| |
ANDY BURNHAM’S ‘A BED EVERY NIGHT’ AND SALFORD COUNCIL ‘SETTING US UP TO FAIL’ STATE ECCLES HOMELESS
|
|
Star date: 11th February 2019 HOMELESS HEADING BACK TO THE STREETS STATES ECCLES SAVING PEOPLE SHELTER IN OPEN LETTER TO SALFORD CITY COUNCIL AND ANDY BURNHAM An emotional open letter to GM Mayor Andy Burnham and Salford City Council by residents of the Eccles Saving People Shelter and supporters, accuses the authorities of 'setting us up to fail'. "We have had nobody return to the streets from the Shelter and that, unfortunately, cannot be said for the 'A bed every night' scheme" the letter states, as it documents the experiences of Shelter residents who have been "offered unsuitable accommodation or no accommodation at all". The letter also accuses Salford Council and NHS Property Services of 'misrepresenting' residents in dealings with the press. To read the full heartfelt letter click here...
|
|
Dear Salford City Council Homeless Team and Andy Burnham's 'A Bed Every Night'... We would like to start by thanking you for the work and services that you provide. We realise the hard work and dedication that your staff and volunteers put into keeping the services running. We feel that with the latest press releases from the NHS and Salford City Council and the conversations between ourselves and Salford City Council's rough sleepers team we are being misunderstood and misrepresented. We are grateful for every offer of accommodation, however the accommodations we are being offered only runs at the present time until 31st March 2019, and we feel that when releasing information to the press that this needs to be documented too. Some of us have turned down offers of accommodation due to it being for a few nights with no indication or explanation of where we will go after the few nights offered. As we hope you can appreciate, this is daunting and we are anxious and unnerved by the unknown of what will happen next. Some of us have turned down two nights in a bed and breakfast as we were given a bus pass and a fast food voucher and sent on our own to find a bed and breakfast on the other side of Greater Manchester. Again, we were also unaware of what would happen in the nights that followed the two nights offered. Some of us have accepted placements in the Narrowgate night shelter but due to alcohol issues we have lost our place. Before we were sent there we explained to you fully that we were alcohol dependent but one of the rules at the Narrowgate is that no resident must be intoxicated when coming onto the premises and no alcohol on the premises. We were not offered any alcohol support and not medicated to be able to stop drinking. The punishment for us was that we must go back onto the streets for seven days. At times you have discussed some of our peer's situations with us without their permission. We feel that you do not understand fully the extent of some of our issues and we feel that we are the lost people. Here at Eccles Shelter we have built a home, a community and we feel safe. We think community working is the way forwards to genuinely help and support homeless people. Some of us work full time, some of us go to training courses, some of us are actively seeking work, some of us have health issues, some of us were presented at the homeless team by social services the mornings of our eighteenth birthdays, some of us are fleeing domestic violence, but all of us are human beings. We once had happy settled homes. Homelessness is not a choice, it's a situation that is now an epidemic. Any of us who have been housed, or are due to move on, it is us that have done the hard work and referrals to make this happen. We have had nobody return to the streets from the Shelter and that unfortunately cannot be said for the 'A bed every night' scheme. Some of us have been given date after date to move into accommodation until the 31st of March and ten weeks down the line are still waiting. All of us have been for housing assessments and some of us have been more than once. We who remain at the Shelter have been offered unsuitable accommodation or no accommodation at all. When you have walked the streets all night long as you're too afraid to sleep...when you have been that cold that it physically hurt to breathe...when, no matter how many warm coats or sleeping bags you have, the cold is imprinted not only into your flesh but into your soul, this Shelter is heaven. We are not ungrateful, we are not too settled here, we are not refusing help and support - we are afraid of the unknown and being back on the lonely cold streets. We need the help and support to be more than until the 31st March; we need change, real wholehearted change. We are not looking for charity or sympathy, we are looking for opportunity. The opportunity to have a choice about our futures and the opportunity to lead our lives in a way that we choose to. We feel that we are being given hope and it's snatched away in moments. Why, when we are being offered accommodation, does it come with a list of stipulations that seem to us to be setting us up to fail? Why will there be visitors' bans? Why will there be random spot checks to make sure we are home? And why do we keep being threatened with the fact that it can easily be taken away? All we want is our right to appropriate housing and our human rights. Love and light The residents of Eccles Shelter, Angela Barratt and Jannah Speat xxx
*The Eccles Saving People Shelter has been open since November and has taken in around 15 residents at a time from the streets. After a court case, the Shelter was due to be evicted last week but a judge ordered a 'stay' while an appeal against the decision is lodged. For full background click here and follow the links
|
|
|
|
Stuart Potts wrote
at 12:24:32 on 24 February 2019 |
|
|
| We don't want a building for nothing and not to pay our way in society we have offered them rent the people that are in the building and are working are willing to pay some rent the people that are entitled to benefits can pay via housing benefit but they don't want it they'd rather leave it empty gaining no money at all which is complete madness. |
|
|
?
|
sonic wrote
at 07:07:32 on 23 February 2019 |
|
|
| Yes they were homeless before they became squatters
and dont for get any one can lose there job and then
the clock starts ticking and the debts start getting
deeper and deeper and they say here is a fone number
to help but all that does is stop interest going on now your payments that are 6 months old and you still cant pay them because you have lost your job and then you get evicted very quick these days as there is a shortage of houses so they pull the carpet under your feet as quick as that and then you are home less now whoes fault is that honda are closeing down 7 thousand jobs gone who fault is that how many will be come home less about 20 pre cent thats 1.400 people home less |
|
|
?
|
Rossi wrote
at 10:04:39 on 15 February 2019 |
|
|
| Rayofsunshine, You need smack if you live under a council as badly managed as Salford's is, by your Muppet friends in Salford Labour. Probably explains why so many citizens are alcoholics. |
|
|
?
|
ROSSI wrote
at 10:04:24 on 15 February 2019 |
|
|
| Rayofsunshine, if you had any heart, any soul, you'd actually feel ashamed of the things that your beloved council have done to this city. But you have neither of those attributes. You're like one of those eunuchs in an old biblical epic, wafting Ramases the Great with a big fan. You're nothing but a nodding dog. A parrot with a stutter. I'm ashamed of you. |
|
|
?
|
wrote
at 10:04:04 on 15 February 2019 |
|
|
| Ray/Bob /Rossi please go and find somewhere else to troll and indulge in your squabbling.
I really think the Salford Star shuld ban some people from commenting or at the very least limit them to a couple of comments a week.
Tedious |
|
|
?
|
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 10:25:18 on 14 February 2019 |
|
|
| What's up,Rossi - run out of smack?? |
|
|
?
|
Bob the regular wrote
at 05:54:08 on 14 February 2019 |
|
|
| This is why Ponzi schemes work. The housing market is one big ,state endorsed ponzi scheme, that unless you want to live in private rented which is worse because its even more expensive, or social housing which is worse because its lower quality housing, you have to join. The housing market has not made any section richer, other than private landlords. The middle class kids who want to live in the same areas as their parents have to pay a fortune to live there. Its all one big illusion. |
|
|
?
|
ROSSI wrote
at 05:53:12 on 14 February 2019 |
|
|
| You sound such a Muppet Rayofsunshine. You probably think that with your tit for tat comments that you're somehow entertaining. You're not. You're boring and come across as a complete local labour party stooge. You talk all of this Socialist nonsense, but you're an apparatchik,whatever your liege lords say, you parrot like a robot. |
|
|
?
|
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 15:01:34 on 13 February 2019 |
|
|
| Bob the regular,it is a historical fact that taking
the last fifty years into account,home ownership has
primarily benefited the Middle Class - in terms of tax payer subsidised capital gains! As to "talking bollocks",you've got past form,Bob the regular! |
|
|
?
|
Bob the regular wrote
at 05:47:10 on 13 February 2019 |
|
|
| Our Ray is back to talking bollocks again. saying that the housing market has been manipulated to benefit the middle class is like saying the first world war was created to enrich the upper class, which a lot of stupid socialists believe. A vast proportion of the wealth of the middle classes is sucked off into the illusory ether of the financial services industry with this so called housing ladder crap.Just wait till the whole bubble bursts. Thats why we have such strict planning laws, to stop the bubble bursting. its a bit like putting a coffer dam around king canute. one day it will burst over. |
|
|
?
|
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 05:46:47 on 13 February 2019 |
|
|
| Bob the règular,it'ĺl be workers,not layabouts,that'll force fundamental change in Britain! |
|
|
?
|
Bob the regular wrote
at 14:27:54 on 12 February 2019 |
|
|
| They say your political mind goes more right wing as you get older, but in my case I'm not so sure. Not so long ago,I would have called Rossi a lazy so and so for what he has just said about never having a job, but nowadays I can see his point. There are probably loads of good people who live near him on the precinct (I know a few) who go to work each day in shit low paid jobs. Their reward is to have to pay high rents for the shit housing and shit treatment they get from the council ,PT, Salix and the rest. They get no better thought of. I am fortunate, throughout my life, I have enjoyed my job and liked what I was doing, the money was good as well. Why should people have to work in shit low paid jobs. If more took Rossi's stance then the workers would have to be treated better. |
|
|
?
|
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 10:40:06 on 12 February 2019 |
|
|
| Further to Bob the regular's comments,housing in B ritain has been manipulated in order to benefit the Middle Class! Furthermore,successive governments have deĺiberately stoked property booms to create a
phoney feeling of "prosperity". |
|
|
?
|
Bob the regular wrote
at 06:16:03 on 12 February 2019 |
|
|
| DJB who says he has to work hard to live, cannot see that he has been brainwashed by the system to believe that. These unfortunate people who he appears to look down on are pawns in the game just to keep people like him in line. If he doesn't work hard to keep what he has, he will have no place to live, he will end up like them, the rulers have convinced him of that. Why do we have a shortage of housing, housing shortage for the very poor to the very rich, not enough housing for anybody, yet we still allow more and more people into our country? All this "housing ladder", "bank of mum and Dad", "Equity release" "upsizing", "downsizing" bullshit. The French don't have a housing problem, neither do the Germans or Italians. Go and see how much houses cost in France. We have a housing problem because all our politicians want one, it suits them all for different reasons. If you want houses, you need building trade workers, not bullshiters. Bullshiters like the council, city west, salix and the rest. All full of workers that get good money for doing sweet FA. Thats where all the cash goes. Come on people ,get your yellow high vis jackets on. |
|
|
?
|
ROSSI wrote
at 06:15:00 on 12 February 2019 |
|
|
| DJB, has empathy died in you? Listen I'm fifty and I've never had a job - do you think that I should starve? Go out and get a job or else, is that it? If it is, then it's shameful. You need to have some kind of conversion/re-animation, just like old Ebenezer in the last ten minutes of A Christmas Carol. |
|
|
?
|
Lis Sutcliffe wrote
at 06:14:35 on 12 February 2019 |
|
|
| We are all human beings, regardless of wealth,intelligence, career, illness including addiction. None of us shit ice cream! It should be a legal right to have a roof over our heads. Andy Burnham's promise of a bed for a night was disastrous and unplanned from the word go. The NHS have left this building unused without any interest. As soon as they here peoples lives are being saved they suddenly take an interest. Probably to sell off putting money in the government coffers. It wouldnt cost much to make this a HMO and save lives. People can then get help for any issues the may have. Denying people this is deplorable and a humanitarian crime. |
|
|
?
|
Bob the regular wrote
at 16:54:07 on 11 February 2019 |
|
|
| It seems to me that there is little understanding for the people with alcohol problems. Once upon a time ,Salford had an great team to help people with alcohol problems, at the crescent and then under the old courthouse in eccles. In their wisdom,to save money, Salford council merged the alcohol team with the drug team,in the mistaken belief that drug and alcohol problems are the same. In some ways they are, but in one major area they are not. Booze is perfectly legal, drugs are not. Also, with booze you cannot make the descision for people not to drink, that has to be by the people themselves, and its not easy if your homeless. You can kill an alcoholic by making them go cold turkey, but you cannot kill a heroin addict by doing the same. Salford has a big problem with the drink, one of the biggest in the country, but because drink is so popular here, nothing gets done about it. |
|
|
?
|
Dave wrote
at 16:53:40 on 11 February 2019 |
|
|
| So much for the caring health service. It looks like they do not give a shit about the building. If you look at the right hand side you can see a long standing ingression of water into the brickwork. Could be just blocked gutters, but it will cause a big problem if left unatended. |
|
|
?
|
DJB wrote
at 16:53:26 on 11 February 2019 |
|
|
| Sorry but anything to do with Burnham I want to fail and fail badly.
"We are not looking for charity" - But you are, I have to work hard to live you want a public building to live in for free, find a way to pay for what you want, pick up litter if nothing else.
|
|
|
?
|
Gareth L wrote
at 10:49:00 on 11 February 2019 |
|
|
| Someone at the Rugby yesterday made a black humour comment re the homeless and Andy Burnham. The suggestion was he was being truthful in his election pledges in getting homeless people off the streets. We just didn't realise it involved them dieing through him doing naff all or letting people kick them back on to the street. Still I don't suppose many homeless people vote. |
|
|
?
|
Kev wrote
at 10:48:55 on 11 February 2019 |
|
|
| Sorry, but they are squatters, pure and simple. |
|
|
?
|
|
|
|
|