HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL £6 MILLION LET OFF FOR MIDDLEWOOD LOCKS DEVELOPER
 

Star date: 17th April 2014

SALFORD COUNCIL TEARS UP PLANNING RULES (AGAIN) FOR MIDDLEWOOD LOCKS

Scarborough Development Group is planning to put huge apartment blocks, a hotel and loads of shops on the currently derelict Middlewood Locks site. For the privilege of plonking an urban profit farm on the Salford border with Manchester, the developer should be paying over £8million in fees to the Salford Council…

…But the Council is only asking for less than £2million - letting the Group off with a massive £6million in payments. This despite £4million of public money having already been spent on the site. 

Full details here…


Middlewood Locks Salford Middlewood Locks Salford
click image to enlarge

Over ten years ago, the then Salford Council Leader John Merry announced that the Middlewood Locks development "is critical to the continued growth of Salford". And over ten years later the site is still derelict, bar the barren Manchester, Bolton, Bury Canal tart up and a history of doomed schemes…

Indeed, nobody would deny that the massive 8.5 hectare plot on the border of Manchester city centre is a total embarrassment for Salford, and that something needs doing with it.

Almost two years ago, new owners, the Scarborough Development Group began a consultation on what the local community wanted to see on the site. Having taken their views into consideration - we're sure - the result is up to 32 storey high apartment blocks, a hotel, loads of shops, a park, a car park and no discernable affordable housing

Earlier this month, Scarborough Developments (Salford) Ltd applied to Salford Council to have its outline planning permission for Middlewood Locks extended and the planning committee had another look at both the application and the finance due to be paid to the Council.

The pre-Scarborough scheme by the now bankrupt Valley and Vale and Beaupere Castle developers to build a £300million `Urban Village' on the site should have paid over £5million into Salford Council coffers in fees for infrastructure, buildings etc – but was charged only £1.95million.

This was, partly because it was to contribute over £1million to British Waterways towards the tarting up of the Canal and a £30,000 annual maintenance payment for the following one hundred years. It was in the developer's interest to do this because waterside apartments fetch a premium of up to 25% on their price.

£1million of the final £1.95million fee was also to pay back Salford Council `for the advance funding of the canal that it undertook on behalf of Valley and Vale'. Which, one can assume, it never got back from the bankrupt company.

Altogether, £4million of public money was sunk into the Canal makeover from a variety of sources (for full details see previous Salford Star article – click here). Yet the site still lies empty and even the reduced fees to the Council never got paid.

Fast forward to 2014 and now it looks like new owners, Scarborough Developments, are set to cash in…

On the planning application this month, Council planning officers agreed that the original fee of £1.95million was acceptable – even though Scarborough Developments, as far as one can make out, haven't given a penny to British Waterways.

On top of this, Scarborough was also due to pay fees for `dwellings' (£3.245million); `commercial floorspace' (£2.232million); and `bed spaces' (£2.885million) – making a total of £8.362million.

However, Salford Council's `planning guidance' states that it should "take a flexible approach in seeking levels of planning obligations and other contributions to ensure that the combined total impact does not make a site unviable".

Planning officers, of course, agreed that the site just wouldn't be economically viable with such payments and - as with virtually every single large planning application made in the city - they were waived. Saving the company over £6million.

There is a `clawback' arrangement in place that, if the scheme does prove to be `viable', then Salford Council can claim all its money back – but no-one is holding their breath for that one!

So Scarborough will get its 32 storey high apartments and hotel and car park and shops, on the edge of Manchester City Centre, for less than a quarter of the money it should be paying financially hard up Salford Council.

£6million would have covered virtually all the Council cuts to Children's Services this year…

 

* For Scarborough's `vision' of the site - see here

 

David cameron wrote
at 12:52:34 on 01 May 2014
@ Michael felse. I urge Salford Star to print email addresses of those pretending to be other people. Never heard of the of the data protection act Michael, the salford star could be in big trouble if the star printed this information and the person or persons then became a target for bulling or threats or physical harm, the salford star would be just as guilty in law to helping in the above if it gave this information out, especially to people who associate with iffy character's. On another level if the star gave this info out what would it say about the star, it would say the star could not be trusted with information or protect the people who divulge information to the star, the cornerstone to any reporter or news outlet their reputation would be trashed, in-effect the end of the salford star and the trashing of the reputation of its reporters. If the star has the ability and information at its office to stop people from using other peoples identity, then the star should stop this from happening but it should be done in house at that star and not as Michael felse would like it done, on line. The star and Mr Kingston should come on and clarify it's position on this matter and that private information remains that, private.ps to white, I didn't think it was Michael felse that made those comments on his behalf, but he has got him to a "t" one minute he's kissing labour arse and then he's kicking it nobody knows if he is serious on any of the subjects he comments on, or whether he's just delusional and has just not been taking his medication. And on who I am let's discuss it over a nice cup of tea, the address is 10 Downing Street, London, just knock on i'm always in
?
Michael Felse wrote
at 11:50:54 on 29 April 2014
I urge Salford Star to print email addresses of those pretending to be other people. It is with pride I can explain to "White" that Felse is a family name from a German word "Felsen" meaning rock. However my branch of that tree is traced to 1643 in England and is now being tracked further. A nice thing about reaching 65 is the pleasure of ditching politics for research as a hobby, however, we will probably never stop them that make a hobby out of pretending they are people they pretend to be. Thanks to Salford Star we know the Editor has identity emails on who you are, amazingly funny.
?
White wrote
at 10:06:11 on 29 April 2014
David Cameron When I read the letter from ‘Michael False’ I didn’t for one minute belief that it was Michael Felse or that someone was posing as him. I saw it as a fairly accurate attempt to take the ‘Michael’ [for want of a better word] out of someone who frequently comes out with some outrageously sycophantic statements about our mayor and councillors. It did though, seem to strike a nerve with Mr. Felse. Strangely, when I spellchecked this comment, Felse kept coming up as ‘False’. And David, I don’t think either that you are the other David Cameron, or are even trying to seem like him.
?
David cameron wrote
at 06:14:53 on 29 April 2014
I have to totally agree with Michael felse about someone posing as him and talking shit in his name, Michael felse doesn't need any help to talk shit, so stop it now. But then again the imposer has got Michael to t, so how do we know it isn't really Michael, Michael do's have many personalities.
?
Michael Felse wrote
at 20:21:02 on 19 April 2014
Warning - I see someone has begun writing as Michael False. I do not know who this is but it clearly is not me. If they cannot have the spine to write in their own name then please do not print stupidity.
?
Michael False wrote
at 09:13:31 on 18 April 2014
Salford council is to be commended for its wise decision. The money paid for this unwanted and unsightly plot of land can be put to good use to pay the Mayor’s salary, Mr, Taylor’s salary and the allowances of the assistant mayors for the next few years. Perhaps, in view of this windfall they could increase the salaries and the allowances of those who are doing such good work for us.
?
James Walsh wrote
at 20:28:44 on 17 April 2014
And yet another site in the Salford area that has rare breeding birds that is being concreted over with no thought given to the ecology of the site
?
The Fat End of The Wedge wrote
at 20:28:28 on 17 April 2014
This is also, judging by the pictures, a loss of what I would call 'urban green belt'. I doubt the proposed park will be very spacious. Bits of green space, trees etc., are being nibbled away in all parts of inner Salford without any protest. Yet look at the outcry when a piece of 'real green belt' is sized up for development. Presumably one day even Weaste cemetery will be swallowed up by Quays development.
?
Brian F Kirkham wrote
at 20:28:09 on 17 April 2014
To our dear council, and its officers - have you completely lost the plot? This farce has been going on since the old high school on that plot was merged with one in Weaste. To date, the only development on that site have been the flats built on the site of the old school playground. That's not my main concern though, and its to do with the "Risk" non-elected officers keep on taking with council taxpayers money with these development companies. If this happened over the river, The council would be getting its cash back and a small return on its investment - why is it developers like taking this city for a ride at our expense? These Questions need addressing.
?
Salford Star wrote
at 20:27:12 on 17 April 2014
See Mike's comment below... sorry it's 32, these applications do your head in! There's also 24 and 25 storey high apartments in the development...
?
mike wrote
at 20:24:29 on 17 April 2014
come on then the flats grew as the story did, 23 or 32 or 322 how tall
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx