HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
ORDSALL RE-BRANDED ‘DOWNTOWN MANCHESTER’ AS SALFORD ARTISTS HIT BACK
 

Star date: 31st May 2017

SALFORD RE-BRANDED 'MANCHESTER' AGAIN...

A huge development in Ordsall, where a one bedroom flat costs a minimum of £163,000, has branded itself 'Downtown Manchester'. The sales hype by developer Villafont, which avoided £1.2million in planning fees on the six block apartment complex, states it will be an "iconic landmark property in Manchester, to service the needs of an ever increasing aspirational residential community".

Last night, Salford artists hit back at the gentrification project...

Full details here...


Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification
Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification
Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification Wilburn Street development Salford
Salford homeless sleep under the bridge Salford artists hit back at Manchester re-branding and gentrification Flypost near Middlewood Locks
Ordsall Graffiti Wall latest
click image to enlarge

Opposite Pomona, where campaigners wanted an urban park but instead got two ugly blocks of flats backed by a cheap loan of £10.3million from Greater Manchester Combined Authority (see here and see here), six blocks of apartments are taking shape.

Salford Council refers to this area as 'Ordsall Waterfront' but developers Villafont have taken it a step further and re-branded its complex of 'hotel style' apartments as 'Downtown Manchester'.

The flats are being marketed to investors at home and abroad as profit farms, promising a 'rental yield' of 7%. The cheapest one bedroom apartment costs £163,000, rising to £273,000 for the cheapest three bedroom place. No local people struggling for housing need apply...

"Downtown is Manchester's premier residence" states the blurb from Villafont, which adds that the blocks of 368 apartments will "create a new contemporary and iconic landmark property in Manchester, to service the needs of an ever increasing aspirational residential community."

Villafont is not only re-branding the complex as in 'Manchester' but is also giving nothing back to Salford, in a double insult to the city.

When planning permission was granted for the blocks two years ago, Villafont avoided paying £1,221,278 in planning obligations to mitigate the impacts of its development.

Councillors agreed to waive the fees, as Villafont was tarting up a bit of the riverside footpath, and because the scheme wouldn't be 'viable' if it had to cough up the money: ie its profits wouldn't be high enough (see previous Salford Star article – click here).

Villafont should also have been providing 20% affordable housing, or 75 properties, but this policy was waived too. A 'clawback' clause was inserted, whereby if the profits were huge enough, some money would be paid back to the Council – but the Salford Star only knows of one development in the whole of central Salford where this has actually happened.

Last night, Salford artists commented on the Villafont scheme which, they argued, was selling a 'utopian' lifestyle of the place - in Manchester - that just doesn't fit.

Nowhere on any of the sales blurb or hoardings does it mention the word 'Salford'. Even the illustrations of the 'contemporary' apartments feature a picture of a London scene by Lowry on the wall. The artists covered this with a photo of a bulldozer smashing down affordable housing in central Salford. They also added an old photo of Ordsall women too, to give it a sense of place.

The giant hoardings show happy 'aspirational' people walking down sterilised streets in front of the future shiny blocks. Here, the artists added some tents to represent the amount of homeless people in the area.

...A few hundred yards up from the Downtown Manchester site, homeless people are sleeping under a bridge by the massive Wilburn Street development of four blocks of 491 unaffordable flats. Here, WB Developments avoided almost £2million in planning fees (see here).

Behind all the new apartment blocks, Ordsall itself remains within the 3%-7% most deprived areas in England.

A few years ago, Salford City Council drew up a development strategy which included a map for a new 'Regional Centre'. The boundary line for the Centre included MediaCityUK and Ordsall Waterfront but not Ordsall itself (see here).

Developers are taking their cue from Salford Council and re-branding apartment complexes as in Manchester – or Downtown Manchester - to make them more sexy. Salford artists are putting some truth into the equation.


See also previous Salford Star article on the Ordsall Boom – click here

Michael James Felse wrote
at 8:50:02 AM on Saturday, June 3, 2017
Brian I must disagree. It is time we thanked Peel and others that put money into building a modern Salford. Clearly within 5 years our Conservatives will have 30 seats on Salford Council as I pitch myself into seeking the Salford Mayoral Conservative nomination at our next Salford Mayor election.
 
Salford lad wrote
at 6:19:28 AM on Thursday, June 1, 2017
Gave the facts ! Given Ordsall's local, national and international acclaim as being largely the home of Salford born criminals who on earth would buy property there !
 
End of May wrote
at 6:19:17 AM on Thursday, June 1, 2017
Never did support Mr Felse but would be interesting to see him be a Salford councilor with his wacky views. Yeh but were does Mr Felse stand on the NHS our green fields and student fees for a start. We know where his Tory councilor lot stand on em.
 
Brian F Kirkham wrote
at 6:19:09 AM on Thursday, June 1, 2017
Hmmm....A Message for Mr Felse. Care to Advocate that twaddle again ? You, like many others who like to run my hometown down for political expediency should wake up to some cold hard facts...run your eye over the books and see where Peel has been getting most of its money for its "Mancunian" developments. I think in the whole it was Salford Ratepayers wasn't it? It wasn't so long ago you wanted to be the man running the whole show at Salford - Now the Pearl has been paid for (Not including Phase II of Mediacity) you want out ? What a surprise!!! Certainly living up to your name as a political agitator.
 
bob wrote
at 1:15:51 AM on Thursday, June 1, 2017
Born and bred down whit lane ,I can only laugh at all this silly talk of Ordsall moved into Manchester, Salford Quays moved into Trafford and Irlam moved into Salford. Why can't we have some real sympathy for the those that have suffered the most, the nice people of Worsley who were dragged kicking and screaming into Salford 40 odd years ago.They have never forgot this evil deed and never will.
 
moversnshakers wrote
at 1:15:35 AM on Thursday, June 1, 2017
There's one thing for sure there's somebody doing alright out of all these waivers , and limited profit viability ££££££££££££££££££ "kerching"pop there's another one just like the other one......"Kerching"£££££££££££££££££££££
 
Eddas67 wrote
at 12:49:13 PM on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Irlam has been part of the 'City of Salford" since 1974. Get over it.... Broughton was once a township separate from Salford, but do you hear Broughtonians moaning about it? Anyway, what sort of fool wants SALFORD Quays moved to Trafford? Probably some toff student or double barrelled more money than sense type that doesn't want to be associated with the 'ruffians of Salford'
 
Michael James Felse wrote
at 12:49:04 PM on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Hate to disappoint JFletcher but owning property in Salford and Trafford means I see the different rate for the same services. Salford would be better off with lower Council Tax as my Salford Mayor campaign in 2012 said, backed by over 1600 voters. Be honest are you satisfied with the level of Salford Council costly services since 2012? I thought not.
 
wrote
at 12:48:44 PM on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Conservatives must be worried. They have resorted to bringing Mr Felse out of his box. It only proves Labour will win.
 
J Fletcher wrote
at 10:26:16 AM on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Some people might be all too pleased to move Salford Quays into Trafford if it had the effect of removing one individual from the Salford Star comments columns.
 
ronnie hilyard wrote
at 8:52:03 AM on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
born n bred in ordsall...in the past 40 years ive seen ordsall vanish year by year as i look out of my window now i see 7 cranes on 7 different sites its a real shame.i live on pomona and i remeber when the big money built the new media city was built we was told it would create jobs for local peope. i dont know 1 person who works there from our estate..it looks like we are being swallowed up by big buisness and some of the building look ugly who decides the look of the building need to go to specsavers..
 
Michael James Felse wrote
at 8:52:00 AM on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Folk need to stop living in the past and start understanding more people have moved into Salford than ever. It is time now to move Salford Quays into Trafford to get us a cheaper council tax. That will attract more students and families into Greater Manchester.
 
the end wrote
at 8:51:56 AM on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
always make me laugh when you get upset about being called Manchester, we in Irlam hate being called IN Salford when quote clearly we have never been part of the city of Salford
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
SLADS
Salford Live Events
Salford Star contact
Salford Star
Salford Star print
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: CLADDING TO BE REMOVED FROM NINE SALFORD PENDLETON TOWER BLOCKS
This reeks of a cover up...I bet they already know the cladding is the flammable sort. Why remove it otherwise? Meanwhile, tenants... [more]
article: SALFORD AND ECCLES MP DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ASSURANCE ON TOWER BLOCK CLADDING
I have it on very good authority that a certain lady from the high command of certain "housing provider", is tickled pink that he... [more]
article: SALFORD LISTED DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS TO BE DEMOLISHED AS PEGGY SEEGER SLATES ‘LAND GRABBERS’
Regarding gas holders on Liverpool street. Love them or loathe them,. Still love to see them . Was brought up and lived in Ayr str... [more]
article: SALFORD COMMUNITY STADIUM MAKES £1.5MILLION LOSS AS COUNCIL LOANS GROW
General opinion from those in the know at the time was it was a vanity project for the ex Leader and Deputy Leader of the Council... [more]
article: SALFORD AND ECCLES MP DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ASSURANCE ON TOWER BLOCK CLADDING
Everybody, including this MP is missing the point. There is no need to test these buildings, all you have to do is contact the com... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

CLADDING TO BE REMOVED FROM NINE SALFORD PENDLETON TOWER BLOCKS

Star date: 23rd June 2017

SALFORD COUNCIL TO REMOVE ALL ACM CLADDING

This afternoon, Pendleton Together has sent a letter to residents informing them that Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding on nine Pendleton Together tower blocks, including Spruce Court, Whitebeam Court and Thorn Court is to be removed, at the behest of Salford City Council.

Salford Council states that the move is "precautionary".

Full details here...

ANOTHER SALFORD GREEN BELT CONSULTATION IN THE PIPELINE

Star date: 23rd June 2017

THOUSANDS OF OBJECTIONS TO SALFORD GREEN BELT PROPOSALS

Salford City Council officers have stated that "it may be necessary to undertake some further public consultation" on plans to build on the city's Green Belt, in a new report to the city's councillors.

During his campaign to be elected GM Mayor, Andy Burnham called for a "radical re-write" of the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework, which included proposals to build 2,250 houses on Green Belt near Irlam and Cadishead. Officers cited "the scale and nature of public objections" as reasons for the re-think.

Full details here...

ORDSALL LEISURE CENTRE TO LOSE RECEPTION STAFF AS DEVELOPERS CASH IN

Star date: 22nd June 2017

COMMUNITY PETITIONS AGAINST LOSS OF STAFF AT SALFORD COMMUNITY LEISURE

Salford Community Leisure is proposing to axe reception staff from Ordsall Leisure Centre. A community petition from users of the centre has been launched, arguing "This will have a detrimental impact on the service we rely upon"

Meanwhile, Salford Council has plans to flatten Ordsall Leisure Centre with the land estimated to be worth up to £1.5million, and developers in the area are paying no planning fees.

Full details here...

SALFORD AND ECCLES MP DEMANDS IMMEDIATE ASSURANCE ON TOWER BLOCK CLADDING

Star date: 21st June 2017

AS CLADDING TESTS CONTINUE, REBECCA LONG BAILEY DEMANDS ASSURANCE AND FINANCE FROM GOVERNMENT

Despite being "assured of tenant safety" by housing providers for the city's 43 tower blocks, Salford and Eccles MP, Rebecca Long-Bailey, has written to the Government demanding immediate "total assurance of safety on the materials used" for cladding.

In a letter to residents, the MP also demands from the Government "funding to carry out any necessary works to remediate once the assessments are complete plus funding to support or re-house residents whilst that is carried out." She also calls for the Government to pay for the retrofitting of sprinklers in the blocks.

Full details here...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL LOOKING TO DITCH URBAN VISION?

Star date: 21st June 2017

SALFORD COUNCIL TESTING OTHER MODELS FOR PLANNING AND HIGHWAYS COMPANY

After a controversial decision last year to extend the contract of Urban Vision, Salford City Council is now tendering for companies to "engage in a Soft Market Testing exercise" to look at other options for the delivery of its planning, highways and building control services for which the Council spends £42million annually.

Urban Vision is a joint venture profit making company in which the Council holds a 19.9% stake but until this year has never even got a dividend.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx