HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
Salford Regeneration Failing
 

Star date: 9th December 2009 

Pathfinder Part 2

IT'S ALL GOING WRONG…BUT THE DEMOLITIONS CONTINUE

In Part 1, we revealed how the Audit Commission slated the multi-million pound Government housing regeneration project, Pathfinder, for informing everyone of what it's up to – except the community.

In Part 2, we reveal what Pathfinder is actually up to, according to the same report by the Audit Commission…

On its own terms the Pathfinder seems to be failing but, while land is cheap, it is "accelerating acquisition of land and property" - which usually means more demolitions and more misery…

Full story here…


For a £360,000,000 regeneration programme, the secrecy surrounding the Government's Pathfinder programme is shocking. Basically there is no accountability to the communities it's changing, a point which the Audit Commission has been stating more or less for four years.

As a result of the programme whole areas of perfectly good, affordable houses have been bulldozed and replaced with grass crofts; communities have been broken up; developers have been given £millions; and in many cases the new properties that have gone up have been either sub standard, unaffordable or unwanted. No wonder Pathfinder has absolutely no transparency.

However, the Audit Commission's report, Market Response, contains the first official hint that Manchester and Salford Pathfinder has failed…and that developers are being bailed out with huge amounts of public money.

To understand how it's failed you have to understand the strange logic that underlies Pathfinder. Put simply, the aim was to improve areas by bulldozing old housing and building posh new properties. This would have the affect of bringing in people with money who would pay higher council tax and dilute all the poverty figures at the same time. It was a win-win for the Council, while the developers were given huge grants to `encourage' them to get involved in previously `defunct' areas. 

In Salford alone, there were originally plans to virtually wipe out the whole of Central Salford's old housing, with Council reports predicting anywhere between 7500 and 15000 houses being bulldozed by 2020. In 2003 a report to Salford Council's Cabinet set out some of the main points, what it called "re-structuring the housing market… by reducing the number of empty properties, increasing the proportion of owner occupied homes, changing the distribution of properties within Council Tax Bands, increasing house values and prices…"

Meanwhile, Countryside Properties, in its planning application for `New Broughton' stated quite clearly that "By introducing more market housing, which is generally occupied by a greater proportion of economically active people, there is likely to be an overall improvement in the health of the residential population of the area."

Does the health of the people who used to live in `Old Broughton' improve? No. Do the statistics improve? Yes. It's called diluting a community and its problems.

So has it all worked, at a cost of over £360million? While Pathfinder itself tells the community nothing, the Audit Commission report lets a few fat cats out of the bag.

It says that this month Manchester and Salford City Councils are setting up an `Experts Reference Group' stuffed full of `consultants'…"to assist in identifying solutions for housing schemes which have stalled or have a large number of unsold properties".

It adds that in `New Broughton' apartment blocks that were "initially built for outright sale" are now being turned over to "social rent, shared equity and first time buyer initiative". The report doesn't mention any gains for the community in terms of social housing, only that "this has helped keep the developer on site and secured a commitment to future phases." 

The pattern is being repeated all over Salford – in Higher Broughton where blocks of huge overpriced houses in Broughton Green have been bought by a housing association… in Kersal where chunks of Miller Homes' `Unity Quarter' have also been turned over to social housing… and in Langworthy where Chimney Pot Park continues to draw public grants…

The Pathfinder's function now seems to be clearing up its own mess, or, according to the Audit Commission report… "to support high profile development schemes where they are on site and at risk of mothballing or withdrawal..."

Basically Pathfinder is veering off its original path and according to its own terms and objectives seems to be failing miserably… In the report the Audit Commission tells the Pathfinder Board to review "the overall impact of the changes in tenure balance of schemes on the long term strategic objective to increase home ownership in the pathfinder area"…

In other words, the whole point of the £360million exercise was to put up posh houses to be bought by professional people, thus bringing the areas `up', in some kind of weird social engineering experiment. But that hasn't happened – and it wasn't happening even before the housing crash.

They are having to put the properties out to rent - which wasn't the idea and suggests massive failure. Plus, more public money is having to be thrown at the problem to bail out developers, who were already in receipt of huge public grants…

However, while Pathfinder is failing, its bulldozers continue to wipe out Salford's old affordable houses. Indeed, while housing and land prices have dropped the Pathfinder, according to the Audit Commission report, is "looking at the accelerated acquisition of land and property".

Which means more demolitions and more grass crofts left empty, waiting for the upturn when developers will return to make more fat profits…

No wonder they don't want any transparency or accountability…

Manchester Salford HMR Pathfinder Partnership (MSP) responded to our previous article:

"This is one of a series of reports produced by the Audit Commission to explore how each of the HMR pathfinders is responding to the changing market conditions experienced in their localities. The report on  MSP highlights a number of actions taken in response to these conditions. MSP is currently considering the  recommendations included  in the report."


 

Neo wrote
at 11:07:39 on 09 December 2009
That makes sense, encouraging home ownership by taking peoples homes off them??? What did the council expect these people to do or where did they expect them to go? These were the poorer, working class, less affluent people. These were the people who invested in the area, who WERE the community. These are the people who have subsidised the regeneration by being exploited over the money they got for their homes. How much money have Salford council or the council tax payers of Salford seen from the flagship (sic) Broughton Green scheme? Come on Merry and Warmisham--tell us its a success. (we know you sneak a peak at the Salford Star site)
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: DIRTY OLD TOWN PERFORMED NEAR SALFORD GASWORKS IN DEMOLITION PROTEST
Should save. As we grow up with them looking as us ever day passed the wall and so did are grandparents an d them before . If they... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
Well done in getting someone to foot the bill. But do not be shy. Tell us who, print the letter of funding agreement, show us the ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
If it was all honest and above board, then you would think that they would be happy to tell you who paid for the trip.However, the... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
Rossi whilst Dennet may be working his arse off he needs to try harder as clearly he as his predecessors continue to fail this Cit... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT
Looks a bit pissed to me. There again, if I'd have been there, and Salford Council were buying, I would have been well pissed, so ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT

Star date: 21st June 2018

COUNCIL SPENT £5,750 ON MIPIM PR IN SOUTH OF FRANCE

Salford Council spent almost £10,000 on the jaunt to the MIPIM property orgy in Cannes. A newly published contract register shows that, as well as the £4,022 costs for the City Mayor and two officers to go to the South of France paid by unknown private sector companies, the Council also spent £5,750 on marketing and PR for MIPIM.

The contract register also shows the Council is spending £9,500 on a 'Salford Story' press consultant, £118,000 on its failed 'digital community hub', over £14,000 on a 'leadership programme' and, er, £25,000 on milk and bread?

Full details here...

NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS

Star date: 20th June 2018

'WE RECOGNISE THE HISTORIC INTEREST'...BUT THEY'RE BEING DEMOLISHED!

Despite musical protests and petitions, the National Grid is adamant that the Salford gas holders, made famous in the Dirty Old Town anthem, will be demolished.

Campaigners are asking for the Grid to re-think a new use for the structures, like in many other towns and cities, but the company states that while "We recognise the historic interest in the Salford gasholder...the structure is being dismantled..."

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE

Star date: 19th June 2018

COUNCIL BLOCKS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST ON £4,000 MIPIM TRIP

Salford City Council has refused to answer a Salford Star Freedom of Information request on which private company paid the £4,022 costs for City Mayor Paul Dennett and two staff to go to the South of France for the MIPIM property event.

The Council states that "the commercial interests of the Council outweigh that of the public interest in disclosure". The Salford Star is to appeal the decision.

Full details here...

DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING

Star date: 18th June 2018

OVER 80% OF COUNCIL WORKERS HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN SERVICES AND ALMOST 50% THINKING OF LEAVING THEIR JOBS

A survey of almost 1,500 local council workers in the North West reveals that 81% have no confidence in the future of local services, 49% are thinking of leaving their jobs, 54% believe their council no longer delivers quality services, and 45% think that their employer doesn't make the right decisions for the public.

The other results of the survey by UNISON to coincide with its local government conference make equally depressing reading, as the union states that "Vital local services in the North West are collapsing".

Full details here...

SALFORD TIME OUT FOR CARERS

Star date: 18th June 2018

TRIPS, CAKES, MASSAGE, ADVICE AND CHAT AS CARERS TAKE TIME OUT

"I was absolutely weary...I needed to get out of the house" Ernie

Caring for a loved one is indeed a labour of love but it can also be life consuming and draining. So a group called Time Out For Carers is making a difference, running weekly sessions where escapism is the order of the day.

There's free massages, trips out, advice on allowances, tea and coffee and cakes, but, most importantly, relaxed informal chats with carers who are all in the same position.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx