HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD MP CONTROVERSIAL LABOUR PARTY SELECTION PROCESS RAGES ON
 

Star date: 27th July 2014

SARAH BROOKES SELECTION FIASCO COMPARED TO EXPENSES SCANDAL

Controversy continues to rage in the Salford Labour Party, with Karl Brookes writing to members of the Selection Committee who picked the shortlist of candidates to stand in Hazel Blears' vacant seat for the next election, comparing their actions to the MPs' expenses scandal – of which Hazel was the poster girl.

Karl is the husband of Sarah Brookes, who came joint second in Labour Party branch nominations for the candidacy, only to be overlooked by the Committee in favour of a candidate who got just one nomination.

Full details here…


The fiasco within Salford Labour Party continues to roll on, with a letter written to the Selection Committee members who shunned Sarah Brookes' in their shortlist of three candidates to stand for Hazel Blears' vacant seat at the next General Election.

Five candidates had secured nominations from branches, of which Sarah Brookes received four, putting her in joint second place with Sue Pugh, after Rebecca Long Bailey came top with seven nominations.

However, the Selection Committee of ten members* decided to shun Sarah Brookes and, instead, put forward Sophie Taylor, who only received one nomination, alongside Sue Pugh and Rebecca Long Bailey. Their decision is not subject to any kind of appeals process.

The letter to Selection Committee members, seen by the Salford Star, is written by Karl Brookes, Sarah's husband, and compares their actions to those of MPs caught in the middle of the expenses scandal, of which retiring Salford MP Hazel Blears was the poster girl…

Advising the Committee's members that his solicitors are pursuing a legal challenge to the decision, Karl Brookes, while declaring his self-interest, gives his reasons as wanting a wide choice of candidates…

"It is also because there is genuine widespread dismay, disbelief and in some cases, disgust that ten members made this decision to not short-list the five nominated candidates, without it appears, adequate, consideration for the more basic point of how would this look?

"By now, I do understand that the response will be words to the effect of: `All present and correct. Move along, there is nothing here to see'" he adds "Alas, we have been here before when 'the rules were the rules' e.g. MPs' expenses, and we all seemed to forget the obvious point of 'how it would look' then too and that is a point you may, or may not, wish to reflect upon."

Karl Brookes then sent solicitors letters to both the Director of the North West Labour Party and the General Secretary of the Labour Party, also seen by the Salford Star, asking for an explanation of the wonky selection process and requesting that the process is halted until it has been investigated. The letter added, cryptically…

"Recently our clients have been made aware of a series of allegations which they are led to believe were made at the Salford City Labour Group of Councillors meeting which took place on 14th July 2014. We understand that the integrity of the selection process was questioned. While our clients have no wish to comment on the allegations they do believe that the Labour Party is committed to the high standards of probity and would want you to be aware of these allegations…It is obviously important that transparency prevails in a situation such as this."

The only word from Sarah Brookes herself has been a recent post on her Facebook site which stated…

"As you may recall, four branches (Irwell, Langworthy, Ordsall and Pendlebury), representing around 150 of the 370 or so eligible members, nominated me. Even in the branches which did not formally nominate me, there was fantastic support for my candidature and I am grateful to everyone who took the time to get involved in this process, including the people who opted not to support me. It was a humbling experience and I was touched to have got this far…

"…Judging by the reaction of the many people who have been in touch with me, I do appreciate that this may come as a surprise. I also understand that some members have contacted the regional office, to put on record their dismay and disbelief over this decision.

"However, having discussed the matter at length with the Regional Office representative, Noel Hutchinson, I can confirm that there is no appeals process and no requirement for the Selection Committee to explain the rationale for their decisions. Though you may be aware that there have been examples of intervention e.g. Falkirk and Cannock Chase…"

In answer to the post, Salford Labour councillor Howard Balkind wrote… "I am as you know a Rebecca Long Bailey supporter. Although everyone says the selection committee was unbiased. I totally disagree…"

And candidate Jacqueline Robinson, who failed to get nominated, added: "I am sorry to hear that you are no longer in the running - it seems to be very unfair as you did have 4 nominations and Sophie Taylor only had 1 - I can't understand it. It does appear from an outsider point of view (although I was brought up locally) that the decision has already been made."

The selection process for Hazel Blears' safe Labour seat in Salford and Eccles has been fraught with fiasco. As well as the nomination controversy, Matt Finnegan, Salford Council's `politically restricted' head of communications, resigned following a Salford Star article about him pushing emails supporting candidate Rebecca Long Bailey (see previous Salford Star article – click here).

As Karl Brookes stated, `How does this look?'

* Members of the Selection Committee included councillors Paul Wilson, Sareda Dirir, Gina Reynolds, Stephen Hesling, Tanya Burch, Neil Blower plus ordinary members Amy Coffey, Gary Buckden and Elza Hingston


See also previous Salford Star articles…

• Salford Council Politically Restricted Head of Press Spins for Labour Party Candidate – click here

• Salford Labour MP Candidates Salford Star Survey – click here

UoS wrote
at 11:49:12 on 29 July 2014
Whilst I fully sympathise with Sarah Brooks, two things strike me. First, litigation will not help her in the long run. She will earn a reputation for it, and other constituencies will be reluctant to consider her. Second, this is precisely what the Labour Party has become - a nepotistic mess of a Party. Less we forget Harrier Harman's husband managed to triumph over a supposedly all-women shortlist to become a Labour MP.
?
Michael Felse wrote
at 11:49:08 on 29 July 2014
Too many none members of Labour feel they can tell Labour how to run their Party. Labour Executive in Salford will have followed the rules to the letter. I am sure their Regional Executive can give correct advice on any appeal. However, only 3 names are put through to Final Selection and I expect their local candidate will easily walk away with the crown.
?
notpoliticallybiased wrote
at 11:24:14 on 29 July 2014
How can she now expect any support from anywhere when she has her husband objecting in her behalf? Doesn't really give the impression that she could stand up and speak out on behalf of herself let alone her constituents!
?
wrote
at 12:11:12 on 28 July 2014
When I went to school even the class dunce would have been able to work this one out according to the scoring process. There is absolutely NO logic or excuse for shortlisting a candidate with less votes than others. Why of why did this panel not use the brains they were born with (or not, as seems to be the case here) and do the honest and honourable thing by allocating the position to the person OBVIOUSLY preferred by their own voting members, didn't this selection committee trust the judgement of its members? How dare they supersede their democratic decision. Salford Labour party is fast descending into the raving loony party
?
Ex Lib Dem wrote
at 12:11:08 on 28 July 2014
All Women Shortlists are perfectly legal in politics, unfair and discriminatory but still legal. I was surprised (slightly) to see that the majority of the selection panel are in Sue Pughs camp. Paul Wilson, Sareda Darir, Neil Blower, Tanya Birch, Stephen Hesling and Amy Coffey are all Sue Pugh supporters. I don't know the other names so can't comment on them. The selection of Sue Pugh would open the door for either her husband, Peter Wheeler or Hazel blears to run for Mayor, then we can all forget about democracy. you think it's bad now, wait til they have ALL the power in salford.
?
LESLIE WOODWARD wrote
at 06:49:52 on 28 July 2014
I AM NOT IN THE BOROUGH BUT A LABOUR SUPPORTER,cannot understand why someone with 1 vote comes above someone else with 4 votes,all though someone else obtained 7 votes,there is te possibility someone wth 4 votes can surpass the 7 votes later on more so than someone with 1 vote
?
More of the same mould!!!!!! wrote
at 20:20:29 on 27 July 2014
O'Neill is correct when he suggests the selection process is discriminatory against the right person for the job, I always thought that the Labour party represented and treated equally all people regardless of Gender, Race, Religious belief, Or Sexual orientation. It seems that is only the case when it suit's them!! As for the selection process as it is, well what can I say apart from it seems that the candidates in favour with the powers that be are progressing in order to return a nodding dog for the Labour party and not a representative of the Salford people. Salford and Eccles IS a safe seat so whoever is chosen is almost guaranteed the job of MP, for ten people to choose the next MP for an area means that Salford & Eccles is what used to be called A ROTTEN BOROUGH.
?
joe O'neill wrote
at 17:15:19 on 27 July 2014
So the committee as been accused of being biased, are we seeing a done deal? one thing I have to ask is are we being short changed, it worries me in the days of out and out equality why a women only list? could you imagine the uproar if they were excluded?. I have always felt the best person for the job not the persons sex. If Labour can't get this right god help us.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx