HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
HAZEL BLEARS REFERRED TO SCOTLAND YARD
 

Star date: 22nd December 2009

POLICE BROUGHT IN ON SALFORD MP'S EXPENSES…

We interrupt this Award ceremony to bring news of a possible police investigation into Hazel Blears' expenses…

The Hazel Must Go! campaign has, this afternoon, written to Scotland Yard formally requesting a criminal investigation into the Parliamentary expenses claims of Hazel Blears, MP for Salford….

Full details here…


In a letter to New Scotland Yard, Hazel Must Go! secretary, Steven North, writes that he believes Hazel Blears "may have committed fraud" in relation to expense claims submitted in June 2008 for cleaning and other items for which she was unable to provide receipts.

While the Parliamentary claims office rejected Blears' expense claim for these items, North adds that "I believe she deliberately made a false representation and intended to gain from it".

He continues… "The lack of a receipt for cleaning expenses is particularly significant because the claim continues an earlier pattern of claims at £120 per month. One presumes that Mrs Blears is unable to supply receipts for this or any of her earlier cleaning claims. It therefore suggests that Ms. Blears may have knowingly made false claims for some time. I believe the picture here is one of prima facie evidence of fraud. Can Ms. Blears verify her unreceipted expense claims? Can any cleaning service provider substantiate her claims?"

North points out that, once receipts have to be produced, Blears' cleaning bill suddenly drops substantially. He draws comparisons with other MPs whose cleaning bills also dropped after receipts had to be produced following the Sir Thomas Legg review of MPs' Additional Cost Allowances. These include Jacqui Smith, MP for Redditch, Dennis MacShane, MP for Rotherham, and  Lindsay Hoyle, MP for Chorley.

"My suspicion is that the un-receipted claims these MPs were making prior to April 2008 may not have been for cleaning costs at all" North concludes.

David Henry, of the Hazel Must Go! campaign adds "We're worried that Hazel's expense claims are not entirely correct and have offered observations and comments to the police which we anticipate will trigger a formal investigation".

For further details of Hazel Blears' most recent expense claims see here…

 

THE LETTER TO SCOTLAND YARD IN FULL

Acting Commander
Specialist Crime Directorate
Metropolitan Police Service
New Scotland Yard, Broadway
London SW1H 0BG

Dear Sir

MP's Expenses - Hazel Blears, MP for Salford – Fraud Act 2006 and Theft Act 1968

I am writing to you to formally request a criminal investigation into the Parliamentary expenses claims of Rt. Hon. Hazel Blears, MP for Salford.

This request follows the recently released records for MPs "Additional Cost Allowance" (ACA) and "Personal Additional Accommodation Expenditure" (PAAE) for 2008-09.

I have some grave concerns about the expenses claims of certain MPs and Ms. Blears in particular as I feel her actions may constitute fraud, as defined under the Fraud Act 2006 and as such may also come under the Theft Act 1968.

In submitting claims for expenses for which she was apparently unable to provide receipts, I believe that Rt. Hon. Hazel Blears, MP for Salford may have committed fraud. This was done for a claim she submitted under ACA on 30th June 2008.

Her claim was rejected by the Department of Resources in a letter dated 7/7/2008 as she was unable to provide receipts for £300 on utilities, £279 on Council Tax, £150 on Telephone and Communications, and most interestingly £360 on cleaning bills.
As a result Ms. Blears was apparently not reimbursed for these expenses, but in attempting to claim without receipts I believe she deliberately made a false representation and intended to gain from it.

The lack of a receipt for cleaning expenses is particularly significant because the claim continues an earlier pattern of claims at £120 per month. One presumes that Mrs Blears is unable to supply receipts for this or any of her earlier cleaning claims. It therefore suggests that Ms. Blears may have knowingly made false claims for some time. I believe the picture here is one of prima facie evidence of fraud. Can Ms. Blears verify her unreceipted expense claims? Can any cleaning service provider substantiate her claims?

Following the refusal to grant £360 in June owing to this lack of receipt her cleaning claims change. She does not claim for cleaning between 1st July 2008 and 30th November 2008. When she commences her claims for cleaning again in December 2008, she only claims £80 a month. Her cleaning claims then stop altogether in February 2009 – the month the Daily Telegraph exposed MPs' expenses claims.

These irregularities may seem incidental until we explore the fact that significant reductions in the amounts other MPs were claiming for cleaning took place after the introduction of the requirement for receipts for amounts of £25 or over in March 2008.

Jacqui Smith, MP for Redditch claimed £200 for cleaning for every month of 2007/08. However, she did not claim for cleaning after March 2008.

Dennis MacShane, MP for Rotherham claimed cleaning expenses of £200 a month during 2007/08, but only £24 a month after the requirement for receipts for expenses over £25 was introduced.

Lindsay Hoyle, MP for Chorley dropped his cleaning claims from £140-£185 a month in 07/08 to occasional claims for £45 for 08/09.

I feel that the nature of these cleaning claims needs to be investigated, as these reductions in the amounts claimed seem too closely linked with the date the requirement for receipts of purchases for £25 and over came into effect. The sums of money involved are significant and may amount to thousands of pounds for each MP

My suspicion is that the un-receipted claims these MPs were making prior to April 2008 may not have been for cleaning costs at all. Although, I accept that is only a suspicion.

Given the public interest, the accountability that must apply to politicians and the seriousness of these offences if proven, I am you to instigate a full criminal investigation.

Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.

Thank you for your help with this important matter.

Yours sincerely,

Mr. Steven North

More on this story here...

H.C. Judge wrote
at 7:38:39 AM on Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Did I miss the dawn raid by a plethora of plods , with the media in tow , eager to force entry in their relentless and impartial pursuit of 'british justice ' ? .I Must have been asleep . Isn't the impariality and fairness of the british judicial system wonderful ?
 
A. Richardson wrote
at 12:03:52 AM on Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Denis MacShane claimed over £20000 for the use of his garage as an office for 3 years. A local property company made it known that they had offered him the rent of a office very close to his home. The rent was £3000 per year inclusive of heating and lighting, but excluding telephone. However he did not take up this offer and is still using his garage as an office. There was also the £8000 he had paid his 'poet' brother for translation services. His brother lives on the Isle of Wight, presumably he could not find any one in South Yorkshire to do the work!!!
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
SLADS
Salford Live Events
Salford Star contact
Salford Star
Salford Star print
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: NO TIMETABLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF CLADDING ON NINE SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS
I believe it is because the failed block is part of Salix, not Pendleton Together. At least that is what I have found, unless you ... [more]
article: SALFORD RESIDENTS BEING KEPT IN DARK OVER TOWER BLOCK DANGER
No one can say that the Salford Star doesn't investigate and report in detail. This paper has a genuine social concern and reports... [more]
article: NO TIMETABLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF CLADDING ON NINE SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS
According to the BBC news website today, the Salford cladding has failed the fire safety test. Nobody at Pendleton Together has in... [more]
article: SALFORD RESIDENTS BEING KEPT IN DARK OVER TOWER BLOCK DANGER
Salix-To save on the costs of removing the cladding from one of the blocks, how about you move your offices into one of the blocks... [more]
article: SALFORD RESIDENTS BEING KEPT IN DARK OVER TOWER BLOCK DANGER
Absolutely well said Stephen Kingston! Together Housing SP+ and particularly Paul Hayes won the contract to refurbish Pendleton h... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALIX HOMES TO STRIP CLADDING FROM SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS

Star date: 25th June 2017

SALIX HOMES CLADDING TO BE REMOVED AFTER TESTS

After Salford Council announced it was removing cladding from nine Pendleton Together tower blocks, this afternoon Salix Homes has informed residents that it is removing cladding from Canon Hussey Court on the Islington Estate.

In a letter to residents, Salix states that "the cladding sample provided for Canon Hussey Court has been identified as a higher risk component". Work to remove "affected cladding" will begin this week. The Salford Star understands that cladding is also to be removed from other blocks.

Full details here...

SALFORD PALS HONOURED IN NEW PLAY FOR GM FRINGE

Star date: 25th June 2017

GREATER MANCHESTER FRINGE COMES TO SALFORD

From Heaven To Hell
Saturday 1st- Monday 3rd July
Salford Arts Theatre £8

The excellent Greater Manchester Fringe arrives at the Salford Arts Theatre this year via a new play honouring the sacrifice made by local heroes at the Battle of the Somme, written by Danny Clifford and directed by Sue Jenkins.

Full details here...

NO TIMETABLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF CLADDING ON NINE SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS

Star date: 25th June 2017

IT COULD BE MONTHS BEFORE CLADDING REMOVED IN SALFORD

"There will be no waiting around in Salford whilst there are any questions about the safety of our residents..."

On Friday, Salford City Mayor Paul Dennett announced that cladding on nine Pendleton Together tower blocks was to be removed... "We take the safety of our residents very seriously and are taking immediate steps" he declared.

Yesterday, residents were told by Pendleton Together that the cladding will not be removed until replacement material is ready to go up – which could take months. And new fire safety advice has been issued, to leave not stay in the event of a fire.

Full details here... Update: 12noon: Cladding is now being removed 'immediately'

SALFORD RESIDENTS BEING KEPT IN DARK OVER TOWER BLOCK DANGER

Star date: 24th June 2017

POTENTIALLY TOXIC CLADDING IN OVER A DOZEN SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS

At yesterday's press conference, Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, said that removing cladding on the nine Pendleton tower blocks was the "right and moral thing to do". Yet Salford City Council knows every component in all cladding in the city which planning officers have passed, and has not disclosed this information.

The Salford Star has investigated, as far as it can, the cladding and materials used in tower block refurbishment and the results are frightening...Materials used on Magnolia Court, Sycamore Court and Mulberry Court should avoid "Exposed heat, flames and/or sparks"; Arthur Millwood Court and Canon Hussey Court are fitted with panels from the same manufacturer as Grenfell Tower, and there's more.

Full details here...

SALFORD RED DEVILS LAST GASP LOSS TO ST HELENS

Star date: 23rd June 2017

ST HELENS 25 SALFORD RED DEVILS 24

Salford Red Devils were beaten by a last gasp kick, as the Saints fought back from what looked like a cert Salford win, as Simon Williams reports, with photos by Steve McCormick.

Match report here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx