HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SHAMBLES AS PEEL HOLDINGS LOSE OUT
 

Star date: 8th July 2011

CHAOS AND DISGRACE AT SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING MEETING – BUT PEEL HOLDINGS REFUSED GREEN FIELD SITE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN WALKDEN

"This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace" Walkden resident.

There were mad, chaotic unbelievable scenes at Salford Council's planning panel meeting yesterday, as the Council's head of planning, Councillor Derek Antrobus, and chief planning officers tried to overturn a decision to refuse Peel Holdings outline permission to build 350 houses on the green field Burgess Farm site in Walkden.

Residents who were objecting to the plans were appalled and shocked by the Council's behaviour before a new vote was eventually taken and Peel's plans to destroy more green land in Salford were finally kicked out. Although the battle for Burgess Farm and the crested newts is only just beginning…

Full story of the fiasco here…


No-one had quite seen anything like it before. Over fifty residents who had come to Salford Council's planning meeting to try to win a democratic decision were totally shocked by the behaviour of certain councillors and officers.

For over two hours the planning panel had listened to arguments for and against Peel Holdings plans to build 350 houses on the green field site of Burgess Farm in Walkden. A vote was taken, planning permission was refused and then those in favour, led by Salford Council's Lead Planning Member, Derek Antrobus, tried to get the decision nulled. 

First, three councillors voted to visit the site to see for themselves the reality of the housing proposal. Then a vote was taken on the application itself which was rejected by a five to four majority. But, incredibly, Councillor Antrobus and chief planning officers - who had recommended approval of Peel's plans - said the vote didn't count, as councillors had to go on the site visit.

Councillor Karen Garrido, who had proposed the visit, said that she would withdraw her request so that the refusal could stand. But planning officers and Councillor Antrobus again tried to void the decision, arguing that the panel couldn't just vote against the proposal. They had to move a separate motion giving reasons why they were voting against it.

Amidst chaotic scenes, with residents shouting `cheats' and `disgrace' from the public areas, a new motion to refuse the application was put forward and finally accepted by the same 5-4 margin, as Peel Holdings and its Council supporters were sent packing. But the whole process had left residents gobsmacked…

"We're very pleased with the decision but disappointed with the way it was done, it was a shambles" said Eddie Howarth, who had earlier given a passionate and articulate speech to the panel against Peel's plans

"If that's the way the panel operate I'm not surprised that a lot of wrong decisions get made in terms of planning" he added "Of course they tried to get out of it. Once the vote went against them they tried to retract that and suggest they shouldn't decide it. We weren't surprised by the comments from Councillor Antrobus – we all know the history there…"

And Joel Hughes, a pupil at St George's RC High School in Little Hulton, who had made his own personal plea to the panel to save the wildlife on the site, was equally shocked by the Council's behaviour…

"I'm very pleased with the decision but I thought they were being stupid and were trying to make reasons for not allowing it" he said "But I'm really looking forward to doing my work experience on the farm now, like delivering lambs and shearing sheep…"

Campaigner, Sue Occleston added… "I think it was diabolical actually, very poorly done, it was a shambles."

Basically, Salford Council had tried to bulldoze the decision through, despite determined opposition from local residents and logical, articulate arguments against the proposed housing development on a green field site by Peel Holdings.

Speakers against the proposals pointed out the shocking impacts of traffic congestion resulting from 350 `aspirational' houses; the fact that Salford Council itself states that there is no need for the housing; the impact on already overflowing primary schools in the area; and the negative impact on local ecology, including the heavily protected great crested newt which has its breeding ground only 150 metres from the proposed building site.

Councillor Les Turner, representing Walkden South, and scoffing at Peel's plans for a `nature park', asked the panel to imagine they were newts…

"You're living in this tranquil site and suddenly bulldozers, lorries and humans become your neighbours. Would you stay? No, you'd get the hell out!"

And Joel Hughes from St George's High School read out a leaflet he'd produced for the meeting…

"If you take away Burgess Farm…you are taking away a part of history in Little Hulton" he said "We also don't need a `man made' nature reserve that Peel has offered us because we have already got a massive `natural' nature reserve that is home to a variety of animals, some rare and some common but all valued by the local community."

These arguments certainly helped sway the planning panel…

Councillor Judith Tope, representing Eccles, said that "the idea of newts packing their bags and going to their nice new home is just not true." And Councillor Ronnie Wilson, representing Weaste and Seedley, added "We have a history of making mistakes with nature and I don't want to be part of making a mistake. We shouldn't be messing around with nature at this stage."

Other councillors pointed out that even Salford Council's own official report recommending approval of planning permission stated that there was no actual need for this housing in Salford.

Speaking from the public gallery, Councillor Iain Lindley, representing Walkden South, declared that he was "flabbergasted" by the report…

"I thought that there was need for this level of housing but there isn't one" he said "Why would we approve a site on green field land when there is no need? Can members honestly say that they can justify this?"

Panel member Councillor Stephen Ord, representing Irwell Riverside, agreed, saying that he had "concerns that this is strategic land and we shouldn't be using it until it is needed."

In response, Lead Member for Planning, Derek Antrobus, said he was impressed with the design of the houses, spoke of the "long term aspirations of the city" and the £500,000 in potential council tax revenues. He argued that this should be balanced against the environmental issues.

Amidst shouts of `disgrace' he agreed that "something very precious is being lost to people in that area…but we must balance local interests against the wider interests of the city"…

… And amidst more shouts of `disgrace' from the public, Councillor Antrobus threatened that if the panel refused the outline planning permission for the development "it will be upheld on appeal".

Indeed, the skewed nature of the planning system means that the battle is only just beginning. Having finally lost the vote, Peel Holdings can now appeal against the decision – even though, had the decision gone in favour of Peel's plans, residents couldn't appeal.

"We're not over the moon yet because we know it will go to appeal" said Eddie Howarth "This is just the beginning…but at least it's an independent body now that's going to determine whether it should be approved or not."

Councillor Lindley said afterwards that there was a long way to go, and urged people in Salford to oppose plans in the Council's Draft Core Strategy for the site to be brought forward officially for housing…

"I'm really pleased that the panel in the end has listened to the residents and refused the application" he said "But this is the first battle and there's still a long way to go. We have the core strategy up for consultation and that effectively demonstrates a need, so we have to have to work very hard until 1st August to make sure we get it removed from the core strategy"

As for the way the panel meeting was run, he just shook his head…

"I think the conduct of the meeting was poor, and in particular we need to make sure that residents have confidence in the planning system - I don't think they will be encouraged by what they saw this morning."

Or as one Walkden resident shouted from the public gallery "This isn't democracy – this is a disgrace…"

Objections to Salford Council's plan for the Burgess Farm green field site in the Draft Core Strategy can be made online before August 1st (see here)

 

 

 

 


 

Fadge - No Hope in this dead city wrote
at 3:21:10 PM on Saturday, October 1, 2011
Caroline makes a valid point about the destruction of farm land and the need to import food .This will be of no relevance to the clowncils that infest Britain , as a clowncils sole remit is to cram as much shoddy housing as possible wherever possible , in order to extort the maximum ammount of council tax from the dis-regarded citizens .The tinpot town hall dictators must maintain the vast fund of extorted income to pay obscene salaries to all important ' executive ' shite-spouters ,fund brain-dead schemes , and to throw at big business chums .The worst example of this is this dump salford . Useless bastards , all of them .
 
caroline wrote
at 1:59:04 AM on Saturday, October 1, 2011
Once again it seems that dark forces are at work in favour of big bussiness and disregarding what Joe public say's or wants. I wonder what all the men and women who gave their lives so we could be free in two great wars would think if they could come back to see if their lives were well spent?. This seems Quite common up and down the UK. Although I am not saying its the same it reminds me of the disgraceful Polson affair. The other point is the ever destruction of farm land that could feed the UK so we do not have to depend on major food imports costing the country large amounts of money.
 
UoS wrote
at 8:31:08 AM on Friday, July 8, 2011
Whilst I agree the attempt to 'sweep' a democratic vote under the carpet is a disgrace (but no less than I would expect from Labour), I am afraid Antrobus is right on the money - the decision will be nodded through on appeal.
 
Eddie Banyard wrote
at 4:19:24 AM on Friday, July 8, 2011
AW.. Shame . Poor council didn't get their way for a change .They can always throw another 15million at Peel , to maintain the all-too-cosy relationship .
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Cornerstone
Salford Star
Salford Star contact
advertisement
Salford Star print
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD COMMUNITY LEGACY MONEY GOES TO ICT CHAIR AND MANAGERS
Michael seems to be in a bit of a bind; on one hand he feigns "concern" for the condition and future prospects of Salford Citize... [more]
article: SALFORD COMMUNITY LEGACY MONEY GOES TO ICT CHAIR AND MANAGERS
In reply to John Monks. Your comments are very long and very condescending to the local residents who have lived in Kersal/Charles... [more]
article: SALFORD RED DEVILS FANS TO TAKE OVER HULL KR MILLION POUND GAME
Phil, not too sure how to respond to your comment but Will have a go. FUCKOFF.... [more]
article: SALFORD FLOOD MONEY SPENDING TO BE DECIDED BY THE COMMUNITY
Working with the AE, SCC with this project make them get there shit together if this happens again. The ad boards are a great sou... [more]
article: SALFORD FLOOD MONEY SPENDING TO BE DECIDED BY THE COMMUNITY
Benches are a no no. They'd be a nightspot resting place for the idle-hands of youth to tank up on bargain booze. Would rather fac... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD FLOOD MONEY SPENDING TO BE DECIDED BY THE COMMUNITY

Star date: 29th September 2016

FLOOD VICTIMS THEMSELVES TO DECIDE HOW £9,707 DONATIONS WILL BE SPENT

Flood victims in Lower Broughton are being given the chance to decide how funds totalling £9,707 generously donated though benefits and collections in the wake of the Boxing Day flood are to be spent.

Ideas so far have included a siren and an electronic flood warning board but anything that benefits the whole flood-hit community will be considered, with suggestions being taken until Friday 21st October.

Full details here...

SALFORD RED DEVILS FANS TO TAKE OVER HULL KR MILLION POUND GAME

Star date: 29th September 2016

SALFORD REDS FANS READY FOR THE `BIGGEST GAME IN HISTORY'

This Saturday, Salford Red Devils travel to Hull KR for the crunch Million Pound Game that will decide their Super League status. The Club has put on free travel for fans and, so far, 14 coaches and around 2,000 fans are heading to Humberside. And there's still more room.

"Everyone in Salford who cares about Rugby League should be in Hull on Saturday" writes Simon Williams "Our team needs us...it's the biggest game in our history..."

Full details here...

THE FREE SALFORD MUSIC FESTIVAL KICKS OFF TONIGHT

Star date: 29th September 2016

THREE NIGHTS, TEN VENUES, OVER 70 ARTISTS, NO TICKETS, ALL FREE

"You've got to know how the Salford-ness works..." Ed Blaney

Tonight, the seventh Salford Music Festival kicks off with three nights of totally free music, featuring over seventy artists in ten venues all over the city.

Here we chat to founder, Ed Blaney, who says this year he's got the balance totally right, with everything from a Queer Party at The Crescent, to Salford Musical Youth at The Salford Arms on Saturday... "They are what the Festival is all about" he says "You've got to know how the Salford-ness works..."

Full details here...

AFTER DOGS4US PROTESTS, SALFORD COUNCIL CONSULTS ON PET SHOP CLAMPDOWN

Star date: 28th September 2016

`CAUTIOUS WELCOME' FROM BOYCOTT DOGS4US AS COUNCIL LOOKS TO NEW PET SHOP LICENCE REGIME

After recent protests outside the Agecroft Road Dogs4Us store, Salford City Council is looking to clamp down on conditions in pet shops, and is consulting on new regulations for animal welfare.

This morning the Boycott Dogs4Us campaign gave the proposals a `cautious welcome' but added "We hope the Council...will take real action to prevent the sale of puppy farm dogs in Salford."

Full details here...

GREATER MANCHESTER FIRE BOSSES SACK PLAN TO SACK ALL FIREFIGHTERS

Star date: 27th September 2016

FIRE BOSSES WITHDRAW THREAT TO SACK FIREFIGHTERS

Last week the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Authority planned to sack 1,250 frontline firefighters in the area unless they agreed new unreasonable contracts. After a huge backlash, today fire bosses announced a u-turn and are withdrawing the notices.

"This is clearly a step forward" says Matt Wrack, General Secretary of the Fire Brigades Union "It does not end the matters of disagreement between the FBU and the employer..."

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx