HOME   STORIES   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US   LINKS      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL CHILDREN’S BOSS SACKED
 

Star date: 9th December 2009  

JILL BAKER SACKED AS OFSTED AGAIN CRITICISES CHILDREN'S SERVICES…

Jill Baker, Director of Children's Services at Salford Council has been sacked this morning for "gross misconduct".

Councillor Bill Hinds, chairman of the cross party disciplinary panel which made the decision said that "there had been a loss of trust and confidence…in Mrs Baker's ability to lead and manage the Children's Services directorate…"
 
But, as OFSTED today again criticises Salford Council's Children's Services in its annual letter to the Council, we ask why those who are also responsible for "significant weaknesses" in the service have not resigned…

Full story here…


In the fall out from the Demi Legh Mahon tragedy and consecutive OFSTED criticism of Salford Council's ability to safeguard vulnerable children, Jill Baker, Director of Salford's Children's Services has today been sacked.

The full statement from Councillor Bill Hinds, who headed the cross party disciplinary panel, reads…

"Jill Baker has been summarily dismissed from her position as Strategic Director of Children's Services for gross misconduct. The dismissal will take place with immediate effect.
 
"The unanimous decision by a cross-party panel of councillors, and endorsed by the authority's cabinet, follows Mrs Baker's suspension in September in order that a disciplinary investigation could be carried out.
 
"The panel was told there had been a loss of trust and confidence by the chief executive Barbara Spicer, council leader Cllr John Merry, and lead member Cllr John Warmisham, in Mrs Baker's ability to lead and manage the Children's Services directorate.
 
"This meant she was unable to honour the terms of her contract, which is a fundamental breach of contract and therefore gross misconduct. The decision to summarily dismiss was not made lightly but was done so based on the evidence and representations from both the employer and employee. Mrs Baker has the right to appeal against the decision.
 
"The panel also considered a grievance by Mrs Baker. An allegation of bullying was rejected unanimously by the panel as unfounded. Some issues were partially upheld in relation to certain HR processes not  adequately followed. The council has apologised to Mrs Baker for these failings. These findings had no bearing on the decision to dismiss."

The statement adds "The council will not be making any further comment on this issue."
 
However, while the Salford Star sheds no tears for Jill Baker - whose resignation the magazine called for  two years ago when the safeguarding children issues were first highlighted – the question has to be asked whether the former Director of Children's Services is being made a scapegoat, while others who were directly accountable survive.

As we pointed out in September, Salford Council actually drew up a list of exact roles and responsibilities for Safeguarding Children, which was amended in 2006 and included…

1. The Leader of the Council: Ensure that the Council gives priority to safeguarding children coherently and consistently in service planning and resource allocation.

2. The Cabinet Lead for Children's Services: Ensure that the Council's Children's Services responsibilities are properly considered, supported and monitored by the Cabinet…Work with the Director of Children's Services to ensure the Directorate is adequately funded and staffed to deliver these priorities…

3. The Chief Executive:  Make sure statutory inter-agency arrangements are in place…and ensure there is an open culture between local agencies and good direct communications between senior managers so that they accept and address concerns brought to their attention.

4. The Director of Children's Services: Ensure that the directorate has access to a range of effective, efficient and flexible services that protect and support vulnerable children and their families.

5. The Director of Community, Health and Social Care: Ensure that staff delivering social care services to adults are watchful for any child protection issues in families they are dealing with.

6. Local Safeguarding Children Board: The inter-agency group with responsibility for agreeing how the different services and professional groups should co-operate to safeguard children in Salford, and for making sure that arrangements work effectively to bring about good outcomes for children.

While Jill Baker, the Director of Children's Services and Chair of the Local Safeguarding Children Board, has been sacked...

* Why hasn't John Merry the `Leader of the Council' who was to "ensure that the Council gives priority to safeguarding children coherently and consistently in service planning and resource allocation" resigned? 

* Why hasn't John Warmisham, Cabinet Lead for Children's Services resigned? He was to "ensure that the Council's Children's Services responsibilities are properly considered, supported and monitored by the Cabinet…Work with the Director of Children's Services to ensure the Directorate is adequately funded and staffed to deliver these priorities…"

* And why hasn't Barbara Spicer, Chief Executive of Salford Council resigned?  She was to "Make sure statutory inter-agency arrangements are in place…and ensure there is an open culture between local agencies and good direct communications between senior managers so that they accept and address concerns brought to their attention".

Surely after all these constant criticisms of Children's Services and the tragic death of a toddler, there has been "a loss of trust and confidence" and in the ability of Councillors Warmisham and Merry, and Barbara Spicer – as well as Jill Baker -  "to lead and manage the Children's Services directorate"?

Today OFSTED again criticises Salford Council in its annual letter about Children's Services…

"The unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment services carried out in July 2009 identified some key weaknesses. There were significant weaknesses in the processes for assessing the needs of vulnerable children. In addition, the inspectors were unable to establish from records that action had been taken to ensure that a small number of children were free from the risk of harm."

 

UPDATED HERE 14TH DECEMBER 2009

Please enter your comment below:
 
Subscribe to our RSS feed
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD MOOR DEER
Alice et al, I have plenty of experience of people from Kersal, and I am very active in the local area. I wrote a piece on Kers... [more]
article: SALFORD MOOR DEER
In answer to those people who are concerneed for the protection of the deer you might like to know that when I took the photo I wa... [more]
article: SALFORD STAR VERSUS SALFORD COUNCIL
Contrary to what Steve argues, I do not believe this is 'a boring obsession.' I think people do care about the priorities of the C... [more]
article: SALFORD STAR VERSUS SALFORD COUNCIL
See Steve's comment below...This is exactly why we need the magazine back out again - because we would have had the time and space... [more]
article: SALFORD STAR VERSUS SALFORD COUNCIL
Despite what you think I'm on your side. I like the Star and wish it well. But I'm not sure that your readers share the priority... [more]
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR VERSUS SALFORD COUNCIL

Star date: 28th July 2010  

SALFORD COUNCIL REJECTS STAR APPEAL

"…you haven't published any positive stuff on MediaCityUK" John Merry

Yesterday, Salford City Council's Cabinet rejected Salford Star's appeal against the Council's decision to stop the city's community committees from funding the community magazine. One of the reasons given was that Salford Star hadn't done any positive stories on MediaCityUK.

Meanwhile, evidence that the Council brought to the `trial' purporting to show that the Salford Star was `not balanced' in its coverage, we believe, was totally discredited. But the goalposts kept shifting…

Very long but edited highlights here…

SALFORD COUNCILLOR SLAMS DERANGED GOVERNMENT

Star date: 27th July 2010  

`DERANGED GOVERNMENT' JIBE AT CONDEM COALITION

During today's Salford City Council Cabinet meeting Councillor Peter Connor, Lead Member for Housing, referred to the current ConDem coalition government as "deranged".

The jibe came during an agenda item on a new report into Child Poverty which revealed that close to 60% of the city's children are currently living in poverty. Councillor Connor accused the Government of undermining the Council's attempts to ease child poverty in the city through its cutbacks.

Full story here…

SALFORD CHILD POVERTY SCANDAL

Star date: 27th July 2010

SALFORD COUNCIL REVEALS ALMOST 60% OF OUR KIDS LIVE IN POVERTY

A report out today titled `Ending Child Poverty IN Salford' sets out the true extent of child poverty in Salford. And it's absolutely shocking.

While previous estimates and official statistics have been based on children living in `workless households' and shown a rate hovering around 30%, new figures taking into account `low income working households' show that "the true level of all child poverty in Salford could be closer to 60%".

Full story here…

SALFORD MOOR DEER

Star date: 26th July 2010 

DEER SPOTTED ON KERSAL MOOR

For weeks there have been reported sightings of deer on Kersal Moor, now, at last we have a photo of one of them.

Full story here…

SALFORD CITY REDS STADIUM PART TWO

Star date: 25th July 2010 

REDS `ICONIC' STADIUM SHRINKS TO 12,000 CAPACITY `BOX'?

Salford Reds supporter Jack Rogers goes on an epic search through Salford Council's planning department to find some truth in the `iconic' new stadium saga…

Full story here…

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx