HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US   LINKS      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SHAMBLES AS PEEL HOLDINGS LOSE OUT
 

Star date: 8th July 2011

CHAOS AND DISGRACE AT SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING – BUT PEEL HOLDINGS REFUSED GREEN FIELD SITE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN WALKDEN

"This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace" Walkden resident.

There were mad, chaotic unbelievable scenes at Salford Council's planning panel meeting yesterday, as the Council's head of planning, Councillor Derek Antrobus, and chief planning officers tried to overturn a decision to refuse Peel Holdings outline permission to build 350 houses on the green field Burgess Farm site in Walkden.

Residents who were objecting to the plans were appalled and shocked by the Council's behaviour before a new vote was eventually taken and Peel's plans to destroy more green land in Salford were finally kicked out. Although the battle for Burgess Farm and the crested newts is only just beginning…

Full story of the fiasco here…


No-one had quite seen anything like it before. Over fifty residents who had come to Salford Council's planning meeting to try to win a democratic decision were totally shocked by the behaviour of certain councillors and officers.

For over two hours the planning panel had listened to arguments for and against Peel Holdings plans to build 350 houses on the green field site of Burgess Farm in Walkden. A vote was taken, planning permission was refused and then those in favour, led by Salford Council's Lead Planning Member, Derek Antrobus, tried to get the decision nulled. 

First, three councillors voted to visit the site to see for themselves the reality of the housing proposal. Then a vote was taken on the application itself which was rejected by a five to four majority. But, incredibly, Councillor Antrobus and chief planning officers - who had recommended approval of Peel's plans - said the vote didn't count, as councillors had to go on the site visit.

Councillor Karen Garrido, who had proposed the visit, said that she would withdraw her request so that the refusal could stand. But planning officers and Councillor Antrobus again tried to void the decision, arguing that the panel couldn't just vote against the proposal. They had to move a separate motion giving reasons why they were voting against it.

Amidst chaotic scenes, with residents shouting `cheats' and `disgrace' from the public areas, a new motion to refuse the application was put forward and finally accepted by the same 5-4 margin, as Peel Holdings and its Council supporters were sent packing. But the whole process had left residents gobsmacked…

"We're very pleased with the decision but disappointed with the way it was done, it was a shambles" said Eddie Howarth, who had earlier given a passionate and articulate speech to the panel against Peel's plans

"If that's the way the panel operate I'm not surprised that a lot of wrong decisions get made in terms of planning" he added "Of course they tried to get out of it. Once the vote went against them they tried to retract that and suggest they shouldn't decide it. We weren't surprised by the comments from Councillor Antrobus – we all know the history there…"

And Joel Hughes, a pupil at St George's RC High School in Little Hulton, who had made his own personal plea to the panel to save the wildlife on the site, was equally shocked by the Council's behaviour…

"I'm very pleased with the decision but I thought they were being stupid and were trying to make reasons for not allowing it" he said "But I'm really looking forward to doing my work experience on the farm now, like delivering lambs and shearing sheep…"

Campaigner, Sue Occleston added… "I think it was diabolical actually, very poorly done, it was a shambles."

Basically, Salford Council had tried to bulldoze the decision through, despite determined opposition from local residents and logical, articulate arguments against the proposed housing development on a green field site by Peel Holdings.

Speakers against the proposals pointed out the shocking impacts of traffic congestion resulting from 350 `aspirational' houses; the fact that Salford Council itself states that there is no need for the housing; the impact on already overflowing primary schools in the area; and the negative impact on local ecology, including the heavily protected great crested newt which has its breeding ground only 150 metres from the proposed building site.

Councillor Les Turner, representing Walkden South, and scoffing at Peel's plans for a `nature park', asked the panel to imagine they were newts…

"You're living in this tranquil site and suddenly bulldozers, lorries and humans become your neighbours. Would you stay? No, you'd get the hell out!"

And Joel Hughes from St George's High School read out a leaflet he'd produced for the meeting…

"If you take away Burgess Farm…you are taking away a part of history in Little Hulton" he said "We also don't need a `man made' nature reserve that Peel has offered us because we have already got a massive `natural' nature reserve that is home to a variety of animals, some rare and some common but all valued by the local community."

These arguments certainly helped sway the planning panel…

Councillor Judith Tope, representing Eccles, said that "the idea of newts packing their bags and going to their nice new home is just not true." And Councillor Ronnie Wilson, representing Weaste and Seedley, added "We have a history of making mistakes with nature and I don't want to be part of making a mistake. We shouldn't be messing around with nature at this stage."

Other councillors pointed out that even Salford Council's own official report recommending approval of planning permission stated that there was no actual need for this housing in Salford.

Speaking from the public gallery, Councillor Iain Lindley, representing Walkden South, declared that he was "flabbergasted" by the report…

"I thought that there was need for this level of housing but there isn't one" he said "Why would we approve a site on green field land when there is no need? Can members honestly say that they can justify this?"

Panel member Councillor Stephen Ord, representing Irwell Riverside, agreed, saying that he had "concerns that this is strategic land and we shouldn't be using it until it is needed."

In response, Lead Member for Planning, Derek Antrobus, said he was impressed with the design of the houses, spoke of the "long term aspirations of the city" and the £500,000 in potential council tax revenues. He argued that this should be balanced against the environmental issues.

Amidst shouts of `disgrace' he agreed that "something very precious is being lost to people in that area…but we must balance local interests against the wider interests of the city"…

… And amidst more shouts of `disgrace' from the public, Councillor Antrobus threatened that if the panel refused the outline planning permission for the development "it will be upheld on appeal".

Indeed, the skewed nature of the planning system means that the battle is only just beginning. Having finally lost the vote, Peel Holdings can now appeal against the decision – even though, had the decision gone in favour of Peel's plans, residents couldn't appeal.

"We're not over the moon yet because we know it will go to appeal" said Eddie Howarth "This is just the beginning…but at least it's an independent body now that's going to determine whether it should be approved or not."

Councillor Lindley said afterwards that there was a long way to go, and urged people in Salford to oppose plans in the Council's Draft Core Strategy for the site to be brought forward officially for housing…

"I'm really pleased that the panel in the end has listened to the residents and refused the application" he said "But this is the first battle and there's still a long way to go. We have the core strategy up for consultation and that effectively demonstrates a need, so we have to have to work very hard until 1st August to make sure we get it removed from the core strategy"

As for the way the panel meeting was run, he just shook his head…

"I think the conduct of the meeting was poor, and in particular we need to make sure that residents have confidence in the planning system - I don't think they will be encouraged by what they saw this morning."

Or as one Walkden resident shouted from the public gallery "This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace…"

Objections to Salford Council's plan for the Burgess Farm green field site in the Draft Core Strategy can be made online before August 1st (see here)

 

 

 

 


 

Fadge - No Hope in this dead city wrote
at 3:21:10 PM on Saturday, October 01, 2011
Caroline makes a valid point about the destruction of farm land and the need to import food .This will be of no relevance to the clowncils that infest Britain , as a clowncils sole remit is to cram as much shoddy housing as possible wherever possible , in order to extort the maximum ammount of council tax from the dis-regarded citizens .The tinpot town hall dictators must maintain the vast fund of extorted income to pay obscene salaries to all important ' executive ' shite-spouters ,fund brain-dead schemes , and to throw at big business chums .The worst example of this is this dump salford . Useless bastards , all of them .
 
caroline wrote
at 1:59:04 AM on Saturday, October 01, 2011
Once again it seems that dark forces are at work in favour of big bussiness and disregarding what Joe public say's or wants. I wonder what all the men and women who gave their lives so we could be free in two great wars would think if they could come back to see if their lives were well spent?. This seems Quite common up and down the UK. Although I am not saying its the same it reminds me of the disgraceful Polson affair. The other point is the ever destruction of farm land that could feed the UK so we do not have to depend on major food imports costing the country large amounts of money.
 
UoS wrote
at 8:31:08 AM on Friday, July 08, 2011
Whilst I agree the attempt to 'sweep' a democratic vote under the carpet is a disgrace (but no less than I would expect from Labour), I am afraid Antrobus is right on the money - the decision will be nodded through on appeal.
 
Eddie Banyard wrote
at 4:19:24 AM on Friday, July 08, 2011
AW.. Shame . Poor council didn't get their way for a change .They can always throw another 15million at Peel , to maintain the all-too-cosy relationship .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star T-shirt ad
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
Salford Star photo stories
Cornerstone advert
Mary Burns Publishing
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL PLANNING VIABILITY FIGURES UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
British politics has never solved the problem of a betterment tax. Each attempt failed, for political or technical reasons. Sectio... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL PLANNING VIABILITY FIGURES UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
Time to refer one of these cases to the Information Commissioner and let them decide. The viability appraisal must contain assumpt... [more]
article: SALFORD URBAN ART EXHIBITION
Hands depicted in pockets rather than pants.... Some artistic license being taken there!... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL £55MILLION CUTS MASSACRE CONTINUES
I really don't need any help "Dave". I give you facts, you call me names. Where is the "argument"?... [more]
article: SALFORD SOCIAL HOUSING RENTS TO RISE BY FOUR TIMES THE RATE OF INFLATION
I see most comments agree with my projection that Salford average rent will rise to £640 a month. I am sorry we alternative Mayora... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL PLANNING VIABILITY FIGURES UNDER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

Star date: 30th January 2015

AS SALFORD PEOPLE GET SCREWED FOR £MILLIONS BY DEVELOPERS, VIABILITY FIGURES TO REMAIN SECRET

After the Salford Star had publicised the disgrace of developers getting away with paying £millions in planning obligations for putting up huge blocks of flats, even Salford Council's Assistant Mayor for Planning called the practice a "public scandal of immense proportions".

Planners are getting away with it by submitting `viability assessments' showing their profits won't be big enough if they had to pay such fees. The Salford Star asked to see one of these `viability assessments' under the Freedom of Information Act – but Salford Council has refused, stating it's `in the public interest' for them to remain secret. You what?

Full details here...

SALFORD STOCK TRANSFER CONSULTANTS TO BE PAID £1,250 PER DAY ON TOP OF £172,000 CONTRACT

Star date: 29th January 2015 

PWC CONSULTANTS TO BE PAID £1,250 A DAY FOR EXTRA WORK ON SALIX HOMES TRANSFER

PWC consultants is set to be paid an extra £41,875, or £1,250 per day, for 33.5 days work for a Lead Advisor/Project Manager to complete work on the council house stock transfer process to Salix Homes by March – even though there is a £172,000 contract already in place for work until that date.

The extra contract will mean that the consultants will have picked up a total of £403,875 for various `advice' and `support' contracts on the transfer. PWC had originally wanted £75,000 for the extra work.

Full details here...

SALFORD SOCIAL HOUSING RENTS TO RISE BY FOUR TIMES THE RATE OF INFLATION

Star date: 28th January 2015

SALIX AND PENDLETON TOGETHER TENANTS GET HAMMERED WITH RENT RISES - AGAIN

With the current rate of inflation running at 0.5%, tenants of Salix and Pendleton Together face rent rises of 2.2% in 2015-16, which will add almost £7 a month to bills. This comes on top of 17.3% rent rises seen over the last three years.

Meanwhile, service charges for both housing providers will `reflect the actual costs of providing those services', so some tenants will see decreases while others will see whopping increases.

Full details here...

SALFORD RESIDENT CAUGHT IN HORRIFIC CARE AND CUTS STORM

Star date: 27th January 2015

CAN THIS GET ANY WORSE? WELCOME TO SALFORD 2015...

"It's all a nightmare...I don't know how I'm going to cope..."

Everything horrific about living under Council and Government `austerity' has come together in a perfect care and cuts storm for one parent caring for a severely disabled adult in Salford.

This mum has lived with a catalogue of cuts and ridiculous benefit policies that have left her with absolutely no income, bills coming in for Council Tax and Bedroom Tax, and inferior care for her son that has seen him wait five hours to go to the toilet. All because she had to have major surgery on her arms. What is real life like in 2015? Read this and weep...Or get angry.

Full details here...

SALFORD MPS REFUSE TO BACK FREEZE ON FRACKING

Star date: 27th January 2015

SALFORD LABOUR MPS ABSTAIN IN FRACKING FREEZE VOTE

Salford's Labour MPs all abstained yesterday in a vote to declare a freeze, or moratorium, on fracking while an independent assessment is carried out into its impact on climate change, the environment, health and safety and the economy.

Instead the Infrastructure Bill was passed with some added conditions including a ban on fracking in national parks and stricter regulations, which Friends of the Earth hailed as a `Government retreat'.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx