HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD TOWER BLOCK CLADDING SIMILAR TO LONDON FIRE MATERIALS
 

Star date: 15th June 2017

CLADDING USED IN PENDLETON TOWER BLOCKS 'CONTRIBUTES TO FIRE GROWTH' STATE EXPERTS

The cladding used in the Salford tower blocks refurbished by Pendleton Together is similar to that used in Grenfell Tower in London, scene of this week's horrific blaze.

The cladding in Salford blocks consisted of a Standard Polyurethane core, or PUR. And an article in the newsletter of experts Probyn Miers states that PUR "contributes to fire growth in a fully-developed fire". Salford City Council was sent samples of the material and passed it as safe.

Full details here…


Pendleton Together design
click image to enlarge

While there has been no official word on what caused the horrific blaze at Grenfell Tower in London this week, experts seem to be agreeing that the cladding certainly contributed to the speed in which the fire spread, with tragic results.

In Salford, the majority of tower blocks have been re-clad, with the most visible example being the high rises along the Crecent, including Thorn Court, Spruce Court, Whitebeam Court and Malthus Court.

Here, all the hype surrounding the refurbishments has been about appearance rather than tenant safety…

"The design has been developed to provide colour and interest at key focal points" stated Pendleton Together "...The rationale for the treatment of Spruce and Thorn is based on the use of the same highly robust and crisply detailed cladding panel, but using two different shades of colour.

"The panel itself, known as 'Chameleon' creates a very dynamic appearance, changing colour as it catches the light" the company slathered "This means that each plane of the building can appear as a different colour shade, depending on the aspect and time of day. The interplay of light and shade and changing colour tones, within each tower and from one tower to the next, will create a mesmerising effect.

"These colours have been carefully considered and selected in conjunction with Salford City Council's planning and design advisors and help to create a stronger sense of character and identity for what are large, grey and somewhat oppressive
buildings" it added "...As the buildings sit adjacent to a major highway they are seen by the public when on the move..."

The appearance hype goes on and on and on – but there is almost nothing written about safety in the blocks. The original 'hybrid' planning proposal for the whole of Pendleton contains little about such issues. And the actual 'outline' application considered by Salford Council, and passed in August 2012, has disappeared from the Council's website completely.

The only clue to the detail of the cladding comes in 2013, amongst dozens of documents in a 'request for confirmation of conditions' from Urban Vision to contractor, Keepmoat, which has two lines giving details of the materials to be used...

"Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding Panels; Composite panels Aluminum Face Sheets; Thickness: 0.020"; Standard Polyurethane core (PE); 4mm thick; panel weight: RB 160 = 1.12 ilbs/sft."

The rest is all about which colours Pendleton Together should be using... "Spruce & Thorn Court shall be predominately in 'Chameleon' finish" etc...*

The letter adds that "Prior to the commencement of development of each phase, samples of the following materials shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority… Bricks; Tiles/slates; Mortar; Structural metal work; Timber work; UPVC; and Cladding."

Salford Council approved the materials, including the 'Standard Polyurethane core', which, it must be stressed, didn't break fire and safety regulations at the time. However, there were numerous warnings about the materials used in the cladding which would take anyone with Google two minutes to find.

An article in the Winter 2016 newsletter of architectural experts, Probyn Miers, goes into huge detail (with sources) of the Fire Risks From External Cladding Panels (see here). It examines fires that have happened all over the world where cladding has been a factor, and highlights polyurethane, or PUR, as one of the materials which poses a risk…

"Polymeric core materials such as EPS [polystyrene] and PUR will burn at temperatures well below that of a fully developed fire and thus contribute to fire spread" it states

"PUR is combustible" it adds "However, it forms a char layer which tends to inhibit further combustion. The char layer is relatively fragile. It may break off to expose fresh combustible foam. PUR also contributes to fire growth in a fully-developed fire, giving off black smoke and toxic fumes, including hydrogen cyanide above 850oC."

Other variants used in cladding are Polyisocyanurate, or PIR, which, the article states "is difficult to ignite and exhibits a pronounced charring which enables it to withstand fire for longer, but is ultimately combustible"; Phenolic foam, which "is difficult to ignite" and Rockwool mineral fibre, which is "non-combustible".

The article concludes that "In the UK, influence from insurers and technical development within the composite panel industry has led to cores of polymer-cored external cladding panels changing from PUR to PIR to phenolic foam, decreasing the fire hazard."

From the materials stated in the Salford Council report, this, apparently, didn't happen. And questions need to be asked about whether cost was a factor in this…or even appearance, god forbid.



The Salford Star has tried to contact Pendleton Together (again) and Salford City Council Lead Member for Housing, Paul Longshaw about legitimate resident concerns. Neither Pendleton Together nor Paul Longshaw returned calls.

This afternoon, Paul Longshaw did put out a press statement…

"The council has been working closely with our key housing partners that have blocks of a similar age to Grenfell Towers to seek assurances their fire safety policies and procedures are in place and have been followed. We have been advised that for current requirements those policies and procedures are in place.

"When the London fire investigation is complete we will analyse the response to the disaster and exactly what happened to see if there are any lessons we can learn in Salford. This will be completed in partnership with local landlords and the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service.

"Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service (GMFRS) works closely with the local authority and housing providers to ensure all buildings in this city are as safe from fire as possible.

"Understandably residents who live in tower blocks in our city at this moment may feel concerned and vulnerable. To reassure people, landlords are writing letters to those in high rise flats, issuing statements and putting messages on social media.

"We expect there will be much reflection and investigation into the cause of the fire in London. We will continue to work with our partners to modify procedures and building safety measures should this be found necessary. Your landlord representative is there to work with you on this should you need to contact them."

This is Part 1 of a two part article... Part Two – Salford City Council and Housing Association Arrogance and Unaccountability: coming soon...

See also previous Salford Star article: Recent Pendleton High Rise Fire Highlights Inadequacies in Salford – click here

Update: 16th June 2017:

Pendleton Together promises independent review of Salford tower block fire safety - click here

Update: 26th June

The Salford Star has been asked to point out that, while the planning letter stated 'Chameleon', this is a product manufactured by Rockpanel. While this product was considered for use, the actual material that was used in the end was a product called Alucobond Spectra, which is an ACM with a similar appearance to Chameleon. The Salford Star is trying to ascertain whether price was an issue in the switch


Steve wrote
at 19:24:50 on 17 June 2017
From an update on the BBC news site regarding cladding with a polyethylene core.Its states that the material is non-compliant and should not be use din buildings over 18 meters in height. Full statement below:- Now comes a statement from the Department for Communities and Local Government: "Cladding using a composite aluminium panel with a polyethylene core would be non-compliant with current Building Regulations guidance. "This material should not be used as cladding on buildings over 18m in height. "We cannot comment on what type of cladding was used on the building - this will be subject to investigations."
 
jenny wrote
at 19:05:32 on 16 June 2017
we had a fire on whitebeam in May, obviously the block didn't light up like a roman candle like london, but with these 6 inch "ventilation holes" in 3 walls which basically sucked in toxic smoke,filling every room including bathroom, there is no way you should "stay put" as the dopey letter we had delivered yesterday suggests, unless you have a death wise... i'll be straight out next time!
 
Rayofsunshine wrote
at 16:50:43 on 16 June 2017
The unfolding tragedy at Grenfell Towers can only be described as 'Proletariancide' - tower residents died because they were mostly working class and poor. In the eyes of the haute bourgeois leadership of Kensington and Chelsea Council, social housing tenants were an 'unacceptable' charge on the public purse. There are media reports that when concerns were raised about safety at tower blocks in the borough, the Tory leader of the council was quoted as saying, "tenants should be grateful for what they currently receiveve!" I wonder if this callous swine wikis an honours graduate of The Teresa May School of Public Relations?
 
Salford resisdent wrote
at 16:50:40 on 16 June 2017
If cost was placed over safety, the cost to replace all those panels should come directly out of the people in charge "wages" no matter who they are and how untouchable they may think they may be. I am also thinking about Labour jump at the chance to talk about rich Kensington carry out "social cleansing" and how good they are to the people compared to the Tories. Admittedly, Labour have great experience in this subject and I feel it fair to mention Langworthy/Broughton/Ordsall residents who were also all displaced when their properties were purchased and bulldozed.
 
concered wrote
at 06:31:14 on 16 June 2017
Concerns about the smoke ventilation system and a report high light 4 other major fire hazards in the block were brought up at one of the community meetings 4 years ago. This meeting was attended by John Wooderson (Head of sustainable regeneration) and Salix. The residents concerned and the report on fire hazards in the tower block where dismissed by both representatives. The minutes for the meeting produced a few weeks after had no mention of what was said. The fire inspection reports for all council tower blocks for the past 10 years must be made public. People living in the tower blocks should get there own independent inspection carried out. If the cladding and the fitting of gas systems in these block poses any sort of risk then CRIMINAL action must be taken against all those responsible. don't let the council, salix, city west and pendelton together, cover this up. Reseident should form action groups https://www.meetup.com/
 
Mark Preston wrote
at 18:20:17 on 15 June 2017
As a former resident of a tower block in Salford, the images of that fire in that block in London made me think about Pendleton. That block in Kensington looks like it's just gone up like as if the whole building was made of flammable material, i.e. not as if some furniture had caught fire, but as if the whole building had combusted. What I would say to any resident in a tower block in Salford is 'be very careful when accepting a flat in a tower block in Salford'! The council hasn't done a good job with it's housing policies and I don't expect they have done a good job with the renovations they've made in Salford. It would also not surprise me to hear that Salford Council have made the same mistake as Kensington Council and have passed flammable material as 'inflammable'. When you start trying to cover up the 'North Korea' look of Pendleton which is what I think Salford Council have ...really done with the 'appearance' scheme they've put up, then I suspect safety has been a minor concern when compared with their 'Politics'.
 
Wrote wrote
at 18:03:20 on 15 June 2017
I don't know if anyone has noticed, but the centre panels of Canon Hussey Court & Arthur Millwood Court are identical in colour, construction, and style to those that were used on the Tower Block in London that burst into flames. Combine that with the fact that there is a huge communal gas powered heating system strapped to the top of the tower blocks, we could be looking at yet another horrendous disaster, just waiting to happen.
 
joseph ONeill wrote
at 18:03:05 on 15 June 2017
This afternoon, Paul Longshaw did put out a press statement… "The council has been working closely with our key housing partners that have blocks of a similar age to Grenfell Towers to seek assurances their fire safety policies and procedures are in place and have been followed. We have been advised that for current requirements those policies and procedures are in place. Sorry would that cover the use of materials that if ignited under extreme heat could spread rapidly? I am no expert but with the disaster in London should we be looking more at substance than design. If the products used are the same surely it is a matter of urgency to remove them. God forbid we face the same level of tragedy those in London faced but if there is an issue I say deal with it.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT
Superb picture. It seems to capture the mind of our great leader. ... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
The heritage -cultural value of these gasholder frames would only enhance the profitability of a scheme with flats inside.Lets fac... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
The children of today will have nothing to remind them of what was once a great city, and it's all down to greed, greed, and more ... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
As long as its not more Apartments... [more]
article: NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS
A park doesnt make money. Overpriced goldfish bowl apartments do. ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT

Star date: 21st June 2018

COUNCIL SPENT £5,750 ON MIPIM PR IN SOUTH OF FRANCE

Salford Council spent almost £10,000 on the jaunt to the MIPIM property orgy in Cannes. A newly published contract register shows that, as well as the £4,022 costs for the City Mayor and two officers to go to the South of France paid by unknown private sector companies, the Council also spent £5,750 on marketing and PR for MIPIM.

The contract register also shows the Council is spending £9,500 on a 'Salford Story' press consultant, £118,000 on its failed 'digital community hub', over £14,000 on a 'leadership programme' and, er, £25,000 on milk and bread?

Full details here...

NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS

Star date: 20th June 2018

'WE RECOGNISE THE HISTORIC INTEREST'...BUT THEY'RE BEING DEMOLISHED!

Despite musical protests and petitions, the National Grid is adamant that the Salford gas holders, made famous in the Dirty Old Town anthem, will be demolished.

Campaigners are asking for the Grid to re-think a new use for the structures, like in many other towns and cities, but the company states that while "We recognise the historic interest in the Salford gasholder...the structure is being dismantled..."

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE

Star date: 19th June 2018

COUNCIL BLOCKS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST ON £4,000 MIPIM TRIP

Salford City Council has refused to answer a Salford Star Freedom of Information request on which private company paid the £4,022 costs for City Mayor Paul Dennett and two staff to go to the South of France for the MIPIM property event.

The Council states that "the commercial interests of the Council outweigh that of the public interest in disclosure". The Salford Star is to appeal the decision.

Full details here...

DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING

Star date: 18th June 2018

OVER 80% OF COUNCIL WORKERS HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN SERVICES AND ALMOST 50% THINKING OF LEAVING THEIR JOBS

A survey of almost 1,500 local council workers in the North West reveals that 81% have no confidence in the future of local services, 49% are thinking of leaving their jobs, 54% believe their council no longer delivers quality services, and 45% think that their employer doesn't make the right decisions for the public.

The other results of the survey by UNISON to coincide with its local government conference make equally depressing reading, as the union states that "Vital local services in the North West are collapsing".

Full details here...

SALFORD TIME OUT FOR CARERS

Star date: 18th June 2018

TRIPS, CAKES, MASSAGE, ADVICE AND CHAT AS CARERS TAKE TIME OUT

"I was absolutely weary...I needed to get out of the house" Ernie

Caring for a loved one is indeed a labour of love but it can also be life consuming and draining. So a group called Time Out For Carers is making a difference, running weekly sessions where escapism is the order of the day.

There's free massages, trips out, advice on allowances, tea and coffee and cakes, but, most importantly, relaxed informal chats with carers who are all in the same position.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx