HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
SHELTER SLAMS AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY
 

Star date: 13th July 2010

SALFORD STAR RESEARCH BACKED UP BY NEW SHELTER REPORT

"Products have been developed as a means to help developers and housing associations to generate revenue" Shelter.

Housing and homelessness charity, Shelter, has produced a new report slating the Government's attempts at providing `affordable housing' through shared ownership and `intermediate' housing, arguing that current schemes benefit developers, housing associations and `high middle income' earners rather than low income households in most need.

The hard hitting report backs up Salford Star research published earlier this year which showed only 10 low earning families in the city benefitting from the various `affordable housing' schemes.

Under Shelter's terms, none of the heavily subsidised Urban Splash housing at Chimney Pot Park could be classed as `affordable'.

Full story here…


Live Manchester Lower Broughton
click image to enlarge

HATS OFF TO SHELTER

At last an official organisation has exposed the myth that government backed schemes for `affordable housing' are helping those on the lowest incomes to become home owners.

Schemes such as `shared equity', `low cost home ownership', `first time buyer initiative', `home buy' other so-called `intermediate' housing products are increasingly being advertised in Salford and the rest of the country as a means of helping people get affordable access to home ownership. But a damning report by Shelter, titled The Forgotten Households, states that the average income of those accessing shared ownership schemes is more than £28,000 a year, and £32,000 a year for shared equity, while those earning an average income of £16,000 or below "cannot afford even the very cheapest shared ownership homes".

The report estimates that there are 866,000 of these `forgotten households' in the UK - people who are working on low incomes, who get few state benefits and who are renting from private landlords.

Meanwhile, housing associations, developers and `high middle income' earners are benefitting from schemes which cost the country hundreds of millions of pounds every year.

To qualify for the state subsidised `intermediate housing' schemes, household income can be anything up to £60,000 (see Mary Burns Feed The Rich Award here) and Shelter believes that "publicly subsidised new supply (of houses) should be directed at helping those in the greatest housing need first, with social rented homes taking much greater priority."

In Salford, intermediate housing schemes have been encouraged in virtually every new regeneration development – Miller Homes at Unity Quarter, Countryside Properties at New Broughton…and Urban Splash at Chimney Pot Parkwhere £5million has gone to subsidise 91 houses under First Time Buyer Initiative and 10 units under the LCHO (Low Cost Home Ownership) scheme at a cost of £350,000.

Many of these housing products are directed through Plumlife which promotes itself as a "government backed company set up to help you get onto the property ladder". Plumlife advertised affordable housing products in glossy magazines such as Live Manchester (`Manchester's premier guide to luxury living') which also carried adverts for Mercedes Benz cars and Rolex Watches.

"New supply is called `affordable' without a common understanding of what this really means" states the Shelter report "The result of this is that intermediate housing is being classified automatically as affordable when vast swathes of the local population cannot afford it."

Salford Council certainly classifies these shared equity schemes as `affordable housing'. It's snappily titled `Affordable Housing Development Control Implementation Note' shows how it uses such schemes to push up the numbers and percentages of affordable houses on each new development.  The Note, rather turgidly, but quite clearly states…

"For intermediate housing the discount required to secure the involvement of a social housing provider is typically 35% on open market value. Where social rented units are to be provided the discount normally required is much greater than that required for intermediate units, typically 65-75% per unit. The contribution sought from developers will be a 35% discount on the open market valuation of each of the affordable units. A 35% discount on open market value equates to approximately 7% of the total sales value of a development. The 35% discount on open market value will be sufficient to secure 20% affordable units within a scheme, if all of the units are to be of intermediate tenure."

In other words, real affordable housing, ie social rented houses, require a 65-75% discount from developers, whereas these `intermediate' houses only require a 35% discount. Salford has a policy of requiring 20% affordable houses on large developments. You get more `affordable housing' for less money but who is it helping – low income families or developers and ultimately the Council's statistics?

"All too often" states the Shelter report "the needs of consumers have been left out of the equation and products have been developed as a means to help developers and housing associations to generate revenue.

"Promoting access to home ownership to all groups at all costs must be questioned as the dominant driver of housing policy and spending" it adds "…disproportionate amounts of public money are being spent on the intermediate market without a clear policy goal."

In 2008/9 the Government's Home and Communities Agency spent £620million, or 23% of the social housing grant fund, on intermediate housing. An extra 10,000 social rent homes could have been built with this money.

In May this year, figures obtained by the Salford Star under the Freedom of Information Act showed that the number of people with household incomes of £20,000 or less who have benefitted from all the various `intermediate' housing schemes in Salford up until 2009 stood at a shocking 10 families (click here for more details).

Shelter damns what it sees as a "smokescreen" behind which "meaningful reform" of the housing system has just not happened, and explains that  publicly subsidised new housing "should be directed at helping those in the greatest housing need first, with social rented homes taking much greater priority".

It recommended that "Focus should be shifted away from higher-middle income first-time buyers, who are likely to achieve home ownership later in life without assistance…(the government) should concentrate more subsidy on generating housing supply that helps those in greatest need."


 

Tickle wrote
at 14:13:10 on 15 July 2010
Two people working full-time on MINIMUM wage would qualify for a mortgage of around £60,000, which is enough to buy a house in Chimney Pot Park on shared ownership. Sorry that houses are expensive, but I don't see that needing a joint income of at least £16,000 to afford a mortgage is unreasonable. Should people working part time, or unemployed, expect to be able to buy a house?
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
tell you what, lets get the two master builders Merry and Dennett to sort it out. They could use the new wonderful company they ha... [more]
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
If I did a bad job, would the council lend me £25million to put it right? Would they bollocks. The bad insulation can be ripped of... [more]
article: CLADDING AND WINDOW SAFETY SCARES AT SALFORD BLOCKS
Sorry people, I was not educated in Salford. Sorry for the mistakes in my message. pressed the wrong buttons I should have checked... [more]
article: GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT
Like I said before Ray now is time for action. The tennants should not pay their rent and use the money to sue these shitbags. The... [more]
article: SALFORD PENDLETON TOGETHER TENANTS TELL OF KNIVES, NIBES, CLADDING, DODGY WINDOWS AND HOLES IN THE WALLS
Excellent writting whoever wrote this. People who are kept in a state of fear and disadvantagement will find it hard to stand up t... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

GOVERNMENT BLOCKS SALFORD CLADDING REPLACEMENT

Star date: 21st September 2018

SALFORD CITY COUNCIL CAN'T ACCESS £400MILLION GOVERNMENT CLADDING FUND

Salford City Council has been told by the Government that it can't access the £400million public fund to help with the cost of replacing dangerous cladding on the nine Pendleton blocks because it's part of a PFI.

Nor will the Government allow the Council to loan Pendleton Together Operating Limited money from its £25million fund set aside for the cladding. In short, it's a complete mess.

Full details here...

SALFORD PENDLETON TOGETHER TENANTS TELL OF KNIVES, NIBES, CLADDING, DODGY WINDOWS AND HOLES IN THE WALLS

Star date: 21st September 2018

'IF YOU WERE TO LIVE HERE FOR ONE WEEK IN ONE OF OUR FLATS, IT WOULD OPEN YOUR EYES...'

Dodgy cladding, knife fights, a tenant threatening to jump off the roof, windows that you can't open, others that are almost falling out...and those NIBEs eating up people's heating budgets. Oh, and tenancy warnings handed out like confetti to elected tenants association officers who are trying to make things better.

Welcome to the Pendleton Together blocks, where residents at Malus Court have just about had enough...

Full details here...

PARENTS MAKE A STAND AGAINST FORCED CHILD REMOVAL BY SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 20th September 2018

CIVIC CENTRE SEES PARENTS RAISE AWARENESS OF COUNCIL CHILD REMOVAL PRACTICE

"We're not doing this for the parents we're doing this for the kids, because kids are being hurt..."

Today saw parents who have had their children removed stage an awareness demonstration outside Salford Civic Centre... "We're not fighting for our kids to be brought back to us now, we're fighting for a better system for our kids in the future because it's not right what's going on, it's really not" Katie Jane told the Salford Star.

The demonstration is set to continue tomorrow (Friday) and next week until the 25th September, with networking in Victoria Park over the weekend.

Full details here...

£7MILLION CYCLE AND WALKING ROUTES FOR SALFORD ANNOUNCED

Star date: 20th September 2018

MONTON, SWINTON AND TRINITY WAY TO GET NEW CYCLE PATHS

Transport for Greater Manchester has announced a plan for £7.1million worth of cycle paths and walkways in Monton, Swinton and Trinity Way, with Salford City Council contributing £1.2million towards the total cost.

"The people of Greater Manchester will soon have a genuine choice in how they travel, ensuring that they and their children have a viable and attractive alternative to the car" says Chris Boardman, Greater Manchester Cycling and Walking Commissioner.

Full details here...

HARROP FOLD HEAD SLAMS ‘PERSONAL VENDETTA’ OF SALFORD CITY COUNCIL

Star date: 19th September 2018

DREW POVEY ACCUSES SALFORD COUNCIL OF 'HEAVY HANDED' 'VENDETTA'

"I'm speaking up for myself but also all the leaders who have been in touch to say the same happened to them #TakeAStand..." Drew Povey

Drew Povey, the Executive Head of Harrop Fold in Little Hulton, has resigned from his post, slamming Salford Council's "heavy handed approach" while investigating 'administrative errors' at the school and accusing it of a "personal vendetta".

In an open letter to the school's governors, Drew Povey writes that he refuses to walk away from the school with a settlement and accept a gagging clause.  So he's gone public...to #TakeAStand.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx