HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
GREATER MANCHESTER DEMO AGAINST LEGAL AID CUTS
 

Star date: 29th July 2013

RALLY AND MARCH AGAINST CUTS FOR THE RIGHT TO ACCESS JUSTICE

March and Rally
Tuesday 30th July 5pm-6pm
Manchester Crown Court – Cathedral Gardens

Tomorrow at 5pm there's going to be a march and rally against ConDem Government cuts to Legal Aid. The cuts will affect people who don't have access to wads of money to pay for lawyers – and will particularly include homeless families, victims of domestic violence and trafficked children, thus trashing any notion of `equality before the law'.

Full details here…


Defend Legal Aid
click image to enlarge

The ConDem Government is now attacking what is called `the fourth pillar of the Welfare State' by cutting access to Legal Aid, or the right to access justice.

* Legal Aid in all civil cases will be subject to a discriminatory `residence' test – which will cut off access for many vulnerable people, including homeless families, victims of domestic violence and trafficked children. The Young Legal Aid Lawyers (YLAL) group says that "under this proposal groundbreaking cases involving the accountability of the state for the actions of the armed forces abroad could not have been brought".

* Legal aid will no longer be paid for the early stages of judicial review claims, unless the case passes the `permission' stage. YLAL lawyers say that "without the help of Legal Aid, judicial review will simply not be possible for the majority. The ordinary citizen will no longer be able to hold the state to account".

* The ConDem Government is proposing to award contracts for criminal defence work to the cheapest bidders, irrespective of quality. Although this is being looked at again by the Government, YLAL lawyers say that "this will lead to a poor quality, low value service. The proposals will also restrict the ability of individuals to choose their lawyer and damage small and medium-sized local businesses".

* Prisoners will no longer receive Legal Aid for many vitally important issues such as whether they are treated lawfully and humanely in the prison system or where they will live on release and how they will be supported to avoid reoffending. YLAL lawyers say "this will stultify the civil liberties of prisoners and jeopardise the Government's stated commitment to rehabilitating offenders and reducing crime".

* There will be further cuts to the fees paid in criminal, civil, family and immigration cases. YLAL lawyers say "these cuts threaten the quality of legal representation and the sustainability of the profession. The cuts will hit low earning junior lawyers the hardest".

* There will be cut to experts' fees. YLAL lawyers say this "will make it very difficult to bring or defend cases which depend on crucial expert evidence, such as child care proceedings or cases involving vulnerable and mentally ill people".

The Greater Manchester event starts at 5pm outside Manchester Crown Court, or the Civil Justice Centre – which is now also the main court for Salford and is about 100 yards over the Manc border on Bridge Street, near the People's History Museum.

There's a rally followed by a march accompanied by the ace PCS Samba band to Cathedral Gardens, near Urbis* The event finishes at 6pm.

Speakers at the rallies include Chris Hilliard (student activist, acquitted after the 2010 student fees protest), a refugee, Debbie Abrahams (MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth), a speaker from campaign group Access to Advice, Manjeet Kaur and Rhetta Moran (RAPAR), Dennis Queen (DPAC), Geraldine O'Connor (a campaigner on legal aid and disability rights), John Nicholson (immigration and public law barrister) from Kenworthy's Chambers, Mark George QC from Garden Court North (criminal defence barrister), Robert Lizar (criminal defence solicitor) and a message from Michael Mansfield QC.

Defend Legal Aid
March and Rally
Tuesday 30th July 5pm
Manchester Crown Court
Court Square Manchester M3 3FL

* Full route - Walk South and East to Left Bank; North along Left Bank past the People's History Museum; East along Bridge Street; North along Deansgate; East to Cathedral Gardens

For further details see also www.savelegalaid.co.uk/justicealliance

Facebook page: http://bit.ly/64yearsLegalAid 

UPDATE: 31st July - see report on the march and rally - click here

       
Steven North wrote
at 12:46:31 on 31 July 2013
@sosick I'd like to comment on a few of the points you've made here. First of all, what is so positive about the Bedroom Tax/Spare Room Subsidy (whatever you choose to call it)? Even if a person accepts the populist and currently popular argument that people on benefits are responsible for all the world's problems, then how exactly does this policy benefit those of us who aren't on benefits given that it's only going to end up costing us more money in the end? It will cost us more because successive Governments (Tory, Labour and Coalition) have failed to build adequate amounts of either affordbale private housing or social housing. This means that there are not enough small social properties in which to re-house people who can't afford to pay their rent following the introduction of the tax/abolition of the subsidy. This means that local authorities either have the choice of letting those arrears build up - which is bad for the rest of us as the Council will need to generate that income from somewhere else like more service cuts or increased council tax - or putting the person in private accommodation which ends up costing us all a fortune because rents are typically higher in order to subsidise the very same landlords who are helping make it impossible for young people to get on the property ladder - thus increasing the likelyhood of people needing social housing. If we then come on to your views on the legal aid caps, let's take those in turn: 1. What is absolutely clear is that those seeking legal aid will no longer have control over who theit solicitor is, which means a reduced likelyhood of a solicitor who is fluent in the type of law being practised. Having studied law (and no I'm not a solicitor and have no direct interest in this policy not being enacted) I can tell you that knowledge of Criminal Law means very little in a Family Law setting. 2. Why should those who have no stable residence not be allowed to access legal aid? What about homeless people? What about women who have been the victims of domestic violence and have no fixed abode? What about foreigners who are trafficked into this country and then dumped by pimps and gangmasters? Is it not in the public interest for them to be able to take their cases to court? Remember Morecambe Bay? Why should the families of those cockle-pickers not have been supported to challenge those responsible for their relatives deaths just because they resided elsewhere? It is in all our interests for such cases to be taken. 3. Guildford Four, Birmingham Six, Derek Bentley, Timothy Evans, Stefan Kiszco....all in prison but not one of them guilty. 4. You give an emotive scenario, but what of the expert who says - "Mr. X do you feel it is appropriate that your now homeless wife and two children should have no access to your earnings or rights to your property, especially after the domestic abuse they suffered at your hands?" Also, you can check this link out to read about the mother of a rape victim speaking out against these cuts: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/rape-victims-mother-makes-plea-to-stop-legal-aid-cuts-8738016.html
 
So sick of this commy crap wrote
at 12:45:22 on 31 July 2013
@Michael Salford (ex Felse), I am so glad you have quoted your position, so you think that people charged with rape should be allowed "experts" to defend them? Because I tell you now that's what happens, the defence teams employ so called "experts" to rip apart the evidence of the victim, all they are really are distraction rapists who let evil raping scumbags roam the streets of Salford. Like I say, glad I know what you stand for now so that me and the rest of the women in Salford can avoid voting for you. Oh and as for the F***ing bit, would you not be angry at these proposals if it was your Mother, Sister, Auntie, Nice, Daughter, that got raped? Well if your answer is no then like I said, glad I will never be voting for an EXTREME LEFT scumbag like you.
 
Michael Salford (ex Felse) wrote
at 15:35:51 on 30 July 2013
Must object to the foul language of So Sick post below - the use of F words is not welcomed in a family accessible site. Salford deserves better.
 
Michael Salford wrote
at 11:26:29 on 30 July 2013
This is a bad policy. With my new name, in readiness to stand for UKIP next year, I will go on fighting to get back justice for Salford vulnerable people.
 
So sick of this commy crap wrote
at 11:26:15 on 30 July 2013
Oh for fucks sake how much more anti government can this site get, not contempt with trying to slag the government off over positive changes like the bedroom subsidy being abolished, then the LEFTIES who call it the "bedroom tax" now have their straw filled brains filled with crap over the legal aid system. Some FACTS for you lefties: 1, The government is not proposing to award contracts for criminal defence work to the cheapest bidders, that policy has been looked at and abolished. 2, The "discriminatory `residence' test" you talk of is designed to stop NON RESIDENTS of this country abusing the system, quite reasonable in my opinion. 3, " Prisoners will no longer receive Legal Aid", GOOD and they should not do, the crimes they have commited are crimes against society what ever they be all crimes have a victim and these people have been convicted of such, prison is a punishment not a fucking holiday camp. 4, "There will be cut to experts' fees" again GOOD and then VICTIMS will not be subjected to "experts" who say things like "psychologically you wanted him to rape you , is that not true victim X" Get a fucking grip Salford Star I thought this was a community publication not a leftie policy forum for slaging off anyone who does not vote for a left leaning party.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
The children of today will have nothing to remind them of what was once a great city, and it's all down to greed, greed, and more ... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
As long as its not more Apartments... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
A park doesnt make money. Overpriced goldfish bowl apartments do. ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
Retired Socialist, I'm getting bored now, reading your sniping comments about Mayor Paul. Can't you change the record? It is just ... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
Sadly shows a complete failure of any ambition to create an iconic legacy for Salford people based on its heritage... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT

Star date: 21st June 2018

COUNCIL SPENT £5,750 ON MIPIM PR IN SOUTH OF FRANCE

Salford Council spent almost £10,000 on the jaunt to the MIPIM property orgy in Cannes. A newly published contract register shows that, as well as the £4,022 costs for the City Mayor and two officers to go to the South of France paid by unknown private sector companies, the Council also spent £5,750 on marketing and PR for MIPIM.

The contract register also shows the Council is spending £9,500 on a 'Salford Story' press consultant, £118,000 on its failed 'digital community hub', over £14,000 on a 'leadership programme' and, er, £25,000 on milk and bread?

Full details here...

NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS

Star date: 20th June 2018

'WE RECOGNISE THE HISTORIC INTEREST'...BUT THEY'RE BEING DEMOLISHED!

Despite musical protests and petitions, the National Grid is adamant that the Salford gas holders, made famous in the Dirty Old Town anthem, will be demolished.

Campaigners are asking for the Grid to re-think a new use for the structures, like in many other towns and cities, but the company states that while "We recognise the historic interest in the Salford gasholder...the structure is being dismantled..."

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE

Star date: 19th June 2018

COUNCIL BLOCKS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST ON £4,000 MIPIM TRIP

Salford City Council has refused to answer a Salford Star Freedom of Information request on which private company paid the £4,022 costs for City Mayor Paul Dennett and two staff to go to the South of France for the MIPIM property event.

The Council states that "the commercial interests of the Council outweigh that of the public interest in disclosure". The Salford Star is to appeal the decision.

Full details here...

DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING

Star date: 18th June 2018

OVER 80% OF COUNCIL WORKERS HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN SERVICES AND ALMOST 50% THINKING OF LEAVING THEIR JOBS

A survey of almost 1,500 local council workers in the North West reveals that 81% have no confidence in the future of local services, 49% are thinking of leaving their jobs, 54% believe their council no longer delivers quality services, and 45% think that their employer doesn't make the right decisions for the public.

The other results of the survey by UNISON to coincide with its local government conference make equally depressing reading, as the union states that "Vital local services in the North West are collapsing".

Full details here...

SALFORD TIME OUT FOR CARERS

Star date: 18th June 2018

TRIPS, CAKES, MASSAGE, ADVICE AND CHAT AS CARERS TAKE TIME OUT

"I was absolutely weary...I needed to get out of the house" Ernie

Caring for a loved one is indeed a labour of love but it can also be life consuming and draining. So a group called Time Out For Carers is making a difference, running weekly sessions where escapism is the order of the day.

There's free massages, trips out, advice on allowances, tea and coffee and cakes, but, most importantly, relaxed informal chats with carers who are all in the same position.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx