HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US   LINKS      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SHAMBLES AS PEEL HOLDINGS LOSE OUT
 

Star date: 8th July 2011

CHAOS AND DISGRACE AT SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING – BUT PEEL HOLDINGS REFUSED GREEN FIELD SITE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN WALKDEN

"This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace" Walkden resident.

There were mad, chaotic unbelievable scenes at Salford Council's planning panel meeting yesterday, as the Council's head of planning, Councillor Derek Antrobus, and chief planning officers tried to overturn a decision to refuse Peel Holdings outline permission to build 350 houses on the green field Burgess Farm site in Walkden.

Residents who were objecting to the plans were appalled and shocked by the Council's behaviour before a new vote was eventually taken and Peel's plans to destroy more green land in Salford were finally kicked out. Although the battle for Burgess Farm and the crested newts is only just beginning…

Full story of the fiasco here…


No-one had quite seen anything like it before. Over fifty residents who had come to Salford Council's planning meeting to try to win a democratic decision were totally shocked by the behaviour of certain councillors and officers.

For over two hours the planning panel had listened to arguments for and against Peel Holdings plans to build 350 houses on the green field site of Burgess Farm in Walkden. A vote was taken, planning permission was refused and then those in favour, led by Salford Council's Lead Planning Member, Derek Antrobus, tried to get the decision nulled. 

First, three councillors voted to visit the site to see for themselves the reality of the housing proposal. Then a vote was taken on the application itself which was rejected by a five to four majority. But, incredibly, Councillor Antrobus and chief planning officers - who had recommended approval of Peel's plans - said the vote didn't count, as councillors had to go on the site visit.

Councillor Karen Garrido, who had proposed the visit, said that she would withdraw her request so that the refusal could stand. But planning officers and Councillor Antrobus again tried to void the decision, arguing that the panel couldn't just vote against the proposal. They had to move a separate motion giving reasons why they were voting against it.

Amidst chaotic scenes, with residents shouting `cheats' and `disgrace' from the public areas, a new motion to refuse the application was put forward and finally accepted by the same 5-4 margin, as Peel Holdings and its Council supporters were sent packing. But the whole process had left residents gobsmacked…

"We're very pleased with the decision but disappointed with the way it was done, it was a shambles" said Eddie Howarth, who had earlier given a passionate and articulate speech to the panel against Peel's plans

"If that's the way the panel operate I'm not surprised that a lot of wrong decisions get made in terms of planning" he added "Of course they tried to get out of it. Once the vote went against them they tried to retract that and suggest they shouldn't decide it. We weren't surprised by the comments from Councillor Antrobus – we all know the history there…"

And Joel Hughes, a pupil at St George's RC High School in Little Hulton, who had made his own personal plea to the panel to save the wildlife on the site, was equally shocked by the Council's behaviour…

"I'm very pleased with the decision but I thought they were being stupid and were trying to make reasons for not allowing it" he said "But I'm really looking forward to doing my work experience on the farm now, like delivering lambs and shearing sheep…"

Campaigner, Sue Occleston added… "I think it was diabolical actually, very poorly done, it was a shambles."

Basically, Salford Council had tried to bulldoze the decision through, despite determined opposition from local residents and logical, articulate arguments against the proposed housing development on a green field site by Peel Holdings.

Speakers against the proposals pointed out the shocking impacts of traffic congestion resulting from 350 `aspirational' houses; the fact that Salford Council itself states that there is no need for the housing; the impact on already overflowing primary schools in the area; and the negative impact on local ecology, including the heavily protected great crested newt which has its breeding ground only 150 metres from the proposed building site.

Councillor Les Turner, representing Walkden South, and scoffing at Peel's plans for a `nature park', asked the panel to imagine they were newts…

"You're living in this tranquil site and suddenly bulldozers, lorries and humans become your neighbours. Would you stay? No, you'd get the hell out!"

And Joel Hughes from St George's High School read out a leaflet he'd produced for the meeting…

"If you take away Burgess Farm…you are taking away a part of history in Little Hulton" he said "We also don't need a `man made' nature reserve that Peel has offered us because we have already got a massive `natural' nature reserve that is home to a variety of animals, some rare and some common but all valued by the local community."

These arguments certainly helped sway the planning panel…

Councillor Judith Tope, representing Eccles, said that "the idea of newts packing their bags and going to their nice new home is just not true." And Councillor Ronnie Wilson, representing Weaste and Seedley, added "We have a history of making mistakes with nature and I don't want to be part of making a mistake. We shouldn't be messing around with nature at this stage."

Other councillors pointed out that even Salford Council's own official report recommending approval of planning permission stated that there was no actual need for this housing in Salford.

Speaking from the public gallery, Councillor Iain Lindley, representing Walkden South, declared that he was "flabbergasted" by the report…

"I thought that there was need for this level of housing but there isn't one" he said "Why would we approve a site on green field land when there is no need? Can members honestly say that they can justify this?"

Panel member Councillor Stephen Ord, representing Irwell Riverside, agreed, saying that he had "concerns that this is strategic land and we shouldn't be using it until it is needed."

In response, Lead Member for Planning, Derek Antrobus, said he was impressed with the design of the houses, spoke of the "long term aspirations of the city" and the £500,000 in potential council tax revenues. He argued that this should be balanced against the environmental issues.

Amidst shouts of `disgrace' he agreed that "something very precious is being lost to people in that area…but we must balance local interests against the wider interests of the city"…

… And amidst more shouts of `disgrace' from the public, Councillor Antrobus threatened that if the panel refused the outline planning permission for the development "it will be upheld on appeal".

Indeed, the skewed nature of the planning system means that the battle is only just beginning. Having finally lost the vote, Peel Holdings can now appeal against the decision – even though, had the decision gone in favour of Peel's plans, residents couldn't appeal.

"We're not over the moon yet because we know it will go to appeal" said Eddie Howarth "This is just the beginning…but at least it's an independent body now that's going to determine whether it should be approved or not."

Councillor Lindley said afterwards that there was a long way to go, and urged people in Salford to oppose plans in the Council's Draft Core Strategy for the site to be brought forward officially for housing…

"I'm really pleased that the panel in the end has listened to the residents and refused the application" he said "But this is the first battle and there's still a long way to go. We have the core strategy up for consultation and that effectively demonstrates a need, so we have to have to work very hard until 1st August to make sure we get it removed from the core strategy"

As for the way the panel meeting was run, he just shook his head…

"I think the conduct of the meeting was poor, and in particular we need to make sure that residents have confidence in the planning system - I don't think they will be encouraged by what they saw this morning."

Or as one Walkden resident shouted from the public gallery "This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace…"

Objections to Salford Council's plan for the Burgess Farm green field site in the Draft Core Strategy can be made online before August 1st (see here)

 

 

 

 


 

Fadge - No Hope in this dead city wrote
at 3:21:10 PM on Saturday, October 01, 2011
Caroline makes a valid point about the destruction of farm land and the need to import food .This will be of no relevance to the clowncils that infest Britain , as a clowncils sole remit is to cram as much shoddy housing as possible wherever possible , in order to extort the maximum ammount of council tax from the dis-regarded citizens .The tinpot town hall dictators must maintain the vast fund of extorted income to pay obscene salaries to all important ' executive ' shite-spouters ,fund brain-dead schemes , and to throw at big business chums .The worst example of this is this dump salford . Useless bastards , all of them .
 
caroline wrote
at 1:59:04 AM on Saturday, October 01, 2011
Once again it seems that dark forces are at work in favour of big bussiness and disregarding what Joe public say's or wants. I wonder what all the men and women who gave their lives so we could be free in two great wars would think if they could come back to see if their lives were well spent?. This seems Quite common up and down the UK. Although I am not saying its the same it reminds me of the disgraceful Polson affair. The other point is the ever destruction of farm land that could feed the UK so we do not have to depend on major food imports costing the country large amounts of money.
 
UoS wrote
at 8:31:08 AM on Friday, July 08, 2011
Whilst I agree the attempt to 'sweep' a democratic vote under the carpet is a disgrace (but no less than I would expect from Labour), I am afraid Antrobus is right on the money - the decision will be nodded through on appeal.
 
Eddie Banyard wrote
at 4:19:24 AM on Friday, July 08, 2011
AW.. Shame . Poor council didn't get their way for a change .They can always throw another 15million at Peel , to maintain the all-too-cosy relationship .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star T-shirt ad
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
Salford Star photo stories
Cornerstone advert
Mary Burns Publishing
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL ACCOUNTABILITY DEFICIT SCANDAL
Are there any statutory rules relating to this matter, and if so do Salford make the grade. If not let Central Government bring th... [more]
article: NHS DEVOLUTION SILENCE FROM SALFORD CIVIC LEADERS
"Mr Shame", you are against a referendum, but in favour of local people having more say in what goes on. And you accuse the Salfor... [more]
article: NHS DEVOLUTION SILENCE FROM SALFORD CIVIC LEADERS
The current mayor of salford like every other council leader has precious little real power or influence, the reason being central... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL ACCOUNTABILITY DEFICIT SCANDAL
It's over 10 years since I posted a foi request to Salford council it's seems since then it's the same old , poor accountable I ca... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL ACCOUNTABILITY DEFICIT SCANDAL
Salford coouncil is always telling us how they believe in an open style of govence yet here again they have failed to live up to ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL ACCOUNTABILITY DEFICIT SCANDAL

Star date: 4th March 2015

ALMOST NO PUBLIC SCRUTINY OF SALFORD COUNCIL FOR THREE MONTHS!

Salford Council and City Mayor Ian Stewart have not been held accountable in public for their actions and policies for over three months, apart from one meeting about budget cuts.

In January the Council voted to cut the number of its scrutiny committees to five but since then only one of those committees, which are supposed to hold the Mayor and Council to account, has met with the public informed.

Full details here... 

SALFORD COUNCIL FORCED TO REVEAL MAYOR DETAILS AFTER INFORMATION COMMISSIONER GETS INVOLVED

Star date: 3rd March 2015

SALFORD RESIDENT NINE MONTH BATTLE TO GET INFO ON MAYOR

Following a Salford Star article a year ago about Mayor Ian Stewart's camper van being parked on Council property, Salford resident, Anthony Dowd, submitted a Freedom of Information request to try and get some truth. Salford Council judged his request `vexatious', then refused to answer it until the Freedom of Information Commissioner became involved.

Now Anthony has set up a Salford Council Freedom of Information Facebook group so other residents can share their experiences of fobbed off requests.

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL TO LOSE ANOTHER £1MILLION DEVELOPER FEES AT BLACK FRIARS PUB

Star date: 2nd March 2015

PETER DONE COMPANY TO AVOID £1.2MILLION PLANNING FEES – AND WON'T EVEN PAY FOR A BUS STOP

A company part owned by Fred Done's brother, Peter, has a planning application going to Salford Council this week, to put up two horrendous blocks of apartments by the Black Friars pub in Trinity. Done's company, FICM, should be paying over £1.2million in planning fees plus providing 76 affordable properties but is set to avoid the payments due to `viability' issues.

Transport for Greater Manchester requested that the developer should at least provide two new bus stops on Blackfriars Road – but Done's company, apparently, can't even afford that. The Done brothers' wealth is estimated at around £700million.

Full details here...

SALFORD TRAINEE SOCIAL WORKERS TO MAKE CONNECTIONS WITH COMMUNITY

Star date: 1st March 2015

SALFORD SOCIAL WORK NETWORK LAUNCHES

SSWN Launch
Friday 6th March 2pm
University of Salford

Launching this Friday, Salford Social Work Network, or SSWN, is a radical student led collective that aims to join the community in fighting social injustice to make change and to find new approaches to social work.

On Friday, anyone from the community is welcome to attend the launch, as well as any students working in the field. There's lots of presentations explaining more about it all.

Full details here...

GREATER MANCHESTER HEADS FOR LONDON CLIMATE CHANGE MARCH

Star date: 1st March 2015

SALFORD ANTI FRACKING GROUPS SUPPORT CLIMATE CHANGE MARCH

"This isn't politics, this is survival"

Next Saturday, 7th March, tens of thousands of people are expected to converge on London for the national Climate Change march – organised as a mass wake-up call before the General Election.

The march is backed by Frack Free groups in Salford, and there are still places on coaches going from Manchester.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx