• In the first 178 homes at Broughton Green there is…no housing for existing residents affected by clearance, and no shared ownership or homes for affordable renting. It would seem very obvious that the fist phase should provide homes for people being relocated.
Translation: Before you knocked everyone's house down in the 1st phase you never even thought of building new homes for the peasants to move into, you were so busy concentrating on the expensive huge luxury houses and flats.
*************
• The plan was initiated by the developer…
Translation: This explains the above point
*************
• In one sense, public subsidy…has paid for high quality, larger homes at a relatively affordable price…Affordability is relative and clearly only applies to the more affluent local households.
Translation: Tax payers' money has helped pay for the massive houses priced between £235,000 and £500,000 which are really cheap for the area… if you can afford it…You're stretching the word `affordability' until its knicker elastic almost snaps.
***********
• the financial return to Salford City Council will not be high in phase 1, and the return for other partners, particularly the Royal Bank of Scotland, is high in relation to the risks borne.
Translation: Private developers are gambling with public money and nicking all the profits.
***************
• It is surprising that there has not been an explicit statement of the regeneration objectives of the Higher Broughton Partnership – how its development will contribute to the future sustainability of the whole Higher Broughton area…
Translation: Have you worked this out on the back of a fag packet or what ?
******************
• There is a need to balance commercial viability with regeneration outcomes. While Salford City Council is on the Board as a key partner, it is still important for there to be a shared understanding of the over-arching and long standing objectives of the Partnership, both to guide its members and to be publicly accountable.
Translation: It looks like you're getting rolled over by the private developers who have their own agenda. And you're not telling anyone. But it's our money you're chucking away here…
*****************
• The master plan focuses on a very narrow area – only the area that is to be cleared and re-developed – so says little about how the re-development will integrate with the wider area and act as a catalyst for physical change within it…
Translation: How the hell's this going to benefit Salford ?
****************
• The NRA (Neighbourhood Renewal Assessment) report suggests that a majority of residents supported the need for some clearance in the worst areas but wanted to ensure that work to other homes would take place at the same time to support home owners…work to existing stock has been limited to alley gating.
Translation: Hello, the community asked for some selected demolition, not to bulldoze the whole bleedin' area…They just wanted their houses done up and you've done nowt but shove up a few alley gates…
****************
• Where residents are to move into a new home at Vincent Street the gap between values of old homes and the cost of new homes has typically been around £60,000
Translation: Affordable ? You've knocked their homes down and now they've got to find at least sixty grand on top…
**************
• Residents of the "top streets" feel that the area is getting worse…
Translation: What a fantastic success this has been…eh? Dickheads !
Read Part 1 here
Read Part 2 here
Read Part 3 here
Read Part 4 here
Read Part 5 here
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
(3).jpeg)
.png)
(1).JPG)
