HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
‘BONKERS’ PLANNING DECISION SEES SALFORD COUNCIL APPROVE UNAFFORDABLE FLATS BUT REJECT AFFORDABLE FLATS
 

Star date: 6th July 2018

CANON GREEN COURT DEVELOPMENT THROWN INTO UNCERTAINTY AS COUNCILLOR SLATES 'BONKERS' PLANNING DECISION

At yesterday's planning panel of Salford City Council, councillors approved plans for almost 300 private rent flats in Lower Broughton, and then rejected plans from Salix Homes for over 100 affordable rent flats at Canon Green Court.

Councillor Peter Wheeler, addressing the panel, said the decision was "bonkers". It had, of course, nothing to do with Fred Done and Urban Splash developments nearby.

Full details here... 


Yesterday, councillors sitting on Salford Council's planning panel had two decisions to make on developments in central Salford.

The first was centred on Countryside Properties' scheme for 299 private rent apartments in Lower Broughton that contained no affordable housing.*

The second was centred on Salix Homes re-applying for planning permission for 108 rent to buy 'affordable' apartments in the grounds of Canon Green Court and Westminster House after the application was rejected at the previous planning meeting.**

The Countryside Properties scheme was approved. The Salix Homes application was rejected again, despite modifications, on design grounds at the bidding of panel chair Councillor Ray Mashiter, on a close vote of six to four.

While the Salix development isn't popular with some social rent tenants who live in Canon Green Court, and the future flats were to be targeted at 'young professionals', at least there was some kind of affordability linked to the scheme via a proposed rent-to-buy scheme.

The decision was described by some of those who attended the meeting as "odd" and "strange", and even Councillor Derek Antrobus, head of planning, voted in favour of the Salix application against the advice of Councillor Mashiter.

Councillor Peter Wheeler summed it up to the panel when he said "It's bonkers. One minute we're bemoaning the lack of affordable houses at a scheme in Broughton, and then within ten minutes we're turning down over one hundred affordable properties less than a mile away."

It's almost as if affordable housing near Chapel Street is not wanted by the powers that be. Very close to the Salix Homes scheme is Fred Done's Blackfriars blocks of unaffordable flats currently being erected, and the Urban Splash blocks of unaffordable flats that were granted planning permission at last month's meeting.

A cynic might argue that the Salix Homes block would undercut these schemes, with a more attractive financial offer to prospective renters/buyers. But that would be cynical. Meanwhile, Salix Homes is expected to appeal the decision, and is 'exploring options'...

"We are disappointed by the decision of Salford Council's Planning Panel to refuse planning approval for a development that would refurbish the homes of our tenants at Canon Green and Westminster Courts and provide more than one hundred new affordable homes in the city" Sue Sutton, executive director of operations at Salix Homes told the Salford Star.

"We've ensured that our residents have been involved with our development proposals every step of the way and we remain fully committed to the refurbishment of our existing units" she added "We will now be exploring our options with colleagues at the council to ensure this decision does not get in the way of the essential improvement work to the existing blocks."

For a full background see previous Salford Star articles...

* Developer Avoids Affordable Housing Provision in Lower Broughton – click here

** Salix Homes 108 Rent To Buy Apartments at Canon Green Court – click here and Salix Homes Canon Green Decision Deferred – click here

Mike wrote
at 09:57:03 on 01 August 2018
I see that Salix have resubmitted this application. Can anything be construed from this?
 
Former resident wrote
at 07:18:17 on 11 July 2018
I wonder if there is some sort of split going on in Salford Labour Party. Just think.Perhaps 2 or 3 at most Torys on panel.Which ever way they vote, it doesn't matter, and this site is miles away from their voters. Perhaps the ones in Labour who know this is not affordable, are the ones who voted against, perhaps in a bid to draw attention to the other ones who voted in favour, so as to expose their polocies on affordability. When it comes to backstabbing Labour can show the Tories a trick or two. The tories do it openly Labour don't.
 
Joey wrote
at 21:13:34 on 08 July 2018
To F.DONE "Esq" (though I doubt that is who you are) you state "Let us Rob your Communal Public Sector Grounds to Hive-Off to the Private Sector". When I was a child in the 50's the location of these proposed flats was a row of Victorian shops with flats above. They were demolished sometime in the 80's and the area given to the block of flats as communal grounds. So no, it is not Communal Public Sector Grounds, it is private land plundered and purloined using public money which was then fenced in for the benefit of a select few at Cannon Green Court. I have NEVER seen anyone use this part of the communal grounds, and it should be put to better use. Whether the proposed building and its new residents would be best use is debatable, but it should be built on, preferably to provide truly affordable homes. To SS, if it really was refused because of site permeability, that is preposterous. At the moment the whole site and Cannon Green Court are surrounded by an impenetrable metal railing perimeter.
 
bob wrote
at 11:28:05 on 07 July 2018
" rents would be 80% of free market rate which they said was around £800 per month". that around £200 per week, who can afford that?. Someone is living in fantasy land making statements like that.
 
Former resident wrote
at 06:59:53 on 07 July 2018
I cannot get my head round this one.I was dead against the scheme in the first place. It is an over development, and it is for sure not affordable. Salix said rents would be 80% of free market rate which they said was around £800 per month. After 5 years they said people could buy the flats. These would not have been at a discount. A 2 bed flat there would be £180k to £200k. They would rely on inertia of people not wanting to move out. A big rip off to fuel the big wages of the Salix high command. Rest assured though, this mad scheme will go ahead. That is unless there is some funny games going on between the council and Salix that we do not know about.
 
F.DONE "Esq" wrote
at 06:59:36 on 07 July 2018
"Sue Sutton" Executive Director of Operations at Salix knows that when a Flat in Canon Green becomes vacant, that Flat is TOTALY REFURBISHED then Let out to over 30 Year Old who must be Employed. Meanwhile the existing Tenants get "CHOICE" when asking for Decent living Standard regards the currents state & quality of the Flats they Pay Full Rent for & Live in now! Let us Rob your Communal Public Sector Grounds to Hive-Off to the Private Sector or you can go Whistle & keep Living in squalor... Democracy : two Wolves & one Sheep around the table debating what to have for Tea...
 
Salford Star wrote
at 06:58:46 on 07 July 2018
See Joey's comment below...That's because, until the minutes are produced, nobody seems to know the exact causes and reasons. Something to do with the permeability of the site, if that helps
 
Joey wrote
at 06:56:14 on 07 July 2018
What were the reasons given for refusal? It seems odd to refuse this scheme but not others. I would like to know why they refused it so that I can make my mind up whether I agree with them or not. The article doesn't give me enough information to adequately assess the decision.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Friends of Kersal Moor
Salford Star Benefit
Salford Star CD
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
I am a sparky by trade and years ago used to work on licensed premises, and as part of the licensing procedure, a fire brigade saf... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
It is a bit like pass the parcel, or musical chairs this blame game. Except the consequences are serious. Could it be Bob's brainw... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
I think I might have been barking up the wrong tree before, but I still think I am in the right Forrest. In a test case in 2012, k... [more]
article: SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022
Bob the reģular,I fear you have watched too many conspiracy thrìlĺers;Mayor Dennett has come up with the money because... [more]
article: OVER £100,000 SALFORD PARENT SCHOOL FINES NOT GOING BACK INTO SCHOOLS
Schools are now run mainly by people who can only remember the days since New Labour when the state education system was treated e... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

OVER £100,000 SALFORD PARENT SCHOOL FINES NOT GOING BACK INTO SCHOOLS

Star date: 15th November 2018

CASH-STRAPPED SALFORD SCHOOLS NOT BENEFITING FROM PARENTAL FINES

A Freedom of Information response from Salford City Council has revealed that during the year 2017-18, £118,920 income was received from parental fines but didn't go directly to help cash-strapped schools in the city. Instead the money went to 'support council services generally'.

"I think the money should go back into education as the lack of funding is clearly apparent" says parent Mandi Lee, who put in the FOI request.

Full details here...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL TO FINALLY TIGHTEN UP ON PUPPY SELLERS

Star date: 14th November 2018

NEW REGULATIONS MEAN TIGHTER CONTROL OF ANIMAL BUSINESSES

New laws on the sales and keeping of animals mean that Salford City Council will be forced to tighten up on regulating puppy sellers and animal keepers through new national regulations.

One of the biggest changes is that a puppy at a breeder's "may only be shown to a prospective purchaser if it is together with its biological mother", and that inspections of premises are to be carried out by a qualified inspector, rather than the Council's Environment Health Team.

Full details here...

SALFORD FIRE HAZARD BLOCKS IN PENDLETON WON’T BE SAFE UNTIL 2022

Star date: 13th November 2018

PENDLETON TENANTS ARE FOUR YEARS FROM SAFETY

The nine blocks of dangerous flats in Pendleton, owned by Salford City Council and managed by Pendleton Together, won't be safe as buildings until 2022, according to the latest accounts posted by Pendleton Together Operating Ltd.

External cladding work, the accounts state, will be completed by 2021 but other internal fire safety measures won't be complete until 2022. Meanwhile, the company recorded a loss of £23.5million last year, and adds that the "cost of further works are estimated to be £35.5million".

Full details here...

PEEL HOLDINGS REFUSED PERMISSION TO BUILD HOUSING ON SALFORD GREENWAY BY SECRETARY OF STATE

Star date: 12th November 2018

SECRETARY OF STATE DISMISSES PEEL HOLDINGS APPEAL TO BUILD 600 HOUSES ON WORSLEY GREENWAY

This morning, the Secretary of State at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has dismissed Peel Holdings' appeal against Salford City Council's refusal to allow the company to build up to 600 houses in the Broad Oak area of the Worsley Greenway.

The Secretary of State agreed with the Inspector that "the proposals would impact negatively on the character and appearance of the Greenway". Noel Gaskell, from RAID, the community group that opposed the development, told the Salford Star "It shows want can be achieved when the general public put their minds to stopping developments that would cause huge problems to the residents."

Full details here...

SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANT TOLD TO LIVE ON £47 A WEEK

Star date: 12th November 2018

'HOW AM I GOING TO MANAGE? I HAVEN'T GOT A CLUE...'

A Salford Universal credit claimant has been told that she must live on just £47 per week, or £190 per month, after 'migrating' from Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)... "How am I going to manage? I haven't got a clue" she tells the Salford Star.

This latest disgusting poverty setback comes on top of the shock of her father dying from a heart attack while waiting for a DWP appeal, after being told he was fit for work. His case, in retrospect, is being heard by an upper tribunal this week.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx