HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
PEEL HOLDINGS TAKES ON ENVIRONMENT AGENCY OVER SALFORD FLOOD ZONES
 

Star date: 29th June 2012

SALFORD FLOOD POLICY ATTACKED BY PEEL

Peel Holdings cost tax payers ten of thousands of pounds last week when it won a High Court ruling to re-classify its land at the side of the Manchester Ship Canal as within a lower ranking flood zone.

Peel won the case against the Environment Agency over its categorisation of `sluice gates', but the implications for Salford's flood zone are huge – it means that the multi £billion company will find it easier to build new developments along the sides of its canal.

See Part 2 of the Peel Deal here…


Flood Zones and the Manchester Ship Canal
click image to enlarge

The PEEL DEAL: PART 2

See Part 1 – Peel Holdings Incinerator Disgrace – click here…

Flood Risk Versus Economic Development?

Sluice Gates? Sluice Gates have never been so controversial. Indeed, last week there was a 43 page High Court judgement that delved into every definition of sluice gates conceivable, as Mrs Justice Lang ruled that the Environment Agency had got its classification wrong.

Her ruling has vast implications for Salford and beyond as, unless the Environment Agency successfully appeals, the Flood Zone around the Manchester Ship Canal will have to be downgraded, making it easier for Peel Holdings to stick its concrete developments up all along the 36 miles of the Ship Canal banks, which runs from Salford Quays and MediaCItyUK to Barton and beyond.

Sluice Gates? They are the things that, with locks, regulate water levels, and there's five sets of them along the Manchester Ship Canal. The main question was whether these sluice gates can be classed as formal flood defences or not.

If they are formal flood defences - which is how the Environment Agency defined them - under Government Policy Statement PPS25 they have to be disregarded when assessing flood risk, with an assumption that they don't work and remain closed at time of flooding. This puts the whole area around the Canal in Flood Zone 3a, with a High Probability of floodingthus obliging Salford and Trafford councils to turn down most developments in the zone.

If the sluices aren't formal flood defences then, under the same Government policy, they are assumed to be working at times of flooding, putting the area in the lesser Flood Zone 2, with a Medium Probability of flooding.

As the Judge's report points out, Peel owns 300 acres of land in the vicinity of the Canal, and "much of this land is either developed or available for development…Designation in Flood Zone 3a adversely affects the value of the land because it reduces its development potential…"

The case in point was Pomona Island on the Trafford side of the Canal where Peel plans for 1500 dwellings had no chance of getting planning permission once the area had been classified as 3a.

The only way that the expert Environment Agency's decision to classify the area as Flood Zone 3a could be challenged was if it was deemed to be `irrational or perverse'.

The Judge ruled that, because the primary purpose of the sluices was not flood defence but to regulate water, while "sluices make a valuable contribution to flood reduction" they are not formal flood defences, and the Environment Agency's decision was therefore `irrational'.

The decision has cost tax payers 70% of Peel Holdings' costs and an `interim payment' of £55,000. Plus the floodgates are now open for Peel Holdings to concrete over vast swathes of the Manchester Ship Canal banks…

A story on Peels' barristers website 4-5 Gray's Inn Square, states that the new revision of the Flood Zones "will have (for Peel and other landowners) the highly beneficial effect that more land will fall within Flood Zone 2 so greatly increasing the prospect of its development".

A spokesperson for the Environment Agency said: "Following the court's judgment, we are considering our next steps and deciding whether or not to seek leave to appeal.

"Flood Zone 2 in the area of the Manchester Ship Canal remains unaffected by the judgement and it remains a requirement to conduct robust flood risk assessments in relation to local planning applications" the spokesperson added "We will be working closely with local authorities to ensure they are kept informed of any changes to the flood map, and to ensure they can interpret the map in relation to flood risk in the area surrounding the canal."

See Salford Flood Risk Map at the Environment Agency website - click here

PEEL DEAL PART 3 - How Many Jobs at Port Salford? Haven't we heard it all before with MediaCityUK? Coming soon...


 

Alex wrote
at 9:57:28 AM on Monday, December 28, 2015
"The Manchster Ship Canal has never flooded"- I could now take a picture from my back window and prove that just just something hasnt happened does mean it never will. Two days ago the MSC breached in several location, including behind my house covering about 50 acres. That only in a small are near Lymm. Peel are less concerned about risk to property and people than they are money. No argument will ever change that. Risk is their world and they take the risk.
 
Tell it how it is wrote
at 12:03:58 AM on Friday, April 5, 2013
John you say like the judgement did, that the EA wrongly chose to classify sluice gates as flood defence, but the flood map produced by the EA is always based on a worst case senario, as you point out "sluice gates let water out" and as i am sure you are aware the level of the canal is managed in that the amount of water passing through certain sections can be controlled. However what would happen if that control were to fail, that is if sluces were not opened and the river rose to flood levels, this can happen when you build lock gates across waterways if you don't let the water out then it rises. Are the people whos houses would be at risk not entitled to some form of protection or warning? I would sugest to Peel that if they want to build near the canal then they need to close it to traffic and remove the lock gates allowing the river to resume a natural flow, but then they don't want to do that do they as that would scupper several big projects such as Port Salford and the Barton hydro dam.
 
John Randle wrote
at 1:04:12 PM on Thursday, April 4, 2013
This is biased reporting. The Environment Agency cost the taxpayer 'tens of thousands' when it wrongly chose to classify sluice gates as flood defence. Sluice gates let water out. The MSC is a major drainage system which actually prevents flooding. The MSC has never flooded. Why should Peel Holdings be prevented from selling land for much needed housing in an area crying out for new homes and employment.
 
Tjl wrote
at 5:19:16 AM on Saturday, July 7, 2012
Very curious story, if the sluices and lock gates work why assume they don't. So bizarre of the Environment Agency to miss such a fundamental factor. It's like saying you have a plug or an overflow in a sink but they are never used. I have never heard of the canal flooding presumably as the lock gates and sluices work. The way the article is written seems to focus on the company not the EA or such a strange view that the canal doesn't work when it worked long before Peel or the Salford Star were dreamt of. If the Salford Star was around at the time of construction of the canal I wonder how it would have reacted.
 
James wrote
at 12:01:50 AM on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Peel Holdings invest in Salford, Oh no! What a disaster. See you are as objective as ever. Some news socialism is dead!!! Shame on you Salford Star for once again seeing only negatives in something which could bring jobs and prosperity to our city. I for one hope Peel continue to invest in the long term here.
 
Nachtschlepper wrote
at 8:43:02 AM on Monday, July 2, 2012
If, or rather when, Peel Grabbings sorry Holdings build houses in these areas and then those homes are continually flooded will Peel be liable to pay compensation to the people who buy them? Or will, as usual, the thieving bastards walk away with a shed load of other people's money? No attempt at objectivity Alex because I see Peel for what they are.
 
Alex Lewis wrote
at 4:16:31 AM on Monday, July 2, 2012
This story makes no pretence at onjevtivity. It would be equally logical to blame the Envoronment Agency, rather than Peel Holdings, for the cost to the public purse. It is obvious that the writer des not like Peel Holdings, and has allowed this to comploetely distort the way the story is written.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SCANDAL CONTINUES WITH JUST ONE AFFORDABLE PROPERTY OUT OF 196
If say the money from council house sales was used to build more dwellings that would have been good ,but it wasn't. Even so ,thes... [more]
article: SALFORD APARTMENTS RE-BRANDED GREENGATE MANCHESTER AFTER AVOIDING £2MILLION FEES
The people who live in these luxury living gated community city centre flats or whatever they are called have to live somewhere.Ap... [more]
article: 91% OF SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANTS IN ARREARS WITH CITY WEST
Mystic Meg looks at Rayofsunshine with pity in her warm, green eyes before: "Ray, you sound like a good kid, but you need to grow... [more]
article: SALFORD APARTMENTS RE-BRANDED GREENGATE MANCHESTER AFTER AVOIDING £2MILLION FEES
The question as already been asked but can someone answer???? what is affordable to the average man or women within this city. For... [more]
article: CHEK WHYTE THIRTY MILLION POUND DEBT
too many comments about chek whyte ,not nice ones either,he is here in moffat conning a lot of people,?... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

AS HOMELESS SALFORD MAN DIES UNCLE ASKS WHY IT’S NOT BEING REPORTED

Star date: 23rd January 2018

'FOR ME, IT'S ALL BEING COVERED UP...'

Last Friday, a homeless man from Salford sadly died after living on the streets in Manchester city centre; the latest, many believe, in a spate of such incidents.

Now his uncle wants to know why his nephew's death was not reported and says "This is probably going on in every big city in the country, and for me it is just being covered up..."

Full details here...

SALFORD APARTMENTS RE-BRANDED GREENGATE MANCHESTER AFTER AVOIDING £2MILLION FEES

Star date: 23rd January 2018

£2MILLION FEE AVOIDANCE, £35MILLION OF PUBLIC MONEY, AND THEN APARTMENT BLOCKS MOVED TO 'MANCHESTER'

 A huge 'luxury' apartment block which avoided almost £2million in fees to Salford City Council, plus around 100 affordable properties, and then got a £35million subsidy from the Government as it changed ownership for £110million, has branded itself 'Greengate Manchester'.

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SCANDAL CONTINUES WITH JUST ONE AFFORDABLE PROPERTY OUT OF 196

Star date: 22nd January 2018

WHEN IS THIS SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SCANDAL GOING TO END?

The planning panel of councillors for Salford City Council will be probably rubber stamping yet another huge development in Ordsall this week – two blocks of 'luxury' apartments, up to nine storeys high, off Ordsall Lane and Dyer Street.

From 196 properties being proposed by Selectric Investments Ltd, just one will be affordable, thanks to official Salford Council policy.

Full details here...

JOE O’BYRNE WINS SALFORD STAR AWARD FOR BEST PLAY

Star date: 21st January 2018

THE HAUNTING OF BLAINE MANOR WINS BEST PLAY

Last year, the Salford Star asked its readers to nominate winners in four categories reflecting Salford's cultural delights – Best Night, Best Performer, Best Play and Best Band.

From the shortlist, Live Events Editor, Ian Leslie, together with Salford Star staff, have decided the worthy winner of the first Salford Star Award for Best Play is The Haunting of Blaine Manor by Joe O'Byrne – a horror masterclass!

Full details here...

GREENPEACE PENGUINS HIT MANCHESTER TO PROTECT ANTARCTIC

Star date: 21st January 2018

CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT PENGUIN HOME

A waddle of Greenpeace penguins paraded in Castlefield, Manchester, yesterday, joining a worldwide awareness raising day about the need for the world's largest protected area to be created in the Antarctic Ocean.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx