HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD CITY COUNCIL ADMITS LACK OF TRANSPARENCY OVER COMMUNITY FOREST GARDEN SALE
 

Star date: 18th April 2019

COUNCIL ADMITS LACK OF OPENNESS OVER URBAN SPLASH LAND SALE – AS SALFORD STAR CALLS FOR RESIGNATIONS

"You just don't reach out and listen to the people" Councillor Stephen Ord

Last night, at a Scrutiny Panel 'call-in', both Salford Council Strategic Director, Ben Dolan, and Deputy Mayor, Councillor Paula Boshell, admitted a lack of openness and transparency over the decision to sell the Community Forest Garden site to Urban Splash.

As the call-in was successful, a full consultation was promised and the decision was referred back to Salford City Mayor Paul Dennett, the Salford Star called for resignations, with councillors arguing that a lack of openness is endemic throughout Salford Council.

Full details here...


Salford Council Public Check List on Urban Splash Sale Salford Council Public Check List on Urban Splash Sale Salford Community Forest Garden In Its Prime
Salford Community Forest Garden Now
click image to enlarge

Salford City Council and its ruling Labour Party faced more criticism last night at its Growth and Prosperity Scrutiny Panel over its total lack of openness and transparency.

Three Labour Party councillors - John Warmisham, Stephen Coen and Richard Critchley - had 'called in' a decision to sell land covering the Blackfriars Community Forest Garden site at East Philip Street to developer Urban Splash for £250,000. The original report on the sale, posted on the Council website as a Part 2 (kept from the public) paper, had given no details at all – just a Public Interest Check List justifying its secrecy.

Amongst 14 questions on the Check List, officers had decided that disclosure of any information would 'damage the Council's interests'; that disclosure wouldn't 'help people to understand and participate in public debate'; that disclosure wouldn't 'allow individuals and companies to understand decisions made by the Council that have affected their lives'; and that disclosure wouldn't 'reveal incompetent, illegal or unethical decision making or examples of malpractice'...

Last night, as Ben Dolan, Salford Council's Strategic Director for Environment and Community Safety, and Councillor Paula Boshell, the Deputy Mayor who signed the decision, admitted and apologised for a lack of openness, transparency and consultation in relation to the Forest Garden sale, it was clear that disclosure would have revealed 'incompetent' and 'unethical' decision making, at the very least...

"Ultimately, in terms of procedures, that's my responsibility, I haven't done that and I apologise to councillors for that; it's an error" Ben Dolan told the Panel and public.

"Clearly consultation should have  taken place and it hasn't" added Paula Boshell "So my suggestion is now that this is put on hold while consultation does take place...Regarding openness, we take that very seriously about what should be Part 2 and what shouldn't, and we'll take that back again and look at that very seriously as well."

The only reason this land sale to Urban Splash came to light is that councillors had called in the decision. After seeing the secret report on the sale they had concluded that "The site's current use, history, community involvement, intended legacy and financial investment by Salford City Council was not identified by the officer dealing with this site"...that "None of the relevant background information was contained within the officer's report"; and that "Without councillor involvement, or that of those who designed, built and help to maintain this site, it cannot be considered that the decision was open."

The call-in guaranteed that the report on the land sale was put into the public domain and it showed that the land was earmarked for 'proposals from Urban Splash' as part of an original Development Agreement dating back almost 15 years! And that the sale price had been reduced from £350,000 to £250,000 due to flood risk difficulties in developing houses on the site, which could house a high rise tower in the future. *

The three councillors spoke at the Scrutiny Panel meeting, Richard Critchley arguing that the report "shouldn't have been confidential", adding that there was no consultation, that no alternative options for the site were proposed, that it was contrary to the Council's green space strategy and that "the entire decision was based on an agreement in 2005". He explained that there were one hundred varieties of trees on the land that were in blossom and could provide fruit for the community.

Councillor Cohen emphasised the "poor communication" in relation to the sale, while Councillor Warmisham railed against a possible "concrete jungle" being created in the area.

From the public gallery, a local business owner said that he had tried to buy the land to save it but had been "stonewalled" by officers and not even notified of the Urban Splash sale: and local resident Diane Wilson, explained that the process of bringing the Forest Garden back into use would be an ideal project to bring the diverse local community together.

Meanwhile councillors on the Panel laid into the general lack of transparency at Salford City Council, saying that this was not an isolated incident...

"What concerns me most is the openness; the fact that ward councillors were not consulted" explained Conservative Councillor Robin Garrido "I'm afraid that this is happening throughout the city...ward councillors are not being consulted. This is just one example of this situation and there are many other examples."

Conservative Councillor Iain Lindley said he felt a sense of "déjà vu"..."This isn't the first call in on a land sale that I've sat through" he said "I am pleased that we're discussing this in Part 1 and that the report is there for the public who want to see it, because when I called in the sale of the playing fields at St Georges I had to sign a confidentiality agreement before I'd even entered the room and was given the papers. I still can't say anything about it other than the call in was denied."

Labour Councillor Stephen Ord slammed the whole "Fifteen year fiasco" in relation to the site... "You originally did the deal with Urban Splash and didn't consult the community; you did the deal with Biospheric and you didn't consult the community; you cut all the trees down and you didn't consult the community and you've done a land deal with Urban Splash and didn't consult the community...

"Until you improve process this Council is stuck in second gear because you just don't reach out and listen to the people" he concluded.

Addressing the Panel, the Salford Star Editor officially called for resignations, saying he was "disgusted at what has happened...

"We see land sales all the time that are confidential, confidential, confidential, there's no details at all" he added "This has only come to light because the councillors called it in. You should not just apologise but resign because this is absolutely shocking..."

The decision was officially 'referred back to the City Mayor for further consideration' by the Scrutiny Panel.


*For a full background see previous Salford Star articles...

Salford City Council Secret Urban Splash Land Deal Revealed – click here

Community Forest Garden Sold By Salford Council - click here

Rossi wrote
at 19:24:05 on 22 April 2019
Yes Wrote, you're right, I don't know Ray Walker very well. Fact is I've only met him a couple of times several years ago when I required Miss Becky's help, and he did the business, languidly I suppose, as her Case Worker. I had no idea that he is standing for election as Councillor. What I would say is that he came over as being an affable man, and was very down to earth. Standing for Labour, it's obvious that he will get in. Whether or not he would make a better Councillor than Joe or Mary, I have no idea. The thing is, he's part of a machine. Part of a big and corrosive machine that has spent decades mismanaging this City. I doubt if Ray will be any different from the other Quislings of Salford Labour. More of the same I suppose. Now whether future Councillor Walker is OUR beloved fellow commenter, Rayofsunshine, I don't know. I suspect that he could well be, but Rayofsunshine is semi literate at best, and to be honest with you, I would expect more from Walker, A Grade O'Level in English at the very least.
?
wrote
at 08:47:33 on 22 April 2019
Rossi you obviously don’t know ray Walker very well! The ray walker I know wouldn’t have the energy or enthusiasm to post on here, let alone run an election campaign! Sorry, he’s running for election but no one has seen him in our ward!! Sad fact is he will get elected even though he has done nothing nor will do anything for our ward.
?
Rossi wrote
at 18:27:05 on 21 April 2019
Me-thinks that this is a case of "the Lady doth protest too much" Ray. I have my suspicions, and that's all I'm gonna say.
?
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 12:38:24 on 21 April 2019
Rossi,can you get it through your thick head;I'm NOT Ray Walker! Rather than stressing yourself about my identity you should address your many faults - obnoxious views and your insatiable appetite to ingratiate yourself up other people's back passages !
?
Rossi wrote
at 12:38:18 on 21 April 2019
Rayofsunshine, At least Joe tries. At least he's willing to put his head above the parapet. Unlike some that I could mention. Namely the little Yezhov Salford Labour Party apparatchik whose toadying and servile dedication to a bankrupt cause is known to all of us who read the Star's comments page. That person's slavish dedication to a long lost cause, and his zeal for defending the indifensible, is taking "Him" into the realm of unintentional comedic legend - think Comical Ali, the Iraqi Propaganda Minister from the 2nd Gulf War ...That person is you, Ray. At least Joe and Mary try to do things, and with sincerity, while you simply do an impression of a pissed up parrot, constantly parroting the same lying crap. You could be Father Jack from Craggy Island, you sound that off the wall.
?
Mary Ferrer wrote
at 12:38:07 on 21 April 2019
Where in any of my comments did I say councillors shouldn't sit on the planning panels. What I did say was we need an outside body to investigate these claims regarding planning.
?
Bob the regular wrote
at 16:12:37 on 20 April 2019
Would it perhaps been a good idea to get one of these derelict land grants and turn this bit of land into a little park, bit like that on on St Stephens street? A little bit of somewhere for the old people to sit out in in summer,a bit of a play area for the little kids.Are these things the sort of things councils are supposed to do?They can even get the developers to chip in a bit for these things can't they?Pay no attention to me ,I am just bonkers.
?
Harry Kemp wrote
at 16:12:25 on 20 April 2019
It's a proven medical fact that open green spaces are good for mental and physical well being . Get these clowns voted out in May . Vote for Independents . At least they care .
?
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 16:11:54 on 20 April 2019
Joe,we'll see how lippy you are in two weeks time when you are humiliated at the polls, yet again!
?
Rossi wrote
at 16:11:46 on 20 April 2019
If what you say about Mary and Joe is true, Ray, then how do you know this, are you little Miss Becky's Walker? If you Are, all that I can say is you're an affable fellow, but pants at your day job. Now if you're not the lethargic Walker, then how do you know so much about Mary and Joe? I've got my suspicions about you Sunshine, and even if I'm wrong and you're not zimmer-framing your languid way around Miss's casework, doing that walker thing that you do, then as far as I'm concerned, just by being Salford Labour, you're still a Quisling just like all the rest.
?
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 16:11:13 on 20 April 2019
Mary,why do you want to exclude democratically elected councillors from making planning decisions? Could it be because you know in your heart of hearts that you'll never be elected in Salford? The "Independent Body" you are calling for would allow unaccountable cranks,such as yourself,to subvert local democracy!
?
a. s. bibby wrote
at 15:16:37 on 19 April 2019
People love green spaces in the place they live, lack of consultation is not on. People will have a chance to get their own back at the local elections in May, voting for candidates who are open.
?
Alice wrote
at 15:16:15 on 19 April 2019
Some Councillors don’t seem to understand that they are paid by Salford residents to lister to their views and report back on the decisions. Is this because they don’t understand or because they are manipulated by some devious members. They should be ashamed of this ignorant sly behaviour. They do not act as genuine Labour members and will lose support at local elections. Jeremy Corbyn emphasised the importance of transparency. Who is dictating to them because transparency isn’t in their books.
?
Joe O'Neill wrote
at 15:16:07 on 19 April 2019
Ray when you grow a pair of balls sit in front of me and raise your comments. or do you prefer to hide behind your computer screen and think of fresh insults. Don't you realise people understand your a spineless knob, gutless and feared to put a name to your constant bullshit. Steve prints your crap why I have no idea but I work and have little time to answer this shite. So I ask again put a name to your comments be brave perhaps and address also.
?
Mary Ferrer wrote
at 15:15:51 on 19 April 2019
I hope an Independent body is brought in to check what has/is going on within the planning department and the people who sit on the panel.We should also have an Independent audit to see what is actually happening within the council. As for your comments Ray, can't you do any better,you are slipping
?
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 09:41:10 on 19 April 2019
Mary,the said fact of the matter is that when you were a "comatose councillor" you were asleep at the wheel. Alongside chinless wonder,Joe O'Neil,most of the time you didn't have a clue over what was going on!
?
Mary Ferrer wrote
at 17:14:33 on 18 April 2019
Open & TRANSPARENT, they don't even tell the ward councillors what is happening in their ward. If they can't tell their own councillors what bloody chance have the residents got. This is what happens when there is no opposition had their own way for far too long. I wonder what else has been rubber stamped over the years. There appears to be a lot of very shady dealings going on within the planning group.
?
wrote
at 12:06:02 on 18 April 2019
Councils and the government are run by mandarins not the politicians. Have you ever watched ‘Yes Minister’? If not you should. You cannot kick out the council. It’s just basic facts that you all keep getting wrong. What should happen is the politicians should hold the council officials to account (which has happened in this case), and then if the politicians don’t hold the officers to account then it’s up to the voting public to kick the politicians out at election time. Sadly the cabinet of politicians who make the final decision put too much trust in officers and not enough trust in their own backbenchers and then stupid decisions are made such as this one. I would quite happily vote for councillors Warmisham, Critchley and Cohen for sticking up for local residents and calling in this disgraceful decision. No doubt they will have lost many brownie points for doing this and we need more of this happening across Salford. As for building a school and doctors surgery on the site, you obviously haven’t seen it, it would probably fit about 20 sheds on it, it’s tiny, which is why selling it for housing is wrong...it would have to be high rise, adding to the multitude of high rises in the area.
?
Graham Jarvis wrote
at 09:31:07 on 18 April 2019
This council should be kicked out at the next local elections as they will sell all our green belt land and on the old eton factory site they are building new homes but they have never thoght were are they going to put children into school as there will be lack of places they should have put a school and doctors surgery on the site
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx