HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL RIPS UP CONSULTATION WITH VULNERABLE PEOPLE
 

Star date: 21st November 2011 

THE REPORT THAT THE COUNCIL DIDN'T WANT SALFORD STAR TO SEE…

Salford Star has finally got hold of the reports on the £3.50 transport charge for the city's most vulnerable people, that Salford Council delayed and delayed sending to us.

The consultation report reveals 27 different concerns from users and carers, ranging from the unaffordable cost to the threat of isolation. The report adds that almost 11% of people currently use the bus service five times a week, and thus will be stung for an extra £17.50 a week or £70 per month.

The findings of the consultation were ignored as Salford Council imposes the new charge this week...

Full story here…


THIS IS HOW SALFORD COUNCIL DOES ITS CONSULTATIONS...

Last week the Salford Star exclusively revealed how Salford Council was about to charge the city's most vulnerable people £3.50 to use its transportation to get to day care centres – click here for the full background story.

In the original Council report it stated that the background papers on the consultation with people who use the transport services were available for public inspection – but despite us requesting to see them, Council officers just wouldn't send them over to us.

Last Friday, the reports finally arrived, a week late, and it's no wonder that the seven Council officers and councillors involved, including the Leader of Salford Council, were dragging their heals…

Eight consultation meetings were held, and 124 people out of the 350 who use the transport service either attended or sent in comments. The people affected have been assessed by Salford Council as "older people, people with learning difficulties, people with complex physical health and or behavioural needs and who can not use other modes or forms of transport".

From what the report states, not one single one of those people (or their carers or families) agreed with the new charge as they raised a massive 27 concerns - ranging from cost, to social isolation, to the possibility of vulnerable people being "subject to bullying on public transportation" - which we print in full below*.

The Report even concludes that 38 vulnerable people currently use the service (10.9%) five days a week which would mean them finding an extra £17.50 a week or £70 per month.

Incredibly the Council report which went from the Assistant Director of Adult Services to the Lead Member Community Health and Social Care, never once mentioned these concerns. The only reference to the consultation in the Report stated… "Through the consultation process people said they wanted a system which…Was easy to use…Fits in with what they do now…Controls the amount taken so they can budget".

No mention of affordability. No mention of isolation. No mention of potential bullying - and all the other 24 concerns.

All the Report seemed interested in was the £123,000 that would be brought into Council coffers following the implementation of the charge, and the best way to implement it.

Indeed, it was only after the decision was made to screw vulnerable people for the £3.50 that the official decision notice stated that the option of "Not charging as people felt they could not afford the charge" was rejected. And… "It is felt that some people may not use the transport because of affordability".

Which all kind of begs the question as to why Salford Council bothered consulting people over the charges in the first place?

The answer to the mad tick box exercise lies in the fact that the Council has to do a `Community Impact Assessment' (CIA), which we also finally got to see.

The CIA states that "The service provides cheap adapted and supported transport to day centres for vulnerable people. Without it some people would not be able to attend". But the Council wants to bring charges in line with those of mainstream bus services, even though it admits that most are on benefits. It adds that "Due to the mobility component of benefits there should be no hardship experienced". But this is not what the user's themselves said in the consultation…

* Here are those 27 concerns…

Service Users

• Concerns about people being socially isolated if they cannot afford to pay the transport charge and will not be able to attend the day centre.
• Concerns that people have a limited income (pensions / benefits) and the additional expenditure will leave people with little or no money left over.
• Concerns that people don't really have a choice if they have to use Social Services transport because of their disability or health needs.
• Concerns that people cannot speak for themselves and it is 'hitting' the most vulnerable.
• Concerns that people will have to reduce the number of days they attend to pay for transport.

Costs / Finance
• Concerns about people's ability to pay.
• Concerns around the actual amount of £3.70 and how this was determined. (People would be willing to pay something if it was a lesser amount)
• Concerns that parent/carers are already subsidising their loved ones and this will be another financial burden.
• Concerns that there is already cost for services plus having to pay for lunches, drinks and activities, the transport charge is another additional cost.


Impact on Families & Carers
• Concerns that they would have to take their son/daughter to the centre at busy times, across the city and for some older carers this would be difficult.
• Concerns the time doing this will infringe on their personal time, and have less time to do other activities, as people have a life outside of their caring role.
• Concerns this responsibility will put extra pressure on families and could result in crisis situations developing.
• Concerns that their son/daughter will not be safe travelling independently and be subject to bullying on public transportation.


Choice & Alternatives
• Concerns there is not an actual choice if people don't have access to a car or cannot use alternative methods of transport.
• Concerns that the alternatives such as Ring & Ride are not reliable and taxis are expensive, Local Link not being available in their areas.
• Concerns that people are currently happy with their transport and if they are not able to use it, they are reliant on their parent/carers for travelling and this is not a choice.
• Concerns that people don't have a choice as to which centre they go to and some have to travel longer distances.


The Future
• Concerns that this is leading to other 'things' happening i.e. centres closing.
• Concerns that this maybe the start of other increases/charges for services received.
• Concerns that people will be moved to a different centre and this may not be based on a decision made by the person.
• Concerns that centres are in the wrong places, and some are on the outskirts of Salford and this makes them difficult to get to.
• Concerns that we are going backwards not forwards.
• Concerns that people may not have enough money in their Personal Budgets.


Application of Charges
• Concerns that the cost is not based on mileage/distance travelled.
• Concerns that there will be a yearly increase.
• Concerns that people may not have the ability to pay.
• Concerns that if people have multiple journeys they will need to pay more than once.


In the CIA one of the sections which the Council has to fill in asks… Can any unfavourable impacts be justified? The Council filled this in `n/a' – or `not applicable'.

Similarly, the Council had to `list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services' - `n/a'

…`List any barriers which may prevent people with disabilities from achieving positive outcomes from the service'… `n/a'

The CIA also asks about the findings of the consultation, to which the Council replied…

"Generally people said they would pay the charge as they could not do without the transport. They also said that their preferred method of payment was the post office voucher system. Some people were concerned about their ability to pay and were given the opportunity to have financial re assessment and welfare benefit advice."

`Some people'??? According to our reading of the consultation report it was virtually everyone who voiced an opinion! The strength of feeling against the new charges can be gauged by the fact that, in addition to the consultation, two letters from MPs were also received – and we can assume they weren't in favour of the charges.

For us, this latest sorry episode in Salford Council's recent history shows three things…

1) That Salford Council will put the burden of the cuts on the city's most vulnerable people, while continuing to support `prestige' projects like MediaCityUK and the Salford City Stadium.

2) That the Council does consultations as a pure tick box exercise with no intention of actually changing its path.

3) That when Salford Council is being held up to account for its actions and decisions, it is reluctant to hand over documents that should be in the public domain.

 


 

Resident of this Deadhole slum . wrote
at 12:48:29 AM on Sunday, December 4, 2011
This inept , useless council should be thoroughly ashamed . How do the bastards sleep at night ? Very soundly , as this arrogant lot care about nothing but themselves . No wonder this city is a deadhole slum . High council tax , nothing to show for it . Salford council are a disgrace .
 
Steven North wrote
at 2:52:27 PM on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Salford City UNISON are currently in the discussion stages of organising and hosting a public meeting to bring together those affected by these cuts. This will probably be done in conjunction with Salford Against the Cuts. As well as our members who deliver these services, we hope to attract service users and members of the public who share the same concerns as we do. Not just to attend the meeting and listen to the usual faces rabbit on (I know full well that I'm one of them!) but to help us build it and tell us how it should be done to guarantee maximum imput from the most vulnerable in Salford. A few years ago, as a Steward in Community Mental Health I was involved in organising a joint staff-service user meeting to deal with a proposal to close week-end drop-ins for our service users. The proposals would also mean that care workers would no longer staff the groups that took place during the week. We knew as staff that we were unlikely to halt those proposals on our own and we knew that service users would lose far more than we would by the changes. We held a joint meeting and submitted a joint response to our management. The approach worked and the drop-ins remained open and are staffed by care workers to this day. Public sector unions have a vital role in defending services - not just to save our members' jobs - but because we believe in public services and are well placed to fight for them. We understand that these services matter even more to those who need them than those who provide them. More will come out about this initiative over the next few weeks. If anybody reading this would like to help they can give me a call on 07557281475 or email steven.north@salfordcityunison.org.uk. Steven North Branch Secretary, Salford City UNISON
 
Fred Hampton wrote
at 2:29:19 PM on Monday, November 21, 2011
Salford council really sinking lower than I thought possible (and that is pretty low). Shameless, incompetent and self-serving beaureacrats. Given that the vast majority of the people affected by this ruling have long-term disabilities, is this not a prima face case of Disability Discrimination by one of the organisations that sanctimoniously professes to practice equality and uphold the rights of the disabled and less affluent members of society. In law "service providers must make reasonable adjustments to allow a disabled person to use their services". Subsidising the cost of transport is a "reasonable adjustment". I notice the same council had no problem in finding £220,000 to subsidise a high-speed bus service to the new BBC HQ at media city earlier this year.
 
Harry Hardcastle wrote
at 12:24:34 PM on Monday, November 21, 2011
Disgraceful , yet so typical of the arrogant Swinetown Cretins .Yet these idiots still waste £200,000 of OUR money on Spicer . Other councils are getting rid of 'executives' to save money . Time the Swinetown Cretins did the same , instesd of making the weakest in society suffer .
 
Fadge wrote
at 9:10:27 AM on Monday, November 21, 2011
Great reporting , Salford Star . Local democracy in action . NOT. A new low for the inept goons at Salford Clowncil . Just typical of the pathetic , inadequate wasters to make the vulnerable suffer because they cannot fight back . The pathetic goons run this Deadcity like Robber Barons. To make the vulnerable suffer the cuts , whilst tossing OUR money away at business chums is obscene . What do the Clowncil get in return ? Salford Clowncil make me puke .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD CITY MAYOR MISLEADING STATEMENTS ON DEVELOPER CASH
Give us a breakdown on what fees have been paid in the last 3 years. And from which development. Also a breakdown on how many affo... [more]
article: DISABLED PEOPLE AGAINST THE CUTS STAGE SCRAP UNIVERSAL CREDIT PROTEST IN MANCHESTER
Esther Mcvey has said on more than one occasion that she will not change Universal credit. Seem she is scared of Iian Duncan-Smit... [more]
article: IS IRLAMS O’ TH’ HEIGHT THE HARDEST PLACE TO SPELL IN BRITAIN?
I have to agree with you that IRLAMS O’ TH’ HEIGHT probably is the hardest name place to spell correctly in Britain. I am here, vi... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL BANNER DECLARES ‘TRANSPARENCY’ DESPITE EVERYTHING BEING SECRET
It has to be stopped. Agree with Mary Ferrer.... [more]
article: OVER 1500 SALFORD PEOPLE SIGN PETITION AGAINST BUILDING IN BUILE HILL PARK
When the foundation put their plan forward they should have made it clear they didn't have the money to renovate the Mansion.Or di... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY MAYOR MISLEADING STATEMENTS ON DEVELOPER CASH

Star date: 19th April 2018

AS £5.5MILLION AVOIDED BY DEVELOPERS SALFORD MAYOR SAYS IT'S A 'MYTH'!

In the latest issue of Salford Council's propaganda mag, Life in Salford, Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, has denounced the "myth" that "developers don't contribute money to the city. It's simply not true" he says.

Yes, they do contribute some money but they also avoid millions of pounds in payments and provision of affordable housing. Indeed, Salford Star analysis shows that developers avoided almost £5.5million in payments last year, as the Mayor only tells half the truth.

Full details here...

DISABLED PEOPLE AGAINST THE CUTS STAGE SCRAP UNIVERSAL CREDIT PROTEST IN MANCHESTER

Star date: 18th April 2018

STOP AND SCRAP UNIVERSAL CREDIT WITH NO EVICTIONS STATE GROUPS

Today, in St Peter's Square Manchester, around half a dozen campaign groups took part in a Disabled People Against the Cuts national day of action calling for Universal Credit to be stopped and scrapped.

Chalk slogans covered the square, speeches were made condemning the affect of the discredited benefit and a giant letter was handed into Manchester City Council calling for 'No evictions' as a result of Universal Credit payment delays.

Full details here...

SALFORD NURSERY CAMPAIGNERS TAKE FIGHT TO PARLIAMENT

Star date: 18th April 2018

FIGHT FOR THE FIVE CAMPAIGNERS HEAD TO WESTMINSTER

A coach load of Save Our Nursery campaigners will be heading to Parliament next Wednesday 25th April for a meeting with MPs in the Palace of Westminster and to urge the Government to be flexible over its new funding formula.

It is also hoped that Labour Party Leader, Jeremy Corbyn, will pressure Theresa May to respond at Prime Minister's Question Time on the same day.

Full details here...

HUGE PAY RISES FOR SALFORD CITY COUNCIL OFFICERS

Star date: 17th April 2018

ASSISTANT DIRECTORS TO GET HUGE PAY RISES

Cash-strapped Salford City Council is to give huge pay rises to senior officers after a 'job evaluation exercise' moved them well up the pay scale. It follows the resignation of the Director of Finance and Corporate Business, and spreading the majority of his salary amongst other re-titled roles.

The Salford Star believes the officers are in line to share around £54,000 between them.

Full details here...

HOMELESS KITCHEN AND PROTEST IN MANCHESTER WHILE SALFORD AIMS TO GIVE HOMELESS A VOTE

Star date: 16th April 2018

HOMELESS IN SALFORD CAN STILL REGISTER TO VOTE AS PROTEST HITS MANCHESTER

Today the Salford Unemployed and Community Resource Centre is urging homeless people to get in touch in order to register to vote as it's the last day to do so tomorrow.

Meanwhile, yesterday a food kitchen and sound system happened in Piccadilly Gardens as a party protest against homelessness... "I have spoken to Andy Burnham and I don't think he is going to accomplish his mission to stop homelessness by 2020" said organiser Emma Mohareb.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx