HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
OFFSHORE PFI COMPANY PROFITS FROM SALFORD KIDS’ EDUCATION
 

Star date: 5th August 2016

SALFORD COUNCIL TO REFINANCE OVER £400MILLION PFI SCHOOL DEBT

Five Salford schools built under the Government's Building Schools for the Future scheme and financed by crippling PFI (Private Finance Initiative) contracts are being re-financed, although the details are being kept secret.

Salford City Council is committed to over £400million in school PFI contracts, backed in part by Government grants, at interest rates of between 8% and 10%; and is paying over £7million a year to a finance `vehicle' which is 80% owned by offshore HICL Infrastructure, as huge profits are made from Salford kids' education.

Full details here...


The details are complicated and secret, the figures eye watering. But what is clear is that offshore companies are cashing in with public money from Salford kids' education.

Back in 2009 Salford City Council began a 25 year Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contract to build two secondary schools under the Building Schools for the Future scheme. Official Government figures show that the actual capital, or building, cost for these schools was £55.6million. By the close of the contract in 2036/7 it will cost a staggering £229million, including interest and operational costs.

In 2011 Salford Council began another 25 year PFI contract to build three new schools. Government figures show that the capital cost was £69.9million, with the final cost an equally staggering £274.4million.

Originally both contracts were with a SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) called S & W TLP (Project Co One and Two), in which companies Hochtief and Lang O'Rourke held an 80% stake, with Salford Council and Amber Infrastructure holding 10% each.

Between four and five years later, Hochtief and O'Rourke had sold their stake to HICL Infrastructure, an offshore company based in the tax haven of Guernsey, which has continued to reap huge profits from the contracts. HICL has a finance portfolio of over three dozen schools contracts nationally.

Salford Council accounts for 2015-16 show the enormity of the PFI schemes, paying interest rates of 8% and 10% on the two contracts, while market rates are currently less than 1%.

Over the remaining years of both contracts, the Council is committed to making payments of £430million, supported by Government grants of over £276million, but still having to find £153.373millionfor schools that cost around £125million to build in the first place.

Accounts show that Salford City Council is having to find an average of £7.133million per year to finance these PFI contracts, although they add that `The actual payments made will depend upon S&W TLP's performance in provision of the services'.

The payments are coming straight out of the budgets for schools, which are already beginning to make teachers redundant (see previous Salford Star articles – click here and click here). It is not clear what happens to these contracts, or the school building assets, should the schools become academies ie privatised.

Next week, Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, is set to rubber stamp the `refinancing' of `Phase 1 and Phase 2 BSF Grouped Schools PFI Schemes'. The details, as always, are being kept secret, discussed in Part 2 of a Cabinet meeting.

The Salford Star would like to ask Salford Council how far these PFI schemes are detrimentally affecting school budgets and what the terms of the `refinancing' are: ie whether there are financial penalties to pay etc. But neither Salford Council nor the Mayor speak to the Salford Star or answer any requests for interviews and comments.

Meanwhile, Salford City Council accounts also reveal the staggering total amount of PFI liabilities for public financed contracts as whole in the city, which include the Pendleton PFI, special schools and secondary schools PFI projects...

The total PFI liability for Salford Council in 2015 was £155.574million. In 2016 it is £185.573millionup by £30million.

This year, Salford Council will be forking out a total of £32.339million in PFI payments, of which £17.5million - over half - is in interest alone!

Over the next thirty years, Salford Council will be forking out a total of £893million in PFI payments, of which almost £295million is interest!

Most of this interest is being paid to offshore companies paying little or no tax; that have bought stakes from the original contractors and are now cashing in, while Salford suffers from an ongoing financial crisis...

The community campaign People vs Barts PFI is calling for the nationalisation of Special Purpose Vehicles to "end profiteering from public assets", and is urging trade union branches, community and other relevant organisations to pass motions in support of its aims.

Its full proposal The People v PFI has a full explanation of what SPVs and PFI are and how they work, together with its alternative nationalisation ideas – click here for full details.


• HICL Infrastructure also has a 50% holding in Salford Royal Hospital PFI – see previous Salford Star article for full details.

Over the coming months, the Salford Star will be investigating the remaining PFI contracts within Salford.

Bill. Eccles wrote
at 05:57:04 on 12 August 2016
The point everyone's missing is the Labour Party don't give a toss about education, unless it's their kids education. Educated people don't vote labour, this is why labour are dumbing down the education system in salford, dumb people vote labour, simple, but true. What Shirley said above proves the point, salford labour councillors don't care about your children's future, it's labours future voters they care more about. Hundreds of children never got anywhere near the standard of education they were entitled to (many didn't realise how bad things really were & some parents chose to believe the garbage put out to them) and not one Salford Councillor cared. Keith Mann, John Merry, Roger Jones and others have a lot to answer for.
?
RayofSunshine wrote
at 09:39:37 on 08 August 2016
Under English Law there is a concept known as "odious debt" ; it applies to cases where although parties freely enter into a contract, the Law views such debt as either "unreasonable" or immoral. Such an adjudication, I feel should apply to Salford 's PFI debts! I also note Michael F else's call for The Tory Government to take direct control of Salford City Council -- by his own words Felse is exposed as "a Tory Collaborator"!
?
shirley jones wrote
at 16:04:07 on 05 August 2016
As concerned parents of children at what became Harrop Fold School, whose education suffered due to Salford Council's greed to get their greedy hands on PFI funding, we expressed concerns when they merged 2 schools in Little Hilton to form one school that subsequently went into special measures. It was deemed by Government Officers to be the worst school in the country we were later told. A fact that Salford Council kept from parents. Parents tried to tell Councillors that PFI was going to be a huge scandal one day, that their decision would cost Salford dearly, but they wouldn't listen. They never do. They disparaged parents hugely for daring to speak out because we valued and cared about our children's education. The fact that the school was placed in special measures proves beyond doubt that Salford Councillors failed hundreds of children for years. They treated parents and our children appallingly, children who paid the price of a new school with their own education, as was proven by a string of damning Ofsted reports that both Salford Council and Ofsted tried to prevent us from seeing. However, the FOIA came into force and I was ready to send the email request that same day. Normally we are only allowed to see the first report that puts a school in special measures and the one after it is taken out. It's the ones in the middle that you need to see that are the most telling. However, after a battle we did get all the reports which were truly shocking, much to Salford Council's annoyance. It was the first time ever that a parent had gained access to reports normally kept secret. No wonder they didn't want parents to see them. To get PFI funding, which they nearly didn't get, almost overnight they found £4 million to enable them to underwrite the cost. We never found out what happened to the £4 million. They were still operating from 2 sites long after the Council had a huge amount of money to move them onto one site. In fact the then DoE were under the impression that the school had moved to one site until parents enlightened them to the truth. Wonder what happened to that too. Parents involved the Government because at one point even after the disastrous merger they weren't going to get the wonderful new school that our kids had paid the price to get. Hochtief were involved with building Harrop Fold too. The damage had been done by this point, so it was important that some good came out of it. Hundreds of children never got anywhere near the standard of education they were entitled to (many didn't realise how bad things really were & some parents chose to believe the garbage put out to them) and not one Salford Councillor cared. Keith Mann, John Merry, Roger Jones and others have a lot to answer for. The only person to listen to us was a guy called David Cameron MP who was a Shadow Education Secretary at the time, he contacted me, asked to see the reports, then later his Chief of Staff called to arrange for us to meet, which we did. Not a supporter of the Conservative party to be clear, but he was the only one offering to listen to concerned parents. He was visibly appalled by the reports, it was clear from his comments he had read them & he did listen to our concerns, which was more than Salford Councillors had ever done. They eventually got the new school after letting down hundreds of children, but at what price? Not just the many, many millions it will cost for many years but with children's educations & their future too, as no doubt many will never truly recover from their loss of education. It was just two weeks before David Cameron became Leader of the Conservative party, the rest is history.
?
Gareth L wrote
at 16:04:03 on 05 August 2016
I was going to write that Salford Council will be paying back the debts long after the schools have fallen down! But considering the build quality, I better say they will paying long after Hell has frozen over!
?
Mary Ferrer wrote
at 16:03:11 on 05 August 2016
Its fantastic to have brand spanking new schools (that look like prisons) But at what cost to our children's education. Within this article it states we are loosing teachers. We can't afford to see the teaching staffing going down,when the intake of children's is going up year on year. Why did we need NEW,why didn't the powers that be,opt for renovation. Everything has to be NEW,concrete,cladding metal and glass.Everything comes at a cost,but this will effect the education of OUR children for years to come.
?
Michael James Felse wrote
at 16:03:05 on 05 August 2016
Problem for Salford Council is the small print is the PFi deals. If the Council change or default penalty applies. This can see one off payments up to £300 million demanded or the debt being sold on to a 40% interest rate off shore company, costing Salford an extra £800 million over 10 years. The best way is to wind up Salford Council in bankruptcy to wipe out all debts. Teresa May will then have to get the Government to clear the bill. Salford for 10 years would not be allowed to collect Council Tax meaning we all win. Otherwise pay the bill and keep the Councillor gravy train rolling its wheels round and round.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx