HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
‘FORCE’ PEEL HOLDINGS TO OPEN SALFORD LIFTING BRIDGE SAYS IRLAM COUNCILLOR
 

Star date: 16th November 2017

'SCANDALOUS' PEEL HOLDINGS SHOULD OPEN BARTON LIFTING BRIDGE INSISTS IRLAM COUNCILLOR

Irlam Councillor, Roger Jones, insisted at yesterday's full meeting of Salford City Council that Peel Holdings should be "forced" to open the Barton Lifting Bridge.

Salford and Trafford Council are currently in the midst of a legal battle with Peel over who will assume liability for the bridge which collapsed last year during construction: "Who on earth would take liability for that bridge...it's madness?" said Councillor Jones, again accusing Peel of holding the authorities to ransom.

Full details here...


Barton Lifting Bridge Salford Barton Lifting Bridge Salford Barton Lifting Bridge Salford
click image to enlarge

The controversy over who pays for the new Barton Lifting Bridge over the Manchester Ship Canal continued at yesterday's full meeting of Salford City Council, with Irlam Councillor, Roger Jones, saying that Peel Holdings should be 'forced' to open it.

The Bridge, next to the M60 flyover at Barton, and part of the Western Gateway Infrastructure Scheme, or WGIS, subsidised with over £30million of public money, has been at the centre of a legal wrangle over who pays for its operation and maintenance.

Peel is insisting that Salford Council and Trafford Council should pay, while the authorities believe Peel should take responsibility. Meanwhile, there's currently a legal stalemate with the bridge due to open within the next couple of weeks and residents complaining about constant congestion.

"We're in a position where that road next week could open and the lifting bridge, but Peel have said at the eleventh hour 'We would like Trafford and Salford to pay...We want you to pay towards the maintenance of the structure of that bridge and towards the opening and closing of the bridge'" explained Councillor Jones, who is also Salford's Lead Member for Transport.

"The public have seen that bridge collapse once; who on earth would take liability for that bridge and the structure of it?" he asked "It's madness but Peel have raised it at the eleventh hour, with four or five weeks to go and, in effect, they are holding us to ransom because they're saying to Salford and Trafford 'If you don't pay up we're not opening the bridge'. Now I think that's scandalous.

"If that bridge doesn't open next week, then I hope that the powers that be in here and in Greater Manchester will do their level best to force Peel to open that bridge" he told the Salford Council meeting "That bridge wasn't just built with Peel money, it was built with public money as well, and the public have the right to get that bridge open."

Responding, Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, confirmed that Salford Council lawyers had become involved, and that he had met Peel's representatives the night before and asked them to open it "as soon as they possibly can"...

"What I'm being told is that works will be completed within the next week or two" he added "I'm fully committed to getting that bridge open as quick as possible to tackle congestion on our roads."


For a full background see previous related Salford Star articles...

Salford Council Held To Ransom By Peel Holdings Over New Ship Canal Bridge – click here

Sale Sharks Call Emergency Meeting With Salford Council Over 'Breaking Point' Stadium – click here

Photos by Steven Speed

JULIA wrote
at 14:16:12 on 11 December 2017
YET AGAIN ANOTHER TOTAL DISASTER PLAN FROM PEEL!!! THE AMOUNT OF LOCAL TRAFFIC THAT USE THE M57 TO GET TO THE M60 AND BEYOND I DARE SAY ARE FED UP TO THE BACK TEETH OF ALL THE CONGESTION AND DELAYS. IT CAN TAKE 45 MINUTES AT THE MOMENT TO DO A 12-15 MINUTE JOURNEY. PEEL HAVE THE ODDEST IDEAS PLUS THEY ARE BADLY EXECUTED!!!! WILL THIS PLAN MAKE TRAFFIC AND EASIER......I DOUBT IT VERY MUCH.
 
Peter bloor wrote
at 08:06:43 on 08 December 2017
Simple do not open it .Do not give peel planning permission for anything in Salford or Manchester ever again Iam sure there are other companies who will be willing to take their place. Peel are the most disposed company in the area.
 
Martin Farrell wrote
at 08:32:32 on 23 November 2017
After seeing the A57 flooded this morning with the 1st heavy rain since the new part of the road opened, the bridge is the least of our worries. You may not be able to get to the bridge without a boat. The whole project has been a disaster, I am yet to come across someone who thinks directing traffic towards the Trafford centre is a good idea. What happened to the road and rail links being completed before opening new warehouses? The rail link has not even started. It's about time our spineless councillors stood up to peel and started to represent the people of Irlam and cadishead. Everything peel say they will do they go back on, or try to change later in their favour. It's in now time for the council to stop all dealings with peel and stop all further development by peel in Salford.
 
Arnold Rimmer wrote
at 13:04:47 on 22 November 2017
There shouldn't be a need to sort anything out...if you buy a new car, I shouldn't have to get you to sign a contract saying that I'm not going to wash it for you.
 
James wrote
at 17:49:42 on 20 November 2017
Common sense needs to prevail here! If Peel want to hold the tax paying peoples who travel in and out of Trafford Park/Centre/Irlam/Eccles/M60 to ransom, in the form of keeping the bridge shut until they get what they want.......then the councils should fight fire with fire and suspend all planning permits in Salford and Trafford until such a time as this is resolved to the tax payers satisfaction. We cannot allow big business to bully the little person any longer. It has been a number of years since I travelled to work without a huge traffic jam caused by Peel and their cronies. Enough is Enough
 
Mike W wrote
at 22:08:01 on 18 November 2017
Typical Salford council half asleep until the last minute. Why was this not sorted out in advance?
 
Dave Probert wrote
at 17:26:26 on 17 November 2017
Peel wanted to build the bridge and build on the land so they Should take over the cost of support for the Bridge. They have held Salford to Ransom over other projects, this time they can whistle.
 
John Davies wrote
at 17:26:22 on 17 November 2017
Every one is blaming each other, I blame the person or persons who drew up the planning for this to go ahead, that the maintenance and manning of the bridge should have been put into the agreement before construction ever started, so them who planned the project should resign because they failed in there duty to the people of the local area. Salford and Trafford Council should not allow Peel Holdings any future planning permission until they take full control of the maintenance and up keep of this bridge, They didn’t have this trouble building the Bridge further up the road in Eccles.
 
retired Socalist wrote
at 05:57:37 on 17 November 2017
Roger old man Would it be in the Public interest to let us see the contract or will it be tucked in the draw with the Stadium one?
 
Dave wrote
at 05:57:34 on 17 November 2017
Cllr Jones is probably right.The agreement they have most likely says what he says it says. Perhaps Salfords liability is just to pay for the road surface that goes over the bridge. When it wears out, Salford and Trafford will resurface it. So , if Peel only open it once a week, or leave it in the up position, then no cars and trucks will go over it. It will never wear out. It will save a fortune in road maintainance, perhaps the money they save on maintaining the bridge roadway can be spent on our other crappy roads.Well done Salford Council, at least they are trying to save money at last.
 
bob wrote
at 05:57:28 on 17 November 2017
Pound to a pinch of shit, Peel will be the winners. Peel and it's boss are no fools. Peel will not waste twopence of their money with the lawyers unless they know they are going to win. We all know who wastes millions of other peoples money without batting an eyelid. Will Cllr Jones show his arse on the town hall steps if Peel win? I will show mine if they loose. The balls in Peels court, the bridge can stay closed, or forever in the up position. Salford council have to make the first move.Another cock up. Vote Labour.
 
Bob wrote
at 05:55:58 on 17 November 2017
Me again. That picture of the four councilors. A cracker, they should call it "The Four Pillars of Wisdom"
 
Michael James Felse wrote
at 18:50:53 on 16 November 2017
The Mayor of London pulled out of the Garden Bridge project on who foots its maintenance. I suggest the Salford Labour Mayor gives him a call for advice.
 
Roger Jones wrote
at 17:47:12 on 16 November 2017
Shirley, yours is a good story but is not based on facts or legal opinion. In all cases there is overwhelming evidence against Peel. In a letter to Peel from the Council it is set out very clearly that Salford would adopt the highway but not the bridge structure.
 
Shirley Jones wrote
at 14:48:26 on 16 November 2017
No Roger. What is madness Cllr. Jones is why this glaringly obvious vital but very basic issue was not dealt with before planning permission and copious funding was granted to them in the first place! How did even Salford Council officers and Councillors miss that one? Blatantly very basic stupid errors that should never have been allowed to occur. No doubt Peel laughing all the way to the bank as per! Peel however know Salford Council, its Officers and its Councillors very well (or is that the reason why?), as we know to our cost! And now more cost to Salford Citizens, as no doubt we're going to have to pay the cost of said 'legal battle' to rectify Salford Councils errors! Doesn't surprise me in the least. This is Salford Council after all. Same old!
 
Rachel wrote
at 12:13:52 on 16 November 2017
Suspend his planning permission for Port Salford and Trafford Waters until he opens the bridge. Miserable old zombie!!
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
tell you what, lets get the two master builders Merry and Dennett to sort it out. They could use the new wonderful company they ha... [more]
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
If I did a bad job, would the council lend me £25million to put it right? Would they bollocks. The bad insulation can be ripped of... [more]
article: CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS
Sorry people, I was not educated in Salford. Sorry for the mistakes in my message. pressed the wrong buttons I should have checked... [more]
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
Like I said before Ray now is time for action. The tennants should not pay their rent and use the money to sue these shitbags. The... [more]
article: SALFORD PENDLETON TOGETHER TENANTS TELL OF KNIVES, NIBES, CLADDING, DODGY WINDOWS AND HOLES IN THE WALLS
Excellent writting whoever wrote this. People who are kept in a state of fear and disadvantagement will find it hard to stand up t... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT

Star date: 21st September 2018

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL CAN'T ACCESS £400MILLION GOVERNMENT CLADDING FUND

Salford City Council has been told by the Government that it can't access the £400million public fund to help with the cost of replacing dangerous cladding on the nine Pendleton blocks because it's part of a PFI.

Nor will the Government allow the Council to loan Pendleton Together Operating Limited money from its £25million fund set aside for the cladding. In short, it's a complete mess.

Full details here...

SALFORD PENDLETON TOGETHER TENANTS TELL OF KNIVES, NIBES, CLADDING, DODGY WINDOWS AND HOLES IN THE WALLS

Star date: 21st September 2018

'IF YOU WERE TO LIVE HERE FOR ONE WEEK IN ONE OF OUR FLATS, IT WOULD OPEN YOUR EYES...'

Dodgy cladding, knife fights, a tenant threatening to jump off the roof, windows that you can't open, others that are almost falling out...and those NIBEs eating up people's heating budgets. Oh, and tenancy warnings handed out like confetti to elected tenants association officers who are trying to make things better.

Welcome to the Pendleton Together blocks, where residents at Malus Court have just about had enough...

Full details here...

PARENTS MAKE A STAND AGAINST FORCED CHILD REMOVAL BY SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 20th September 2018

CIVIC CENTRE SEES PARENTS RAISE AWARENESS OF COUNCIL CHILD REMOVAL PRACTICE

"We're not doing this for the parents we're doing this for the kids, because kids are being hurt..."

Today saw parents who have had their children removed stage an awareness demonstration outside Salford Civic Centre... "We're not fighting for our kids to be brought back to us now, we're fighting for a better system for our kids in the future because it's not right what's going on, it's really not" Katie Jane told the Salford Star.

The demonstration is set to continue tomorrow (Friday) and next week until the 25th September, with networking in Victoria Park over the weekend.

Full details here...

£7MILLION CYCLE AND WALKING ROUTES FOR SALFORD ANNOUNCED

Star date: 20th September 2018

MONTON, SWINTON AND TRINITY WAY TO GET NEW CYCLE PATHS

Transport for Greater Manchester has announced a plan for £7.1million worth of cycle paths and walkways in Monton, Swinton and Trinity Way, with Salford City Council contributing £1.2million towards the total cost.

"The people of Greater Manchester will soon have a genuine choice in how they travel, ensuring that they and their children have a viable and attractive alternative to the car" says Chris Boardman, Greater Manchester Cycling and Walking Commissioner.

Full details here...

HARROP FOLD HEAD SLAMS ‘PERSONAL VENDETTA’ OF SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 19th September 2018

DREW POVEY ACCUSES SALFORD COUNCIL OF 'HEAVY HANDED' 'VENDETTA'

"I'm speaking up for myself but also all the leaders who have been in touch to say the same happened to them #TakeAStand..." Drew Povey

Drew Povey, the Executive Head of Harrop Fold in Little Hulton, has resigned from his post, slamming Salford Council's "heavy handed approach" while investigating 'administrative errors' at the school and accusing it of a "personal vendetta".

In an open letter to the school's governors, Drew Povey writes that he refuses to walk away from the school with a settlement and accept a gagging clause.  So he's gone public...to #TakeAStand.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx