HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
PEEL HOLDINGS TO GO FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OVER SALFORD HOUSING REFUSAL
 

Star date: 21st December 2018

PEEL STATES SECRETARY OF STATE'S DECISION OVER BROADOAK HOUSING IS 'UNLAWFUL'

Peel Holdings is to challenge the decision by the Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to dismiss its appeal against Salford City Council's refusal to allow up to 600 houses in the Broadoak area of the Worsley Greenway. Today, the company stated that the refusal was "unlawful and should be quashed".

Full details here...


Last month, James Brokenshire, the Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, dismissed Peel Holdings' appeal against Salford City Council's refusal to allow the company to build up to 600 houses, plus a further 165, in the Broadoak area of the Worsley Greenway.

He agreed with the Inspector that "the proposals would impact negatively on the character and appearance of the Greenway" (see here).

Today, however, Peel Holdings' subsid, Peel Investments, announced that it would be seeking a judicial review into the decision which it claims was "unlawful and should be quashed...

"Peel Investments (North) Limited will bring a claim for a statutory review of the decision by the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government to dismiss two appeals for new homes at Broadoak in Salford, Greater Manchester" stated the company.

"The central question will be whether the Secretary of State correctly interpreted national policy, particularly in respect of housing and the presumption in favour of sustainable development" it added "It is Peel's contention that the Secretary of State's errors render the decision unlawful and should be quashed."

Peel added, with sentiments that have met with scorn on social media, that "In our view, the decision brushed aside the genuine needs of families and people on affordable housing waiting lists. These are needs that are not going to be met in any other way. It cannot be right that Salford's housing supply is only about numbers and that it doesn't matter what gets built where or for whom."

"In those circumstances, where there is no alternative to meeting the real needs of people, national policy and housing needs must prevail over local policies that seek to restrict development" it stated "We think the Government has failed to correctly apply its own National Planning Policy Framework in this case."

On the RAID (Residents Against Inappropriate Developments) Facebook site one campaigner wrote: "No surprise there, they are like a dog with a bone, don't know when to let go. Affordable homes don't make me laugh, more like making loads of money and not giving a hoot about the local residents and the council. Boycott anything to do with Peel Holdings."

Which just about summed up Salford people's reactions...

DJB wrote
at 10:58:01 on 24 December 2018
More appropriate here is the infrastructure issues. What many are not embracing is that the RHS garden on the other side of Worsley roundabout will bring in 1,000,000+ visitors a year meaning the area will be incredibly busy all day (not just at peak times) so when you add possibly 500+ more cars from this and the development on Campbell Road you basically have the perfect storm for traffic chaos. It can already take 20 minutes to get to the M60 from Worsley Road opposite Bridgewater School so to add this many extra cars is just lunacy. While it is important to take into account the needs of people who require housing it can't be at the expense of the people who already live in the area and are basically already gridlocked in on a daily basis. The roundabout needs traffic control adding, junction 13 access anti clockwise needs increasing to 2 lanes and ideally direct access from the M60 to the A580 needs to be added.
?
Bob the regular wrote
at 07:46:03 on 23 December 2018
Love them or loath them, Peel do have an arguable point here. If there is a national policy in favour of sustainable development and national needs for housing, then it must be applied. What do they mean by sustainable though? As for the people who argue that it does not help people on housing waiting lists, I can see how their blinkered thinking helps them come to the views that they come to. For sure, on this development, nobody from the council housing list will be moved into these new 4/5 bed exec homes. But what happens if we built a million such houses? We would not have enough execs to put in them, so less well off people would have to move in, still not housing the ones on the waiting list. What we would then have is a surplus of housing, which would help the ones on the waiting list, because all the surplus houses can only make money if people live in them. In our city, nobody gives a shit when they build houses in labour voting areas, (apart from the other site in swinton) . What happens in cases like this is that the winner gets their costs paid. If Peel win ,let us hope it is the home office not the council that pick up the tab.
?
DJB wrote
at 08:58:06 on 22 December 2018
Peel will ultimately get what they want, when they held Eccles and Irlam to ransom last year it was obvious they use bully boy tactics and their substantial wealth to get what they wanted at any cost. If Peel don't get to build on Broadoak they will within the next 2/3 years get access to a much larger area of land to build on which they already have planning permission for, they get both then I'd guess they maybe knocking up 1500+ houses in the next 5 years.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx