HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
ANTI BEDROOM TAX CAMPAIGNERS LOBBY CONTOUR HOMES
 

Star date: 6th April 2013

BEDROOM TAX LOBBY OF CONTOUR HOMES OFFICE IN SALFORD QUAYS

"To make a 15 year old, someone who's almost an adult, and a six year old share is ridiculous" Vanda Smith

Yesterday, Contour Homes residents from Hillock Estate in Whitefield invaded Contour Homes office in Salford Quays, protesting about the Bedroom Tax and forthcoming arrears, evictions and social injustice. Chloe Glover hears the horror stories.

Full details here…


Bedroom Tax Protest at Contour Homes Bedroom Tax Protest at Contour Homes Bedroom Tax Protest at Contour Homes
Bedroom Tax Protest at Contour Homes Bedroom Tax Protest at Contour Homes Bedroom Tax Protest at Contour Homes
click image to enlarge

"My bill's £25 a week and they basically said I either pay it or get evicted...It's not my fault that my children grew up and moved out, leaving me with the spare rooms" Elaine Collins


Anguished residents have staged the first lobby of a housing association provider in Greater Manchester as frustration over the organisations' lack of commitment to adequately protect communities from the savageries of the Bedroom Tax reached boiling point.

Tenants of Contour Homes, one of the North West's largest housing providers, are angered by the way they believe the housing association is one of many attempting to pass the buck to the Government over the evictions and increased debt cases that have been predicted will occur as a result of the implementation of the tax.

Whilst the policy, which came into force last Monday, has been widely condemned as an outright `war on the poor by millionaires', deeply unjust and flawed, many housing associations vocally opposed to the tax prior to its enactment are now warning their tenants that action may be taken against them should they fail to pay.

A strong group of residents from the Hillock Estate in Whitefield took the fight against the bedroom tax into Contour's main office in Salford's Lowry Mall to demand that it rethinks its policies after they were told last week that the organisation has a policy of eviction if in arrears.

They also expressed their outrage at the organisation's "inadequate and patronising" response to the Tax, which like many other social housing providers is focused on teaching tenants to budget. Contour Homes owns 916 properties on the estate and a total of 12,503 in the region.

Residents believe that the association, which netted a £7.4million surplus last year, should use its resources to prevent evictions and waive arrears of those who cannot afford to pay it.

Since coming into force on the 1st April those living in social housing, and in receipt of full or partial housing benefit, will have their support decimated if they are found to be `under occupying' their home. This amounts to cuts of 14% for those classified as having one spare bedroom and 25% for those with two or more.

Like other tenants hit by the tax, Elaine Collins, who has lived in the same house on the estate for thirty years, fears she is at risk of losing her home for having two spare bedrooms. 

"My bill's £25 a week and they basically said I either pay it or get evicted" she said "It's not my fault that my children grew up and moved out, leaving me with the spare rooms.

"They reckon I could be waiting three years for a house" she added "I will get into arrears which I have never been in before. Then they won't transfer you, only evict you. When they won't give you a one bedroom property but are willing to put you on the streets how can that be right? If I don't pay and they decide to evict me they won't have a duty to re-house me because I'll classify as intentionally homeless as I `chose' not to pay the bill. It's not responsible for a social housing association to suggest this."

Stood next to several neighbours who have not been hit financially by the tax but came in support, the breadth of the impact of the Tax was also clear.
   
"It's going to split up communities and it will break down relationships" explained Elaine "We all look out for each other so if I move away I will lose so much more than a house. The effect of this Tax if it continues uncontested is likely to devastate many people's lives. The mantra united we stand has never been more important. It's important people affected by this Tax know there is active support out there that is growing in strength and in number as we speak."

Vanda Smith, is another resident facing eviction, despite contesting her inclusion in the Tax…"I'm being billed £13.50 a week because the government think I've got a spare bedroom which isn't true" she said "I live in a three bedroom house with my two sons but one's a box room and another's only small yet we've still been classed as under-occupying because under their new rules both of them have to share a room despite their almost ten year age gap.

"To make a 15 year old, someone who's almost an adult, and a six year old share is ridiculous" she added "He'll also be 16 in nine months which means we'll be allowed one room each, so I've appealed for an exemption so we can avoid having to move for nine months but I've not heard anything about that.

"I've been without hot water for three weeks but I've not had any meaningful response about that either, they just fob you off" she explained "They only seemed interested in contacting me last week to ask why I've not paid the Tax so far. It really shows their true colours. I just can't afford it. I'm worried that it could make us homeless."

In a petition presented at the lobby to the managing director, Judith Winterbourne, they demanded that Contour made assurances that no householder would be evicted in a move echoing Brighton Council's recent decision. They also asked that the association consider following Knowsley Housing Trust in reclassifying its housing stock as smaller properties to provide security to tenants.

Adam Rose, from Whitefield said: "It's a war on the poor by millionaires. The response to this war on the poor by landlords is to help tenants learn to budget better. What this really means is that they are persuaded to spend less on food, heating or clothes.

"From the information in their annual report the cost of reclassifying homes to one bedroom is £2.40 per house which Contour Homes could easily afford" he added "As social landlords we expect them to put the needs of their tenants before the dictates of an unjust government. We demand that they don't evict anyone because they're not able to pay Bedroom Tax and that they write off any arrears of those who can't pay, or reclassify housing stock so that residents get their housing benefit paid in full.

He praised the success of the lobby, which could be set to become a popular tactic employed by enraged and worried social housing tenants around the UK.

"I think everyone was really inspired by the lobby. There was a real sense of determination and strength amongst residents as to how we held the management to account. I think we really worried the managing director; it doesn't seem like they realised they'd have to deal with residents in this way. After the success today we need to plan but I think if we continue to bring more people together in opposition we could see off this tax like we did the Poll Tax."

In a non-committal reply to the lobby Ms Winterbourne stated that she agreed that it was a retrospective law, supported residents with their aims and added that "nobody is talking evictions". The organisation would not, however, take an outright oppositional stance to the now active policy by making a commitment to residents' requests not to evict tenants and waive arrears caused by the Tax.

 "Contour Homes was set up to house people and as such has obligations to all tenants" she said "We understand the worry and upset that the Government's Bedroom Tax is causing our tenants. We are deeply concerned about the impact of it on our customers, some of whom are vulnerable and disabled, and we are doing all we can to provide support. We have lobbied against the Bedroom Tax and are calling on the Government to think again."

Asked whether the association would consider reclassifying its properties she added: "We are unable to re-classify all our properties as one-bedroom homes. Our properties are listed as collateral for loans to help us provide more homes for people in need across the North West."  

Residents appeared less than impressed with the response. Jacqui De La Maziere, who lives in a Contour Home in Tithebarn Court, Stockport and has been charged £14 a week said "Their response was disgraceful and non-committal and nothing more than I expected, frankly. There's no substantial help at all. I've been asking for assistance since January as I've been struggling to get a job. They only came to visit me two weeks ago. I've been told that I don't qualify for any more points if I apply again for re-housing which would place me higher up the housing list so I'm a sitting duck waiting to be evicted." 

Jane Smith added: "They say they are sticking up for you but that's crap. Social housing should be secure. If they try to evict anyone we will all go around to their house to stop it. We'll chain ourselves together; whatever we need to do we will do. The government is attempting to divide and rule but our strength is in our numbers - we will be back. United we stand divided we fall."

The first Broughton Against the Bedroom Tax public organising meeting will be held at the Broughton Trust Office in the Humphrey Booth Centre at 6pm on Monday 8th April

It will be followed by a Manchester-wide meeting on 9th April at 7pm at Friends Meeting House, Mount Street which will plan for the first joint Manchester and Leeds demonstration on April 20th in central Manchester.

For more information go to: http://www.nobedroomtax.co.uk/ or contact the facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/NBTGM?ref=ts&fref=ts

And read No Bedroom Tax's latest campaigning and support guide - click here

Words and photos by Chloe Glover


 

Pissed off with contour tenant wrote
at 12:23:51 AM on Wednesday, August 21, 2013
In reply to "mr4nders0n" I can only say we hear you. but the so called social landlords and the "3rd sector" are not social by any means. what they are about is profit all it means is instead of the profits goin to the gready bastards down south they go to the gready bastards in Manchester that get paid hundreds ov thousands for runnin thease so called "social" and "3rd sector" COMPANIES coz that is egaxcly what they are . only difference is the profits go to the bosses not the shareholders.
 
mr4nders0n wrote
at 2:35:56 AM on Tuesday, August 20, 2013
If these so-called "social housing" organisations really were true "social housing organisations" they would stand united with their tenants and REFUSE TO COLLECT the bedroom tax. In fact ALL LANDLORDS should do this and where would this fascist dictatorship, nay totalitarian regime be then with regards the bedroom tax, up the swannie that's where !!! Even if landlords & social housing orgs did this simply from an economic standpoint, let alone a moral one, don't they realise tenants would have more money available for rent or if not rent then home improvements. The bedroom tax does nothing but promote slum landlords over ethical landlords. What kind of landlords should a govt really be promoting !!! This is the yardstick for measuring what kind of govt it is that we have !!!
 
Tahir Chakotai wrote
at 4:21:36 PM on Monday, April 8, 2013
Well it looks like the Con-Dems want to destroy social housing completely, and replace it with a private landlord scheme. My Sister is a private Landlord, and has told me that there is no Second Bedroom Tax on Privately Let Housing. We can therefore assume that Mr. Cameron's intentions are to destroy the social housing system, and replace it with private landlords, whom charge more rent, thus increasing housing benefit claims, within the U.K, putting more strain on the national economy. Well done Mr. Cameron. A man whom is intent on destroying what is left of the U.K. economy.
 
Truth wrote
at 2:04:30 AM on Monday, April 8, 2013
The government seems to be peddling nonsense about the the cuts to housing benefit. The single room rate has in many areas been started long before April (although the extra percentage for an extra bedroom didn't start til April). Basically, many areas had their housing benefit cut to what the local authority (incorrectly) assumes you can rent a single room for (these days they are the same price as a full flat). The cuts to the benefit were made to many people in December. Many have got around £30 per week less than the average rental price council or otherwise (private and council are now similar in the Salford area yet Salix don't make a profit - sure they don't!!!). This cut includes 1 bedroom properties, so it is not just those with 2 or more affected as they would like you to believe.
 
Gaynor Heaton wrote
at 8:36:45 AM on Sunday, April 7, 2013
Bedroom Tax 1st April 2013 The year is Twenty Thirteen, and April Fools day is the day,but for many the first of April is greeted with dismay. The Government seems certain that it will have its way,as the ill-conceived Bedroom Tax comes into force today. Many Ministers in Parliament have spare Mansions in which to stay,and claim absurd Expenses and the Taxpayers have no say. But the Sick and the Disabled and the Poor will have to pay,for a so called spare bedroom that is in fact used every day. I consider this illegal, and I don’t intend to pay,as everyone is Equal, is what British Law does say. The cheapest suitable property is where I chose to stay,it’s cheaper than a smaller place, so why do I have to pay? If I was renting privately this wouldn’t be the way,I wouldn’t pay a top up of 14% from today. My rent is well below what Housing Benefit will pay,and my needs will not be met if I have to move away. Disability and Equalities act and Human Rights Act all display,the need for reasonable adjustment, which the government should obey. The case of Gorry and of Burnip and Trengove exposed the way,the Government repeatedly and still continue to disobey. This Bedroom Tax, like the Poll Tax, will surely not stay,as it unquestionably discriminates in far too many a way. Pensioners are more likely to have children who have moved away,if it’s to free up larger properties why don’t older people pay? It discriminates on age which can’t be justified anyway,and it discriminates against others when there’s nowhere else to stay. It contravenes the Law to treat disabled people in this way,all needs must be considered, so it’s no wonder there’s dismay. The Vulnerable are to be protected or so the Government say,and yet nobody is querying why there’s no protection in any way. It doesn’t matter if you’re on Top rate DLA,or if you can’t work and you’re in the Support Group of ESA. How are the Vulnerable protected, please tell me in what way? Since there are NO concessions, and all will have to pay! Please read the various acts, as they clearly convey,to implement this Bedroom Tax breaches Laws ALL must obey. Gaynor Heaton
 
kenny ross wrote
at 6:24:51 AM on Sunday, April 7, 2013
this tax is wrong wen billons av been give in over seas aid 446million 2 pakistan wen we need in here iain duncan smith spends 39pounds on breakfast and claimed it back thats 195 aweek jus for breakfast wem most people dont live on that
 
Michael Felse wrote
at 6:13:33 AM on Sunday, April 7, 2013
Jane is voicing thoughts of many. She is correct to plant this blame at a "government that attempts to divide and rule". This Con-Dem government has to be the removal priority and not those people who are unable to pay extra tax owing to continued Con-Dem policies. Sadly most people will not bother voting and the risk is even a worse lifestyle threatening result if the Con-Dems or Con-u-Kip get into power. I will support Jane's campaign by guaranteeing my vote to be against those that have created a bedroom tax.
 
Mark Krantz wrote
at 11:48:05 AM on Saturday, April 6, 2013
Great report from Chloe Here is a video link of the protest http://youtu.be/KFpstl2-YTw
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD APARTMENTS RE-BRANDED GREENGATE MANCHESTER AFTER AVOIDING £2MILLION FEES
The question as already been asked but can someone answer???? what is affordable to the average man or women within this city. For... [more]
article: CHEK WHYTE THIRTY MILLION POUND DEBT
too many comments about chek whyte ,not nice ones either,he is here in moffat conning a lot of people,?... [more]
article: SALFORD COUNCIL AJ BELL STADIUM WORTH £6.5MILLION DESPITE OVER £24MILLION PUBLIC LOANS
bob the regular- so you would rather it go bust and we get nothing back? or would you rather it be sold and at least get £9m back?... [more]
article: 91% OF SALFORD UNIVERSAL CREDIT CLAIMANTS IN ARREARS WITH CITY WEST
Mystic Meg, you seem to resent the fact that the council is in the process of replacing tower block cladding. Why are you so disp... [more]
article: ‘ETHICAL’ AVIVA TRIES TO EVICT NEW MANCHESTER HOMELESS SQUAT
David why blame Burnham. Didn't he put Dennett in charge of Greater Manchester housing? Didn't Dennett get extra top up making hi... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD APARTMENTS RE-BRANDED GREENGATE MANCHESTER AFTER AVOIDING £2MILLION FEES

Star date: 23rd January 2018

£2MILLION FEE AVOIDANCE, £35MILLION OF PUBLIC MONEY, AND THEN APARTMENT BLOCKS MOVED TO 'MANCHESTER'

 A huge 'luxury' apartment block which avoided almost £2million in fees to Salford City Council, plus around 100 affordable properties, and then got a £35million subsidy from the Government as it changed ownership for £110million, has branded itself 'Greengate Manchester'.

Full details here...

SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SCANDAL CONTINUES WITH JUST ONE AFFORDABLE PROPERTY OUT OF 196

Star date: 22nd January 2018

WHEN IS THIS SALFORD COUNCIL PLANNING SCANDAL GOING TO END?

The planning panel of councillors for Salford City Council will be probably rubber stamping yet another huge development in Ordsall this week – two blocks of 'luxury' apartments, up to nine storeys high, off Ordsall Lane and Dyer Street.

From 196 properties being proposed by Selectric Investments Ltd, just one will be affordable, thanks to official Salford Council policy.

Full details here...

JOE O’BYRNE WINS SALFORD STAR AWARD FOR BEST PLAY

Star date: 21st January 2018

THE HAUNTING OF BLAINE MANOR WINS BEST PLAY

Last year, the Salford Star asked its readers to nominate winners in four categories reflecting Salford's cultural delights – Best Night, Best Performer, Best Play and Best Band.

From the shortlist, Live Events Editor, Ian Leslie, together with Salford Star staff, have decided the worthy winner of the first Salford Star Award for Best Play is The Haunting of Blaine Manor by Joe O'Byrne – a horror masterclass!

Full details here...

GREENPEACE PENGUINS HIT MANCHESTER TO PROTECT ANTARCTIC

Star date: 21st January 2018

CAMPAIGN TO PROTECT PENGUIN HOME

A waddle of Greenpeace penguins paraded in Castlefield, Manchester, yesterday, joining a worldwide awareness raising day about the need for the world's largest protected area to be created in the Antarctic Ocean.

Full details here...

EVIDENTLY WINS SALFORD STAR AWARD FOR BEST REGULAR EVENT

Star date: 21st January 2018

SALFORD STAR AWARDS SEE EVIDENTLY TRIUMPH

Last year, the Salford Star asked its readers to nominate winners in four categories reflecting Salford's cultural delights – Best Event, Best Performer, Best Play and Best Band.

From the shortlist, Live Events Editor Ian Leslie, together with Salford Star staff, have decided the worthy winner of the first Salford Star Award for Best Regular Event is Evidently, the top spoken word night at the Eagle Inn.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx