HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SALFORD ADULT CARE HORROR
 

Star date: 8th March 2011

A Salford Star Exclusive

OVER 100 CARE ALERTS FOR ELDERLY SALFORDIANS!

Salford Council has admitted that well over 100 `care alerts' have been issued for just one company which is looking after some of the city's most vulnerable people. And 10% of those elderly people are still being closely monitored, as chaos envelops Salford's new adult social care regime.

According to Salford Star sources, elderly people have been left for hours unable to move, medication has been missed and the time spent with carers has been cut by a quarter. Nigel Pivaro investigates…

Full story here…


MORE SALFORD CARE CHOAS
Part 1

An elderly Ordsall lady leans back in her chair and sighs, "I wasn't too bad, they only missed four or five visits of mine. But there were cases of people left in their own urine…"

Last December we reported how Salford's reorganisation of its care for over 1,400 of Salford's older residents who receive home visits was in chaos (see here). Salford Council's Adult Services got rid of 15 out of 17 Salford based companies, replacing them with seven companies, most of which were from outside Salford.

One of those companies, Homecare Support - which won its contract over locally based Salford companies to deliver home visits and care to 133 elderly people in the Ordsall and Seedley areas - has been criticised by both service users and carers. It's also had almost 200 `alerts' – or breaches of care - against its name.

"There were 180 'alerts' connected to the service provided by Homecare Support" a Salford Council spokesperson told us last month. "Homecare Support took on the contract …on 1 November 2010. By January 2011 we had received 125 alerts, many as a result of missed calls. Of these, 103 occurred in November. Ten occurred in January when a senior did not cover the absence of a carer who called in sick. We are currently continuing to monitor 14 individuals to be absolutely sure that the quality of care is appropriate."

We are still unsure as to what the remaining 55 alerts related to. But the previous figures alone paint a disturbing picture of the level of care dispensed by the company.
The fact that five months after Homecare Support has taken over looking after our elderly citizens, 14 of them - or 10 per cent of total clients under their care - are still being monitored surely raises cause for concern.

Paul Murphy, 44, a care worker for four years quit his post with Homecare Support after just four months with the newly installed company, describing the situation as "a complete farce".

Paul lists a string of errors including missed visits, people not getting their medication or being left on their own for hours on end.

"The most common thing to happen was carers being sent to the same visit, so sometimes I would arrive and there would be two, even three carers, for one person - that often meant that somebody else would be missing a visit" he explains "When two carers were required, sometimes one was sent, so you would phone in to a so-called `response unit'…

"You tell them the problem and they would say 'Right okay move on to the next visit it's been logged', without any solution whatsoever" he adds "So if somebody needed moving and it was a two person job they would just record the incident, but that person would not be moved until the next visit."

The other recurring problem was wrong information on the care plans for clients.

"Service users were getting the wrong care due to errors on care plans, and after about two months they had to bring in somebody from outside to review them" Paul says "The rotas were as clear as mud and that meant people were missing visits and medication."

One colleague of Paul's had five service users who missed visits within one week period… "That meant a service user missing their medication and another who took their medication all at once" he says "Another incident involved a man whose electric had blown, leaving him sat in the dark until I arrived.

"I logged it but when I spoke to the next of kin to see if she had dealt with the repair to ensure it didn't happen again, she told me that nobody from Home Care Support had contacted her - as they should have done - and she was unaware of any problem."

Carers have also had their time with elderly people reduced by a quarter, from the previous twenty minutes to a mere fifteen.

"We were told that we had fifteen minutes to wash and dress an elderly couple" Paul says "And two men jobs were cut down to one man. When we queried it, we were told that the Council will only pay for one carer."

Salford Council claims that it now has an 'electronic monitoring system' in place for their staff to log in and out, to `safeguard' against missed visits.

However that system is little more than an answer machine that logs code numbered calls from the landlines of the service users. Where this system falls down is where the often elderly service user does not have a landline phone or simply will not allow the carer to use their phone.

"The problem is that if there is nobody at the other end of the line it goes to automated service" says Paul "And not all service users have phones or were happy to let us use their phones."

Service user Anita Calder confirmed the system's shortcomings: "Carers do phone in to the office from my landline but it is far from a perfect system as there is one carer who comes who doesn't make the call because she said she has not been yet given a log-in number. This after three weeks.

"I can gladly say that I have been in receipt of all my visits on time but I am aware of the great unease and dissatisfaction amongst the carers who I know are too frightened to speak out" she adds "I am also speaking out for the many service users who I know have received less than appropriate care who for many reasons, unlike me, are unable to raise issues affecting their care with Salford social services and the care companies."

Salford Council replies:

"The transfer of domiciliary care contracts to some of the new care providers did not happen as smoothly as we would have liked. Our safeguarding processes in Salford use a system of 'alerts' to identify issues which may need further investigation as actual referrals.  Where for example a visit has been missed by a domiciliary agency we have insisted that the care provider treat this as a safeguarding issue and inform us immediately.

"We insisted on this extra measure so that we can monitor visits and be absolutely clear about the actual level of support being provided. In addition, we have also insisted that the agencies use 'electronic monitoring systems' for their staff to log in and out - giving us clear evidence of whether a visit has been completed or not. This means that any missed visits are now being logged and has added an extra layer to the safeguarding work we do.

"The level of missed visits has substantially reduced since Christmas and we are now satisfied with the progress being made. We take our responsibility for ensuring individuals health and safety very seriously and since the change of contracts have conducted a full review of the package of care for every individual, in many cases in face to face visits with clients and their families. In some cases we took the extra step of providing care to people from our intermediate care service in the short term, wherever we felt this may be necessary.

"We remain committed to ensuring that the service now being delivered meets the standards both we and local people expect. There has been a marked improvement in the quality of service provided by Homecare Support, checked out through the individual service user and their families meetings."

Trevor Morris, managing Director of Homecare Support adds:
 
"Homecare Support acknowledges that when we assumed the contract in Salford in November that there were a number of issues which affected the quality of care delivered to service users.

We have worked closely with the Council, carers, service users and their families to bring the level of care up to the highest standards but acknowledge that a tranche of the transferred workforce has caused unneccessary disruption to the service.

The company is committed to Salford and to delivering the highest quality of care to Salford residents and we are confident in having any remaining outstanding issues resolved to the satisfaction of our users as soon as possible."

However, almost five months after Homecare Support first took on the contract to care for our elderly citizens, 10% of them are still having to be "monitored"…

We have asked for an interview with Councillor John Warmisham, Leader Member for Adult Services on at least five separate occasions but this has not been forthcoming.

Salford Council's Health Wellbeing and Social Care Scrutiny committee meets on 23rd March to get an "Update on the changes to the care contracts including issues raised since the changeover"…

Part 2 click here

 

 

sandra howarth wrote
at 08:50:07 on 28 March 2013
my step mum has home care support and since last april 2012 we have had compliants every week if not twice a week about the lack of care that is given to our step mouldy food left in the fridge making sandwich with dried up meat even the poor cat has had her food put down on a dirty saucer we have have the safe guard going on for about six months and nothing seems to change yesterday and today we have had to complain i would raelly like a different company all together but keep being told by the socail worker that these are the only company that have the contract for salford .yours sincerely Mrs Sandra Howarth
 
Nachtschlepper wrote
at 12:45:04 on 10 March 2011
'Hope I die before I get old' Pete Townshend.
 
grumpybutright wrote
at 15:37:44 on 08 March 2011
Dear Oh Dear what can be achieved in 15 minutes? even less with these lazy Salford workforce. Thats why Salford lost the docks because the workforce was bone idle .It took the Salford dockers so long to discharge fresh produce off cargo ships that it was rotten by the time they cleared the hold.Shocking! The only stuff that made it off them docks fresh ended up in the Stevedores larder. Liverpool dOCKERS LOVED sALFORD dOCK WORKERS THEY WERE THE ONLY MEN IN THE COUNTRY THAT MADE lIVERPOOL DOCKERS APPEAR HARD WORKING.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD MP SHOULD BE DESELECTED AFTER KEEPING TORIES IN POWER SAYS CONSTITUENT
Slurp, thè real hypocrits are Labour Mps,such as Stringer,Mann and Hoey who are clearly "useful idiots" for the Tory Right!... [more]
article: SALFORD MP SHOULD BE DESELECTED AFTER KEEPING TORIES IN POWER SAYS CONSTITUENT
Labour is led by a man who has voted against his own party's line over 600 times in his parliamentary career. But when someone e... [more]
article: SALFORD UNIVERSITY SACKS TOP PROFESSOR FOR FAILING TO CHASE MONEY
I have had the pleasure of being taught by Jim for the past two years and found him to be the most approachable, helpful, and down... [more]
article: SALFORD UNIVERSITY SACKS TOP PROFESSOR FOR FAILING TO CHASE MONEY
Years ago An old boy of my school who had risen to a very high place in the health service estates section told me what a bunch of... [more]
article: SALFORD UNIVERSITY SACKS TOP PROFESSOR FOR FAILING TO CHASE MONEY
Appalling that some jobsworth could end a career by ticking a box! Well done prof for standing up for education over profit! Hope ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD UNIVERSITY SACKS TOP PROFESSOR FOR FAILING TO CHASE MONEY

Star date: 20th July 2018

PROTEST AT THE LOWRY AS STUDENTS GET DEGREES

Yesterday, as students received their degrees at The Lowry, Professor James Newell and UCU supporters were outside raising awareness of how the University of Salford sacked him, after 27 years service, for basically failing to chase money in what has become a national cause against the marketisation of education.

Almost 3,500 people have signed a petition calling for Professor Newell's reinstatement, as he told the Salford Star that marketisation "is the essential issue that underlies the exorbitant fees that students have to pay..."

Full details here...

SALFORD SCHOOL SHUTS AS PARENTS AND PUPILS PROTEST HEAD TEACHER SUSPENSION

Star date: 19th July 2018

HARROP FOLD CLOSES FOR THE DAY DUE TO PROTEST

As pupils and parents prepared to protest the suspension of Harrop Fold head teacher, Drew Povey, and three other staff, the school closed today citing the "distressing effect on our students".

Some pupils, parents and members of the community did show up outside the school gates anyway, with one parent saying the suspensions were "unjust...He needs to be here doing his job".

Full details here...

SALFORD MP SHOULD BE DESELECTED AFTER KEEPING TORIES IN POWER SAYS CONSTITUENT

Star date: 19th July 2018

CALLS FOR GRAHAM STRINGER TO BE DESELECTED FOR 'TREACHERY'

On Tuesday night, Blackley and Broughton MP, Graham Stringer, was one of four Labour Party MPs who voted with the Tories on the latest Brexit proposals, allowing Theresa May to scrape to victory by three votes and avert a possible General Election.

Here, a constituent of the Salford MP and Labour Party member, gives her personal opinion, joining the call for Graham Stringer to be deselected...

Full details here...

PEPPA PIG COMMUNISM GRAFFITI GOES SUBVERSIVE IN SALFORD

Star date: 18th July 2018

'COMMUNISM IS FOR THE CHILDREN' SAYS SUBVERSIVE PEPPA PIG

Bizarre graffiti art has appeared near Salford Central Station depicting two delighted looking Peppa Pigs by the slogan 'Communism is for the children'. The art has led to much amusement and bemusement but is probably related to China banning the popular kids' cartoon.

Full details here...

SALFORD TOWERBLOCK CLADDING RESIDENTS UNITE TO TACKLE PENDLETON TOGETHER

Star date: 18th July 2018

SPRUCE COURT AND THORN COURT TENANTS GET ORGANISED TO FIGHT BACK

"We're sick to death of being treated like dirt..."

Last night, tenants from Spruce Court and Thorn Court met to share concerns over dangerous cladding, fire safety, security and other issues, as they united to take on towerblock manager Pendleton Together and Salford City Council, which owns the blocks.

"They try to ignore what we're saying" insisted one tenant "They're complacent... we're sick to death of being treated like dirt...".

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx