HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL DOES NOTHING AS PORTSMOUTH COUNCIL FORCES TRANSPARENCY ON DEVELOPERS
 

Star date: 19th October 2017

PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL FORCES DEVELOPERS TO REVEAL VIABILITY ASSESSMENTS

As developers in Salford continue to evade £millions in planning obligations and provision of affordable housing, Portsmouth City Council has passed a motion forcing builders to publicly reveal the viability assessments that give them a get-out.

The Salford Star has shown that over £40million has been avoided in the city by developers, plus the loss of over 1,000 affordable houses... "We want to stop developers that are out to deceive people" said Portsmouth Councillor Steve Pitt, as Salford City Council does nothing.

Full details here...


Portsmouth City Council this week passed a motion, supported by all parties, to try and stop greedy developers avoiding Section 106 payments for things like roads and parks, and affordable housing.

In Salford, planning councillors have complained weakly in the past about developers avoiding payments but have done absolutely nothing. The Salford Star has shown that over £42million worth of these payments plus the provision of over one thousand affordable properties have been avoided through 'viability assessments'.*

'Viability Assessments' are basically documents that show how developers' profits won't be big enough if the full contributions were made. And there's now a whole industry of planning consultants, including Gary Neville's Zerum company**, which specialise in producing these assessments.

"We want to stop developers that are out to deceive people" said Portsmouth Councillor Steve Pitt after the Council passed its no-nonsense motion.

It compels developers to be transparent and will "Require any planning application which does not meet the affordable housing requirement...to submit an Economic Viability Assessment which must be fully public and will be published online alongside the other planning application materials."

Meanwhile, as an incentive, the Council is considering "offering a 'fast-track' planning service to applications which deliver 30%, or more, affordable housing".

The Portsmouth motion states: "This council recognises the need to provide quality homes which are affordable to those on low and middle incomes in Portsmouth, and for transparency in regard to planning applications to ensure that the council's own policies, on affordable housing requirements, as laid out in the Portsmouth Plan, are met.

"It has become clear that there are companies who are openly boasting in their promotion, that they can help developers to avoid paying Section 106 monies and making appropriate levels of affordable housing provision" it adds "These companies produce what are known as Economic Viability Assessments or EVAs, in order to demonstrate that developers are not making sufficient profits to enable councils to insist on full 106 or affordable housing contributions.

"This issue has caused concern among councillors across the political spectrum in the city, along with notable contributions from both members of the public and party activists of different hues" it explains "Whilst some of these EVAs are no doubt submitted in good faith, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the reports are often prepared in such a way as to attempt to confuse local planning committees and present a misleading picture.

"Indeed, some councils, especially in London, are now insisting that EVAs are no longer able to be submitted unless they are able to be viewed by members of the public and in open session at planning committee meetings" the motion concludes.

Salford City Council still refuses to make the viability assessments public, even after Freedom of Information requests, citing 'commercial confidentiality'. If Portsmouth Council and those in London can do it, this argument no longer holds.

The Salford Star will now be banging in Freedom of Information requests on every single application where 'viability assessments' have been used to evade or avoid planning fees.

The latest application to use a viability assessment was for the site of the Brown Cow pub in Worsley, where the Star estimated over £400,000 was avoided, including provision of affordable houses (see here)

Sign the Salford Star petition calling for more transparency in planning applications – click here


*See previous Salford Star article - £42million Planning Scandal – click here

**Gary Neville is a director of Zerum Construction Management Ltd, which has helped planning fee avoiders like Middlewood Locks (£6million avoided), Peel Holdings (£millions avoided) and Pegasus M6/Vermont Construction on Frederick Road (£400,000 avoided) – see previous article click here.


See also previous related Salford Star articles...

Salford Becomes 2nd Home Capital of England – click here

Only Two Affordable Properties Out Of 4,172 Built In Greengate and Chapel Street – click here

Salford Council Gives Ordsall Away For Nothing – click here

Fred Done Publicly Subsidised Flats Marketed To Foreign Investors - click here

The Fat End of The Wedge wrote
at 10:04:38 on 22 October 2017
I've signed. I made a comment on a planning application recently regarding the claims the developer had made about the unviability of Section 106 payments. How many others have done so? I also pointed out that their claims of the development not being suitable for local sustainable power generation were not true. There is of course a very big missed opportunity in all the recent development to incorporate solar PV/Water heating into new builds - much better than retro fitting - along with other equally relevant ideas.
?
Mike Corless wrote
at 06:29:50 on 20 October 2017
Even with a 'claw back' clause what is there to stop a developer selling off the development half way through construction to another holding company for a price that allegedly proves their non viability assessment and then having a profit share with the new owners when the development is sold off for a profit in excess to the non-viability assessment? Is the original agreement then null and void and not applicable to the new owners? Does anyone know the wording of the 'claw back' clause?
?
Shirley Jones wrote
at 15:58:37 on 19 October 2017
If I told them I couldn't pay my council tax due to insufficient funds, before I got any help, if at all, they would insist I'm sure on me providing proof of earnings/income before any agreement was arrived at. Worked at the courts long enough to know that. So why do they not ask for proof from developers who say they cannot pay their Section 106 fees? If they don't have to then why should anyone else have to?
?
Joe O'Neill wrote
at 15:58:22 on 19 October 2017
I Sometimes wonder with the apathy of Salford residents is the Star the only real opposition to this council. I have signed the petition have you?
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx