HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COMMUNITY LAUNCHES FIGHT TO SAVE THE GRANGE
 

Star date: 9th July 2013

SALFORD COUNCIL CUTS SERVICES FOR KIDS WITH DISABILITIES

"You're persecuting our children for the way they are because they are more needy than anybody else" parent

Salford Council's latest cuts are aimed at disabled children and their carers. It plans to kick kids with disabilities out of The Grange, an `outstanding' short term respite centre, and move those over 14 years of age to an adult facility at Granville House.

Now, amidst dodgy Council statistics and reasoning, the community has launched a `Save The Grange' campaign.

Full details here…


SAVE THE GRANGE SAVE THE GRANGE
click image to enlarge

Margaret and Alan Tunacliffe have two children, Lucy aged 17, and Nathan aged 15. Both have autism and severe learning difficulties. David Thornley's son Michael, 15, has complex learning difficulties, autism and cerebral palsy. 

Vincent Riley's 13 year old daughter, Courtney Davies, has cerebral palsy.  Caroline and Peter Dawson have 16 year old twin daughters, Laura and Megan, who have autism and epilepsy.

These are the circumstances of just a few parents who love their kids and devote all their lives to caring for them. Without a break to re-charge their life batteries, however, these people would be totally drained, with knock-on effects for their kids and family life.

That break, or respite, comes for short periods at The Grange – a purpose built five bedded short break residential unit for children with disabilities aged between seven and 17…

"Lucy loves it" says Margaret "It's got a sensory room, a play area, it's her holiday. Here she is in the house all the time."

"Courtney finds it hard to mix with her peers in our area like her younger sister" says Vincent "At The Grange it's like a little social life of its own for her. The staff are great, she enjoys it there and it's a small but welcome break for us."

"Megan and Laura love it" adds Caroline "They walk in as if they own the place."

For the 27 parents who use The Grange, it provides a rest, and for the kids it's like a holiday home. Now Salford Council wants to move the short term break kids out of there, send the under 14 year olds to foster carers, and put the over 14s into Granville House, which is an adult facility (see previous Salford Star article for full details – click here).

In financial terms it's a cut of around £500,000. In real life terms the parents aren't having it, and have launched a Save The Grange campaign with the community and trade union Salford City UNISON.

"The ones who need the most and cost the most are being let down" explains Margaret "They're saying `We can't afford to look after your children'. But these are vulnerable children with complex needs. They are persecuting our children for the way they are because they are more needy than anybody else."

In the rush to save money and get the disabled kids out of The Grange, Salford Council presented figures to show that the respite centre was underused and had "occupancy rates averaging around 55% since 2004/05". Immediately, parents questioned the stats…

"It was the stick they hit us with, that there had been a decline in demand but I don't believe it" says Vincent "I had an 18 month wait to get my daughter in there. They couldn't find a space for her, yet they are saying that it's half empty? She goes for one night a month. We did ask if we could put that up to two nights a month, with no response. But at 55% capacity surely that should be no problem."

David Thornley went to a meeting with Salford Council about the proposals… "I asked `Why 2004? And why is one child only getting 12 nights when she really needs 24 nights?' They looked at us and went `Oh'. That was it. They've got no answers."

Since questions were asked, the Council came back with revised figures of 70% occupancy over the last two years. Even this figure is questioned, given the wait to get children into the respite centre, given that one bed is always kept free for emergencies, plus the suspicion that the panel which decides whether kids can go to The Grange is denying access in favour of `direct payment' routes and thus running the place down.

So far, the Council has come up with no answers (see Part 2 interview with John Merry, Assistant Mayor for Children and Young People - click here).

Meanwhile, Parents are also questioning the ethics of putting children, aged 14 to 17, into the adult centre at Granville House, where the age range is 18 to 85…

"Someone's talked about the sexual aspect of this - they might be 14 but they're not 14 in their head, they're five and it frightens the life out of me" says Alan "They come up with stupid ideas like `Well, we won't have children in on the nights that adults are in' and that they will build a separate door…"

Caroline and Peter Dawson are not happy at all with the idea of sending their 16 year old twin daughters to Granville…

"They're autistic, one has no concept of stranger danger at all" says Caroline "She will go and give hugs and kisses to anyone who shows her any amount of attention, so going in with adults is not appropriate."

The safeguarding aspect also bothers David

"If something goes wrong I'd never forgive myself, therefore unless you prove to me that Michael is going to be 100% safe he's not going" he insists "If you had a mainstream daughter who was 14 or 15 and you were going through problems in your life so they put her into care, and six months later they said `We're going to stick your daughter in with adults, it will be ok won't it?'…all hell would break loose. So where's the difference? Is the Council saying `We can put disabled adults and children together and nothing will happen?'".

Parents argue that, even if the Council did have separate sessions for younger and older people, they are both going to have times curtailed.

"It wouldn't work because the people who are in Granville now won't get the respite they are currently getting because their time will be cut" says Margaret.

Meanwhile, under the proposals, those children under 14 will be placed with `specialist' foster carers for their breaks. Salford Council currently has one person, and is looking to recruit one more. But as parents point out, their homes will have to adapted to have things like ground floor access for wheelchairs, special bathrooms, safe areas, sensory environments… all of which comes at a cost. And will the new foster carer be competent?

The preferred Salford Council option is also to lose the short term kids who currently use The Grange, in order to bring back children who require medium and long term care, and are currently placed outside the city. Bringing them back is the big cost saving – except that there are 29 currently staying outside of Salford, and only five beds at The Grange. Whether the children's families want them to come back to Salford is another question, given that they will lose all their current friends and social contacts.

"If you want to look at bringing these children back to Salford to save money, do it in a better way, there's lots of empty buildings here" reasons David "Organise it and leave the people at The Grange where the staff know the children, the children know the staff.

"Michael can't walk, he can't talk…he can tell you what he wants in his own way, but he can't tell you what his problem is…His developmental age at best is watching The Hoobs, maybe seven or eight" he adds "He's got autism cerebral palsy, his hand doesn't work, he can't stand up on his own. The Grange have had him for four years and are still coming to terms with him… and they want him to go to a completely new facility with different staff?"

Indeed, there are so many unanswered questions and problems. The parents have all the reasonable, thoughtful, rational arguments against closing The Grange for their children. But the Council has already stated that leaving the service as it stands is not an option. With around £500,000 `savings' on the line service is now `not viable'.

There's a consultation running until August 14th. But the option of keeping The Grange for short term respite is not an option. There is, however, the option of shutting The Grange completely and selling the building.

The parents, together with concerned people from the community and trade union, Salford City UNISON - worried about the effects on the children, parents and staff who work at The Grange - have decided to fight the decision, forming a new Save The Grange campaign.

"This cut is purely financially driven and has been poorly thought out and ill conceived" says UNISON's Ameen Hadi "The Council, I believe, has a duty to protect the most vulnerable who have borne the brunt of horrendous Tory cuts. We fully support the parents and the disabled children campaign to retain quality services for their future."

The parents aren't just fighting for their own children but for future generations, because, as Alan points out, "once The Grange is gone, it's gone…

"One of our children has got to move to Granville anyway but what about all these new children coming through who need The Grange?" he says "More and more children are coming through with cerebral palsy, autism and all those kind of things and the list is growing. Parents need somewhere to put their children and have a break to re-charge their batteries - otherwise family life will just disintegrate, and what happens is that parents split up, the children end up in care and there's a massive cost, an even bigger cost."

The point is underlined by David, a single working parent…

"It's madness…The Grange has got a new manager in there who has transformed the place, we've got a valuable asset doing the job fine, so don't let's take it away" he says "This Government and Council are of the opinion that carers should look after adults or children in the home. If you want me to look after him, support me - don't take away my support."

The parents contrast their position with the public money that has been thrown at Salford Reds rugby club, the £69,000 Mayor, the £72,000 spin doctor, the £100,000s on Assistant Mayors, plus £millions on fountains and bridges…

"If these things can be done why can't they be done to help the most vulnerable members of society?" asks David.

"You think to yourself, `Hang on, if we've got no money, we've got no money and we'll all batten down the hatches there's nothing anyone can do'" says Alan "But you know there is something they can do. The way they are spending the money is completely out of order. A lot of them have come from working class backgrounds and trade unions and then feathered their own nests; that's the annoying part. They say it's not like that but it is."

Caroline, who has MS on top of caring for her daughters, says she has a large care package of support…"but now they're trying to take it away and it ain't going to happen. If I've got to turn up in my hospital bed, it ain't going to happen…

"It's not going to be easy to make a noise because I think a lot of the parents are going to be tired" she adds "We need this like a hole in the head."

There are only 27 tired families in Salford affected by cuts to The Grange but they are calling for support in their campaign from the wider community.

"We always say `Thank god' for this break to just so we can have an hour out to go to my mum's or have a sleep" he adds "We don't ask for much just a break…"

 

The SAVE THE GRANGE petition is online at Change.org - to sign click here 

There's also going to be a lobby of councillors and Mayor Ian Stewart at the next Full Council meeting on July 17th, beginning at 8:30am.

In Part 2 the Salford Star grills John Merry, Assistant Mayor for Children and Young People about the cuts to The Grange, putting to him all the points the parents have raised. Will he have any answers? Click here

Main photo shows Margaret with Nathan and Lucy

pauline cosgrove wrote
at 16:50:59 on 12 July 2013
Salford Council should hang their heads in shame
?
Samantha dunne wrote
at 06:24:09 on 12 July 2013
My son Liam attended the grange from the age of 9 years of age until he was 19 it was a life line for my family and for Liam! Without the grange I don't think I would of been able to carry on caring for my son knowing I wasn't going to get any kind of break! My son couldn't go to a short break foster family because they couldn't managr him physically! It angers me so much that these families that use this service use it because their isn't anywhere else for their children to go and the council are trying to take it away! Their a disgrace!
?
steve U.S.U.C. wrote
at 06:23:23 on 12 July 2013
Keep strong if you campaign/fight hard enough you can grind them down & win them. Some people thought that we would not achieve our aim but we did. Happy to help & get involved in any way that I can. Will be there on 17th July.
?
Sue Akpobaro wrote
at 06:29:21 on 10 July 2013
I have taught some of the children mentioned above, and I can confirm they DO need specialist respite care. Their families are wonderful looking after them, but they and the youngsters do need time apart, and in a safe and secure environment. It took a long time for The Grange to get fully up and running, and also for the parents to accept the offered support. Salford Council really do need to re-think this decision. They do NOT want a tragedy on their hands! The stress levels of parenting some of these amazing youngsters is through the roof. Salford, play fair! Hands off The Grange!
?
Nicola wigmore wrote
at 06:29:14 on 10 July 2013
Sorry I didn't get back in time to add my name and my daughters Alana who attends the grange once a month this is the only break me and my family have and with out it we would be lost. It has taken two years for her to settle in and now they want to move her so it will disrupt her routine and cause her distress which will set us back two years. Alana has global developmental delay, area flexia, hypomotobility and mild autism with severe learning difficulties. Day to day life is hard enough as she doesn't sleep well so to take this away would affect everyone in the family. Maybe the fat cats need to learn what life is really about and come down from there ivory tower.
?
mary ferrer wrote
at 06:28:48 on 10 July 2013
When I was a Councillor I remember doing a couple of visits to the Grange,what a fantastic place. The work they do is beyond words. Its a life line for families who need all the help they can get.The Children should ALWAYS come first. As a Councillor you are told you have a duty of care to our children. So this is how OUR Council show their duty of care. I wish this campaign all the luck and if you need anything I am more than willing to help.
?
Colin Hannigan wrote
at 06:28:38 on 10 July 2013
Does anyone know if our mayor has even bothered to visit anywhere at all and seen what a job these people do for these children and there parent's,because every time i see him he has his picture in the Salford,advertiser,Shame on you Mayor and shame on the advertser
?
Gillian Welsh wrote
at 22:09:35 on 09 July 2013
Once again Salford Council show just how heartless they can be. Cuts, cuts, cuts that's all we ever hear about across all services in Salford from refuse collections to Council employees to providing care & stability for our vulnerable & needy residents young & old. The one thing we never hear about is cuts in these useless waste of space Councillors salary & that includes the elected Mayor & the Ceremonial Mayor. It is time that we all fought back and I for one will certainly be doing so.
?
beige beret wrote
at 20:42:09 on 09 July 2013
Words fail me regarding this decision! It makes me SO angry- especially as we had a knock on our door earlier asking for a donation to the Salford Reds! WTF?? All the money already wasted on that "project" when it could have gone to a much better place like The Grange. I'm going to sign the petition! Viva La revolution!
?
margaret tunnacliffe wrote
at 20:42:00 on 09 July 2013
This is a fantastic report stephen. I know for a fact a foster care family and whoever the other foster carer will be don't have safe environments for children with autism and challenging behaviours,i already knew this without being told because we tried to get respite for Lucy in a foster carer's home but was turned down because of her sleeping habits(only sleeps 2/3 hours everynight)her challenging and aggressive behaviours.There are going to be more and more children coming through needing a place like The grange.Lucy was the first child at the age of six to attend the grange because there was NO other Support out there. Lucy has now been going to the grange for 11 years and the staff have been great and have looked after her in every way possible even when she was also diagnosed with epilespy we new they could deal with it.Lucy loves going to the grange.Her Brother Nathan has also been going for 7 years and he likes to go.To lose this suppose would put so much more pressure on us as a family let alone on our children.So please will every one sign the online petition..
?
So true, so why? wrote
at 20:41:52 on 09 July 2013
@the end, what you say is common scence, so why is it the clowns running the circus can not see this??????? And still how many idiot sheeple will vote Labour at the next election? It amazes me and really does make me physically sick.
?
the end wrote
at 19:27:02 on 09 July 2013
Salford council has plenty of money to spend on all services, they just make poor decisions and lbame it on the government. This country needs to live within its means,the council need to stop wasting mony on its ego projects and provide the services required
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx