HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SHAMBLES AS PEEL HOLDINGS LOSE OUT
 

Star date: 8th July 2011

CHAOS AND DISGRACE AT SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING – BUT PEEL HOLDINGS REFUSED GREEN FIELD SITE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN WALKDEN

"This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace" Walkden resident.

There were mad, chaotic unbelievable scenes at Salford Council's planning panel meeting yesterday, as the Council's head of planning, Councillor Derek Antrobus, and chief planning officers tried to overturn a decision to refuse Peel Holdings outline permission to build 350 houses on the green field Burgess Farm site in Walkden.

Residents who were objecting to the plans were appalled and shocked by the Council's behaviour before a new vote was eventually taken and Peel's plans to destroy more green land in Salford were finally kicked out. Although the battle for Burgess Farm and the crested newts is only just beginning…

Full story of the fiasco here…


No-one had quite seen anything like it before. Over fifty residents who had come to Salford Council's planning meeting to try to win a democratic decision were totally shocked by the behaviour of certain councillors and officers.

For over two hours the planning panel had listened to arguments for and against Peel Holdings plans to build 350 houses on the green field site of Burgess Farm in Walkden. A vote was taken, planning permission was refused and then those in favour, led by Salford Council's Lead Planning Member, Derek Antrobus, tried to get the decision nulled. 

First, three councillors voted to visit the site to see for themselves the reality of the housing proposal. Then a vote was taken on the application itself which was rejected by a five to four majority. But, incredibly, Councillor Antrobus and chief planning officers - who had recommended approval of Peel's plans - said the vote didn't count, as councillors had to go on the site visit.

Councillor Karen Garrido, who had proposed the visit, said that she would withdraw her request so that the refusal could stand. But planning officers and Councillor Antrobus again tried to void the decision, arguing that the panel couldn't just vote against the proposal. They had to move a separate motion giving reasons why they were voting against it.

Amidst chaotic scenes, with residents shouting `cheats' and `disgrace' from the public areas, a new motion to refuse the application was put forward and finally accepted by the same 5-4 margin, as Peel Holdings and its Council supporters were sent packing. But the whole process had left residents gobsmacked…

"We're very pleased with the decision but disappointed with the way it was done, it was a shambles" said Eddie Howarth, who had earlier given a passionate and articulate speech to the panel against Peel's plans

"If that's the way the panel operate I'm not surprised that a lot of wrong decisions get made in terms of planning" he added "Of course they tried to get out of it. Once the vote went against them they tried to retract that and suggest they shouldn't decide it. We weren't surprised by the comments from Councillor Antrobus – we all know the history there…"

And Joel Hughes, a pupil at St George's RC High School in Little Hulton, who had made his own personal plea to the panel to save the wildlife on the site, was equally shocked by the Council's behaviour…

"I'm very pleased with the decision but I thought they were being stupid and were trying to make reasons for not allowing it" he said "But I'm really looking forward to doing my work experience on the farm now, like delivering lambs and shearing sheep…"

Campaigner, Sue Occleston added… "I think it was diabolical actually, very poorly done, it was a shambles."

Basically, Salford Council had tried to bulldoze the decision through, despite determined opposition from local residents and logical, articulate arguments against the proposed housing development on a green field site by Peel Holdings.

Speakers against the proposals pointed out the shocking impacts of traffic congestion resulting from 350 `aspirational' houses; the fact that Salford Council itself states that there is no need for the housing; the impact on already overflowing primary schools in the area; and the negative impact on local ecology, including the heavily protected great crested newt which has its breeding ground only 150 metres from the proposed building site.

Councillor Les Turner, representing Walkden South, and scoffing at Peel's plans for a `nature park', asked the panel to imagine they were newts…

"You're living in this tranquil site and suddenly bulldozers, lorries and humans become your neighbours. Would you stay? No, you'd get the hell out!"

And Joel Hughes from St George's High School read out a leaflet he'd produced for the meeting…

"If you take away Burgess Farm…you are taking away a part of history in Little Hulton" he said "We also don't need a `man made' nature reserve that Peel has offered us because we have already got a massive `natural' nature reserve that is home to a variety of animals, some rare and some common but all valued by the local community."

These arguments certainly helped sway the planning panel…

Councillor Judith Tope, representing Eccles, said that "the idea of newts packing their bags and going to their nice new home is just not true." And Councillor Ronnie Wilson, representing Weaste and Seedley, added "We have a history of making mistakes with nature and I don't want to be part of making a mistake. We shouldn't be messing around with nature at this stage."

Other councillors pointed out that even Salford Council's own official report recommending approval of planning permission stated that there was no actual need for this housing in Salford.

Speaking from the public gallery, Councillor Iain Lindley, representing Walkden South, declared that he was "flabbergasted" by the report…

"I thought that there was need for this level of housing but there isn't one" he said "Why would we approve a site on green field land when there is no need? Can members honestly say that they can justify this?"

Panel member Councillor Stephen Ord, representing Irwell Riverside, agreed, saying that he had "concerns that this is strategic land and we shouldn't be using it until it is needed."

In response, Lead Member for Planning, Derek Antrobus, said he was impressed with the design of the houses, spoke of the "long term aspirations of the city" and the £500,000 in potential council tax revenues. He argued that this should be balanced against the environmental issues.

Amidst shouts of `disgrace' he agreed that "something very precious is being lost to people in that area…but we must balance local interests against the wider interests of the city"…

… And amidst more shouts of `disgrace' from the public, Councillor Antrobus threatened that if the panel refused the outline planning permission for the development "it will be upheld on appeal".

Indeed, the skewed nature of the planning system means that the battle is only just beginning. Having finally lost the vote, Peel Holdings can now appeal against the decision – even though, had the decision gone in favour of Peel's plans, residents couldn't appeal.

"We're not over the moon yet because we know it will go to appeal" said Eddie Howarth "This is just the beginning…but at least it's an independent body now that's going to determine whether it should be approved or not."

Councillor Lindley said afterwards that there was a long way to go, and urged people in Salford to oppose plans in the Council's Draft Core Strategy for the site to be brought forward officially for housing…

"I'm really pleased that the panel in the end has listened to the residents and refused the application" he said "But this is the first battle and there's still a long way to go. We have the core strategy up for consultation and that effectively demonstrates a need, so we have to have to work very hard until 1st August to make sure we get it removed from the core strategy"

As for the way the panel meeting was run, he just shook his head…

"I think the conduct of the meeting was poor, and in particular we need to make sure that residents have confidence in the planning system - I don't think they will be encouraged by what they saw this morning."

Or as one Walkden resident shouted from the public gallery "This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace…"

Objections to Salford Council's plan for the Burgess Farm green field site in the Draft Core Strategy can be made online before August 1st (see here)

 

 

 

 


 

Fadge - No Hope in this dead city wrote
at 3:21:10 PM on Saturday, October 1, 2011
Caroline makes a valid point about the destruction of farm land and the need to import food .This will be of no relevance to the clowncils that infest Britain , as a clowncils sole remit is to cram as much shoddy housing as possible wherever possible , in order to extort the maximum ammount of council tax from the dis-regarded citizens .The tinpot town hall dictators must maintain the vast fund of extorted income to pay obscene salaries to all important ' executive ' shite-spouters ,fund brain-dead schemes , and to throw at big business chums .The worst example of this is this dump salford . Useless bastards , all of them .
 
caroline wrote
at 1:59:04 AM on Saturday, October 1, 2011
Once again it seems that dark forces are at work in favour of big bussiness and disregarding what Joe public say's or wants. I wonder what all the men and women who gave their lives so we could be free in two great wars would think if they could come back to see if their lives were well spent?. This seems Quite common up and down the UK. Although I am not saying its the same it reminds me of the disgraceful Polson affair. The other point is the ever destruction of farm land that could feed the UK so we do not have to depend on major food imports costing the country large amounts of money.
 
UoS wrote
at 8:31:08 AM on Friday, July 8, 2011
Whilst I agree the attempt to 'sweep' a democratic vote under the carpet is a disgrace (but no less than I would expect from Labour), I am afraid Antrobus is right on the money - the decision will be nodded through on appeal.
 
Eddie Banyard wrote
at 4:19:24 AM on Friday, July 8, 2011
AW.. Shame . Poor council didn't get their way for a change .They can always throw another 15million at Peel , to maintain the all-too-cosy relationship .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Live Events
Salford Star contact
Salford Star
Salford Star print
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD DONALD TRUMP PROTEST AT MEDIACITYUK BRIDGE
The looney left once again prove they only like democracy when they win... [more]
article: SALFORD REMEMBRANCE SERVICE HELD FOR HOMELESS IN SHADOW OF OBSCENE WEALTH
What if it was your child? ?? ... [more]
article: SAVE OUR PUPS SALFORD DOGS 4 US PROTEST
It's a personal vendetta because the ringleader lost her job. She talks about d4u 24/7. She's running out of steam ... [more]
article: EAST SALFORD COMMUNITY DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM COUNCIL ON CONTROVERSIAL CHARITY
Yes the community were up in arms regarding ICT and are demanding answers from the CEO and former chair of ICT and also the person... [more]
article: SAVE OUR PUPS SALFORD DOGS 4 US PROTEST
I thought it was illegal for the media to incite a protest... it seems all this publication does is target this shop, very poor jo... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

NEW SALFORD PEOPLE’S RECORD LABEL LAUNCHES

Star date: 21st January 2017

SHINNY'S RECORDS LAUNCHES AFTER CHRISTMAS NUMBER 1 BID

Fresh from an assault on the Christmas Number One, Salford's James `Shinny' Davenport is launching SHINNy'S RECORDS: The People's Label – to promote local music.

Shinny is on the lookout for local bands and musicians, and the first label release is to be his own track for Valentine's Day, Took You for Granted, as Ian Leslie reports...

Full details here...

LENDLEASE SALFORD OCCUPIED BY PRISON PROTESTERS

Star date: 21st January 2017

PRISON PROFITEERS NOT WELCOME STATE CAMPAIGN GROUPS

Yesterday, the Salford Quays HQ of construction company and Tory Party donors Lendlease was occupied by groups to highlight the company's involvement in prison expansion, which includes a new £250million mega-prison in Wrexham and a potential new prison in Greater Manchester.

"We don't want a new prison here in Greater Manchester or anywhere" said local resident Jess Bradley, who joined the protest "We desperately need to fund alternatives."

Full details here...

SALFORD REMEMBRANCE SERVICE HELD FOR HOMELESS IN SHADOW OF OBSCENE WEALTH

Star date: 20th January 2017

HOMELESS DEATHS REMEMBERED

`Love leaves a memory no-one can steal...'

In the shadow of new hotels, car parks and office blocks developed by the obscene wealth of Legal and General and Salford Council obsequiousness, a memorial service was held tonight for homeless people who have died on the streets, near the spot where Daniel Smith was murdered a year ago.

Full details here...

SALFORD DONALD TRUMP PROTEST AT MEDIACITYUK BRIDGE

Star date: 20th January 2017

`WE WILL NOT BE TRUMPED' #BRIDGES NOT WALLS

This afternoon, as Donald Trump was preparing to be inaugurated as President of the United States, a huge banner was unfurled over the Millennium Bridge at MediaCityUK stating `We Will Not Be Trumped'.

It was part of a #BridgesNotWalls protest against Trump which happened in over three hundred cities around the world... "Places like Salford are known for tolerance, people helping each other, diversity, harmony and passion" said Furqan Naeem of Citizens UK which led the protests "And that's what we want to show today."

Full details here...

EAST SALFORD COMMUNITY DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM COUNCIL ON CONTROVERSIAL CHARITY

Star date: 20th January 2017

INSPIRING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER CONTROVERSY RAGES ON...

Controversial charity, Inspiring Communities Together (ICT) - labelled `greedy' "power grabbing control freaks" by a local councillor - was at the centre of more anger at a meeting of East Salford Community Committee last night, when its Chair and CEO declined to attend to answer questions about its spending of £90,000 of community money.

Instead, ICT sent a written response, and the community, in turn, demanded that Salford City Council's commissioning officer for the £90,000 of public money attend a future meeting to explain why the Council apparently has no concerns about ICT.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx