really concerned about the old trees in the area that are being chopped down to make way for new builds...I can say, as someone who has suffered with mental health issues most of my life (mainly depression), how much of a lifeline the local trees are to my personal wellbeing and the good they do for us all in this area in so many ways.

I'll always remember the time I went to the Civic Centre in Swinton to register to vote and fell in love with the city even more because of the inscription on the wall in the main reception waiting area that says "60% Green Space, 18 sq miles of countryside and parks, 6 waterways, 30 miles of rivers and canals, 112 ponds and lakes, 14 waterway bridges, Britain's largest inland waterway, a world class arts and theatre complex attracting over 1,000,000 visitors a year, a history stretching back to 923 AD"… and so on. That always remained in my heart as the core of a city I am proud to call home.

The two most recent sites where old trees were chopped down is adjacent to a new open car park opposite St. Philips Church. I counted the rings on the stumps that remain and they were all 25 years old. It cut like a knife to see they had been removed and I can't see why? It's just an open car park that's been created from the brownfield land behind them. There was no consultation beforehand either; I'm not sure if there's supposed to be or not? They didn't seem to be obstructing (unless a survey has deemed so). They were the same type of tree the massive sculpture beside the Church was created in honour of.

The other site was on Blackfriars Road opposite the Renault garage. That removal of the tall trees there to me was criminal. Any trees that are so close to the city that act as the first line of defence should be preserved and protected really due to the massive ecological benefits. The skinny young trees you see planted take so long to grow and unfortunately most get vandalised before they establish.

There is another site next to the Old Victoria Theatre opposite Mocha. I am really worried about as it looks like prime real estate for developers. I went along to take some photographs and enjoy the space last week and it really is a special place that could even be utilised by the local schools to have outdoor forest/woodland/nature lessons.

I have tried to have a look at upcoming works on the council website but they're not very lay person friendly and after the fact information.I also contacted a tree group and they provided the following information:

'Trees, especially large canopy trees are very important in an urban context because they provide so many benefits. In particular their visual amenity is very important from a mental health perspective as they are proven to have a calming effect on people. Trees also where located next to busy roads help to reduce or disperse the amount of pollution reaching communities that are situated behind and around them. They can also help to shield the source of noise pollution which can help to reduce stress levels for adjacent residents.

'Trees are also very important from a climate change resilience perspective. They are instrumental in helping to reduce our vulnerability to heat waves (especially for children and older people) as they cool the air by shading and evapo-transpiration. They also intercept rain water on their leaves and branches and allow more water to infiltrate into the ground below them by virtue of the increased permeability created by their root system. This is very important from a surface water flooding perspective, as this can help to reduce the likelihood of flash flooding following a heavy rainfall event and may also help to reduce pollution into adjacent water courses by reducing the amount of rain watering the combined sewer system.'

As there is so much focus on climate change (which we see first-hand with all the local flooding) and how important trees are, not only to us but the delicate insect and wildlife communities that also call Salford home. It's our duty to protect them too as they don't have a voice, and protecting the trees and green spaces that are already here is even more important. The amount of wildlife in this area is testament to them all.

I guess what I am asking for is awareness of upcoming builds/works in this immediate area, assurances to consult the public and make it clear to all constituents, well in advance, of any existing green spaces that are being considered for new builds or the like. So we have our say in protecting our forest city.

I dread to see any more trees going for the sake of money and us all regretting it in the future when we have a chance now, with all the information that's available to us, to avoid that for our future generations and local wildlife.

Are you able to help?

Kindest regards,

Concerned Resident X


Martha John-Rose wrote
at 16:57:01 on 28 July 2020
I believe 17 mature healthy trees are to be cut down in the 3 Sisters green space at the back Ellesemere Park in September 2020, and wondered if anyone is aware of this too?
?
Tracy Holroyd wrote
at 10:44:45 on 29 May 2019
I also drew the Salford Star's attention to the felling of trees on Poets' Estate, Swinton during nesting season. It is illegal to do this, but Salix Homes went ahead on the word of their 'expert' tree fellers. Nesting birds are protected by the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. However, as always with so-called protection laws, there is a clause giving tree fellers a 'get-out'. Discussing my anger at this with a tree feller who happens to be a friend, he told me that property developers would always win, because they are the ones who have the money. Two days later, I heard that he had been working on a tree in which he found an active nest. When he stopped work to inform his boss of this, he was asked: "Can't you work around it?" He refused, but I have no doubt that the company involved found someone unscrupulous enough to do what he would not. Property developers won't wait until the autumn. Today, a beautiful blossom tree is being massacred on Beech Farm Estate (rear of Shakespeare Road). These companies are liars - no less. We know they are lying. They know they are lying. Even worse, they no longer even try to cover up that they are lying. It seems that lying has become an acceptable pastime in today's world.
?
jon wrote
at 10:44:23 on 29 May 2019
Tracy Holroyd, My friend is the senior Arboriculturalist to the Queen, with responsibility for all the trees in the Royal Parks. He has spent many years studying for a doctorate in forestry, ecology and conservation. I would take his word over someone that is a landscape architect, basically a garden designer. I have spoken to him about the example you mention. If the tree died after pollarding, it must have been diseased, or in a poor condition and should have been removed in any case to protect the other nearby trees. Pollarding INCREASES the lifespan of a healthy tree. There is so much misinformation spoken about trees and their protection, especially by those that have little or no knowledge at all. Those that rely on emotion rather than facts are often responsible for damaging decisions being made regarding the environment. As an environmental activist myself, I wish people would educate themselves before having knee jerk reactions to tree removal/maintenance. It does our cause no good if decisions are made from a place of ignorance.
?
Tracy Holroyd wrote
at 09:39:27 on 28 May 2019
Rossi, many years ago, we raised concerns about two trees on Beech Farm playing fields Swinton that were due for pollarding. A chap who was a landscape architect for another Greater Manchester council told me that some types of tree did not fare well after undergoing pollarding. Together we raised objections with our Residents' Association, informing members that there was only a 50% survival rate for the trees in this instance. We were told that the 'experts' involved knew best. No one wished to acknowledge the expert status of the resident making an objection. Two trees were eventually pollarded, and one died, as predicted by my friend. The trees in question were over 40 years old. As a little girl, I saw them planted. As an adult, I saw them massacred with the blessing of Salford City Council.
?
jon wrote
at 10:42:00 on 22 May 2019
ROSSI, what you are describing is Pollarding, it has been done for centuries. Far from damaging a tree it is in fact very beneficial for a tree and for the environment. It keeps a tree juvenile, which is when it is most productive at reducing CO2. Pollarding tends to make trees live longer by maintaining them in a partially juvenile state and by reducing the weight and possible wind damage of the top part of the tree. Arboriculturalists do know what they are doing, far more than keyboard warriors.
?
ROSSI wrote
at 20:54:54 on 21 May 2019
I've just gone down Wallness Road to get through the University. The tree surgeons (or should I say the Arboreal Serial Killers) were out en masse, with their chainsaws, mutilating nature's largest plants. Why they do it I have no idea, but it does look awful. A long line of branchless and leafless trees stretched out, their limbs sawed off, what was once beautiful and alive, now looking dead. I was reminded of the line of crucified rebel slaves that stretched along both sides of the Appian Way and led to the Gates of Rome. Truly, what Our Betters do is horrific. Joni Mitchell was right, they do pave Paradise and put up a parking lot.
?
Former Resident wrote
at 21:09:29 on 13 May 2019
In response to Em3, I can only say this. The cutting down of the trees at Canon Green had nothing to do with greedy rich developers, or the lack of money councils have due to the Tory government. There were no chainsaws in the middle of the night or on a bank holiday. It was all done properly by Salix, who applied to the council as part of their plans for permission to do so, and the council like the morons they are, agreed they could do it. All part of the greater socialist good, building homes not for the poor, but for the better off. But if thats what people want,well, who am I to stand in their way? Rossi makes a good point about all the old Iron curtain countries, I remember seeing what he mentions years ago on my travels to Romania, Bulgaria, and poland. All shitholes, but the booze was dirt cheap though. Drunk as a skunk for less than a quid.There again,a lot of the lads I know would probably like that, drunk each day for a quid, and the housing standards are only just above shithole grade.we are nearly there.
?
Em3 wrote
at 09:04:59 on 13 May 2019
Concerned resident I agree with you. Suggest you ask your councillor/MP or you get Tree Protection Orders. Council budgets have been cut so much by this government for the few - that rich developers are free to do what they wish.
?
Lynne Meakin wrote
at 18:43:18 on 11 May 2019
The council chop down tree on the flimsiest of excuses. . Trees should be valued for all the benefits they give us. Trees help to reduce global warming .
?
Resident Encombe Place wrote
at 13:43:53 on 11 May 2019
Couldn’t agree more, it’s criminal. Our view is now terrible onto the car park by St Philips church. Used to be beautiful and prevented loads of sound pollution from the road. There should definitely be consultation for such old and important trees.
?
former resident wrote
at 10:28:14 on 11 May 2019
Concerned Resident X.I also share your views. It is sad to see our environment destroyed, and for what?Who benefits. The lives of the people who live in an area are not improved in any way, the opposite in fact.All so we can crowed even more people into ever overcrowded places. I tried and failed to get opposition going to the development and removal of trees at Canon Green but got nowhere. I gave up, and I moved. I guess that I also was getting a bit depressed by this destruction,but depression is one thing a lot of us do not like to admit to ourselves, so we keep it hidden, sometimes with tragic results.
?
ROSSI wrote
at 10:27:45 on 11 May 2019
I don't want to crow, but as I've said many times in my comments, this is what Salford Labour Council do. They kill trees. It seems to be a bizarre obsession of these lefty muppets. Killing trees seems to be their version of the blue blooded toff types enjoying their blood sports. I suspect that in their warped and bankrupt way of thinking, they have fantasies of making Salford look like one of those drab, treeless hell holes that you'd get in Eastern Europe during the bad old days of the Iron Curtain and the USSR. Nary a tree in sight, just boring high rise apartment buildings everywhere you go. Shame on them. Shame on Salford Labour! Shame on these Quislings! They ARE a DISGRACE!!!!!
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx