HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL TO LOAN ALMOST £1MILLION TO ITS AJ BELL STADIUM
 

Star date: 7th June 2016

SALFORD MAYOR TO LOAN EVEN MORE MONEY TO FAILING STADIUM

Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, is to sign off another public money loan to the Council's joint venture AJ Bell Stadium, this time up to £942,500, on top of the original £20/22million loan to build the ground and subsequent loans of £2.6million `working capital'.

A report on the stadium, which seeks to ratify the further huge loan at next week's Cabinet meeting, states that there will be more loans needed over the next three years, and that the `market rate' interest will be only be paid "a number of years hence"...

Full details here...


Salford City Council is to loan a further figure `up to £942,500' to its AJ Bell Stadium, or Salford Community Stadium Ltd (COSCOS), which it joint owns with Peel Holdings. Peel will be matching the sum.

A report to be considered by the Council's Cabinet next week, seeking to ratify the loan, states that "Despite an expected break even position at a trading level, there is still the requirement for the Stadium to be supported financially by the Shareholders in 2016/17 in order to repay development and working capital loans and interest..."

These `capital loans and interest' are actually payable to Salford Council, so, yet again, the Council is lending itself money to pay itself... "The funding for 2016/17 is predominantly required to allow COSCOS to pay its existing loan principal and interest obligations to the City Council" the report states.

The same thing happened last August when the Council and Peel loaned the stadium company £857,500 each (see here). The total `working loan capital' now given to the stadium company by Salford Council alone will stand at £3.55million if ratified by new Salford Mayor, Paul Dennett, next week. This is on top of around £17million still owed by the Stadium company to the Council from the original £20-22million building loan.

Salford's ruling councillors have been keen to point out recently how the city actually makes money from the stadium through its `market rate' loans but this latest report states that the interest won't be paid for a long time...

"The interest has been ignored for cash flow forecast purposes, as interest on new loans is expected to accrue but is not expected to be actually paid in the cash flow planning period" it states "Interest repayment will be a number of years hence aligned to Loan Note repayment." It proposes that the repayment date is 2022.

The report states further... "Interest will be charged at the agreed rate between the shareholders but will only be payable upon redemption".

The interest on loans that the Council takes out is almost certainly taken from its Revenue Account, ie the money used to pay for front line services.

These latest loans are not the end of the hand-outs, according to the report... "It is also currently anticipated, that over at least the next three years further loan finance will be required from the two COSCOS shareholders to support the company."

The report adds that the only way the stadium company is ever going to pay off these loans is by flogging the 17 hectares of development land around the Stadium. Two years ago, the then Deputy Mayor David Lancaster stood up at a Council meeting and announced that the Council was on the verge of selling land other than the Greene King pub deal..."If this comes off we won't be needing any more loans" he crowed.

Two years, and two more loans worth £1.8million later, no further land has been sold - although the Council is confident that "Further sales of development land are in the pipeline and will possibly include small supermarkets, fast food outlets, car dealerships, a hotel and petrol filling stations..."

It adds that "an estimated 5,000 more jobs will be created by the development at the site".

Together with the 3,858 `gross permanent jobs' being promised at Port Salford, and the 15,500 jobs promised at MediaCityUK, Salford is obviously looking towards full employment in the very near future...


mary ferrer wrote
at 04:49:16 on 12 June 2016
Noreen, I don't know if they still have a question time at full council. When they did you had to have your question in 10 days before. Its just a thought.its a crime the way this council have and are still treating the people of this city. We all know they had to make cut's. But I am sure there were other places these cuts could have come from. The stadium being one.They have free run of this city and they will never change until there is a strong opposition. The conservatives are only bothered about what happens within their little space. Sod the rest of the city
?
Michael James Felse wrote
at 04:48:48 on 12 June 2016
Good words Noreen. We need to get a none labour leader in Greater Manchester to stop all these disgraceful moves. A free Mayor is the only way to get public trust.
?
noreen bailey wrote
at 16:07:37 on 11 June 2016
well its taken me a while to reply to this as I am totally dumb founded, why has this new mayor not learned from the animosity that was left through ian stewart what this man and his followers did to the most vulnerable in Salford is just beyond belief specially when the transport was stopped for the elderly and the adults with additional needs, you might all think this was what had to be done but believe me it has caused a lot of hardship and upset in both carers and clients lives who used and depended on the transport and to think we were all trying so hard to believe that this new mayor would be more under standing and willing to talk to us but nothing, I asked him on his face book page what he was going to do to help us carers but did not even have the decency to reply. well I can assure you Mr Dennitt I will be asking you for an appointment for myself and other mums and dads who were hit bad when ian stewart decided it was his choice to do this and make those cuts I am asking you on here please would you agree to see myself and a few other people to let us know why you also think it is more important to lend the AJ Bell Stadium nearly another million pounds when we have families that are struggling so much to get their sons or daughters to centres If you don't see this I will send you a copy of it as well via email to have an appointment whichever one it takes and I will not leave this there if you do not give myself and friends an answer.This really is rubbing salt in our wounds a very irate mum
?
Michael James Felse wrote
at 16:07:22 on 11 June 2016
Yes Marcus - I want a free Mayor in Greater Manchester and with me being a Brexit supporter the writing is on the wall.
?
Marcus9er@hotmail.co.uk wrote
at 09:42:44 on 11 June 2016
Oh no are we going to have Felse banging on about him being a free Mayor for the next year!?!? People wouldn't touch you with s barge pole!
?
Phil Hogan wrote
at 13:42:42 on 10 June 2016
Its about time they looked after themselves, They have a stadium thats empty 70% of the time Peel Holdings and AJ Bell company should get there acts together and start having live bands there. They could make a profit easy. I cant understand why such a big stadium with so many opportunities doesn't grasp it. Even Ethiad and old Trafford have gigs on to keep money coming in its not rocket science. Irlam Live just had 3 days of gigs organised by 3 local lads and with no knowledge money or experience of live bands and it was really successful, So for a Company like Peel Holdings to lie back and ask for anything is an absolute joke. The only thing they seem to promote all year round is Jinglefest at AJBell at an extortionate price. Here's an Idea put a promoter on the payroll and get some money coming in and stop running to mummy when the money runs out.
?
Michael James Felse wrote
at 18:26:54 on 09 June 2016
Wrote should realise my time in life brings a freedom that lets me talk the truth. Salford is important to me where I wish for better in everyone's life. As Salford Council fail in that duty it will be my big pleasure to seek the Greater Manchester mayor job to bring our and other councils to be forced corrective actions. Free as this is about trust, respect and social justice to me and not about pay.
?
wrote
at 17:06:04 on 08 June 2016
Michael nobody will vote for someone dying of cancer shut up about having a ukip manchester mayor. Salford is better off with labour again giving cash to our sport teams.
?
Pete Green wrote
at 08:58:01 on 08 June 2016
Built too far away from Salford's rugby league heartland. The Willows was a 'proper' rugby league ground and with a little investment, would have been a better option for Salford fans. As a lifeline nag Swinton supporter, I very much feel the bias towards the red side of the City! Remember Station Road, SWINTON?
?
Michael Jsmes Felse wrote
at 08:57:55 on 08 June 2016
How can the people be expected to trust politicians. We need a free Grester Manchester mayor to sort out this mess and to show how UKIP is the future party of truth and trust.
?
Woody wrote
at 06:06:45 on 08 June 2016
Bryan Kirkby,try not to email when your pissed
?
bryan kirkby wrote
at 20:32:33 on 07 June 2016
can pople get there fax right the ground is nothing to with salford red delivils salford pays rent to the comupeny that rounds the stadium to use the place salford do not make any money from any thing on match dayds exsetet from the ticites
?
Simon wrote
at 19:35:24 on 07 June 2016
All that money spent and Swinton still ain't got a ground, remind me again where Salford council is based???? Maybe the new mayor can sort it out, probably not!!!
?
Inside Out wrote
at 19:35:21 on 07 June 2016
Last I heard they hadn't approved this. It was going to the vote and to his credit he was at least laying the argument out. Laying it out to the electorate in advance would be a nice gesture but a token one as councillors will vote as they wish regardless. It's naive to think Labour voters didn't already know what they're getting once they voted him in. Questions after this are really two fold. One would be whether this sum of money could have been spent in a way which would have produced a greater yield. That seems unlikely. The business of a Council would not ordinarily focus on profit but in times of fake austerity it's inevitable that it does. The other issue is as to what is being propped up. Whilst a mere 250 jobs would be at stake the fact is the Council can't afford for this to fail. The land around hasn't sold and there's no plan to develop a tram stop there regardless of periodic noises made to the contrary. Salford City haven't yet sugar daddied their way to sufficient success to justify a stadium move and if the Reds stadium fails then investment elsewhere in the city would potentially be called into question. On balance then, and in the absence of anyone here making a sane suggestion as to an alternative, it looks like a small step in the right direction.
?
joseph.oneill wrote
at 18:54:49 on 07 June 2016
Labour will continue unabated while there is no opposition within to hold them to account. Kudos to Steve and this Online Mag to try to dig out the truth, but sadly Mr Merry and Labour have left us with a white elephant along with the BBC orchestra. How Long can this farce be allowed to fester and bleed this city dry?, Mary asked was there a business plan obvious their was not, salford could never fill this ground and without the variety club to subsidise it we had the start of a money pit. If the club wishes to continue then let it seek funding from the markets if not then like the disaster it is let it die and sell the ground to ikea I believe they are looking for premises.
?
Salford Star wrote
at 18:28:24 on 07 June 2016
See White's comment below... Yep we've seen this letter which came out an hour after it went on this website. In it, Mr Dennett says he wants an "open and honest dialogue with staff, council members and Trade Union representatives" - and Labour Party members! What about the rest of the community??? Don't they get to find out? Don't they get to hold him to account?
?
white wrote
at 18:24:44 on 07 June 2016
According to Mr Dennett's letter to party members; the council has received £1.503m in loan repayment in the past year and over four years has had £1.04m in interest. Perhaps someone could work out how long it will be at this rate before the council gets it’s money back. I would say that this drip feeding of money back to the council is not what is needed; what is needed is the whole sum that was turned over to the stadium which could be used where it is vitally needed in the city. He states that the stadium company is a growing business and requires financial support. if it is a viable ‘growing business it should be able to get finance from the usual sources, i.e. the banks. To top all this he now going to hand over another £900,000+, and probably more over the next three years, which is more money that isn’t being spent where it is needed. The stadium is a bottomless pit and the council simply can’t see that. plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
?
Mary Ferrer wrote
at 17:30:18 on 07 June 2016
I am sat here staring at a plank screen,because words fail me.our new mayor is following in the footsteps of the last one.I would love to look at the books for the stadium. I can honestly say I haven't see any advertising for the venues within the stadium for rent or hire.I know the phone number is a premium number.been told the gym within the building is crap(my sons words,not mine) I wonder did they ever do a business plan before the council invested OUR money in this sinking community stadium.Knew before the first brick was put in place this was going to be a drain on the people of Salford. But no one would listen
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx