HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
GREATER MANCHESTER SPATIAL FRAMEWORK SEES SALFORD GREEN BELT DESTRUCTION
 

Star date: 7th January 2019

IRLAM, BOOTHSTOWN AND PORT SALFORD GREEN BELT DESTRUCTION FOR ALMOST 2,000 HOUSES PLUS WAREHOUSES

The Revised Greater Manchester Spatial Framework has been published – and is already meeting huge opposition, particularly in Irlam where 1,600 dwellings are being proposed on Green Belt land north of Irlam Station, with only around 150 designated for social rent.

"Utterly shameful...We are going to be surrounded by development - Port Salford one side, houses on the other" states the Planning For Our Future Facebook group "The fight begins!"

Full details here...


GM Framework Boothstown plans GM Framework Port Salford plans GM Framework Port Salford
GM Framework Salford development Green Belt Salford floorspace Salford Green Belt Housing
Salford housing projection
click image to enlarge

The Greater Manchester Spatial Framework:Revised Draft 2019 has been published, by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA), with Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, as the main GM Housing Lead.

The Framework was re-written after huge campaigns against the last publication before Andy Burnham became Greater Manchester Mayor. However, this latest version, contained in reports over one thousand pages long, is already meeting with opposition from Salford groups, ranging from Planning For Our Future in Irlam and Cadishead, to the Salford Green Party General Election candidate, Bryan Blears, to even the Labour Party local election candidate, Lewis Nelson.

The Greater Manchester Spatial Framework proposes 1,600 'dwellings' on Green Belt land to the north of Irlam Station. 25% will be classed as 'affordable', but out of those 'affordable' houses only 37.5%, or 150 properties, will be for social rent.

The proposal was only published yesterday but is already meeting with opposition...
"1,600 homes in an area where no new infrastructure can be brought in" questioned the Planning For Our Future In Irlam and Cadishead Facebook group administrator "To think that you can just re-designate a little bit and the developers won't challenge you is ludicrous. This opens the door for the whole area to to be developed!

"Why would you choose the publicly accessible Western Greenbelt over the private restricted land to the East?" they added "Utterly shameful! We are going to be surrounded by development...Port Salford one side, houses on the other. The fight begins!"

Bryan Blears, the Salford Green Party designated General Election candidate, was also scornful of the proposal..."Plans to build 1,600 homes in Irlam are unsustainable and will wreak havoc on the local community" he said "The Green Party opposes the use of Green Belt land for these housing developments which will go towards lining the pockets of private property developers, instead of creating affordable homes for Salford residents."

And even the local election Labour Party candidate, Lewis Nelson, has come out against the plans on social media..."I do not believe plans for 1600 houses on Chat Moss between Roscoe Road and Cromwell Road are in the interest of our community" he wrote.

Meanwhile, Peel Holdings' Port Salford will see an expansion onto the Green Belt, including part of the golf course, with 320,000square metres of 'employment floorspace' allocated on the land. Elsewhere in the strategy, Port Salford is compared to the 'Panama Canal', in that it will be capable of accommodating larger ships.

Hazelhurst Farm will see 400 'dwellings' on Green Belt land, with fifty per cent designated as 'affordable', but maybe 'off site'; and Boothstown will see 300 'top end' houses between Leigh Road and the Bridgewater Canal, with fifty per cent designated 'affordable', and possibly 'off site'.

The GM Framework also proposes "around 263,400 sq m of office floorspace and around 8,200 new dwellings" at Salford Quays during the period until 2037.

Elsewhere in the huge document, which covers everything from environment, to jobs and transport, it's acknowledged that "Over 50,000 properties in Greater Manchester have a 1% chance of flooding from main rivers in any year" with thirty per cent of such properties located in Salford.

There's also a statement which appears to be opposing fracking in Greater Manchester... "It is therefore considered prudent to not exploit new sources of hydrocarbons and keep fossil fuels in the ground so at this point in time Greater Manchester will not support hydraulic fracturing (fracking)."

But it is the building of thousands of properties on Green Belt land that will form the main arguments around this new Revised Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.

"Now is the right time for pushing forward on our ambitions set out in the Greater Manchester Strategy" states Andy Burnham in the introduction "...Crucially, we want everyone to have green space to enjoy and clean air to breathe...Since the first version was published, we have listened carefully to what people told us. Planning will always be a difficult question of striking a balance between creating new homes and jobs and protecting the environment.

"This radically-revised GMSF is as much a vision for the environment and quality of life of Greater Manchester as it is for new development" he adds "It cuts the loss of Green Belt by over half, introduces new protections on other green spaces and a presumption against fracking in Greater Manchester. It is a prospectus for more sustainable development whilst not diminishing our ambitions for growth in housing and employment..."


For links to the full Draft Revised Framework, details of the consultation and more information click here

the end wrote
at 08:32:40 on 12 January 2019
reference- Peter- you clearly have no idea how many new houses have gone up in Irlam in the last 10-15 years. Suggest you do your home work before commenting. The issue is not just the new houses, its the appalling road and rail links that exist
?
white wrote
at 14:43:52 on 09 January 2019
“plenty of development here. none in Worsley though is there” writes Bob the regular. His geographical knowledge is singularly lacking. Where does he think Boothstown and Hazlehurst Farm are?
?
Ant Ford wrote
at 08:24:49 on 09 January 2019
The main priority for these Labour councils is getting as much council tax as possible from higher banded properties. Improving lives making Manchester a great place to live - don't believe a word of it!
?
Bob the regular wrote
at 08:23:58 on 09 January 2019
Well ,plenty of development here. none in Worsley though is there? Keep your red flags flying in Irlam and Cadishead, this is what you get for being loyal to labour.
?
pete wrote
at 19:03:57 on 08 January 2019
This is a modest expansion of an already urban and industrial area. Irlam has not seen that much development in recent decades compared to other outlying areas like Lymm, Sandbach, Wilmslow, Urmston, Middlewich, Altrincham etc, and I'm sure it can handle this new proposal. The new houses will be close to the green belt. Not everyone wants to live on brownfield inner city sites in small high rise flats - including many Greens and nimbys who want others to do so. It is also environmentally sensible to build new housing near to the employment opportunities offered by the new Port Salford development, as this cuts down on commuting and therefore pollution from vehicles.
?
Alan Bibby wrote
at 07:15:22 on 08 January 2019
By all means build on brown field sites as long as there is adequate infrastructure and leave green belt land as it is, once it is built on it will never be restored to fields. The roads around green belt land are full to capacity at present and get worse each year, more pollution, build in cities to avoid travel by car and cut pollution, THINK AGAIN PLANNERS AND GET IT RIGHT.
?
Bob wrote
at 07:15:06 on 08 January 2019
Since Salford took over Eccles, Irlam and Cadishead we have lost thousands of acres of green belt land to housing. Salford is Building mad and NOT making any money from it. I can remember Salford councillors saying " We want more open spaces for people to live", instead they are cramming as many properties as they can in such a small space.
?
Gareth L wrote
at 07:14:37 on 08 January 2019
The whole framework is terrible. The destruction of the greenbelt will eventually lead to a concrete jungle. The problem is rising populations, longer lifespans and corporate greed.
?
DJB wrote
at 07:13:30 on 08 January 2019
Well we have the arch bell end Burnhams name mentioned so quite frankly I don't believe as word of it. The name should be removed from office and charged for his deliberate attempts to put local people out of business.
?
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Forever manchester
Salford Star
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: PAUL HOUGHTON BRINGING MOSAICS AND TAPE ART TO SALFORD
Hi Paul I hope you are well, please can you tell me how much it would be to have the George Best Mosaic made? Indeed if you are st... [more]
article: CUSSONS SOAP AND KERSAL MOOR SALFORD – A VERY CLEAN STORY
I am Marjorie Goodwin's grandson. I still have that battered tobacco tin. I don't know what happened to the silver one! ... [more]
article: SALFORD PRECINCT SHOPPERS STUNG BY PARKING `RACKET’
I parked here with a disability badge and my back tyre was slightly over line as I suffer with coordination and it says if I appea... [more]
article: SALFORD LOST STREETS
4 North Johnson Street, Salford. My Great Grandfather was the son of Household James Rowlands 68. x2. His wife Frances Rowlands... [more]
article: John Cooper Clarke On Life In Higher Broughton.
lived for many years as a kid in Murray st. Hilda who was mum to John would visit my grandmother and would tell us about what john... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD STAR CLOSES AFTER 15 YEARS WITH ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

Star date: 17th May 2021

SALFORD STAR – 15 YEARS OF ATTITUDE AND LOVE XXX

The Salford Star closes tonight after 15 years of giving the community a voice, holding power to account and bigging up all the great things that have happened in the city.

Thousands of people in Salford have been involved in one way or another with the Star and we'd like to thank them all. Salford is a very special city and, hopefully, we've given it a very special community publication.

For the final curtain click here... 

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO BLOCK AND DISCREDIT THE STAR

Star date: 17th May 2021

THREATS, LIES, FEAR AND LOATHING IN SALFORD...

Today, the Salford Star shuts down but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. Here the Salford Star editor, Stephen Kingston, looks at how democracy perished badly under the Salford mayoral system.

Full details here...

SALFORD HAS 7 NEW CORONAVIRUS CASES AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Star date: 17th May 2021

A WHIFF OF FREEDOM AS RESTRICTIONS ARE EASED

Salford has 7 new coronavirus cases, down from the previous day's 14, while the seven day rate per 100,000 population now stands at 30.1, down from 30.9. There have been no new virus-related deaths announced by Salford Royal Hospital.

Today sees restrictions eased and the first whiff of freedom in over a year. It's also the final coronavirus bulletin from the Salford Star which is closing. Here we look back over 14 months of the pandemic and the absolute communication failings of Salford City Council and its City Mayor.

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE: HOW SALFORD COUNCIL TRIED TO STOP THE STAR

Star date: 16th May 2021

THEY WILL TRY TO DISCREDIT YOU...TO BLOCK YOU, TO SHUT YOU DOWN

We are almost at the final closure of the Salford Star but we write this article as a warning to others who may follow on the pitfalls of founding a genuine publication that aims to give the community a voice and hold public bodies up to account. 

They will try to discredit you, block information and shut you down. In South America they just blow up the offices of journalists that don't play the game. Here they just financially assassinate you...

Full details here...

SALFORD STAR CLOSURE – GUY GRIFFITHS ON THE HUMAN COST OF PATHFINDER DEMOLITIONS

Star date: 16th May 2021

THE HUMAN COST OF REGENERATION

The Griffiths brothers of Higher Broughton are kind of infamous as the only people to be forcefully evicted from their house as part of the Pathfinder 'housing market renewal' project during the first decade of the 21st Century.

Here, Guy Griffiths, now living in 'sunny' north Wales and one of the main inspirations for the Salford Star's creation, writes the second part his own personal view of the Government project that devastated communities throughout Central Salford.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx