HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS
 

Star date: 14th May 2021

HI JINX IN HIGHER BROUGHTON

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, gives his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Read Part One here...


Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford
Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford
Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford
Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford
Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford
Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford Top Streets Higher Broughton Salford
click image to enlarge

Part 1: Pre-Salford Star


The Salford Star asked me to do an article about the regeneration in Higher Broughton but said 'Don't be too bitter about it...' Knowing how Salford Council works, I will say I am still bitter about Pathfinder, because if I don't they will assume that I am happy about it!

Oddly, the Oasis single Don't Look Back in Anger was released in 1996, about 18 months after a neighbourhood coordinator got involved in the area, and ten years before the first Salford Star was published.

I'll try and bring you up to speed with what happened before the Salford Star, as later stuff has been covered. It's worth mentioning that I kept a lot of the documentation involved and, as I probably won't live forever, maybe some historian will get in touch and cover the Pathfinder regeneration before I die.

There is evidence to show that a housing association owned a property in the Bottom Streets that a problem family was moved into, which started the decline of the area. The housing association always led people to believe that it was owned by a private landlord. Knowing that a lot of the people and agencies involved are very job incestuous, I sometimes wonder if it was a deliberate move to begin the degeneration of the area?

There are copies of leaflets that the neighbourhood coordinator gave out at residents' meetings, maps of the Masterplan (the original as there were several), which involved the county market becoming the community hub. There is also evidence of £70,000 out of £250,000 regeneration money being spent on two assistants to the neighbourhood coordinator. One of these turned up years later working for the Broughton Trust.

In around 2000, the Council announced that it had £1million to purchase approximately 130 properties in the area. If we had known the score then, we could have served a blight notice and then gone to a land tribunal. Assuming we would have been successful, that would have stopped the regeneration as the Council would not have had enough money to buy the houses.

Then the properties would have been in a real market, people would have come in to buy them and the existing homeowners could have either stayed or sold at a decent price. Sadly, I write that with hindsight and guilt that we didn't do it.

As I was quite vocal against the Council and didn't acquiesce, the neighbourhood coordinator made things difficult for me. If I wanted to photocopy something at Clowes House, it was censored or refused. I was not allowed to photocopy anything that referred to Councillor Merry or copy his image. I mean! He is a local councillor, not some tin pot dictator with delusions of godhood. I went through the complaints procedure several times as, while they had the complaints procedure booklets in white, blue and yellow, they didn't actually have a procedure and had to set one up.

After that, a lot has been published. The Bottom Streets were split from the Top Streets, and the people in the Top Streets were happy for the Bottom Streets to be demolished. I remember one woman who lived in King Street screaming "Demolish them they are full of piss heads...".

Oddly, years later, after she had died, I bumped into her husband and he said to me "I used to wonder what you were on about...but I realise now that they took the f*king piss out of us". The last time I saw him he was going to move out of Salford. Another resident from the Top Streets once said to me "Your house is coming down. Mine is stopping up, thank you very much.".

I wish the Salford Star had been there to cover things that happened before 2005.
There were the 190+ break-ins in empty Council owned houses in a ten month period. There were the attempts to get security on the demolition sites, the incident when a brick came through my window one Saturday afternoon and I left it in a local councillor's porch, with a note 'Yours I believe'...and his response 'That was very irresponsible. Someone could have used it to break my windows!'...Yes, you thick twonk, it has already been used to break mine!'.

There are letters from John Prescott's office and Hazel Blears, basically saying that the regeneration was a matter for the Council. So much for 'Our Hazel' being good for the people of Salford, eh? There is a letter from a Council officer to my brother, saying that they would not advance him the relocation grant if he did not accept the Council's valuation of his house; to stop him going to a land tribunal.

Anyhow, maybe that historian will get in touch at some point and cover it.

Some of us in Salford are old enough to remember other regenerations. The streets where I was born, on the Salford/Cheetham Hill border, being demolished and an estate built...then twenty odd years later, half of the estate being knocked down.

We remember Lower Broughton being knocked down and re-built, then partially knocked down again. If you are not old enough to remember, the shops on Lower Broughton Road and Great Clowes Street were thriving. Broughton Lane used to be open, then they closed it and now it has opened up again.

They built a sports centre on Littleton Road. Years later, they knocked it down, waited about ten years and then built another one. Schools were closed in Salford as they said that there were too many schools for the number of pupils. Ten years later there was a shortage of places.

People have different views of things. Some might say that all this was necessary and others might say that Salford City Council has never really had a clue...


This is Part One of Guy's Story – Part Two about the human fallout of regeneration will be published shortly...

For a bit of a background as to what went on see these previous Salford Star articles...

Higher Broughton Regeneration – A Can of Worms – click here

Council Dirty Tricks in Higher Broughton – click here

For loads more use the search engine at the top of the website front page


Previous articles on the Salford Star Closure...


Salford Star To Close After 15 Years – click here

The Star Is Born – click here 

Alice's Story: Injustice From South Africa to Salford – click here

Salford Stars – Part 1 – click here

Salford Stars Part 2 – click here

The Battle of Barton Moss – click here

Nigel Pivaro Looks Back Over 15 Years of the Star – click here

Planning Scandals and the Affordable Housing Crisis - click here

Campaigns, demos and protests – click here

bob wrote
at 16:44:42 on 16 May 2021
There is something in these letters here that feel like the eureka moment.I think Ray must feel the same because he is trying to put the blame on Merry's head today for pathfinder in his response to another article. If the statements made to the court were by any chance not right, it goes beyond paying compensation to the wronged party. What happens in such cases is that the victims must be put in the position they would have been had the wrong not happened. How can they though when the houses have been knocked down? In cases like this ,the six year rule to bring a case does not apply. Also ,if it went to court, it is one of the sort of cases that could be tried by a civil jury. I for one, would gladly give up my free time to sit on such a jury, it would be a privilege. Lets see the papers.
?
bob wrote
at 16:18:43 on 16 May 2021
If you look at our Rays rantings today,in another article (and for once I agree with every single word he says) he tends to lay the blame at Merrys door. As it has been mentioned below. Let us see all this paperwork. I smell a Rat, a big one. If someone is going to get blamed, why not Merry? It seems to me, that this attack on Merry could be the start of the Labour civil war which has long been prophesied.My grandad would turn in his grave. He was a highly skilled engineer,strong union man,and lifelong labour man. This labour lot have betrayed the working class, and their political in fighting makes things worse.
?
Something in the air wrote
at 14:38:42 on 15 May 2021
There might be something in what wrote at 19-36 says. Planning for the new estate was given in 2012 and it was built very quick after.If I remember right, Guy Griffiths was thrown out of his house in 2006 by the CPO.How can someone have gone to court before 2006 and told the court that planning permission was given already when it wasn't given until 2012? This raises the following questions. 1.Can we see the full application to the court for the 2 CPO orders, with all statements and affidavits. 2.Can the council tell us what permission was granted that was referred to in the CPO application papers, and who the applicant was. 3. Can the council tell us who the developer is who was referred to in the CPO application. 4. The council are alleged to have told the court dealing with the CPO application that the developer had funds in place. Can the council tell us who this lender is, and what level of funding was in place? 5.If indeed there was another developer, with prior planning permission prior to 2006, and funds were in place, why did this development not take place,after all,these people would have already spent a lot of money on the project? With regards to the officer who made the application. I have a suspicion as to who this might be,however, I do not think it appropriate to comment on that matter at this time. Let us just get the facts into the open, we have a right to know.It could be all just a big mix up, you know what the council are like.
?
bob wrote
at 20:04:56 on 14 May 2021
The same terraced houses on the other side of Leicester road are now £220 grand each. I used to know loads of lads who did grant work on these houses. Thousands of pounds of grant money was spent on them. I bet the demolition guys got a couple of grand to knock each one down.All government money,all wasted.The houses on the other side of Leicester have got another 100 years left or more. I cannot see them knocking them down. I remember this story. If all the people had been like Guy, the council would not have got away with what they did. Fat arse merry and his mates wont be able to repeat what they did on the other side of Leicester road, they would have his fat guts for garters.
?
wrote
at 19:36:08 on 14 May 2021
What happened to this man was terrible. I had 2 friends who lived in a house in those streets,they also sufford under compulsory purchase. Their house was lovely and paid for. They moved away,and instead of a good retirement, both died early.They could never work out what happened. They said there were 2 Compulsory orders. In each case, people from the council had gone to the court and said the council needed to buy the houses, and planning permission was granted for new houses,and that they had a developer to build them,and that money was in place to do the work. After a while when work did not commence, my friends questioned what had happened, and asked for proof of the statements made to the court. Time and time again they tried, but they could not get an answer from the council.They went to see a solicitor, but because they were both working,they could not get legal aid, rather than throw good money after bad, they left it.The lawyer did say the statements made to the court had to be true, otherwise all the people affected by the Compulsory purchase would have to be compensated. To make matters worse ,the man who went to the court to get the compulsory purchase for the council has also since died. Each time I have seen this story in the Salford Star, it made me think.Did anybody ever get the proof that what was said to the court was right? I would love to know, one way or the other, just to put my mind and my friends memory to rest. Thinking of my old friends troubles just makes me sad. Things like this should not happen to anyone ever again. I hope Guy has found a bit of happiness in his new hope in Wales. Its a lovely place. God bless.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx