HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SHELTER SLAMS AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY
 

Star date: 13th July 2010

SALFORD STAR RESEARCH BACKED UP BY NEW SHELTER REPORT

"Products have been developed as a means to help developers and housing associations to generate revenue" Shelter.

Housing and homelessness charity, Shelter, has produced a new report slating the Government's attempts at providing `affordable housing' through shared ownership and `intermediate' housing, arguing that current schemes benefit developers, housing associations and `high middle income' earners rather than low income households in most need.

The hard hitting report backs up Salford Star research published earlier this year which showed only 10 low earning families in the city benefitting from the various `affordable housing' schemes.

Under Shelter's terms, none of the heavily subsidised Urban Splash housing at Chimney Pot Park could be classed as `affordable'.

Full story here…


Live Manchester Lower Broughton
click image to enlarge

HATS OFF TO SHELTER

At last an official organisation has exposed the myth that government backed schemes for `affordable housing' are helping those on the lowest incomes to become home owners.

Schemes such as `shared equity', `low cost home ownership', `first time buyer initiative', `home buy' other so-called `intermediate' housing products are increasingly being advertised in Salford and the rest of the country as a means of helping people get affordable access to home ownership. But a damning report by Shelter, titled The Forgotten Households, states that the average income of those accessing shared ownership schemes is more than £28,000 a year, and £32,000 a year for shared equity, while those earning an average income of £16,000 or below "cannot afford even the very cheapest shared ownership homes".

The report estimates that there are 866,000 of these `forgotten households' in the UK - people who are working on low incomes, who get few state benefits and who are renting from private landlords.

Meanwhile, housing associations, developers and `high middle income' earners are benefitting from schemes which cost the country hundreds of millions of pounds every year.

To qualify for the state subsidised `intermediate housing' schemes, household income can be anything up to £60,000 (see Mary Burns Feed The Rich Award here) and Shelter believes that "publicly subsidised new supply (of houses) should be directed at helping those in the greatest housing need first, with social rented homes taking much greater priority."

In Salford, intermediate housing schemes have been encouraged in virtually every new regeneration development – Miller Homes at Unity Quarter, Countryside Properties at New Broughton…and Urban Splash at Chimney Pot Parkwhere £5million has gone to subsidise 91 houses under First Time Buyer Initiative and 10 units under the LCHO (Low Cost Home Ownership) scheme at a cost of £350,000.

Many of these housing products are directed through Plumlife which promotes itself as a "government backed company set up to help you get onto the property ladder". Plumlife advertised affordable housing products in glossy magazines such as Live Manchester (`Manchester's premier guide to luxury living') which also carried adverts for Mercedes Benz cars and Rolex Watches.

"New supply is called `affordable' without a common understanding of what this really means" states the Shelter report "The result of this is that intermediate housing is being classified automatically as affordable when vast swathes of the local population cannot afford it."

Salford Council certainly classifies these shared equity schemes as `affordable housing'. It's snappily titled `Affordable Housing Development Control Implementation Note' shows how it uses such schemes to push up the numbers and percentages of affordable houses on each new development.  The Note, rather turgidly, but quite clearly states…

"For intermediate housing the discount required to secure the involvement of a social housing provider is typically 35% on open market value. Where social rented units are to be provided the discount normally required is much greater than that required for intermediate units, typically 65-75% per unit. The contribution sought from developers will be a 35% discount on the open market valuation of each of the affordable units. A 35% discount on open market value equates to approximately 7% of the total sales value of a development. The 35% discount on open market value will be sufficient to secure 20% affordable units within a scheme, if all of the units are to be of intermediate tenure."

In other words, real affordable housing, ie social rented houses, require a 65-75% discount from developers, whereas these `intermediate' houses only require a 35% discount. Salford has a policy of requiring 20% affordable houses on large developments. You get more `affordable housing' for less money but who is it helping – low income families or developers and ultimately the Council's statistics?

"All too often" states the Shelter report "the needs of consumers have been left out of the equation and products have been developed as a means to help developers and housing associations to generate revenue.

"Promoting access to home ownership to all groups at all costs must be questioned as the dominant driver of housing policy and spending" it adds "…disproportionate amounts of public money are being spent on the intermediate market without a clear policy goal."

In 2008/9 the Government's Home and Communities Agency spent £620million, or 23% of the social housing grant fund, on intermediate housing. An extra 10,000 social rent homes could have been built with this money.

In May this year, figures obtained by the Salford Star under the Freedom of Information Act showed that the number of people with household incomes of £20,000 or less who have benefitted from all the various `intermediate' housing schemes in Salford up until 2009 stood at a shocking 10 families (click here for more details).

Shelter damns what it sees as a "smokescreen" behind which "meaningful reform" of the housing system has just not happened, and explains that  publicly subsidised new housing "should be directed at helping those in the greatest housing need first, with social rented homes taking much greater priority".

It recommended that "Focus should be shifted away from higher-middle income first-time buyers, who are likely to achieve home ownership later in life without assistance…(the government) should concentrate more subsidy on generating housing supply that helps those in greatest need."


 

Tickle wrote
at 8:13:10 AM on Thursday, July 15, 2010
Two people working full-time on MINIMUM wage would qualify for a mortgage of around £60,000, which is enough to buy a house in Chimney Pot Park on shared ownership. Sorry that houses are expensive, but I don't see that needing a joint income of at least £16,000 to afford a mortgage is unreasonable. Should people working part time, or unemployed, expect to be able to buy a house?
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD HOMELESSNESS CONFERENCE EXCLUDES HOMELESS AT OVER £325 PER TICKET
Bang on Ged and Michael, bang on. I also am having to try and help an old friend of mine with this change of benefits lark and all... [more]
article: SALFORD HOMELESSNESS CONFERENCE EXCLUDES HOMELESS AT OVER £325 PER TICKET
I would suggest the homeless are unfortunaly little more than a means to make money for the elitist great and the good. This confr... [more]
article: SALFORD HOMELESSNESS CONFERENCE EXCLUDES HOMELESS AT OVER £325 PER TICKET
David Backhouse is right.Real homeless people at this conference would just get in the way of the real issue ie how can middle-... [more]
article: PEEL HOLDINGS SALFORD BUILDING SQUATTED BY HOMELESS
Squats conjure up all sorts of images in peoples minds and generally people tend to think of them as scruffy, needle ridden and fi... [more]
article: SALFORD HOMELESSNESS CONFERENCE EXCLUDES HOMELESS AT OVER £325 PER TICKET
What a two faced shirt front.... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

NEW CLADDING FOR SALFORD TOWER BLOCKS IN MARCH SAYS DEPUTY MAYOR

Star date: 17th January 2018

PENDLETON BLOCKS WILL HAVE NEW CLADDING IN MARCH

At today's full meeting of Salford City Council, Deputy Mayor, John Merry, said he was "fairly confident" that new cladding will be put on the nine Pendleton tower blocks, beginning in March. He added that residents' safety had been put "top of the list...I don't think anyone can complain".

John Merry disclosed that documentation relating to cladding on blocks owned by Salix and City West had been sent to councillors, although nothing has been published for the public. He added that a report into how the dangerous cladding was put onto the blocks in the first place will soon be available.

Full details here...

SALFORD HOMELESSNESS CONFERENCE EXCLUDES HOMELESS AT OVER £325 PER TICKET

Star date: 16th January 2018

SALFORD UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE PROMISES 'UNIQUE INSIGHT INTO CAUSES OF HOMELESSNESS' – WITH NO HOMELESS PEOPLE PRESENT

A University of Salford conference which promises to "provide unique insights into the underlying causes and potential solutions to the homelessness crisis" is charging £325+VAT per ticket, thus excluding not only the homeless but also grass roots housing organisations.

One of the speakers is Salford City Mayor, Paul Dennett, while a panel will ask 'How can we most effectively improve services to vulnerable homeless households and individuals?'...without any 'vulnerable homeless' people there to share their views.

Full details here...

‘NO COMPASSION’ AS MANCHESTER HOMELESS SQUAT EVICTED

Star date: 16th January 2018

BETFRED SQUAT EVICTED AS 17 HOMELESS PEOPLE BACK ON STREETS

Yesterday's early morning eviction of a squat above the BefFred shop opposite Manchester Town Hall has been roundly condemned by housing campaigners, as 17 homeless people were put back on the streets.

Greater Manchester Housing Action stated "shame on whoever it was that made the decision to evict"; while Angela Barratt, of Salford Manchester Street Support, who was volunteering at the squat's night shelter as the eviction happened, told the Salford Star that "There was just no compassion..."

Full details here...

PEEL HOLDINGS SALFORD BUILDING SQUATTED BY HOMELESS

Star date: 15th January 2018

PEEL OFFICES IN ECCLES SQUATTED

As the Manchester squat above BetFred in the city centre was evicted this morning, homeless people in Salford have occupied an office building owned by Peel Holdings near Eccles.

Peel recently received a cheap public money loan of over £8million for its Lightbox apartments in MediaCityUK, where flats cost up to £400,000... "This was our only option" says John who has been homeless for almost five years.

Full details here...

80 YEAR OLD SALFORD PERSON WANTED TO PLANT 80TH ANNIVERSARY TREE IN BUILE HILL PARK

Star date: 14th January 2018

BUILE HILL PARK CELEBRATES 80TH ANNIVERSARY

This month, it's the 80th anniversary of Buile Hill Park since it was inaugurated at its present size. And to celebrate this oak anniversary, the Friends of Buile Hill Park are looking for an 80 year old Salford person, preferably born in January 1938, to help plant a tree.

The Friends are also searching for any living relatives of John Thomas Harrison, who was Chairman of the Parks Committee in 1938.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx