HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD COUNCIL MUST SIGN ETHICAL CARE CHARTER TO PROTECT VULNERABLE
 

Star date: 31st March 2014

WHY ISN'T SALFORD AN ETHICAL CARE COUNCIL?

Salford Mayor, Ian Stewart, makes a big deal about this being a Living Wage City and protecting the vulnerable, yet Salford City Council still hasn't signed the Ethical Care Charter which puts an end to the practice of fifteen minute visits for the sick and elderly, and ensures that care workers are paid a living wage.

As Salford privatises the last remnants of its adult services, the Charter guarantees ethical care for all citizens. Lancashire, Reading and Camden are amongst those who have become ethical care councils. Why not Salford?

Full details here...


Last week at the meeting of the full council, Salford City Mayor, Ian Stewart, and his sidekick Assistant, Councillor Paul Dennett, made speeches/Labour Party political broadcasts about how the Council looks after its staff and the city's vulnerable people, to great cheers from their own councillors.

All this against a background of the constant privatisation of adult care services and hundreds of adult care jobs either axed or transferred to the private/third sector. The speeches were also made against the shocking statistic that Salford Council's Adult Social Care budget accounts for just 22% of its overall budget...the second lowest in the whole of the North West. The average is 32%.

Salford has the Mayor's Charter for Employment Standards, the Living Wage Charter, and finally signed the Disabled Children's Charter this month, at the fourth time of asking (see here). Yet Salford Council still hasn't signed the Ethical Care Charter, introduced by trade union UNISON over two years ago, imploring local authorities to become ethical care councils.

The Charter was born from UNISON research reflecting the appalling state of homecare services in the UK...

Call cramming: 79.1% of respondents reported that their work schedule was arranged in such a way that they either had to rush their work or leave a client early to get to their next visit on time. 56% of respondents were low paid, leading to high staff turnover as workers could not afford to stay in the sector. Clients therefore have to suffer a succession of new care staff. 57.8% of respondents were not paid for their travelling time between visits, meaning even less take home pay.

... 36.7% of respondents reported that they were often allocated different clients, affecting care continuity and the ability of clients to form relationships with their
care workers. This is crucial, especially for people with such conditions as dementia. 52.3% reported that concerns about clients were `only sometimes' acted on, highlighting a major potential safeguarding problem. Only 43.7% saw fellow
homecare workers
on a daily basis at work, leading to staff isolation and low morale. And 41.1% were not given specialist training to deal with their clients specific medical needs, such as dementia and stroke related conditions.

Commenting on its survey, the UNISON report berated "a disturbing picture of a system in which the ability to provide some companionship and conversation to often lonely and isolated clients is being stripped away. Some recounted the shame of providing rushed and insufficient levels of care because of the terms and conditions of their job, whilst many detailed insufficient levels of training that they had been given to carry out the role. Others made the point that rushed visits are a false economy leading to a greater likelihood of falls, medication errors and deterioration through loneliness."

"...Some homecare workers were doing tasks and errands for their clients in their spare time, despite the seemingly best efforts of the current care model to strip away any sense of personal warmth or humanity" it added "Homecare workers are personally propping up a deteriorating system of adult social care, but they are being pushed to breaking point...For the system to work it needs to be underpinned by adequate funding and a workforce whose terms and conditions reflect the respect and value they deserve. Crucially they must be given the time to care."

The UNISON response was the Ethical Care Charter upon which councils pledged to commission care only from providers who will:

• schedule visits so that homecare workers are not forced to rush their time with clients or leave their clients early to get to the next one on time
• match the time allocated to visits to the particular needs of the client
• allocate clients the same homecare worker wherever possible
• use contracts that are appropriate for individual homecare workers
• pay the Living Wage
• pay homecare workers for expenses such as their travel time and travel costs

Many councils have signed the Charter, including Lancashire County Council, Renfrewshire Council, Camden, Reading and Southwark Council. Yet Salford City Council, which is forever banging on about its Mayor's charters, has yet to sign up.

"Making this commitment to decent employment conditions for care workers is all about improving the quality of life for the people they care for" says UNISON's head of local government Heather Wakefield "A living wage and more secure employment make it possible for dedicated care workers to stay in the job and focus on giving the best possible care."

The Charter is being backed by Bolton Labour MPs David Crausby and Yasmin Qureshi, yet Salford's MPs and Mayor and `Humanegement Mayor' are strangely silent on the issue.

Last week, as Salford Council privatised almost the last remnants of its adult social care services into the mutual Aspire (see previous Salford Star article – click here), Salford City UNISON branch secretary Steven North implored the signing of the Charter to protect staff and clients in the future when the Council's guaranteed contract runs out...

"All too often the setting up of a social enterprise is the first step to outright privatisation and we are concerned that in three years' time Aspire could find itself the losing party in a bidding war with a private sector care organisation that can deliver this service for less money because it pays bargain basement wages and subjects its clients to fifteen minute-only visits" he said 

"It is now the duty of Salford City Council to ensure that doesn't happen" he added "In our view the most practical way it could do this is by adopting UNISON's Ethical Care Charter. Doing so would ensure that the provision of services for vulnerable people could only ever be delivered by organisations that pay the Living Wage, that properly train their staff and that treat their clients with human decency. If the Council wants this social enterprise to succeed it will adopt the Charter."

Salford City UNISON is now publicising an e-petition on Salford Council's website which it is urging all residents and union members to sign. It states...

`We the undersigned petition Salford City Council to sign up to UNISON's Ethical Care Charter. UNISON's Ethical Care Charter calls for decent standards of employment for care workers, whether they work directly for a local authority or for a company that is contracted by them.

The Charter guarantees workers: Time to talk to clients; Paid travel time; The Living Wage; Sick Pay; Proper Training

These things are good for clients as well as staff and we hope Salford Council will show its commitment to the most vulnerable and those who care for them by joining other councils, such as Lancashire County in signing up.'

To sign the petition – click here

To read the full Ethical Care Charter - click here


* See also previous Salford Star article: Salford Pensioners in line for £500,000 cuts - click here


Kellie greenall wrote
at 10:19:07 on 10 May 2015
Jim Gilroy did u ever work in butlins in North Wales in the late 60s / early 70s??
?
freddie wrote
at 10:18:25 on 13 April 2015
Organisations which force its suppliers of care to work for less than £10 per hour (as the city council does) cannot be ethical for in doing so they force a race to the bottom both in terms of suppliers and quality. And of course all this at a time when they say they are committed to the living wage. A living wage within this local authority is paid for by those working in the private sector whose incomes have been raped by the city council. Of course this is the same council that recently told us it never paid below £12:20 for home care (www.ukhca.co.uk/) which is more than just a bit innacurate! Ethical? There ain't much ethical in the way this LA functions.
?
Reg Howard wrote
at 15:54:59 on 01 April 2015
In a nutshell, Mayor Stewrat and his cronies would never sign such a document, why ? because they don't care !!!.It takes people with a heart and a social conscience to feel sympathy for the elderly and disabled,qualities seriously lacking in this council, however, not long now and if the people of Salford get off their backsides and vote then this councils days could be numbered,
?
rotten to the core wrote
at 15:54:45 on 01 April 2015
Ethical salford council what a joke, there about as Ethical as the courts summons are legal they send out. Who's copy signature are they using on them and why are Steve Norths members keeping stum about whats going on. Do the decent thing, remember salford people are humans as well and what you are doing is sending some of the most vulnerable and poorest people further into debt, relying on food banks. Shame on salford council staff, council will not look after you and are sacking/pay cuts for lots of staff.
?
Paul Quinn wrote
at 18:14:44 on 31 March 2015
Salford City Council staff have been given the green light to launch a new company to deliver £10.5 million worth of adult social care services. Around 400 staff will transfer to the independent not for profit company which they will own. Aspire will be commissioned by Salford City Council to deliver services for around 800 local residents with substantial and critical needs. If I am reading this wright Salford council have no need to adopt an Ethical care Charter because they have privetised all the service for adultcare City Mayor Ian Stewart said the move is a way of protecting services for the future and enabling the council to continue delivering services people rely on. How can the Mayor and council say this when they have give the running of these services to a privite company Aspire.They are going to have specialist day services and all the other services the Mayor and council have got rid of . so give me clue any one wheres the £10.5 mlion and the 400 staff going to come from the Mayor says this plan as taken to years to draw up. So do’s that means two years ago the Mayor and the council was planing on getting rid of all these services that he said was the fault of this Tory Lib government or this that me just thinking aloud
?
Jim Gilroy wrote
at 14:34:50 on 31 March 2015
I'm disgusted with the like of Stewart and Dennett. I voted for both of them. And Paul Dennett didn't give me the courtesy of responding to my phone calls or emails. He's supposed to be one of my councillors. And he lives on the estate I lived on and was involved in community wise for 18 years too. As for Stewart I wrote a letter to him in support of Salford Supported Tenancies as they had saved my life and I wanted him to know how important they are to local people. This was during the first tranche of cuts. He had to phone round and ask how to respond to my letter. How pathetic. And I nearly threw up on the spot when I heard him say publicly last summer that it didn't matter who would be in power there would be hard hitting cuts. Again. How pathetic. I'm fed up with excuses. I've signed a few other petitions and the responses I get are unbelievable.
?
Topman920 wrote
at 12:57:58 on 31 March 2015
Father in law (81) discharged from Hope Hospital L ward on Sunday evening 29th March after bad fall. Sent home to COLD house. Could not get into bed. At 4am pressed his red button for care on call emergency service. They made him cup of tea and sandwich then put him into bed for night. The system is F#cked up! The hospital should hang it's head in shame.
?
Tahir Chakotai wrote
at 12:57:55 on 31 March 2015
Salford Mayor, Ian Stewart, will never sign, on behalf of Salford, an "Ethical Care Policy". That would mean the Vulnerable in the city would have adequate care. It would also mean that The Salford Council would have to pay more for such care services, to improve the level of care in Salford. But we all know, the building of apartments, at great cost to the Salford Citizen, is more important, than caring for the vulnerable. I think it's also important to realise that Salford/Manchester are the only cities, within the UK without any Autism Services. Many disabled and vulnerable Autistic Adults, are not receiving the right care and support. Care Assessments are not being carried out correctly, because the Social Workers have not been adequately trained. There have even been cases where some Autistic Adults have attempted suicide because they have not received the right care, and support. In my humble opinion, it's time the Salford Mayor, invested time and resources into the care services. There is no point expanding and over developing a city, if you do not have the correct services in place to support such a city.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx