HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD QUAYS DEVELOPER TO AVOID £1MILLION PAYMENT WHILE NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVIDED
 

Star date: 17th July 2018

FURNESS QUAY DEVELOPER PROVIDES NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON HUGE APARTMENT SCHEME

Salford's planning scandal is to go up another gear this week when an application by developer De Trafford for 421 apartments in blocks up to 27 storeys high on the site of Furness Quay is considered by councillors. Thanks to Salford City Council policies, the developer will be providing no affordable properties, while, through 'viability' assessments it is set to avoid over £1million in planning fees.

Meanwhile, the English Cities Fund (ECf) is continuing its secrecy in relation to new apartments and an office development around Chapel Street and New Bailey.

Full details here...


At this week's Salford Council planning panel, developers are set to, yet again, ride roughshod over the city's housing needs.

Developer De Trafford has submitted an application for 421 apartments in blocks up to 27 storeys high on the site of Navigation House on Furness Quay. In line with Salford Council's own 'SPD' policy, if 'high density' flats are built in a 'high value' area, no affordable housing is required.

This is confirmed by the officer's report going before councillors... "It is noted that the site falls within a high value area as defined by the Planning Obligations SPD" they write "However, given that the development is over six storeys it is deemed to be high density and in accordance with the SPD there is no requirement for high density apartment schemes to provide for affordable housing on the basis of viability..."

The officer does note, however, that the "proposed development is of a size that would impact on the surrounding public realm and therefore a contribution towards public realm is also sought".

'Public Realm' is calculated by a payment of over £1,000 per bed space within the development, with an added bed per space. This development will have 1,112 bed spaces to be calculated, giving a figure in excess of £1.1million...

However, as usual, the developer has submitted a 'viability assessment' which the officer notes will "demonstrate that the scheme would not be financially deliverable if the contribution was too high"...ie, its profits would not be big enough.

Instead, the Council has agreed a contribution of just £100,000, with a 'clawback' clause to pay some more if profits are higher than anticipated. And within the 'Public Realm', thirty trees, including 13 Category B trees, will be trashed.

This one development alone will give a loss to the city of potentially £1million plus around eighty affordable properties (20%) thanks to the Council's ridiculous planning policies.

Meanwhile, the English Cities Fund, or ECf (a partnership of Homes England, Legal and General and Muse Developments, cheer-led by Salford Council), will have its application for 167 apartments and 11 townhouses, next to Islington Park on Chapel Street, considered by the planning panel.

Around a decade ago, the Council set up an agreement with ECf, whereby all Section 106 payments would be superseded by a thing called the Development Trust Account, a mechanism shrouded in secrecy but basically allowing any potential planning payments to cross subsidise other ECf developments in the area. Affordable housing payments come almost last on the list*.

No figures have been produced by Salford Council for what the ECf should be paying for things like public realm, education and heritage, while no affordable housing is being proposed.

The ECf has also submitted an application to build a seven storey office block at New Bailey. Here, there will be no payments, even to the Development Trust Account, for things like transport, public realm and highways, because ECf is putting in some pedestrian pathways and some 'highway work'...

Over in Walkden, Countryside Properties is proposing 302 properties (58 apartments and 244 houses) off Worsley Road North. 148 of the properties will be for private rent, 102 for open market sale, and 52 properties would be for 'affordable rent' and 'shared ownership' via Great Places.

Countryside should be making payments for education, public realm, highways and open space. However the developer will be making a contribution of just £100,000 for highways, while any other contributions will be delegated to a decision by the Assistant Director of Planning and Housing, after a 'viability assessment' has been, er, assessed...

It seems that, while affordable housing is being provided within the outskirts of Salford, there is less and less in central Salford - and it's looking more and more like a deliberate policy...


.* See previous Salford Star article – Not A Penny Back from ECf - click here

Gareth L wrote
at 06:30:02 on 18 July 2018
Going on the stories from last week Salford Council should blame Trump or Raheem Sterling for the fact that they keep letting Thier billionaire friends off with planning fees. Where are the protests Salford?
 
wrote
at 06:29:32 on 18 July 2018
The Star's been exposing this for a long time now, gentrification's continued, the Council hasn't changed it's policies and the majority of people in Salford don't seem to give a shit. Maybe the people of Salford are getting exactly what they deserve for being so disinterested and being blindly loyal to a Council that's trying to socially cleanse them.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star CD
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
I wonder if our single tenant Social housing Lab Councillors got a letter? I bet not:) ... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
I got this letter I have lived on my own for 14 years... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
He will be if my dad gets one!... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
Sack anyone who was involved in generating this pathetic idea we could save a lot of council tax money by not employing t... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
I'm in my eighties and haven't had one. Is it just one or two particular areas? In which case it may a jobsworth sticking his or h... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH

Star date: 22nd October 2018

CALLOUS COUNCIL TAX LETTER SCARES ELDERLY 

Hundreds, and possibly thousands, of letters have been sent by Salford City Council to elderly people threatening them with the loss of their single person Council Tax discount as it states 'Records show that multiple adults are living at your address', even though they are widows and widowers. The letter tells them to fill in an online form 'within the next 14 days' or the discount will be cancelled.

"It's not fair to be treating your senior citizens in this way, it's just callous" says Jill Royle, whose 92 year old non-computer literate mother became totally agitated on receiving the letter "Salford Council needs to know how much anguish it's caused."

Full details here...

BOLTON NHS HOSPITAL WORKERS CELEBRATE HUGE PAY VICTORY

Star date: 22nd October 2018

AFTER TWO DAY STRIKE HOSPITAL WORKERS WIN NHS PAY PARITY

"We stuck together and we won!" Vicky, cleaner at Royal Bolton Hospital

Bolton Royal Hospital workers are celebrating a massive victory after taking two days of strike action over pay parity earlier this month, supported by Salford UNISON and many other trade unionists.

The workers, who include cleaners, catering staff, porters and security staff, are employed by Bolton NHS Trust's subsidiary company iFM, doing the same jobs as other NHS workers but were offered pay at a lesser rate. Now they have won an increase in line with other NHS workers, backdated to last April.

Full details here...

RALLY TO SAVE OUR NURSERIES AS CAMPAIGNERS PUT DEMANDS ON SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 22nd October 2018 

TEN DEMANDS ON COUNCIL BY NURSERY CAMPAIGNERS

Next Saturday, 27th October, Save Our Nurseries campaigners are to hold a rally, from noon, on the lawn of Salford Civic Centre to reinforce the push for a long term solution to closures.

While Salford MPs Graham Stringer, Barbara Keeley and Rebecca Long-Bailey have confirmed attendance, campaigners are putting to the Council ten demands which must be met to avoid a clash.

Full details here...

TONNES OF SALFORD RECYCLING PAPER REJECTED AS PEOPLE PUT WRONG STUFF IN BLUE BINS

Star date: 22nd October 2017

DIRTY NAPPIES AND PLASTIC BAGS PUT IN BLUE BINS

Tonnes of Salford's paper and card recycling collections are being rejected as people put the wrong stuff in blue bins, including dirty nappies, plastic bags, polystyrene packing and even electrical items.

Now Recycle for Greater Manchester has teamed up with Salford City Council to launch a What's In The Box? campaign to remind residents that only newspapers, magazines, greeting cards, paper wrapping paper, cardboard boxes and junk mail and envelopes can be put in the blue bins.

Full details here...

DICK WHITTINGTON COMES TO ST LUKES IN SALFORD

Star date: 21st October 2018

PANTO TIME IN SEEDLEY

Dick Whittington
Monday 22nd–Saturday 27th October
St Luke's Parish Hall, Derby Road £6.50/£5.50

St Luke's Arts and Drama Society, well known for its class performances, is putting on the classic panto, Dick Whittington this week, from Monday until Saturday.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx