HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL TRANSPARENCY BYPASS ON HUGE ORDSALL HOUSING BLOCKS
 

Star date: 4th June 2018

PLANNING TRANSPARENCY NON-EXISTENT AS COUNCIL CONSIDERS PLANS FOR HUGE ORDSALL BLOCKS

This Thursday, Salford City Council planning panel will consider plans for 296 townhouses and apartments in three blocks up to 23 storeys high in Upper Wharf Street in Ordsall.

Thanks to Council policies, the huge development will bring finance for just three affordable houses, while 'viability' issues means the developer will be escaping around £600,000 in planning payments. But, while other councils are bowing to public pressure over planning transparency, Salford is actually getting worse.

Full details here...


Salford Council Transparency
click image to enlarge

The Salford Star really is sounding like a broken record when it comes to developers not paying planning fees. However, while the city struggles financially, the Star just has to keep pointing out the massive monetary losses as the concrete jungle expands...

...And that is not getting any easier, as Salford City Council, despite its 'great eight' claim to 'transparency', continues to muddy the real figures that developers should be coughing up for their wall-to-wall profit farms known as apartment blocks.

The latest contender for fee avoidance is Outwood Developments 2 Ltd which is applying for planning permission this week to build 296 flats and townhouses (283 flats and 13 townhouses) in three blocks rising from eight to 23 storeys high on Upper Wharf Street in Ordsall, near Oldfield Road.

Because of Salford Council's own planning policies, the developer doesn't have to pay fees for education or affordable houses to put up any of its apartments. It only has to pay for these things on its houses – twenty per cent of 13 houses, which is three affordable houses and £36,645 in education payments, plus £50,365 for 'open space'.

These figures are not provided in the report; the Star has had to work it out from the Council's own tables...

"The development is likely to result in increased demand for access to public realm and public open space within the vicinity of the site, as a result of the increase in residents" states the Council's planning officer's report "Planning obligations have therefore been sought to mitigate against this impact.

"With regard to education and affordable housing contributions, the level of planning obligations required in this case is applied to the 13 townhouse units only. In accordance with the Planning Obligations SPD, education and affordable housing contributions are not applied to the apartments within the scheme."

As far as the apartments go, according to the Council's own tables, the developer should be paying an estimated £1.367million in planning contributions for transport, public realm and open space.

With this fee plus the education and open space payments for the houses, the total is around £1.454million, as estimated by the Star based on official Council tables...but the developer is being asked for just £864,000 with an added 'clawback' agreement that if profits are sky high, some more money might be forthcoming.

"A review of the applicant's viability appraisal undertaken by the City Council's consultant surveyors concluded that the applicant's assertions that the scheme cannot support the full level of contribution sought is sound" the report adds "On this basis the applicant and the City Council have agreed a contribution of £864,000."

Where has that £864,000 figure come from? It appears to have just been plucked out of the air. No figures or breakdowns are provided for any of the payments...nor where these Section 106 payments might be going; only that they "would be directed towards projects that have been agreed in writing with the Chair of Planning Panel" (Councillor Ray Mashiter).

So, let's get this right about the 'transparent' Salford Council...Three massive blocks of 296 apartments and townhouses, with payment for just three affordable properties (not specified) and education payments (not specified), and reduced planning fee of £864,000 (no breakdown), with these payments going to non-specified projects at the discretion of Councillor Mashiter

Back in the day, at least Council planning officers used to lay out the exact fees due, so that Salford council tax payers could actually see how much they were being ripped off. Now, as other councils are beginning to bow to public pressure and publish things like 'viability assessments', Salford City Council is going the other way...while having a great big 'transparency' banner on the Civic Centre...

Will any councillors sat on the planning panel this Thursday question any of this? Of course they won't!

Meanwhile, at the same planning meeting this week, Urban Splash will be applying to increase the number of apartments on its Springfield Lane site from one hundred to 150. As such, the Section 106 payments will increase from £100,000 to £150,000, or just £1,000 per apartment, plus a 'clawback' agreement.


See also previous Salford Star article - Salford Council Banner Declares 'Transparency' Despite Everything Being Secret - click here

Update: 8th June: Salford planning panel councillors told not to question Council planning policy - click here

Alice wrote
at 14:36:09 on 06 June 2018
I am amazed to read that the Council is doing it again...bowing down to Developers with apparent little thought or consideration for the Salford residents trying to get together the deposit to buy a home. .....an actual house, not an apartment, but a house in which they can build a life maybe with children. Apartments are not suitable for children because they rarely have a garden or playing space. They are usually the smallest space possible to maximise the number of units. .....that's what battery hens' buildings are judged on! Increasing the profits is lower down the list than quality of life. I am a Labour supporter but ashamed of these decisions. Why three affordable houses....why not insist on 33 or more and fewer apartments. I know the answer and it's not a social one!
?
Bob the regular wrote
at 15:55:42 on 04 June 2018
They might not be building council flats any more , but this block sure looks like em. It reminds me of the block at the end of cross lane, before the cladding gang got on the job.
?
Gareth L wrote
at 14:14:26 on 04 June 2018
When will Ordsall be rebranded Media City or Quays 2?
?
The Fat End of The Wedge wrote
at 14:12:54 on 04 June 2018
I think Salford Council is fairly transparent - anyone can see they are incompetent.. Seriously though, whenever I travel into Manchester by road, rail or tram, I inevitably pass a new development site for the latest tower block. That being either within Salford, or Manchester city centre area. Some now seem so close to each other that somebody in one block could almost reach over and touch somebody on the balcony in an adjacent building. The view for 25 - 50% of residents will be into the apartment on the same level in the adjacent building. Lovely. My most recent visit was by tram last Thursday afternoon, and despite it being nice and sunny quite often we were in shadow due to the over-development along the route, and darkness appeared to have descended over some areas. Nice to see they have started digging up Pomona, presumably to shove another monstrosity into the air... How I wish I could afford to live in one...
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx