HOME   ARCHIVE   GALLERY   SHOP   ABOUT US      
 

 
UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD BOSSES RESIGNATIONS DEMANDED OVER FAILED LIBEL CASE
 

Star date: 12th February 2013

SALFORD UNIVERSITY VICE CHANCELLORS MARTIN HALL AND ADRIAN GRAVES CALLED TO RESIGN OVER EXCESSIVE LIBEL COSTS

University acted "to stifle criticism of Dr Graves and Professor Hall" says judge.

Dr Gary Duke, who spent three years battling a libel action brought by the University of Salford, has called for the resignation of Vice-Chancellor Martin Hall and Deputy Vice-Chancellor Adrian Graves, after a High Court judge ruled that to continue the case would be "an abuse of the court's process".

The University spent, what Dr Duke reckons, is `possibly in excess of  £100,000' bringing the libel action against him at a time when staff members were being axed to save money. Now Dr Duke wants a full investigation.

Full details here…


A libel action brought by Salford University against former lecturer, Dr Gary Duke, has been thrown out on appeal by the High Court.

Basically, the University of Salford brought the action against Gary Duke, arguing that in his blog, Rat Catchers of the Sewers, he had libelled the University.

The judge, Justice Eady, ruled that Duke hadn't libelled the University at all. Rather, his satirical jibes were aimed at Vice-Chancellor Martin Hall and Deputy Vice-Chancellor Adrian Graves - and in some cases, the University "is portrayed almost as a `victim' in the sense that its best interests are being damaged by those identified as the culprits."

The `culprits', identified as mainly Vice-Chancellor Martin Hall and Deputy Vice-Chancellor Adrian Graves, were accused in the blog of everything from sticking a finger up at the Freedom of Information Act, to nepotism, to paying off PAs.

The judge ruled that, while Graves and Hall could possibly argue that they had been libelled with the accusations, the University itself couldn't. And some of the extracts from the blog site read out by the judge to prove the point are hilarious…

"There follows the allegation" the judge stated "that…`under the leadership of Hall and Graves the University would seem to be adopting some of the more odious policies of the great Chinese bureaucratic dictatorship that dresses itself in the apparel of 'communism'…"

The judge added that "the criticism is directed towards the individuals" and concluded "that, in substance and reality, this is an action about allegations against individuals rather than against the University itself."

In a damning indictment of the University bosses he added: "I am not convinced that…the proceedings should be allowed to continue purely for the purpose of the University's obtaining an injunction to stifle criticism of Dr Graves and Professor Hall (for that is what it is about)."

And in an even more damning indictment of the pair, stated that if the the libel action continued it would be "an abuse of the court's process"…
 
"I regard it as wholly unreal, and indeed an abuse of the court's process, for these proceedings to continue on the basis that the only claimant is the University when the conduct to be examined in any plea of justification or fair comment would be that of Dr Graves and Professor Hall…"

Gary Duke, who spent three years defending himself in courts over the libel action has now, not only called for the resignation of Hall and Graves, but also wants a thorough investigation of how University of Salford money was spent on the libel action, which he reckons was `in excess of £100,000'.

"I'd like to know who gave the University the green light to pay these sums when they are laying off hundreds of members of staff to save money and students are having to pay increased tuition fees" he says "The authorisation was never on any publicly available minutes, nor was it openly discussed at the University Council.

"I'm calling for the resignation of Adrian Graves and Martin Hall over the use of public money to, as the judge said, `stifle criticism' of themselves" he adds "I am also going to write to the Higher Education Funding Council to ask for an immediate inquiry."

The Salford Star asked the University of Salford for a response to the High Court ruling and also asked how much the failed libel action had cost. The University has not commented.

WHAT THE JUDGE SAID ON EXTRACTS FROM THE RAT CATCHERS OF THE SEWERS BLOG…


On the Freedom of Information Act…

"Sub-paragraph (c) refers to `these two implacable University bosses' who regard themselves as immune to the whims of mere legislature in the shape of Parliament, and feel that they can readily cock their metaphorical hind legs at the trifle of English Law whilst offering the universal one-finger salute against the Freedom of Information Act (2000)'…

"The subject of the attack is plainly, yet again, the `University bosses'", the judge stated.

Another example from the blog, which the University complained about, was also read out by the judge…

"With more than a hint of irony, this week, Vice Chancellor Hall has been appointed to the Knowledge Sharing Board … Can Hall successfully square his wish to be open about other people's research when he is so secretive about information that he ultimately controls, and which should equally be open to those who request it?"

On Nepotism…

"The accusation complained of is that there have been `acts of nepotism' and appointments made, not on individual merit, but on the basis of personal relationships" stated the judge "It makes no sense to accuse a corporation of `nepotism'. The allegations can only relate to individual human beings. From the context it is clear to whom that criticism is directed."

On Pay-offs to a Personal Assistant…

The judge states: "Sub-paragraph (d) identifies a blog referring to the departure of a personal assistant called Susan Burgess. The suggestion seems to be that the `Graves/Hall Continuum' was wishing to conceal the circumstances of her rather hurried departure and that they authorised `a significant payment … in order to cover a heinous impropriety'.

"This is raised by way of a question, but the implication is clear." The judge adds "At all events, any `heinous impropriety' can only have been brought about by one or more human beings. Again, it makes no sense to suggest that the University was paying money to cover a heinous impropriety. The behaviour described is such as to be ascribable only to human beings.

On Biased Staff Hearings…

"Sub-paragraph (j) complains of an allegation that `senior members of staff' ensure that the findings of the staff mediation service are biased and that members of staff will not be given a fair or impartial hearing. That is plainly an allegation which is defamatory of those who administer the mediation service. Lack of impartiality, or `bias', must refer to human failings."

See the full judgement - click here

See Dr Gary Duke's latest blog - click here


See previous Salford Star article on University of Salford Freedom of Information Responses…click here

M3 wrote
at 19:09:58 on 14 February 2013
WONDERFUL GARY - GOOD 4U There is a native American saying that 'if you sit by the river long enough, the body of your enemies will go floating by'. In this case - the enemies float by in their chauffeur-driven car, the limousine which still carries around these fat cats - despite their appalling behaviour, their wasting of public money and the fact that they continue to decimate our once-brilliant university and turn it into an elitist profit-making factory.
 
salford pimpernel wrote
at 06:38:52 on 14 February 2013
Salford pimpernel did not write this, hope we haven't got an imposter ............................Salford Pimpernel wrote at 2:50:15 AM on Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Prof Hall (total emoluments of £250,000 last year) and Dr Graves (total remuneration also well into six figures) have clearly spat their dummies out and thrown their toys out of their pram after Dr Duke tweaked their noses a little. Now they've been left with egg splattered all over their faces after pursuing this preposterous, futile and expensive libel action. They are a liability and an embarrassment and should both resign forthwith.
 
UoS wrote
at 19:47:43 on 13 February 2013
The University really left it too late to instruct specialist counsel in defamation law. Had they done so earlier, great expense may have been avoided. I do not know if resignation is appropriate. Afterall, the ruling was not that the statements were true (or, rather, not defamatory), but that the claim really ought have been brought in the name of the individuals in question and not of the University. Put another way - they did not lose on the merits, but on the process they had adopted. I think the judge summed up the real issue though - was the game really worth the candle? What is to be gained by pursuing through the courts tortuous damages for a statement written three years ago, that most people have forgotten about, and by all accounts appears not to have had any detrimental effect on the institution or its officers? An appeal might be in the offing. We may still get to hear the merits. Theoretically, the individuals could still bring a claim, assuming they could clear the obstacle that is the Limitations Act (a claim of defamation may only be brought within one year of publication). However, hopefully the University and its officers will see sense. Spending another £100,000 on a point of principle is unlikely to end well.
 
Salford Pimpernel wrote
at 08:50:15 on 13 February 2013
Prof Hall (total emoluments of £250,000 last year) and Dr Graves (total remuneration also well into six figures) have clearly spat their dummies out and thrown their toys out of their pram after Dr Duke tweaked their noses a little. Now they've been left with egg splattered all over their faces after pursuing this preposterous, futile and expensive libel action. They are a liability and an embarrassment and should both resign forthwith.
 
heh wrote
at 08:50:10 on 13 February 2013
lol funny, University big wigs and they didn't get access to proper legal advice or understand what they were doing. Shows how the institutions are all run by dictators who you gotta brown nose to get anywhere just like this business I mean country of ours. Idiots at all pillars of society is our main problem.
 
Gareth L wrote
at 23:13:23 on 12 February 2013
Its annoys me to read stories like this of waste, when as a PHD student at the University of Salford, I can't get any funding to help my studies into understanding and fighting male eating disorders.
 
Please enter your comment below:
 
 
 
Salford Star Hoodies
Salford Star contact
Deli Lama
advertisement
 
Contact us
phone: 07957 982960
Facebook       Twitter
 
 
Recent comments
article: SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE
I would be interested to know what the 91 pound expenses were. I bet the6 got taxis instead of public transport. No doubt the £200... [more]
article: DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING
The UK is on is knees. I got out at the earliest opportunity. Mental Health Services ON ITS KNEES Adult Social Care ON ITS KNEES F... [more]
article: DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING
The future is frightening... [more]
article: DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING
Big headlines over comments from a small number of the overall staff. Rather misleading headline... [more]
article: DIRTY OLD TOWN PERFORMED NEAR SALFORD GASWORKS IN DEMOLITION PROTEST
It's funny that the Oval cricket ground gas holders can get the council to locally list and English Heritage to nationally list th... [more]
 
 
 
 
 
Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds
 
 
 

Donate

Help the Salford Star...

all donations welcome

 
 

More articles...

SALFORD COUNCIL REFUSES TO REVEAL WHO PAID FOR CITY MAYOR TRIP TO SOUTH OF FRANCE

Star date: 19th June 2018

COUNCIL BLOCKS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST ON £4,000 MIPIM TRIP

Salford City Council has refused to answer a Salford Star Freedom of Information request on which private company paid the £4,022 costs for City Mayor Paul Dennett and two staff to go to the South of France for the MIPIM property event.

The Council states that "the commercial interests of the Council outweigh that of the public interest in disclosure". The Salford Star is to appeal the decision.

Full details here...

DEVASTATING SURVEY OF NORTH WEST COUNCIL WORKERS SHOWS LOCAL SERVICES COLLAPSING

Star date: 18th June 2018

OVER 80% OF COUNCIL WORKERS HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN SERVICES AND ALMOST 50% THINKING OF LEAVING THEIR JOBS

A survey of almost 1,500 local council workers in the North West reveals that 81% have no confidence in the future of local services, 49% are thinking of leaving their jobs, 54% believe their council no longer delivers quality services, and 45% think that their employer doesn't make the right decisions for the public.

The other results of the survey by UNISON to coincide with its local government conference make equally depressing reading, as the union states that "Vital local services in the North West are collapsing".

Full details here...

SALFORD TIME OUT FOR CARERS

Star date: 18th June 2018

TRIPS, CAKES, MASSAGE, ADVICE AND CHAT AS CARERS TAKE TIME OUT

"I was absolutely weary...I needed to get out of the house" Ernie

Caring for a loved one is indeed a labour of love but it can also be life consuming and draining. So a group called Time Out For Carers is making a difference, running weekly sessions where escapism is the order of the day.

There's free massages, trips out, advice on allowances, tea and coffee and cakes, but, most importantly, relaxed informal chats with carers who are all in the same position.

Full details here...

DIRTY OLD TOWN PERFORMED NEAR SALFORD GASWORKS IN DEMOLITION PROTEST

Star date: 17th June 2018

SALFORD MUSICAL PROTEST TO STOP DEMOLITION OF DIRTY OLD TOWN GASWORKS

This afternoon saw Ewan MacColl's Dirty Old Town performed like never before near the famous gasworks, as a musical protest posse played instruments and sang along to the anthem to try to get the National Grid to stop the demolition of the iconic gas holders and re-think their use.

Full details here...

BUGZY MALONE PLAYS HOME TOWN MANCHESTER FOR £5

Star date: 17th June 2018

BUGZY HOSTS DO WHAT MOVES YOU SHOW

Bugzy Malone plus guests
Saturday 23rd June, 7pm-midnight
Gorilla, Manchester

Top, top, top grime artist, Bugzy Malone, hosts the Bacardi Do What Moves You show at Gorilla on Whitworth Street next Saturday, with local rappers and MCs. Tickets are priced at just £5 with all proceeds going to Lonely Whale.

Full details here...

 



written and produced by Salfordians for Salfordians
with attitude and love xxx