HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD MAYOR DAY OF DESTINY OVER SALFORD REDS SCANDAL
 

Star date: 26th August 2014

EXPECT A WHITEWASH FROM SALFORD COUNCIL AUDIT COMMITTEE

Tomorrow morning Salford Council's Audit and Accounts Committee will discuss the internal audit report which revealed the scandal of former Strategic Director Martin Vickers authorising up to £164,000 subsidies to Marwan Koukash's Salford City Reds (now Salford Red Devils), weeks before he left the Council and got a job with the rugby club - all done with the knowledge and agreement of Salford Mayor Ian Stewart.

The conclusion of the audit report was a whitewash, so expect a probable whitewash tomorrow – but will members of the Audit Committee ask the right questions? Here we give them a hand...

Full details here...


Last week a bombshell internal audit report from Salford Council exposed a web of financial dealings whereby public funds were diverted to, yet again, subsidise Salford City Reds rugby club, now known as Salford Red Devils.

The report revealed...

• Up to £164,000 of Salford City Council money set aside to pay for match day costs of the rugby club which should have been paid to the AJ Bell Stadium joint owners, Salford City Council and Peel Holdings. The details were confirmed in a letter by former Strategic Director Martin Vickers to Peel Holdings

• This was all done with the full knowledge of Salford Mayor Ian Stewart. The report notes... "The City Mayor has confirmed that he was involved and was aware of, and in agreement with the contents of this letter at the time it was sent and had discussed the matter with the Deputy City Mayor" [Councillor David Lancaster].

• No decision notice was ever published, meaning the payments/subsidies were not open to scrutiny by councillors, the media or the public.

• The person who should have noticed the misdeed was the Council's Monitoring Officer. But the Monitoring Officer was Martin Vickers.

•  The Report adds: "The City Mayor has stated that whilst he was involved in the making of the decision to fund the match day costs he does not know why the proper governance procedures including producing a Record of Decision were not followed by officers at the time." Yet...

• ...the City Mayor has "Primary legal and strategic responsibility for the operational management of the Council and the development of its plans, policies and priorities." In other words, City Mayor, Ian Stewart, is legally responsible for the management of these decisions.

• There's a lot more, including that the rugby club was given two years free rent at the Stadium, apparently worth over £700,000 (rugby newspapers reported at the time, wrongly as it turns out, that this was the sort of figure the Reds were paying for two seasons)...That Martin Vickers was given a pay-off of £78,000 before he left the Council, yet a Council loan he took on for a car was not deducted from that pay-off (see full details and background of the whole report in previous Salford Star article – click here).

The conclusions to the internal audit were a complete whitewash – On Vickers walking into a job with Salford Reds weeks after arranging these deals and taking a huge pay-off, the report recommends to "strengthen the Council's consideration of such matters in future"...On Vickers being the Monitoring Officer despite being the one who should have been monitored, the report recommends the Council to "consider the creation of an independent Monitoring Officer role and the appointment of a qualified solicitor to that post"...

...Even worse, the report recommends that to cover for the secret decision to subsidise match day costs for the Reds which `did not follow due process and ensure transparency', a decision is backdated by a year and that the payments continue!

The conclusions of the report are a complete whitewash – but what is the Audit Committee going to do about it when it meets in public at the Civic Centre tomorrow morning (9am)?

The answer is, `Don't expect much!'. Of the nine man Committee, six are Labour Party councillors (Councillors Jim Dawson, David Jolley, Joe Murphy, John Walsh, Stephen Hesling and Assistant Mayor, Roger Jones); Conservative Councillor Robin Garrido is in the Chair, and there are two independent members, Tony Bannister and Rabbi Grant.

Labour Party councillors are already playing the report down, talking of mere `defects in the process' which will be sorted. But the audit report, we understand, is just the mere tip of an iceberg which only a full external investigation, Public Inquiry or police investigation could uncover.

In the meantime, here's some questions that the Audit Committee members might like to ask...

1) Martin Vickers had a staff car loan from the Council – How much was this for? What were the pay back terms and interest on the loan?  How much of the loan has been paid back and when?

2) Did Martin Vickers ever own a property on Salford Quays? If he did, did he ever put the flat in the Council's name to avoid a community charge?

3) If the Mayor knew about the decision to subsidise the rugby club, how could he `not know' why `the proper governance procedures...were not followed'?

4) Is the Mayor, who has `legal responsibility' for such decisions, willing to accept such responsibility? If so, he should resign.

5) Why did the Chief Financial Officer not pick up on all this – after all, he's the one who writes the cheques?

6) Why did the external auditors Grant Thornton, not pick up on the secret subsidies? At the Audit Committee meeting tomorrow, Grant Thornton's report on the Council accounts state that "Financial governance arrangements at the Council generally are adequate...Our audit is not designed to test all internal controls or identify all areas of control weakness. However, where, as part of our testing, we identify any control weaknesses, we report these to the Council. Our work has not identified any control weaknesses which we wish to highlight for your attention".

The whole point about having local councils in charge of public money is that they are supposed to be transparent and accountable to the citizens who pay and entrust them with that money. This internal audit report shows a serious breakdown in transparency, accountability and trust.

Somebody must take responsibility for these breakdowns – and it has to be the elected politicians. Will the Audit Committee make them take responsibility, or, at the very least, order an external investigation? Don't hold your breath. Expect a whitewash!


• Those affected by cuts to services for vulnerable people have been absolutely horrified by the revelations of the report. They have called a demonstration outside Salford Civic Centre in Swinton tomorrow morning 8am-10am (for further details see here).

• The Salford Star will be broadcasting live from the Audit Committee meeting To watch click here http://bambuser.com/channel/salfordstar

UPDATE: 27th August

Salford Mayor Scandal Whitewash Over Salford City Reds Investigation - click here 

When are the people of salford going to wake up. wrote
at 19:09:09 on 06 September 2014
Was told last week Ian stewert had abig slap up meal at the town hall for all the labour councillors and thanked them in their help in brushing this story under the carpet, Lancaster, merry and all the other labour councillors were there, the waiter ask stewert what meat he would like, stewert replied he'll have the steak, the waiter then asked what about the vegatables, stewert replied the councillors will have the same. An old one from mrs t days
?
When are the people of salford going to wake up. wrote
at 13:42:21 on 06 September 2014
@wrote. There's actually three cabbages representing the weaste ward, Ronnie Wilson his son Paul Wilson and Paul Wilsons best mate Steven hesling, talk about keeping it in the family. Must cost the labour council a small fortune in big crayons and colouring books to keep these three happy at meetings. You could just see Ian Stewart wiping their chins at meetings when they start to dribble. I've heard Ronnie and Steven are allowed to take their colouring books home after the meetings, David Lancaster informed me if you try to take the books away they stamp their feet and bang on the table.
?
wrote
at 23:14:20 on 05 September 2014
So, Weaste has yet another rotten cabbage to keep the other company. I wondered what the bad smell was.
?
When are the people of salford going to wake up. wrote
at 10:40:20 on 05 September 2014
I read on hear sometime ago someone calling his ward councillor Steven hesling a cabbage and a labour yes man with a low IQ, how spot on and right he was, he to is my ward councillor and I to have spoken to him and all I can say is he's not the sharpest knife in the box, he was one of the labour councillors who took part in the salford reds dodgy deal inquiry, how can someone so incompetent be involved in a inquiry so important as council tax payers money being misspent, but mybe I've answered my own question, labour wanted a yes man and cabbage on the inquiry so they could brush it under the carpet and they certenly got one in hesling
?
wrote
at 16:07:15 on 27 August 2014
The stench of CORRUPTON hangs heavy over this DEAD CITY.
?
shirley jones wrote
at 05:07:48 on 27 August 2014
This shouldn't be dealt with at local level, it's far too serious a matter for that. It should be dealt with by the Audit Commission or from central government. There should be no opportunity given for there to be the expected whitewash. How could it not be with 6 Labour Councillors on the panel. Why haven't the police been called in? How much more public money has been used/squandered in this way? What's next to come out in the open? What about all this selling off of protected public open land and Salford's green spaces, to developers and not even for the highest price? Deals agreed on by Cllr. Lancaster even before notifications are published giving their intention to sell? Negotiations for over 2 years before residents are told anything but then not allowed the same considerations or time that developers are? No time or resources to meet with residents. Time enough though to negotiate with developers, the local cricket club and Lancashire County Cricket Club before residents. We just hope that Martin Vickers wasn't involved in all that. Despite letters to both the Mayor of Salford and the Deputy Mayor several weeks ago from our residents group, neither has had even the common courtesy to reply to us. Then they wonder why people are making the comments that 'it all stinks to high heaven'. Here's hoping they see sense instead of pound signs as usual! Then they wonder why so many either have or are losing all trust in them. You would think their own party would want rid of them, they're making the whole party a laughing stock and dragging it down with them. They're also making an even bigger laughing stock of all Salford Citizens because we continually let them get away with it. If we can't vote them out how else do we get rid of them when they prove not fit for purpose, to be not doing their job that they're paid for and possibly guilty of a crime on this level?
?
mary ferrer wrote
at 05:07:44 on 27 August 2014
The council have for what ever reason over the last 4/5 years been giving loans to the club.In 2010 they gave loans over £1M.I question that figure,as I think it was a lot more.This was to be paid back by the directors if things went belly up.Never happened.Then the loans were to be paid back on the sale of houses built on the former ground at the willows,never happened. I thought the club would not have to pay any rent unless the gates were over a set number.Have they ever reached that number? and who within the council set the cutoff point? Millions have been given and spent on this project,yet the council can't find funding for the people of our city who need the help and support a lot more than a private company.Because that is what the Red Devils are.They never paid the ground rent to the Council when they were at the willows,you or I would never get away with that,but they did for years
?
Disgusted! wrote
at 19:55:21 on 26 August 2014
If there is a whitewash tomorrow then surely this leads the way for any future employee to refer back to this when they make a genuine mistake or dont follow procedure? Has the new council Chief Executive not given a response to this? Yes it was before his time but he is the boss now is he not??? Too many leaders, dont know who does what these days?? And it seems neither do they!
?
More white wash for the future???? wrote
at 19:55:17 on 26 August 2014
Dear report authors, The independent monitoring officer does not need to be a solicitor, the job just needs the post holder to have moral standards. Quite simple really when you think about it for a position designed to uphold "standards" , the only reason a solicitor would be needed is if the decision being monitored involved covering the councils arse on dodgy decisions. Not rocket science is it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
?
et bear wrote
at 19:55:05 on 26 August 2014
Do you know if the Mr Dolan who carried out the internal report is the same Mr Dolan who was a director at the Salford Stadium company until five and a half weeks before the deal was agreed and who stood down to enable Martin Vickers to become a director in his stead? And who then became a director again when Mr Vickers left, eight weeks after the deal? If he is the report must of course be "totally unbiased", as if.
?
Tahir Chakotai wrote
at 19:54:45 on 26 August 2014
Yet another case of the disabled being neglected due to The Salford Council. It disgusts me to know that those who are vulnerable are less important than some random football club. How does the Salford Mayor sleep at night? This is not a case of Austerity Cuts destroying the services for the disabled, this is a case of The Salford Council directing funding to non essential projects, thus depriving the disabled of transport and caring services. Why should I as a disabled person, pay my council tax, only to find out that my money is going into the pockets of a football club, and the employees who work for the Peel Holdings/Group. It's time for change. It's time that Mr. Ian Stewart stands down as Mayor of Salford. It is quite obvious that he does not understand his professional duties, and certainly does not listen to the needs of the vulnerable adults who reside in Salford. I just hope that there is enough citizens within Salford , with a backbone, to challenge this disgusting and inappropriate act against the Disabled. Once again, well done to the editor of the Salford Star, for a balanced and informative news story.
?
wrote
at 19:53:25 on 26 August 2014
Sewerat needs to fuel his camper van up , for his early removal from Salford.
?
wrote wrote
at 17:17:05 on 26 August 2014
dear Salford Star, you should also be asking Stewart and the 6 local Councillors about Irlam and Cadishead College's appalling GCSE results.
?
Tom Warburton wrote
at 17:17:02 on 26 August 2014
Why was the A J Bell stadium built in such an out of the way place inaccesable to ordinary supporters who used to walk to the Willows Salford a last game at the willows against Catalan Dragons attracted 10000 yes Ten thousand plus all on foot or tram Where is that support now If you have not got a car and prepared to pre pay parking charges the forget about going because of the hassle Given larger crowds would allow any loans to the council and peel holdings to be repaid a lot quicker
?
Paul Gerrard wrote
at 13:41:44 on 26 August 2014
Ian Stewart's largesse towards the Red Devils is in stark contrast to his mean-spirited decision to cancel transport for adults with disabilities. We will be making this point at tomorrow's protest, Civic Centre between 8 and 10 am. Come and join us before you go to work.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx