HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD DEMOCRACY AT THE HEART OF NO VOTE FOR SALIX STOCK TRANSFER
 

Star date: 15th October 2014

WHY DISABLED CANON HUSSEY COURT TENANT IS VOTING `NO' TO PRIVATISATION OF SALFORD COUNCIL HOMES

TJ is physically and mentally disabled and lives on the incredibly unsuitable 14th floor of Canon Hussey Court on the Islington Estate. He had been battling Salix Homes for years, attempting to get moved to a ground floor property, and got nowhere. Then a Salford City councillor became involved, making the company aware of its equalities duties against discrimination. Almost the next day TJ was offered a ground floor property.

This accountability of Salix to councillors, and ultimately residents, is why TJ is calling for Salix tenants to vote `No' in the current ballot on Salford Council stock transfer.

Full details here...


TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford
TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford
TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford TJ at Canon Hussey Court Salford Vote No To Stock Transfer in Salford poster
Defend Council Housing logo
click image to enlarge

Tahira Chakotai, or TJ, lives on the 14th floor of Canon Hussey Court on the Islington Estate, literally a stone's throw from all the posh new developments on Chapel Street.

TJ's list of physical and mental disabilities is alarming... "I have an auto-immune disorder, I have damaged leg and hips which can't be fixed because I have bad heart and uncontrolled epilepsy so I can't go under surgery... I have neurasthenia, which means that when I get distressed my heart rate goes above 150bpm and I'm at risk of a stroke or heart attack...I have tunnel vision in my left eye, dyspraxia and autism..."

TJ walks with a stick and, on bad days, has to use his mobility scooter which he can barely negotiate around the tight corridors and paths of Canon Hussey Court; indeed he has to get out of the scooter and lift it over a step to get into his top floor flat because Salix refuse to provide a ramp.

He walks with a stick and has permanently damaged legs following two nasty falls down the stairs at Canon Hussey, sustained when the lifts were out of service. Following these events, TJ almost became a prisoner in his own home when the lifts weren't working, were being refurbished or were blocked off by workmen's ladders serving the `eco-pod' on the roof after the block's `decent homes' makeover.

A medical assessment in August 2013 by Dr Richard Smith, and sent to Salix, stated clearly that "TJ's current living environment poses a clear and immediate risk to his health...

"...as someone with a number of disabilities I hope that TJ's accommodation status is reviewed immediately and changes are made in line with the Equality Act (2010) and the government's own autism strategy, Fulfilling and Rewarding Lives, to find suitable accommodation that fits his needs as someone with numerous physical health mental health and neurodevelopmental needs" he added "...In TJ's case severe mental health problems could result, as well as suicide attempts, if his accommodation is not reviewed and changed as soon as possible." 

Following this letter, in October last year, TJ was given a `management award for re-housing' by Salix and was invited to bid for a bungalow in a number of places, including the nearby Devine Close. However, when he bid for a property here, he was turned down as it was "age banded to people over 55 years old".

TJ put in a complaint citing discrimination under the Equality Act - `eligibility through disability' – but it was turned down by a Salix officer who wrote "I find that you have not been discriminated against by Salix Homes due to your disabilities nor has Salix Homes restricted the service or the support you receive as a result of your disability. Salix Homes have provided adequate assistance, support and reasonable adjustment to facilitate your move and to enable you to improve your living circumstances..."

"I took it to a Stage 1 and Stage 2 complaint" says TJ "Unfortunately, it was always the same letter...that they had not discriminated and to stop contacting them; it was harassment."

Meanwhile, a Salford Council Needs Assessment of TJ from November, seen by the Salford Star, stated "Salix Homes to offer alternate accommodation...if he were in more suitable accommodation he would be less stressed and hopefully his mental health would improve as his level of anxiety decreased..."

But the move still never happened. And in certain cases where the lift at Canon Hussey was out of order, TJ literally had to be carried up and down the stairs to his flat in order to do shopping or carry out his many volunteering duties in the community.

It wasn't until June this year when Councillor Paul Dennett, an Assistant Mayor, got involved, challenging Salix on its obligations under the Equality Act, that the social housing company changed its policies.

Dennett wrote to TJ - copying in the Salford Star and Salix – stating "I just want to assure you that the issue of the City Council's Housing Lettings/Allocations Policy (Choice-Based Lettings) being Equalities Act compliant has been taken seriously and I've previously received assurance from Salix Homes that this will be considered in the forthcoming review of the Housing Lettings/Allocations Policy.
 
"Also, just to let you know, I have also agreed to participate in the City Council's working group to review the Housing Lettings/Allocations Policy" he added "and I'm especially interested to know how the general and specific duties contained within the Equalities Act 2010 will be considered as part of the review and incorporated in any future policy."

Almost immediately, TJ was offered another property at Alexander Gardens.

"Councillor Dennett challenged Salix on their policies to do with bidding and implementing tenancies to people who are disabled" TJ explains "He wrote to Salix and said that their procedures for tenancy application is actually outside of the equality legislation. The Equality Act 2010 clearly states that you cannot discriminate on age.

"The policies were changed last year because it meant that people were getting a property based on their age and not their disability, therefore they were living in unsuitable accommodation, thus needing more support and costing councils even more money to keep them in the wrong dwelling" he adds "If you say `I don't want a person to live in a bungalow because they are not over 55 but they are severely disabled' that would be inappropriate. Because a councillor got involved they changed their policy."

At present, Salford Council remains the ultimate accountable body for Salix Homes and councillors can intervene on behalf of residents. If people vote `Yes' in the current ballot on stock transfer, this democratic right would be lost. Needless to say, TJ is voting `No'.

Unfortunately, this isn't the end of the story for TJ. He turned down the property he was offered in Alexander Gardens...

"It had rotten windows, asbestos exposed via the floor, and the wiring hadn't been tested which is a breach of installation regulations" he explains "Besides which, Alexander Gardens is being knocked down, although they've denied it."

In the formal Business Case for the stock transfer it clearly states "A number of key issues were identified in the study that highlighted the need for an option appraisal for Alexander Gardens, a 36 unit sheltered housing scheme. The study concluded that this is not an appropriate location for such a facility and recommends the consideration of redevelopment of the site to mitigate the flood risk."

So TJ is back to square one, living in an inappropriate flat on the top floor of a towerblock. This week he is in more pain, a slipped disc caused by trying to negotiate getting his mobility scooter into the property.

"I got home after being at the Mobility Shop in the Arndale" he says "I tried to turn my scooter around as there is no room to just drive it straight into my flat, as there is a wall in front of my door. There is non-slip polish on all the floors, which creates a large amount of resistance when trying to slide the scooter around. My right leg gave way, and something in my back went.

"I have already been diagnosed in the past with badly worn plates and was told not to lift heavy objects" he explains "I recently asked Salix Homes to create a ramp out of my existing step which would cost no more than £200 but they refused. Because of this I have now have slipped disc in my back, which is trapping a nerve, and is causing me a great deal of pain and discomfort.

"I do not think it is fair, and feel that I am being discriminated against, as Salix Homes refuses to make reasonable adjustments to my current property, which has already been deemed unsuitable by many health specialists" TJ concludes "I now feel that Salix Homes no longer care for the disabled, and I have lost complete faith in their managing abilities."


Photos of TJ by Steven Speed

Shane T wrote
at 04:21:17 on 24 October 2014
Hi TJ. Finally got to read the article. I am as disgusted as everyone else, that you are being treated in this truly appalling manner. It simply doesn't make sense to me, that a company would treat someone in this way. Keep fighting the good fight (even though you shouldn't have to), and I hope you get somewhere decent to live very soon. See you at Shopmo :-))
?
wrote
at 09:56:37 on 17 October 2014
It heartens me to read that Mr T Chakotai got a least some help from Cllr Dennett. More is the pity the local Cllr encouraging everyone to vote No to the transfer didn't show more concern for this mans plight...but then what else would you expect from a shallow man, full of empty promises who's more interested in jetting off to COE on National Labour party business than to care about the wellbeing of constituents in his own ward...he's grown fat on the back of the Labour party.
?
Peter Tully Snr wrote
at 16:07:22 on 16 October 2014
Tenants should vote NO! end of.
?
Tahir Chakotai wrote
at 08:50:55 on 16 October 2014
May I start by thanking Mrs Gaynor Heaton, Mr. Tom Nolan, and Mrs Sharon Hooley for their supportive and informative comments. Mr. Tom Nolan resides in my tower block, and was treat in a appalling manner by Salix Homes employees when Canon Hussey Court was being refurbished. Mr. Tom Nolan makes a valid point when he says "it's an uphill battle", as Salix Homes staff rarely take responsibility for their mistakes. I have defended many vulnerable adults from the inappropriate behaviour of Salix Homes, and even had to go to court. In a recent case Salix Homes/Salford Council legal team lost because there were serious inaccuracies and exaggerations within their evidence concerning a tenant and a dog. I was even threatened with eviction for defending a tenant in a court of Law. To date I have received any apologies from Salix Homes, and have been informed by Stephensons Solicitors that this was a criminal act, as they had threatened a witness in an ongoing Civil/Criminal case. This lack of accountability is why many tenants will be voting "No" to the Privatisation of Salix Homes. I would also like to state "That I am disgusted with Salix Homes for leaving Mrs Sharon Hooley, who is a disabled person, in a property that yet again, is totally unsuitable. There is no excuse for this. Mrs Hooley can be moved to a more suitable property, using a internal policy called a "Management Move". It would seem once again, Salix Homes employees are discriminating against another disabled/vulnerable adult. I am sure there are more disabled victims out there, who's story and voice needs to be heard, and I would encourage them to come forward, and allow The Salford Star to print their story. It really is the only way to stop the inappropriate abuse of disabled tenants, by Salix Homes employees. I have also noticed a lack of comments from Salix Homes employees, concerning this story. I wonder why that is? Salix Homes needs to be overseen by the Salford Council, to neutralise their inappropriate behaviour towards the disabled and vulnerable, which is why I personally, will be voting "No" to the privatisation of Salix Homes.
?
Sharon Hooley wrote
at 06:31:29 on 16 October 2014
I cannot believe the way Salix Housing is working. I'm a resident at Canon Green Court and I must admit that I too have been on the housing list for over 3 years now and can't find a suitable wheelchair friendly home. It's been such a nightmare that I gave up looking. I struggle with crutches and have no proper access to the kitchen. The bathroom is too small....even if it was made into a wet room it will not house a wheelchair. Depressed is not the word. I feel useless in my own home. I've certainly changed my mind to vote 'NO'.
?
tom nolan wrote
at 06:31:06 on 16 October 2014
just a point when I asked the council for help over the disgraceful way I have been treated with the decent homes work I was told by the council and gena merret that the could not help as salix police themselves and are accountable to no one only themselves . that's why I have had a 2 year battle with them with no help from anyone. Even when I went before the independent panel the chair of the panel warned me that this is a futile exercise as salix do not have take any notice of any recommendations they may make. well done tj this is one up hill battle now I go to the ombudsman but even they say it's a waste of time.
?
wrote
at 06:30:54 on 16 October 2014
Thank you Mrs Gaynor Heaton for your supportive words. Alexander Gardens is a Sheltered Scheme, which means this place houses the elderly and disabled. I find it completely disgusting that a Salix Homes managed Sheltered Scheme, has allowed the elderly to be placed in housing, that is not to a Decent Homes Standard. On top of this, they are planning, within the near future, to demolish Alexander Gardens. These OAP's have worked most of their lives, only to end up in substandard accommodation. Yet another reason to vote "No" to the privatisation of Salix Homes.
?
Gaynor Heaton wrote
at 18:12:07 on 15 October 2014
I personally viewed numbers 8 & 10 Alexander Gardens 3 months ago and was deeply concerned at the appalling state of both of them. Neither came even close to the “Decent Homes Standard”. It is completely inappropriate and unacceptable that the single glazed wooden windows in both these properties were not only rotten, but were insecure and had thick mould growing on them. Neither of the two Kitchens complied with the “Decent Homes Standard” either on Size or Layout, and with regards to the Electrical Sockets, there was an inadequate Number and they were Untested and clearly exceptionally old. Also as it states in the Article there was no Electrical Certificate at all for the properties. I was informed by Salix “That the Electrics were to Current Standards”, which they most definitely are NOT. They may well be “Safe” but that is not the same as “To Current Standards”. And more importantly NOBODY can legally state they are safe when they haven’t been CHECKED! And, as also stated in the Article, the Kitchen floor had exposed Asbestos Tiles, and since these were broken and scuffed have to be classed as dangerous. I have noted that these Two Properties have consistently reappeared on Salford Home Search showing that nobody is willing to move into them in the dilapidated state that they are in.
?
Tahir Chakotai wrote
at 18:10:48 on 15 October 2014
I would like to start by saying a massive thank you to the editor and photographer of the Salford Star. The article is truly amazing and informs Salix Homes tenants why they should vote "No To Privitisation". Recently I commented on a Salford Star concerning the "Transfer Of Salix Homes Properties". I stated that many Salix Homes tenants like myself, who are disabled, were being discriminated against, and stopped from moving to more suitable accommodation, due to the age banding of properties in Salford. However, "A Dr Steve Sharples, whom spurts out random government legislation on the Salford Star, implied that what I stated was "infactual, and was not legible , so he could not extract any relevant information to comment on". Well Dr Steve Sharples was obviously not wanting to comment or promote the fact, a company he supports is discriminating against disabled tenants. In conclusion, thanks to the wonderful services of Councillor Dennett, and his fabulous PA's, the disabled can now bid on properties that are for the over 55's. Councillor Dennett has now set a new legal president, so if I am entitled to such an offer, then the disabled of Salford are entitled to these housing services too. This is what the Equality Act 2010 is all about. I will end this comment by saying what I always say "Do Salix Homes Tenants want to privatise a company, that shows no compassion or humility, towards those who have been deemed vulnerable by society"?
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx