HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD TOWER BLOCK CLADDING SIMILAR TO LONDON FIRE MATERIALS
 

Star date: 15th June 2017

CLADDING USED IN PENDLETON TOWER BLOCKS 'CONTRIBUTES TO FIRE GROWTH' STATE EXPERTS

The cladding used in the Salford tower blocks refurbished by Pendleton Together is similar to that used in Grenfell Tower in London, scene of this week's horrific blaze.

The cladding in Salford blocks consisted of a Standard Polyurethane core, or PUR. And an article in the newsletter of experts Probyn Miers states that PUR "contributes to fire growth in a fully-developed fire". Salford City Council was sent samples of the material and passed it as safe.

Full details here…


Pendleton Together design
click image to enlarge

While there has been no official word on what caused the horrific blaze at Grenfell Tower in London this week, experts seem to be agreeing that the cladding certainly contributed to the speed in which the fire spread, with tragic results.

In Salford, the majority of tower blocks have been re-clad, with the most visible example being the high rises along the Crecent, including Thorn Court, Spruce Court, Whitebeam Court and Malthus Court.

Here, all the hype surrounding the refurbishments has been about appearance rather than tenant safety…

"The design has been developed to provide colour and interest at key focal points" stated Pendleton Together "...The rationale for the treatment of Spruce and Thorn is based on the use of the same highly robust and crisply detailed cladding panel, but using two different shades of colour.

"The panel itself, known as 'Chameleon' creates a very dynamic appearance, changing colour as it catches the light" the company slathered "This means that each plane of the building can appear as a different colour shade, depending on the aspect and time of day. The interplay of light and shade and changing colour tones, within each tower and from one tower to the next, will create a mesmerising effect.

"These colours have been carefully considered and selected in conjunction with Salford City Council's planning and design advisors and help to create a stronger sense of character and identity for what are large, grey and somewhat oppressive
buildings" it added "...As the buildings sit adjacent to a major highway they are seen by the public when on the move..."

The appearance hype goes on and on and on – but there is almost nothing written about safety in the blocks. The original 'hybrid' planning proposal for the whole of Pendleton contains little about such issues. And the actual 'outline' application considered by Salford Council, and passed in August 2012, has disappeared from the Council's website completely.

The only clue to the detail of the cladding comes in 2013, amongst dozens of documents in a 'request for confirmation of conditions' from Urban Vision to contractor, Keepmoat, which has two lines giving details of the materials to be used...

"Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding Panels; Composite panels Aluminum Face Sheets; Thickness: 0.020"; Standard Polyurethane core (PE); 4mm thick; panel weight: RB 160 = 1.12 ilbs/sft."

The rest is all about which colours Pendleton Together should be using... "Spruce & Thorn Court shall be predominately in 'Chameleon' finish" etc...*

The letter adds that "Prior to the commencement of development of each phase, samples of the following materials shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority… Bricks; Tiles/slates; Mortar; Structural metal work; Timber work; UPVC; and Cladding."

Salford Council approved the materials, including the 'Standard Polyurethane core', which, it must be stressed, didn't break fire and safety regulations at the time. However, there were numerous warnings about the materials used in the cladding which would take anyone with Google two minutes to find.

An article in the Winter 2016 newsletter of architectural experts, Probyn Miers, goes into huge detail (with sources) of the Fire Risks From External Cladding Panels (see here). It examines fires that have happened all over the world where cladding has been a factor, and highlights polyurethane, or PUR, as one of the materials which poses a risk…

"Polymeric core materials such as EPS [polystyrene] and PUR will burn at temperatures well below that of a fully developed fire and thus contribute to fire spread" it states

"PUR is combustible" it adds "However, it forms a char layer which tends to inhibit further combustion. The char layer is relatively fragile. It may break off to expose fresh combustible foam. PUR also contributes to fire growth in a fully-developed fire, giving off black smoke and toxic fumes, including hydrogen cyanide above 850oC."

Other variants used in cladding are Polyisocyanurate, or PIR, which, the article states "is difficult to ignite and exhibits a pronounced charring which enables it to withstand fire for longer, but is ultimately combustible"; Phenolic foam, which "is difficult to ignite" and Rockwool mineral fibre, which is "non-combustible".

The article concludes that "In the UK, influence from insurers and technical development within the composite panel industry has led to cores of polymer-cored external cladding panels changing from PUR to PIR to phenolic foam, decreasing the fire hazard."

From the materials stated in the Salford Council report, this, apparently, didn't happen. And questions need to be asked about whether cost was a factor in this…or even appearance, god forbid.



The Salford Star has tried to contact Pendleton Together (again) and Salford City Council Lead Member for Housing, Paul Longshaw about legitimate resident concerns. Neither Pendleton Together nor Paul Longshaw returned calls.

This afternoon, Paul Longshaw did put out a press statement…

"The council has been working closely with our key housing partners that have blocks of a similar age to Grenfell Towers to seek assurances their fire safety policies and procedures are in place and have been followed. We have been advised that for current requirements those policies and procedures are in place.

"When the London fire investigation is complete we will analyse the response to the disaster and exactly what happened to see if there are any lessons we can learn in Salford. This will be completed in partnership with local landlords and the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service.

"Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service (GMFRS) works closely with the local authority and housing providers to ensure all buildings in this city are as safe from fire as possible.

"Understandably residents who live in tower blocks in our city at this moment may feel concerned and vulnerable. To reassure people, landlords are writing letters to those in high rise flats, issuing statements and putting messages on social media.

"We expect there will be much reflection and investigation into the cause of the fire in London. We will continue to work with our partners to modify procedures and building safety measures should this be found necessary. Your landlord representative is there to work with you on this should you need to contact them."

This is Part 1 of a two part article... Part Two – Salford City Council and Housing Association Arrogance and Unaccountability: coming soon...

See also previous Salford Star article: Recent Pendleton High Rise Fire Highlights Inadequacies in Salford – click here

Update: 16th June 2017:

Pendleton Together promises independent review of Salford tower block fire safety - click here

Update: 26th June

The Salford Star has been asked to point out that, while the planning letter stated 'Chameleon', this is a product manufactured by Rockpanel. While this product was considered for use, the actual material that was used in the end was a product called Alucobond Spectra, which is an ACM with a similar appearance to Chameleon. The Salford Star is trying to ascertain whether price was an issue in the switch


Steve wrote
at 19:24:50 on 17 June 2017
From an update on the BBC news site regarding cladding with a polyethylene core.Its states that the material is non-compliant and should not be use din buildings over 18 meters in height. Full statement below:- Now comes a statement from the Department for Communities and Local Government: "Cladding using a composite aluminium panel with a polyethylene core would be non-compliant with current Building Regulations guidance. "This material should not be used as cladding on buildings over 18m in height. "We cannot comment on what type of cladding was used on the building - this will be subject to investigations."
 
jenny wrote
at 19:05:32 on 16 June 2017
we had a fire on whitebeam in May, obviously the block didn't light up like a roman candle like london, but with these 6 inch "ventilation holes" in 3 walls which basically sucked in toxic smoke,filling every room including bathroom, there is no way you should "stay put" as the dopey letter we had delivered yesterday suggests, unless you have a death wise... i'll be straight out next time!
 
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 16:50:43 on 16 June 2017
The unfolding tragedy at Grenfell Towers can only be described as 'Proletariancide' - tower residents died because they were mostly working class and poor. In the eyes of the haute bourgeois leadership of Kensington and Chelsea Council, social housing tenants were an 'unacceptable' charge on the public purse. There are media reports that when concerns were raised about safety at tower blocks in the borough, the Tory leader of the council was quoted as saying, "tenants should be grateful for what they currently receiveve!" I wonder if this callous swine wikis an honours graduate of The Teresa May School of Public Relations?
 
Salford resisdent wrote
at 16:50:40 on 16 June 2017
If cost was placed over safety, the cost to replace all those panels should come directly out of the people in charge "wages" no matter who they are and how untouchable they may think they may be. I am also thinking about Labour jump at the chance to talk about rich Kensington carry out "social cleansing" and how good they are to the people compared to the Tories. Admittedly, Labour have great experience in this subject and I feel it fair to mention Langworthy/Broughton/Ordsall residents who were also all displaced when their properties were purchased and bulldozed.
 
concered wrote
at 06:31:14 on 16 June 2017
Concerns about the smoke ventilation system and a report high light 4 other major fire hazards in the block were brought up at one of the community meetings 4 years ago. This meeting was attended by John Wooderson (Head of sustainable regeneration) and Salix. The residents concerned and the report on fire hazards in the tower block where dismissed by both representatives. The minutes for the meeting produced a few weeks after had no mention of what was said. The fire inspection reports for all council tower blocks for the past 10 years must be made public. People living in the tower blocks should get there own independent inspection carried out. If the cladding and the fitting of gas systems in these block poses any sort of risk then CRIMINAL action must be taken against all those responsible. don't let the council, salix, city west and pendelton together, cover this up. Reseident should form action groups https://www.meetup.com/
 
Mark Preston wrote
at 18:20:17 on 15 June 2017
As a former resident of a tower block in Salford, the images of that fire in that block in London made me think about Pendleton. That block in Kensington looks like it's just gone up like as if the whole building was made of flammable material, i.e. not as if some furniture had caught fire, but as if the whole building had combusted. What I would say to any resident in a tower block in Salford is 'be very careful when accepting a flat in a tower block in Salford'! The council hasn't done a good job with it's housing policies and I don't expect they have done a good job with the renovations they've made in Salford. It would also not surprise me to hear that Salford Council have made the same mistake as Kensington Council and have passed flammable material as 'inflammable'. When you start trying to cover up the 'North Korea' look of Pendleton which is what I think Salford Council have ...really done with the 'appearance' scheme they've put up, then I suspect safety has been a minor concern when compared with their 'Politics'.
 
Wrote wrote
at 18:03:20 on 15 June 2017
I don't know if anyone has noticed, but the centre panels of Canon Hussey Court & Arthur Millwood Court are identical in colour, construction, and style to those that were used on the Tower Block in London that burst into flames. Combine that with the fact that there is a huge communal gas powered heating system strapped to the top of the tower blocks, we could be looking at yet another horrendous disaster, just waiting to happen.
 
joseph ONeill wrote
at 18:03:05 on 15 June 2017
This afternoon, Paul Longshaw did put out a press statement… "The council has been working closely with our key housing partners that have blocks of a similar age to Grenfell Towers to seek assurances their fire safety policies and procedures are in place and have been followed. We have been advised that for current requirements those policies and procedures are in place. Sorry would that cover the use of materials that if ignited under extreme heat could spread rapidly? I am no expert but with the disaster in London should we be looking more at substance than design. If the products used are the same surely it is a matter of urgency to remove them. God forbid we face the same level of tragedy those in London faced but if there is an issue I say deal with it.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star CD
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: COUNTESS WHO MURDERED 650 WOMEN ARRIVES AT EAGLE INN SALFORD
Photos by @shayrowanphotography... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
I wonder if our single tenant Social housing Lab Councillors got a letter? I bet not:) ... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
I got this letter I have lived on my own for 14 years... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
He will be if my dad gets one!... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH
Sack anyone who was involved in generating this pathetic idea we could save a lot of council tax money by not employing t... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL THREAT LETTER CAUSES ELDERLY CITIZENS ANGUISH

Star date: 22nd October 2018

CALLOUS COUNCIL TAX LETTER SCARES ELDERLY 

Hundreds, and possibly thousands, of letters have been sent by Salford City Council to elderly people threatening them with the loss of their single person Council Tax discount as it states 'Records show that multiple adults are living at your address', even though they are widows and widowers. The letter tells them to fill in an online form 'within the next 14 days' or the discount will be cancelled.

"It's not fair to be treating your senior citizens in this way, it's just callous" says Jill Royle, whose 92 year old non-computer literate mother became totally agitated on receiving the letter "Salford Council needs to know how much anguish it's caused."

Full details here...

BOLTON NHS HOSPITAL WORKERS CELEBRATE HUGE PAY VICTORY

Star date: 22nd October 2018

AFTER TWO DAY STRIKE HOSPITAL WORKERS WIN NHS PAY PARITY

"We stuck together and we won!" Vicky, cleaner at Royal Bolton Hospital

Bolton Royal Hospital workers are celebrating a massive victory after taking two days of strike action over pay parity earlier this month, supported by Salford UNISON and many other trade unionists.

The workers, who include cleaners, catering staff, porters and security staff, are employed by Bolton NHS Trust's subsidiary company iFM, doing the same jobs as other NHS workers but were offered pay at a lesser rate. Now they have won an increase in line with other NHS workers, backdated to last April.

Full details here...

RALLY TO SAVE OUR NURSERIES AS CAMPAIGNERS PUT DEMANDS ON SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 22nd October 2018 

TEN DEMANDS ON COUNCIL BY NURSERY CAMPAIGNERS

Next Saturday, 27th October, Save Our Nurseries campaigners are to hold a rally, from noon, on the lawn of Salford Civic Centre to reinforce the push for a long term solution to closures.

While Salford MPs Graham Stringer, Barbara Keeley and Rebecca Long-Bailey have confirmed attendance, campaigners are putting to the Council ten demands which must be met to avoid a clash.

Full details here...

TONNES OF SALFORD RECYCLING PAPER REJECTED AS PEOPLE PUT WRONG STUFF IN BLUE BINS

Star date: 22nd October 2017

DIRTY NAPPIES AND PLASTIC BAGS PUT IN BLUE BINS

Tonnes of Salford's paper and card recycling collections are being rejected as people put the wrong stuff in blue bins, including dirty nappies, plastic bags, polystyrene packing and even electrical items.

Now Recycle for Greater Manchester has teamed up with Salford City Council to launch a What's In The Box? campaign to remind residents that only newspapers, magazines, greeting cards, paper wrapping paper, cardboard boxes and junk mail and envelopes can be put in the blue bins.

Full details here...

DICK WHITTINGTON COMES TO ST LUKES IN SALFORD

Star date: 21st October 2018

PANTO TIME IN SEEDLEY

Dick Whittington
Monday 22nd–Saturday 27th October
St Luke's Parish Hall, Derby Road £6.50/£5.50

St Luke's Arts and Drama Society, well known for its class performances, is putting on the classic panto, Dick Whittington this week, from Monday until Saturday.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx