HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL RIPS UP CONSULTATION WITH VULNERABLE PEOPLE
 

Star date: 21st November 2011 

THE REPORT THAT THE COUNCIL DIDN'T WANT SALFORD STAR TO SEE…

Salford Star has finally got hold of the reports on the £3.50 transport charge for the city's most vulnerable people, that Salford Council delayed and delayed sending to us.

The consultation report reveals 27 different concerns from users and carers, ranging from the unaffordable cost to the threat of isolation. The report adds that almost 11% of people currently use the bus service five times a week, and thus will be stung for an extra £17.50 a week or £70 per month.

The findings of the consultation were ignored as Salford Council imposes the new charge this week...

Full story here…


THIS IS HOW SALFORD COUNCIL DOES ITS CONSULTATIONS...

Last week the Salford Star exclusively revealed how Salford Council was about to charge the city's most vulnerable people £3.50 to use its transportation to get to day care centres – click here for the full background story.

In the original Council report it stated that the background papers on the consultation with people who use the transport services were available for public inspection – but despite us requesting to see them, Council officers just wouldn't send them over to us.

Last Friday, the reports finally arrived, a week late, and it's no wonder that the seven Council officers and councillors involved, including the Leader of Salford Council, were dragging their heals…

Eight consultation meetings were held, and 124 people out of the 350 who use the transport service either attended or sent in comments. The people affected have been assessed by Salford Council as "older people, people with learning difficulties, people with complex physical health and or behavioural needs and who can not use other modes or forms of transport".

From what the report states, not one single one of those people (or their carers or families) agreed with the new charge as they raised a massive 27 concerns - ranging from cost, to social isolation, to the possibility of vulnerable people being "subject to bullying on public transportation" - which we print in full below*.

The Report even concludes that 38 vulnerable people currently use the service (10.9%) five days a week which would mean them finding an extra £17.50 a week or £70 per month.

Incredibly the Council report which went from the Assistant Director of Adult Services to the Lead Member Community Health and Social Care, never once mentioned these concerns. The only reference to the consultation in the Report stated… "Through the consultation process people said they wanted a system which…Was easy to use…Fits in with what they do now…Controls the amount taken so they can budget".

No mention of affordability. No mention of isolation. No mention of potential bullying - and all the other 24 concerns.

All the Report seemed interested in was the £123,000 that would be brought into Council coffers following the implementation of the charge, and the best way to implement it.

Indeed, it was only after the decision was made to screw vulnerable people for the £3.50 that the official decision notice stated that the option of "Not charging as people felt they could not afford the charge" was rejected. And… "It is felt that some people may not use the transport because of affordability".

Which all kind of begs the question as to why Salford Council bothered consulting people over the charges in the first place?

The answer to the mad tick box exercise lies in the fact that the Council has to do a `Community Impact Assessment' (CIA), which we also finally got to see.

The CIA states that "The service provides cheap adapted and supported transport to day centres for vulnerable people. Without it some people would not be able to attend". But the Council wants to bring charges in line with those of mainstream bus services, even though it admits that most are on benefits. It adds that "Due to the mobility component of benefits there should be no hardship experienced". But this is not what the user's themselves said in the consultation…

* Here are those 27 concerns…

Service Users

• Concerns about people being socially isolated if they cannot afford to pay the transport charge and will not be able to attend the day centre.
• Concerns that people have a limited income (pensions / benefits) and the additional expenditure will leave people with little or no money left over.
• Concerns that people don't really have a choice if they have to use Social Services transport because of their disability or health needs.
• Concerns that people cannot speak for themselves and it is 'hitting' the most vulnerable.
• Concerns that people will have to reduce the number of days they attend to pay for transport.

Costs / Finance
• Concerns about people's ability to pay.
• Concerns around the actual amount of £3.70 and how this was determined. (People would be willing to pay something if it was a lesser amount)
• Concerns that parent/carers are already subsidising their loved ones and this will be another financial burden.
• Concerns that there is already cost for services plus having to pay for lunches, drinks and activities, the transport charge is another additional cost.


Impact on Families & Carers
• Concerns that they would have to take their son/daughter to the centre at busy times, across the city and for some older carers this would be difficult.
• Concerns the time doing this will infringe on their personal time, and have less time to do other activities, as people have a life outside of their caring role.
• Concerns this responsibility will put extra pressure on families and could result in crisis situations developing.
• Concerns that their son/daughter will not be safe travelling independently and be subject to bullying on public transportation.


Choice & Alternatives
• Concerns there is not an actual choice if people don't have access to a car or cannot use alternative methods of transport.
• Concerns that the alternatives such as Ring & Ride are not reliable and taxis are expensive, Local Link not being available in their areas.
• Concerns that people are currently happy with their transport and if they are not able to use it, they are reliant on their parent/carers for travelling and this is not a choice.
• Concerns that people don't have a choice as to which centre they go to and some have to travel longer distances.


The Future
• Concerns that this is leading to other 'things' happening i.e. centres closing.
• Concerns that this maybe the start of other increases/charges for services received.
• Concerns that people will be moved to a different centre and this may not be based on a decision made by the person.
• Concerns that centres are in the wrong places, and some are on the outskirts of Salford and this makes them difficult to get to.
• Concerns that we are going backwards not forwards.
• Concerns that people may not have enough money in their Personal Budgets.


Application of Charges
• Concerns that the cost is not based on mileage/distance travelled.
• Concerns that there will be a yearly increase.
• Concerns that people may not have the ability to pay.
• Concerns that if people have multiple journeys they will need to pay more than once.


In the CIA one of the sections which the Council has to fill in asks… Can any unfavourable impacts be justified? The Council filled this in `n/a' – or `not applicable'.

Similarly, the Council had to `list any barriers that service users may encounter when accessing services' - `n/a'

…`List any barriers which may prevent people with disabilities from achieving positive outcomes from the service'… `n/a'

The CIA also asks about the findings of the consultation, to which the Council replied…

"Generally people said they would pay the charge as they could not do without the transport. They also said that their preferred method of payment was the post office voucher system. Some people were concerned about their ability to pay and were given the opportunity to have financial re assessment and welfare benefit advice."

`Some people'??? According to our reading of the consultation report it was virtually everyone who voiced an opinion! The strength of feeling against the new charges can be gauged by the fact that, in addition to the consultation, two letters from MPs were also received – and we can assume they weren't in favour of the charges.

For us, this latest sorry episode in Salford Council's recent history shows three things…

1) That Salford Council will put the burden of the cuts on the city's most vulnerable people, while continuing to support `prestige' projects like MediaCityUK and the Salford City Stadium.

2) That the Council does consultations as a pure tick box exercise with no intention of actually changing its path.

3) That when Salford Council is being held up to account for its actions and decisions, it is reluctant to hand over documents that should be in the public domain.

 


 

Resident of this Deadhole slum . wrote
at 06:48:29 on 04 December 2011
This inept , useless council should be thoroughly ashamed . How do the bastards sleep at night ? Very soundly , as this arrogant lot care about nothing but themselves . No wonder this city is a deadhole slum . High council tax , nothing to show for it . Salford council are a disgrace .
 
Steven North wrote
at 20:52:27 on 23 November 2011
Salford City UNISON are currently in the discussion stages of organising and hosting a public meeting to bring together those affected by these cuts. This will probably be done in conjunction with Salford Against the Cuts. As well as our members who deliver these services, we hope to attract service users and members of the public who share the same concerns as we do. Not just to attend the meeting and listen to the usual faces rabbit on (I know full well that I'm one of them!) but to help us build it and tell us how it should be done to guarantee maximum imput from the most vulnerable in Salford. A few years ago, as a Steward in Community Mental Health I was involved in organising a joint staff-service user meeting to deal with a proposal to close week-end drop-ins for our service users. The proposals would also mean that care workers would no longer staff the groups that took place during the week. We knew as staff that we were unlikely to halt those proposals on our own and we knew that service users would lose far more than we would by the changes. We held a joint meeting and submitted a joint response to our management. The approach worked and the drop-ins remained open and are staffed by care workers to this day. Public sector unions have a vital role in defending services - not just to save our members' jobs - but because we believe in public services and are well placed to fight for them. We understand that these services matter even more to those who need them than those who provide them. More will come out about this initiative over the next few weeks. If anybody reading this would like to help they can give me a call on 07557281475 or email steven.north@salfordcityunison.org.uk. Steven North Branch Secretary, Salford City UNISON
 
Fred Hampton wrote
at 20:29:19 on 21 November 2011
Salford council really sinking lower than I thought possible (and that is pretty low). Shameless, incompetent and self-serving beaureacrats. Given that the vast majority of the people affected by this ruling have long-term disabilities, is this not a prima face case of Disability Discrimination by one of the organisations that sanctimoniously professes to practice equality and uphold the rights of the disabled and less affluent members of society. In law "service providers must make reasonable adjustments to allow a disabled person to use their services". Subsidising the cost of transport is a "reasonable adjustment". I notice the same council had no problem in finding £220,000 to subsidise a high-speed bus service to the new BBC HQ at media city earlier this year.
 
Harry Hardcastle wrote
at 18:24:34 on 21 November 2011
Disgraceful , yet so typical of the arrogant Swinetown Cretins .Yet these idiots still waste £200,000 of OUR money on Spicer . Other councils are getting rid of 'executives' to save money . Time the Swinetown Cretins did the same , instesd of making the weakest in society suffer .
 
Fadge wrote
at 15:10:27 on 21 November 2011
Great reporting , Salford Star . Local democracy in action . NOT. A new low for the inept goons at Salford Clowncil . Just typical of the pathetic , inadequate wasters to make the vulnerable suffer because they cannot fight back . The pathetic goons run this Deadcity like Robber Barons. To make the vulnerable suffer the cuts , whilst tossing OUR money away at business chums is obscene . What do the Clowncil get in return ? Salford Clowncil make me puke .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star CD
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SWINTON PROTESTS BRING SALFORD COUNCIL AND BELLWAY HOMES TO NEGOTIATING TABLE
241 houses . That's got to be a bare minimum of 5 years build . Probably longer. All that time to have your life disrupted by nois... [more]
article: SWINTON PROTESTS BRING SALFORD COUNCIL AND BELLWAY HOMES TO NEGOTIATING TABLE
Unfotunateley under the Residential roads and footpath standards any developement of 300 dwellings or less needs only one access r... [more]
article: ARTISTS TAKE UP RESIDENCE IN CONTROVERSIAL URBAN SPLASH SALFORD DEVELOPMENT
'The talk is in hushed tones, and there don't seem to be any proper Salford people here' Ah yes, because 'proper' Salford peopl... [more]
article: ARTISTS TAKE UP RESIDENCE IN CONTROVERSIAL URBAN SPLASH SALFORD DEVELOPMENT
More deranged rantings from Bob the regular! What evidence have you got for your slanderous accusations? The fact about Chimney ... [more]
article: SALFORD TRADES COUNCIL CONDEMNS CITIZENS ADVICE BUREAU FOR £39MILLION UNIVERSAL CREDIT COLLABORATION
CAB staff in Salford have done as much as anyone lto help people fight universal credit injustices including fighting injustices a... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SWINTON PROTESTS BRING SALFORD COUNCIL AND BELLWAY HOMES TO NEGOTIATING TABLE

Star date: 17th October 2018

NEVER MIND THE BREXITS HERE'S SAVING OUR NEIGHBOURHOOD!

As Theresa May was locked in Brexit talks in Brussels, this morning Salford City Council, Bellway Homes and Swinton residents' Saving Our Neighbourhood group were meeting to try and resolve horrendous problems around the Campbell Road natural green space, where the developer is attempting to build 241 houses.

The Council and Bellway have been brought to the table after constant protests by residents..."I think that's the only way we're going to get anywhere" said Barry Woodling of Saving Our Neighbourhood as residents demonstrated yet again outside the Civic Centre.

Full details here...

SALFORD MP RAILS AGAINST GOVERNMENT AS FRACKING BEGINS IN FYLDE

Star date: 16th October 2018

REBECCA LONG-BAILEY SLATES 'GREEN GREAT BRITAIN' TORIES AS WESTWOOD DANCES ON CUADRILLA'S INJUNCTION LINE

Salford and Eccles MP, Rebecca Long-Bailey, slated the Tory Government in Parliament yesterday, pointing out "What a terrible irony it is that the first day of Green Great Britain Week is the day that fracking is due to commence..."

Today, Vivienne Westwood performed a break dance to Abba's Dancing Queen on Cuadrilla's 'draconian injunction line' outside the Preston New Road site in a dig at Theresa May's hopeless jig at the Tory conference and to stand up for the right to protest.

Full details here...

ARTISTS TAKE UP RESIDENCE IN CONTROVERSIAL URBAN SPLASH SALFORD DEVELOPMENT

Star date: 15th October 2018

ARTISTS TO CHALLENGE HOUSING POLICIES WHILE LIVING IN LUXURY HOUSE

'You can't even stop your car to take in the breathtaking sterilization of the place...'

Last week, artists moved into a stunning Urban Splash house in the new Springfield Lane development as part of a year-long project called Tenancy in which they will explore 'what it's like to live in a city negotiating rapid change' and 'who is benefitting'.

The Springfield Lane development, being branded as in 'Manchester', has no affordable housing and avoided hundreds of thousands of pounds in planning fees. Can the artist project, actually sponsored by Tom Bloxham and Urban Splash, make a difference?

Full details here...

HUGE INTERNATIONAL FILIA WOMEN’S CONFERENCE COMES TO ECCLES

Star date: 14th October 2018

SALFORD STREET SUPPORT TO TALK AT LARGEST UK WOMEN'S RIGHTS CONFERENCE

FiLia 2018 Conference
Saturday and Sunday 20th and 21st October
The Lighthouse, Eccles

The massive FiLiA international conference is to take place in Eccles next weekend, with women flying in from all over the world, including from Argentina and Palestine.

There's over two dozen sessions covering all feminist-related subjects, and from Salford, Angela Barratt of Salford and Manchester Street Support will be speaking on women and poverty, while Salford University lecturer, Suryia Nayak, will be giving an Introduction To Consciousness Raising.

Full details here...

COUNTESS WHO MURDERED 650 WOMEN ARRIVES AT EAGLE INN SALFORD

Star date: 14th October 2018

HUNGARIAN GOTHIC DRAMA BASED ON TRUE STORY OF MURDER AND VANITY

Countess
Monday 29th October 7pm and Tuesday 30th October 4pm and 7pm
Eagle Inn £10/£8

A truly gothic production of Countess arrives at the Eagle Inn on 29th and 30th October, based on the true story of Hungarian aristocrat, Elizabeth Bathory, who murdered 650 women for the sake of her vanity. This aims to get inside of her mind with a supernatural twist.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx