HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD CITY COUNCIL TO SELL OFF MORE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 

Star date: 18th August 2020

WALKDEN AND LITTLE HULTON SITE SELL-OFF FOR HOUSING

Salford City Council wants to flog public open space land at Crompton Street, Walkden, and a site at Highfield Road, Little Hulton, for 32 specialised and social housing apartments and houses.

The Crompton Street site has 17 objections lodged but the Council is hoping to sell both sites for a net capital receipt of just £260,700 once covenants have been sorted with Peel Holdings. A further site sell-off at Holyoake Road, Walkden, was dropped after a huge petition by local residents.

Full details here...


Following plans by Salford Council to flog public open space land near the David Lewis Playing Fields to Salford University (see here) and to build on a children's play space in Ordsall (see here), it is now looking to sell public open space land in Crompton Street, Walkden, for specialised and social housing apartments and houses.

In Crompton Street, Great Places wants to build 12 apartments for people with complex needs and five social rent houses, some of which might be sold back to Salford Council's Derive housing company. 

Also, as the Council report for a meeting next week notes, "The Crompton Street site is subject to a restrictive covenant and mines and mineral rights which requires a release to be obtained from Peel Land and Property to permit the development to proceed".

The report doesn't say how much it would cost to get Peel to rescind the restrictions but it does quote a figure of £260,700 'net capital receipt' after the sale of both this site and one on Highfield Road in Little Hulton, where Great Places wants to build a shared house with six apartments and two self-contained apartments for people with learning difficulties, plus seven social rent houses of which the Council might buy some back via Derive.

That's two sites with 32 housing units and £260,700 coming back to the Council, with the possibility of buying five of the social rent houses back. All the maths workings out for getting out of Peel's 'restrictive covenant' and more are kept secret in Part 2 of the meeting.

Meanwhile, 17 residents near Crompton Street have raised objections to the sale of what the Council calls the disposal of 'informal open space' on the grounds of 'loss of greenspace, flooding, highway safety/parking, anti-social behaviour and noise and air pollution'.

The Council dismisses these in the report as the land "is not part of the Council's Greenspace Strategy [certainly not now!], due to the proximity of other greenspace assets nearby"...and that Great Places has "allowed for a contribution of circa £50,000 towards the loss of the open space as part of their s.106 obligations which is in line with planning policy and can go towards improving local facilities."

Meanwhile plans to sell off a smaller site on Holyoake Road in Walkden have been dropped after a petition with around 450 signatures objecting to the plans was lodged. The scheme was replaced with the Highfield Road site.

While the Council meeting next week is to agree to the actual sale of the land, Great Places will still need to get planning permission. In the meantime, Salford Council argues in its report that the proposals are "part of Salford's strategic approach to deliver improvements in service quality and customer experience, providing care closer to home in schemes integrated into the local community and to deliver value for money in the provision of housing and care solutions in Salford.

"The proposals are designed to provide care and support at the right level to meet need and in the least restrictive way, whilst being affordable, adaptable, flexible (including wheelchair accessible) and efficient" it adds "The additional creation of 12 2/3  bedroom houses for social rent will help deliver much needed accommodation to those on the housing register..."


Main image from Salford Council's controversial campaign to promote its green credentials via drug references around a decade ago

Joe Muggins wrote
at 17:59:34 on 21 August 2020
To bob wrote, you are Professor Stanley Unwin and I claim the £5.00
?
Bob wrote
at 15:52:52 on 21 August 2020
To Joe Muggins, I must admit that I know balls all about the site, and not much more about the area. I know its a good working class area and a decent place to live. Perhaps if we wish to put a place for vulnerable people with special needs in a Warden controlled environment, this area might be right. But what do they mean by complex needs? Do they mean nutters on the Carsberg special all day, kicking off, and they need somewhere cheap to house them as a cheap alternative to jail.I am sure Labour have written off your area as a gain for the Tories (Walkden South?). They did something like this years ago when they had to find a traveller site, so they proposed to put it in Boothstown. Old Mother Garido soon saw that one off. What you should all do,is join the Worsley civic Trust. The trust is not just for those who live around the Green.It is for Walkden as well. In fact its remit stretches from the Westwood estate to the far end of Little Hulton, but I suspect they don't have many members in LH. I think Walkden South is about at the limit of what the Salford Torys aspire to. Maybee Swinton south as well. 15 deats would give them just the right bit of muscle. Give them a go.
?
Joe Muggins wrote
at 14:22:57 on 21 August 2020
Wrote- none of the people who have opposed the sale of this land have any need to be ashamed of themselves over this matter whatsoever. The people who should be really ashamed of themselves are the Council Officials,Senior Councillors who are completely ruining the area with stupid planning decisions, not listening to residents concerns and they have succeeded in waking people up to the fact that these same officials and senior councillors are useless in most things that they are involved in. Wrote-do you know the land in question? Do you know anything about what has gone on up to now?
?
Jennifer McLaren wrote
at 09:50:46 on 21 August 2020
I am a resident of Spring Clough Drive and strongly object to the building work which is due to take place on Crompton Street. There is a primary school at the bottom of Crompton Street, this would put at risk the safety of these children, together with all the extra traffic that this would cause from Old Clough Lane. It’s a mad idea!!
?
Joe Muggins wrote
at 20:21:02 on 20 August 2020
bob wrote you clearly know very little about this proposal and the stance that the people who are objecting to this community land being sold by our council. The area is a green field in area that has seen more than its fair share of development over many years and this site has been deliberately neglected by the council, a local resident looks after it with little help from the council. The meeting held in October 2019 was set up by the council for about 12 people to attend and over a hundred turned up, the meeting was badly organised, not advertised in the local area, it was badly run, and the representatives from various organisations were very poor in their presentations one person on the panel didn’t appear to know where either of the original sites were and another said that an in depth study had been carried out and that there was no spare land in Salford for these two developments, that got a good laugh. The top and bottom of it all is that the people around Walkden have lost confidence in the council and do not trust them in the way that this is being handled from start to finish. The council and its officials have not listened to the local people in fact they have treated them with contempt over several developments over many years.
?
wrote
at 19:35:16 on 20 August 2020
NOT IN MY BACKYARD! I agree with Bob, it’s not like it’s a tower block! It’s housing for the vulnerable. You should be ashamed of yourselves to oppose this!
?
bob wrote
at 22:45:49 on 19 August 2020
Credit where its due. If our council are getting off their arses to make housing for our disabled people, well ,thats the right thing. How can anyone object to such a good cause? Has Worsley nimbyism spread to Wogdin? Wogdin folk used to be nice.
?
John & Dorothy Brown wrote
at 16:22:04 on 19 August 2020
All t he residents of Crosby Ave objected to building on the land at Crompton st after the meeting at Gateway earlier in the year . As nobody had been notified of the plans or the meeting properly we were notified by a local councillor on the day the meeting took place . Many of our neighbours were there .from Crosby ave and Springclough drive were there. As the meeting was about both the site at Crompton st and Holyoake rd . This was wrong as as residents of both areas were expressing their opinions . We are disgusted that once again the council are considering any plans to build here. The area is built up enough already . Have they considered the primary school at the end of Crompton st ? Children will be being dropped off and collected as well as all the traffic From old Clough lane during building . Would the vunerable people with learning difficulties want to be housed in such a busy area???
?
Paul green wrote
at 08:15:21 on 19 August 2020
I’m a resident near Crompton street in Walkden and dismiss the councils attitude towards local residents in regards the green space which we all use and I’m sure there was more than 17 complaints against this building work
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx