HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SHELTER SLAMS AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY
 

Star date: 13th July 2010

SALFORD STAR RESEARCH BACKED UP BY NEW SHELTER REPORT

"Products have been developed as a means to help developers and housing associations to generate revenue" Shelter.

Housing and homelessness charity, Shelter, has produced a new report slating the Government's attempts at providing `affordable housing' through shared ownership and `intermediate' housing, arguing that current schemes benefit developers, housing associations and `high middle income' earners rather than low income households in most need.

The hard hitting report backs up Salford Star research published earlier this year which showed only 10 low earning families in the city benefitting from the various `affordable housing' schemes.

Under Shelter's terms, none of the heavily subsidised Urban Splash housing at Chimney Pot Park could be classed as `affordable'.

Full story here…


Live Manchester Lower Broughton
click image to enlarge

HATS OFF TO SHELTER

At last an official organisation has exposed the myth that government backed schemes for `affordable housing' are helping those on the lowest incomes to become home owners.

Schemes such as `shared equity', `low cost home ownership', `first time buyer initiative', `home buy' other so-called `intermediate' housing products are increasingly being advertised in Salford and the rest of the country as a means of helping people get affordable access to home ownership. But a damning report by Shelter, titled The Forgotten Households, states that the average income of those accessing shared ownership schemes is more than £28,000 a year, and £32,000 a year for shared equity, while those earning an average income of £16,000 or below "cannot afford even the very cheapest shared ownership homes".

The report estimates that there are 866,000 of these `forgotten households' in the UK - people who are working on low incomes, who get few state benefits and who are renting from private landlords.

Meanwhile, housing associations, developers and `high middle income' earners are benefitting from schemes which cost the country hundreds of millions of pounds every year.

To qualify for the state subsidised `intermediate housing' schemes, household income can be anything up to £60,000 (see Mary Burns Feed The Rich Award here) and Shelter believes that "publicly subsidised new supply (of houses) should be directed at helping those in the greatest housing need first, with social rented homes taking much greater priority."

In Salford, intermediate housing schemes have been encouraged in virtually every new regeneration development – Miller Homes at Unity Quarter, Countryside Properties at New Broughton…and Urban Splash at Chimney Pot Parkwhere £5million has gone to subsidise 91 houses under First Time Buyer Initiative and 10 units under the LCHO (Low Cost Home Ownership) scheme at a cost of £350,000.

Many of these housing products are directed through Plumlife which promotes itself as a "government backed company set up to help you get onto the property ladder". Plumlife advertised affordable housing products in glossy magazines such as Live Manchester (`Manchester's premier guide to luxury living') which also carried adverts for Mercedes Benz cars and Rolex Watches.

"New supply is called `affordable' without a common understanding of what this really means" states the Shelter report "The result of this is that intermediate housing is being classified automatically as affordable when vast swathes of the local population cannot afford it."

Salford Council certainly classifies these shared equity schemes as `affordable housing'. It's snappily titled `Affordable Housing Development Control Implementation Note' shows how it uses such schemes to push up the numbers and percentages of affordable houses on each new development.  The Note, rather turgidly, but quite clearly states…

"For intermediate housing the discount required to secure the involvement of a social housing provider is typically 35% on open market value. Where social rented units are to be provided the discount normally required is much greater than that required for intermediate units, typically 65-75% per unit. The contribution sought from developers will be a 35% discount on the open market valuation of each of the affordable units. A 35% discount on open market value equates to approximately 7% of the total sales value of a development. The 35% discount on open market value will be sufficient to secure 20% affordable units within a scheme, if all of the units are to be of intermediate tenure."

In other words, real affordable housing, ie social rented houses, require a 65-75% discount from developers, whereas these `intermediate' houses only require a 35% discount. Salford has a policy of requiring 20% affordable houses on large developments. You get more `affordable housing' for less money but who is it helping – low income families or developers and ultimately the Council's statistics?

"All too often" states the Shelter report "the needs of consumers have been left out of the equation and products have been developed as a means to help developers and housing associations to generate revenue.

"Promoting access to home ownership to all groups at all costs must be questioned as the dominant driver of housing policy and spending" it adds "…disproportionate amounts of public money are being spent on the intermediate market without a clear policy goal."

In 2008/9 the Government's Home and Communities Agency spent £620million, or 23% of the social housing grant fund, on intermediate housing. An extra 10,000 social rent homes could have been built with this money.

In May this year, figures obtained by the Salford Star under the Freedom of Information Act showed that the number of people with household incomes of £20,000 or less who have benefitted from all the various `intermediate' housing schemes in Salford up until 2009 stood at a shocking 10 families (click here for more details).

Shelter damns what it sees as a "smokescreen" behind which "meaningful reform" of the housing system has just not happened, and explains that  publicly subsidised new housing "should be directed at helping those in the greatest housing need first, with social rented homes taking much greater priority".

It recommended that "Focus should be shifted away from higher-middle income first-time buyers, who are likely to achieve home ownership later in life without assistance…(the government) should concentrate more subsidy on generating housing supply that helps those in greatest need."


 

Tickle wrote
at 14:13:10 on 15 July 2010
Two people working full-time on MINIMUM wage would qualify for a mortgage of around £60,000, which is enough to buy a house in Chimney Pot Park on shared ownership. Sorry that houses are expensive, but I don't see that needing a joint income of at least £16,000 to afford a mortgage is unreasonable. Should people working part time, or unemployed, expect to be able to buy a house?
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: DIRTY OLD TOWN PERFORMED NEAR SALFORD GASWORKS IN DEMOLITION PROTEST
Should save. As we grow up with them looking as us ever day passed the wall and so did are grandparents an d them before . If they... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
Well done in getting someone to foot the bill. But do not be shy. Tell us who, print the letter of funding agreement, show us the ... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
If it was all honest and above board, then you would think that they would be happy to tell you who paid for the trip.However, the... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
Rossi whilst Dennet may be working his arse off he needs to try harder as clearly he as his predecessors continue to fail this Cit... [more]
article: SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT
Looks a bit pissed to me. There again, if I'd have been there, and Salford Council were buying, I would have been well pissed, so ... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL SPENT ALMOST £10,000 ON MIPIM PROPERTY JAUNT

Star date: 21st June 2018

COUNCIL SPENT £5,750 ON MIPIM PR IN SOUTH OF FRANCE

Salford Council spent almost £10,000 on the jaunt to the MIPIM property orgy in Cannes. A newly published contract register shows that, as well as the £4,022 costs for the City Mayor and two officers to go to the South of France paid by unknown private sector companies, the Council also spent £5,750 on marketing and PR for MIPIM.

The contract register also shows the Council is spending £9,500 on a 'Salford Story' press consultant, £118,000 on its failed 'digital community hub', over £14,000 on a 'leadership programme' and, er, £25,000 on milk and bread?

Full details here...

NATIONAL GRID WILL NOT RE-THINK DEMOLITION OF SALFORD DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS

Star date: 20th June 2018

'WE RECOGNISE THE HISTORIC INTEREST'...BUT THEY'RE BEING DEMOLISHED!

Despite musical protests and petitions, the National Grid is adamant that the Salford gas holders, made famous in the Dirty Old Town anthem, will be demolished.

Campaigners are asking for the Grid to re-think a new use for the structures, like in many other towns and cities, but the company states that while "We recognise the historic interest in the Salford gasholder...the structure is being dismantled..."

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE

Star date: 19th June 2018

COUNCIL BLOCKS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST ON £4,000 MIPIM TRIP

Salford City Council has refused to answer a Salford Star Freedom of Information request on which private company paid the £4,022 costs for City Mayor Paul Dennett and two staff to go to the South of France for the MIPIM property event.

The Council states that "the commercial interests of the Council outweigh that of the public interest in disclosure". The Salford Star is to appeal the decision.

Full details here...

DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING

Star date: 18th June 2018

OVER 80% OF COUNCIL WORKERS HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN SERVICES AND ALMOST 50% THINKING OF LEAVING THEIR JOBS

A survey of almost 1,500 local council workers in the North West reveals that 81% have no confidence in the future of local services, 49% are thinking of leaving their jobs, 54% believe their council no longer delivers quality services, and 45% think that their employer doesn't make the right decisions for the public.

The other results of the survey by UNISON to coincide with its local government conference make equally depressing reading, as the union states that "Vital local services in the North West are collapsing".

Full details here...

SALFORD TIME OUT FOR CARERS

Star date: 18th June 2018

TRIPS, CAKES, MASSAGE, ADVICE AND CHAT AS CARERS TAKE TIME OUT

"I was absolutely weary...I needed to get out of the house" Ernie

Caring for a loved one is indeed a labour of love but it can also be life consuming and draining. So a group called Time Out For Carers is making a difference, running weekly sessions where escapism is the order of the day.

There's free massages, trips out, advice on allowances, tea and coffee and cakes, but, most importantly, relaxed informal chats with carers who are all in the same position.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx